Policing: Innocent Bias - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Policing: Innocent Bias

Description:

... Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North ... African Americans make up12% of population and roughly 35% of arrests for drug offenses ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:639
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: reneesc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Policing: Innocent Bias


1
PolicingInnocent Bias
  • Dr. Matt Robinson
  • CJ 3532
  • Injustice in America
  • Appalachian State University

2
Innocent Bias
  • Even if every police officer followed the IACP
    mandates and was good cop
  • There would still be a bias in policing!
  • If the criminal law is biased, then enforcement
    of it will be biased.

3
Innocent Bias
  • Innocent bias occurs when police enforce biased
    law
  • It is innocent because it is not intentional on
    their part

4
Innocent Bias
  • Sources of innocent bias include
  • 1) Focus on street crime
  • 2) Location of police
  • 3) Discretion
  • 4) Profiling
  • 5) War on drugs

5
Innocent Bias
  • 1) Focus on street crime
  • These acts are disproportionately committed by
    the powerless (poor, minorities)
  • Street criminals much more likely to be arrested
    than white-collar and corporate offenders

6
Innocent Bias
  • 2) Location of police
  • Greater police presence in large cities,
    inner-city areas, neighborhoods with high levels
    of poverty and minority residence
  • social threat or minority threat hypothesis
    more police officers in minority areas

7
Innocent Bias
  • 3) Discretion
  • The ability of police to act according to their
    professional judgment
  • Race and class are used as warning signs
  • Decisions about who to stop, pull over, and
    suspect of criminal activity are informed by
    images of crime created by the criminal law and
    broadcast in the news media. (p. 181)
  • So what does the typical criminal look like?

8
Innocent Bias
9
Innocent Bias
  • 4) Profiling
  • Use of race, class, other extra-legal factors
    to identify potential suspects
  • Outcomes people of color more likely to be
    stopped, questioned, searched, and have car
    searched
  • BUT only slightly more likely to be arrested (see
    pp. 182-184)

10
Innocent Bias
  • 4) Profiling
  • Verified in at least the following states
    California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois,
    Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,
    Missouri, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North
    Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode
    Island, Texas, Washington

11
Racial Profiling found in studies
12
http//www.amnestyusa.org/us-human-rights/other/ra
cial-profling---laws-in-your-state/page.do?id1106
665
13
Innocent Bias
  • 5) War on drugs
  • African Americans make up12 of population and
    roughly 35 of arrests for drug offenses
  • The 2007 NSDUH found pastmonth drug use rates of
    9.5 for blacks versus 8.2 for whites (in 2001
    the rates for blacks and whites were 6.9 and
    6.8, respectively).

14
Innocent Bias
  • 5) War on drugs
  • Seattle, WA two-thirds of arrestees are black
    even though the only drug for which blacks make
    up a majority of dealers is crack cocaine
  • The majority of those involved in dealing
    methamphetamine, ecstasy, powder cocaine, and
    heroin are white

15
Innocent Bias
  • 5) War on drugs
  • Racial disparity in arrests due to three
    organizational factors
  • 1) explicit focus by police on crack offenders
  • 2) explicit focus by police on outdoor drug
    activity
  • 3) racially diverse outdoor drug markets received
    more attention by police than predominantly white
    outdoor drug markets.

16
Outcomes
  • Certain people are more likely to be
  • Stopped
  • Questioned
  • Detained
  • Arrested
  • Subjected to excessive force
  • The same people are less likely to
  • Have favorable view of police
  • Cooperate with police
  • Assist police
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com