Court Records Access in Canada - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Court Records Access in Canada

Description:

Historical Context Canada s legal system is based largely on English and French law Quebec s Civil Code is based on the French Code Napol on British North ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: privacyLeg
Category:
Tags: access | canada | court | records

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Court Records Access in Canada


1
Court Records Access in Canada
  • Prepared for the 6th Conference on Privacy and
    Public Access to Court Records
  • Williamsburg, Virginia
  • November 6-7, 2008
  • Kate Welsh
  • Alberta Courts
  • Courts Advisory Counsel

2
Historical Context
  • Canadas legal system is based largely on English
    and French law
  • Quebecs Civil Code is based on the French Code
    Napoléon
  • British North America Act, 1867
  • Enacted by British Parliament at request of
    founders
  • Created the Dominion of Canada
  • United the British colonies of Upper Canada
    (Ontario), Lower Canada (Quebec), Nova Scotia and
    New Brunswick
  • Other colonies joined later last one in 1949
    (Newfoundland)

3
The Constitution
  • The supreme law of Canada laws that are
    inconsistent are, to the extent of the
    inconsistency, of no force and effect s. 52
  • Division of powers
  • Federal government has a general power to make
    laws for the peace, order and good government of
    Canada (the POGG power)
  • Except for subjects assigned exclusively to the
    provinces
  • As amended and consolidated Constitution Act,
    1867 (formerly the British North America Act)

4
Federal powers
  • Criminal law, including procedure
  • Marriage and divorce
  • (and 27 other classes of subjects)
  • Section 91
  • Appointment of judges
  • The superior courts of the provinces and
    territories (trial courts of plenary
    jurisdiction)
  • Federal Courts
  • Supreme Court of Canada, Federal Court Trial
    Division, Tax Court of Canada, Courts Martial
  • Appellate Courts
  • Section 96

5
Provincial powers
  • Property and civil rights
  • Imposition of punishment to enforce provincial
    laws
  • Administration of justice in the province,
    including
  • Civil and criminal courts
  • Civil procedure
  • Appoint judges of provincial and territorial
    courts (statutory jurisdiction)
  • Section 92
  • (and other powers)

6
The Charter
  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Incorporates both common law and principles
    developed in earlier statutes including the
    Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) and the Canadian
    Human Rights Act (1977)
  • Entrenched in the constitution
  • Privacy and access rights are recognized in the
    Charter
  • The Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to
    the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11

7
Fundamental freedoms, including
  • Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and
    expression, including freedom of the press and
    other media of communication 2(b)
  • The principle of open courts is inextricably
    tied to the rights guaranteed by s. 2(b).
    Openness permits public access to information
    about the courts, which in turn permits the
    public to discuss and put forward opinions and
    criticisms of court practices and proceedings.
    Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick
    (A.G.), 1996 3 S.C.R. 480

8
Legal rights, including
  • The right to life, liberty and security of the
    person and the right not to be deprived thereof
    except in accordance with the principles of
    fundamental justice s. 7
  • The liberty interest respect for individual
    privacy is an essential component of what it
    means to be free R. v. O'Connor, 1995 SCC

9
Legal rights, including
  • The right to be secure against unreasonable
    search or seizure 8
  • Protects a reasonable expectation of privacy
    Hunter v. Southam Inc., 1984 SCC
  • The right of individuals to determine when, how,
    and to what extent they will release personal
    information about themselves R. v. Dyment, 1988
    SCC

10
Legal rights, including
  • If charged with an offence, the right to be
    presumed innocent until proven guilty according
    to law in a fair and public hearing by an
    independent and impartial tribunal s. 11(d)
  • Balance with other rights and freedoms - Dagenais
    v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., 1994 SCC
  • Reasonable limitation, order to close courtroom
    when necessary for proper administration of
    justice (Criminal Code s. 486.1) Canadian
    Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick (A.G.), 1996
    SCC

11
Charter challenge
  • Attacker proves facts showing a prima facie
    violation
  • Onus shifts to government to show the limitation
    of the right is
  • reasonable
  • prescribed by law (statute, common law, judges
    order)
  • demonstrably justified in a free and democratic
    society.
  • Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms (s. 1)

12
The Oakes text
  • There is a strong evidentiary burden government
    must show
  • A sufficiently important objective
  • The means are rationally connected to the
    objective
  • Proportionality between the objective and the
    means taken to achieve it.
  • Minimal impairment of the right or freedom
  • R. v. Oakes, 1996 SCC
  • Modification and adaptation of the test over time

13
Starting point is full access
  • Public accessibility and judicial accountability
  • Curtailed only when necessary to protect social
    values of superordinate importance, such as
    protection of the innocent
  • Privacy interests of litigants are normally
    insufficient to overcome the rule
  • Nova Scotia (A.G.) v. MacIntyre, 1982
    SCC(pre-Charter)

