Free Space Optical (FSO) Communications in Next Generation Cellular Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Free Space Optical (FSO) Communications in Next Generation Cellular Networks

Description:

... (prompting research in cognitive radio) * Factors are in increasing order of importance (font size and colour) Atmospheric gas concentration: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:569
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: sceCarlet6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Free Space Optical (FSO) Communications in Next Generation Cellular Networks


1
Survey of Free Space Optical (FSO) Communications
Opportunities in Next Generation Cellular Networks
Frédéric Demers, Halim Yanikomeroglu Marc
St-Hilaire Presented at the Communication
Networks and Services Research Conference 4 May
2011
2
Outline
  • Motivation Key Characteristics of FSO systems
  • Channel model and path loss overview
  • Recent advances in FSO communications
  • Full Optical FSO systems
  • Hybrid RF/FSO systems
  • Mobile FSO systems
  • Indoor diffuse FSO systems
  • Applications within Next Generation Cellular
    Networks
  • Conclusions

3
Motivation key characteristics
  • RF spectrum scarcity vs increasing throughput
    requirements
  • A single FSO channel can offers Tb/s throughput
    wirelessly
  • Free space optical spectrum is license free and
    nearly unlimited (very dense reuse)
  • FSO systems are generally very difficult to
    intercept
  • Effective range limited by weather and eye-safety
    considerations

4
Channel model
  • Factors affecting light propagation through the
    atmosphere
  • Physical composition of atmosphere
  • Changes in refractive indices
  • Aerosol particles

5
Channel model
850 nm
1550 nm
6
Channel model
  • Channel effects
  • Absorption
  • Diffraction
  • Rayleigh scattering (atmospheric gases molecules)
  • Mie scattering (aerosol particles)
  • Atmospheric (refractive) turbulence
  • Scintillation
  • Beam wander

7
Channel model
8
Path loss, RF
  • Typical RF attenuation (e.g. 2 GHz, 15 dBi
    antenna gains)
  • Avg path loss in free space -gt 68 dB _at_ 1km , 118
    dB _at_ 10 km
  • Avg path loss in mobile radio (n3.4, d0100 m)
    -gt 82 dB/km, 146 dB _at_ 10 km

9
Path loss, FSO
M. Bass, "Atmospheric optics," in Handbook of
Optics ,Third Edition ed., vol. 5, M. Bass, Ed.
McGraw-Hill, pp. 3.3., 2010.
10
Path loss, FSO
Refractive index of air
11
Path loss, RF vs FSO
  • Typical RF attenuation (e.g. 2 GHz, 15 dBi
    antenna gains)
  • Avg path loss in free space -gt 68 dB _at_ 1km , 118
    dB _at_ 10 km
  • Avg path loss in mobile radio (n3.4, d0100 m)
    -gt 82 dB/km, 146 dB _at_ 10 km
  • Typical optical attenuation (e.g. 1550 nm or 194
    THz)
  • clear atmospheric conditions -gt 0.2 dB/km
  • urban (because of dust) -gt 10 dB/km
  • Rain -gt 2-35 dB/km
  • Snow -gt 10-100 dB/km
  • light fog -gt 120 dB/km
  • dense fog -gt 300 dB/km
  • maritime fog -gt 480 dB/km

12
Full Optical FSO
  • No requirement for electrical-optical conversion
  • Easy extension of RF-over-fibre links
  • Wavelength division multiplexing

K. Kazaura, K. Wakamori, M. Matsumoto, T.
Higashino, K. Tsukamoto and S. Komaki, "RoFSO A
universal platform for convergence of fiber and
free-space optical communication networks,"
Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 48, pp.
130-137, 2010.
13
Hybrid RF/FSO
  • FSO is most affected by fog, RF by rain
  • RF links complements FSO to achieve carrier class
    availability (99.999)
  • Lower throughput in adverse weather

I. I. Kim and E. Korevaar, "Availability of free
space optics (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems,"
Optical Wireless Communications IV, EJ Korevaar,
Eds. , Proc. SPIE, vol. 4530, pp. 84-95, 2001.
14
Mobile FSO Systems
  • Tightly packed LED transceivers around spherical
    device
  • Able to maintain optical link in motion
  • Experiment rather simplistic

J. Akella, C. Liu, D. Partyka, M. Yuksel, S.
Kalyanaraman and P. Dutta, "Building blocks for
mobile free-space-optical networks," in Wireless
and Optical Communications Networks, 2005. WOCN
2005. Second IFIP International Conference on,
pp. 164-168, 2005.
15
Indoor Diffuse Optical Wireless
  • Non Line-of-Sight optical communications
  • Multipath interference an issue, limiting
    throughput
  • Hybrid narrow-beam designs provide both bandwidth
    and coverage