14
Privacy legislation N/A
  • Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy
    Act FOIP (Alberta, 1984)
  • Court records and judges records are excluded
  • Similar legislation in other provinces
  • Privacy Act and Information Act (Canada)
  • Personal Information and Electronic Documents Act
    PIPEDA (Canada, 2001)
  • Public records regulation under the Act
  • Consent not required when collection, use and
    disclosure are consistent with the purpose for
    which the record was created. (?)
  • But many provincial and federal provisions do
    affect court records access

15
The court controls its records and process
  • Every court has a supervisory and protecting
    power over its own records
  • Nova Scotia (A.G.) v. MacIntyre, 1982 SCC
  • The clerk or any person wishing to deny public
    access to court files must first obtain leave of
    the court
  • Solomon v. McLaughlin, 1982 ABQB

16
Current state of access
  • Closed courtrooms are rare.
  • Supreme Court provides live video feed CPAC
    broadcasts later. Other courts not televised.
  • In Alberta, accredited media may record for
    accuracy, but not for broadcast (Audio Recording
    Policy, Queens Bench)
  • File search by file number or partys name fees
    apply
  • Documents in the file transcripts
  • Exhibits are a special case court will enquire
    into purpose and may require an application on
    notice
  • Free judgments databases on court websites,
    CanLII
  • Docket information online in British Columbia,
    Manitoba, Federal Court, Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court documents online soon.

17
Full access may be limited
  • Protection of the innocent
  • Search warrants where nothing found (MacIntyre,
    1982 SCC)
  • Inadmissible exhibits (Vickery, 1991 SCC)
  • Interim publication bans (bail, preliminary
    hearing, etc.)
  • Persons under a disability
  • Administration of justice
  • Complainants and witnesses (often in sexual
    assault matters) Criminal Code, s. 486.4
  • Young accused, offenders and witnesses Youth
    Criminal Justice Act
  • Confidential commercial information (Sierra Club,
    2002 SCC)
  • And so on

18
Forms of restrictions on access
  • Closed hearings and exclusion orders
  • Sealing all or part of court file
  • Confidentiality
  • Permanent or interim ban on publication
  • Use of pseudonym, screens, etc.
  • Ban on identification
  • Source of authority
  • Statutory, either discretionary or mandatory
  • Common law exercise of discretion

19
Common statutory protections
  • Records closed, identity not to be published
  • Youth criminal justice
  • Child protection
  • Adoption
  • Publication bans
  • Identity of sexual assault complainants
  • Pre-trial criminal proceedings (bail, preliminary
    inquiry)

20
Discretionary restriction on access
  • A court order made at common law or when a
    statute allows for exercise of discretion (may)
  • Evidentiary burden on applicant
  • Charter analysis
  • The order is necessary to prevent risk to a
    recognized value, and no reasonable alternative
    measure will prevent the risk
  • Beneficial effects outweigh harmful effects on
    the right or freedom
  • Notice is normally required to other parties,
    to media
  • Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., 1994
    SCC many subsequent Supreme Court decisions

21
Canadian Judicial Council
  • The Chief Justice of Canada is chair members are
    chief and associate chief justices of
    federally-appointed courts.
  • Objectives are to promote efficiency, uniformity,
    and accountability, and to improve the quality of
    judicial service in all superior courts of
    Canada.
  • Has developed a number of technology-related
    model policies, including the Model Policy for
    Access to Court Records (2005).

22
Model Policy for Access to Court Records
  • Personal data identifiers and personal
    information should be included in the record only
    when required for the disposition of the case.
  • Parties are responsible for documents in the
    file judges are responsible for judgments.
  • Systems should allow PDI to be excluded from
    public access.
  • Public may have remote access to judgments and
    docket information.
  • Parties and registered users may have remote
    access to documents.
  • CJC, 2005

23
Use of Personal Information in Judgments and
Recommended Protocol
  • Authoring judge, not publisher, is responsible
    for contents of judgment.
  • Courts should post judgments on court websites or
    provide them to other freely accessible sites.
  • Personal data identifiers should be excluded from
    judgments.
  • Judgments should comply with bans on publication
    or identification required by law or a court
    order.
  • In exceptional cases, identification may be
    omitted where its inclusion would harm minor
    children or innocent non-parties, or where the
    ends of justice might be subverted.
  • CJC, 2005

24
Justice Information Management System (JIMS)
  • Alberta project, now in early stages
  • Data-sharing between justice system entities
  • Public and media access
  • Remote access to docket and judgments
  • Parties, remote access to file
  • Other users register and track?
  • Bulk access?
  • Education
  • Personal data identifiers
  • No more practical obscurity
  • Legislative amendments will be needed

25
Court Records Accessin Canada
  • Kate Welsh
  • Courts Advisory Counsel
  • Alberta Courts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com