R. J. Green, H. Joshi, M. D. Higgins and M. S.
Leeson, "Recent developments in indoor optical
wireless systems," IET Communications, vol. 2,
pp. 3, 2008
16
Next Generation Cellular Networks
  • Densification of access points (eNodeB)
  • Shorter hops
  • Suitability to mesh connectivity
  • Heterogeneous access points
  • Relaying
  • Distributed antennas
  • Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission Reception
    (CoMP)
  • Self-Organizing Networks

17
Next Generation Cellular Networks
18
Conclusions
  • Radio frequencies alone will not suffice to
    provide the required throughput to the end-users
  • Next generation networks will require a denser
    infrastructure to cater to mobile user needs

This denser infrastructure will shorten hops
between base stations and ease the establishment
of mesh connectivity
These architectural changes open the door to an
increased reliance upon FSO communication systems
PHY layer is not dead!
18
19
Main references
  • J. Akella, C. Liu, D. Partyka, M. Yuksel, S.
    Kalyanaraman and P. Dutta, "Building blocks for
    mobile free-space-optical networks," in Wireless
    and Optical Communications Networks, 2005. WOCN
    2005. Second IFIP International Conference on,
    2005, pp. 164-168. Available http//citeseerx.ist
    .psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi10.1.1.143.6352rep
    rep1typepdf
  • M. Bass, "Atmospheric optics," in Handbook of
    Optics ,Third Edition ed., vol. 5, M. Bass, Ed.
    McGraw-Hill, 2010, pp. 3.3.
  • R. J. Green, H. Joshi, M. D. Higgins and M. S.
    Leeson, "Recent developments in indoor optical
    wireless systems," IET Communications, vol. 2,
    pp. 3, 2008. Available http//www.ieeexplore.ieee
    .org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp
    arnumber4446618
  • K. Kazaura, K. Wakamori, M. Matsumoto, T.
    Higashino, K. Tsukamoto and S. Komaki, "RoFSO A
    universal platform for convergence of fiber and
    free-space optical communication networks,"
    Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 48, pp.
    130-137, 2010. Available http//www.ieeexplore.ie
    ee.org.proxy.library.carleton.ca/stamp/stamp.jsp?t
    parnumber5402676
  • I. I. Kim and E. Korevaar, "Availability of free
    space optics (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems,"
    Optical Wireless Communications IV, EJ Korevaar,
    Eds. , Proc. SPIE, vol. 4530, pp. 84-95, 2001.
    Available http//www.ece.mcmaster.ca/hranilovic/
    woc/resources/local/spie2001b.pdf

20
Other considerations
  • FSO mesh topologies have been shown to provide
    carrier class reliability in spite of low FSO
    link availability
  • Relay-assisted transmission is a powerful fading
    mitigation tool for FSO systems operating in
    channels with atmospheric turbulence
  • Redundant links and MIMO can be used to mitigate
    alignment challenges (turbulence, building sway)

21
Path loss, FSO
Structure function
22
Channel model (8)
Diffraction
Scattering
23
Channel model (9)
Refraction
24
FOS Systems
  • Unaffected by EMI interference

25
Conclusion
26
Whatever
Propagation of light beams through the atmosphere
Absorption and Scattering
Tilt
Diffraction
Scintillation
  • Index of refraction of the air has a constant
    and a variable part
  • At optical wavelengths the index of refraction
    is much more affected by temperature than
    pressure fluctuations
  • The equation that relates temperature
    fluctuations to index of refraction fluctuations
    is

Where ? Cp/Cv 1.4 for air p air pressure
in millibars T temperature in Kelvin
27
Link Budget Examples
  • Tx Power 20 dBm (100 mW)
  • Rx Sensitivity 35 dBm
  • Beam divergence 2 mrad
  • Distance 1 km
  • Receiver size 50 mm
  • Geometric loss 21 dB
  • Margin 10 dB
  • Able to handle dense fog at 120 dB/km
  • Tx Power 0 dBm (1 mW)
  • Rx Sensitivity 35 dBm
  • Beam divergence 2 mrad
  • Distance 1 km
  • Receiver size 50 mm
  • Geometric loss 21 dB
  • Margin 10 dB
  • Able to handle light fog 16 dB/km
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com