Worldwide Standards for Gb/s WPAN Using the 60 GHz Unlicensed Band - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Worldwide Standards for Gb/s WPAN Using the 60 GHz Unlicensed Band

Description:

Worldwide Standards for Gb/s WPAN Using the 60 GHz Unlicensed Band Bruce Bosco Overview What is a standard ? What are the types and advantages of various standards ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: ewhIeeeO61
Learn more at: https://ewh.ieee.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Worldwide Standards for Gb/s WPAN Using the 60 GHz Unlicensed Band


1
Worldwide Standards for Gb/s WPAN Using the 60
GHz Unlicensed Band
  • Bruce Bosco

2
Overview
  • What is a standard ?
  • What are the types and advantages of various
    standards organizations (SDOs)?
  • Why is 60 GHz band generating so much interest?
  • What are the SDOs presently looking at this
    space?
  • Why do we care?

3
Standards What Why?
  • Standard (n) a pattern or model that is
  • generally accepted
  • Standardize (v) to make things
  • of the same type all have the
  • same basic features
  • This discussion Standard (n) A technical
    specification, usually a formal document
    specifying uniform criteria
  • A means to enable interoperability

4
Types of Standards
  • Open Standard
  • Anyone can participate
  • Implies reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty
    fees
  • Proprietary Standard
  • Privately held by a single entity
  • Private/membership Standard
  • Consortium of members. Generally requires a paid
    membership and usually by invitation
  • De facto Standard
  • Informally established and accepted over time
  • As opposed to De Jure, or by decree
  • Mandatory Standard
  • Generally Government mandated

5
Proprietary Vs. Standardized Solution
  • Proprietary
  • First to market
  • Minimize technological compromise
  • Often most innovative
  • Can be very successful (Microsoft, Apple)
  • Standard
  • Slow, often messy process
  • Always some compromise
  • But alternate sources usually available
  • Interoperability increased marketing
    base
  • Competition lower product cost more
    demand
  • Takes advantage of economies of scale

6
Economy of Scale
  • Producer
  • Lower profit margin/unit but potentially much
    larger total profit!
  • Example
  • 10M units _at_ 1 net Vs.
  • 10k units _at_ 100 net

7
Motivation for Gb/s Standards
  • Ever increasing amount of digital data for
    consumer applications
  • High definition uncompressed streaming video
  • Interactive gaming
  • Digital photography
  • Digital home movies
  • Data and file transfer

8
Common Use cases
  • Required for proposal evaluation in both
    802.15.3c
  • and ECMA-387

9
Motivation for Gb/s Standards
  • Present wired standards/data rates
  • Wired de facto standard presently for high data
    rates
  • Gigabit Ethernet- 1 Gb/s for consumer, typical
    interoffice
  • Firewire/IEEE 1394 - 400 Mb/s to 800 Mb/s (rates
    up to 3.2 Gb/s defined)
  • DVI/HDMI 3.986 Gb/s to 4.5 Gb/s ( 10.2 Gb/s for
    versions 1.3a and 1.3b)
  • USB 2.0 (Hi-speed) 480 Mb/s

10
Motivation for Gb/s Standards
  • Present deployed wireless WPAN/WLAN
    standards/data rates
  • 802.11 b/g/n
  • .11n advertises rates up to 300 Mb/s
  • Note that these are maximum data rates
  • Sustained rates are usually ½ or less than the
    max
  • Recent benchmarking of several commercially
  • available systems indicate maybe ¼ advertised
  • rate is more accurate

11
Motivation for Gb/s Standards
  • Expectation from consumer is that wireless
    maintain a quality of service (QoS) very close to
    that of wired
  • Deployed systems requirements
  • Robust
  • Easy to set up
  • Cost effective (cheap)

12
Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN)
  • What is our working definition of WPAN?
  • Traditionally, less than 10m in radius from user
  • More recent definition is that range is not key
    defining factor
  • Focus is inward, towards a single user or
    isolated ad-hoc network

13
Why 60 GHz?
  • Bandwidth, bandwidth, bandwidth
  • Unlicensed
  • 7 GHz US Japan
  • 3.5 GHz contiguous spectrum available world wide

14
Why 60 GHz?
  • Attenuation due to atmospheric absorption and
    most other materials

15
Why 60 GHz?
  • Relatively high gain antennas required
  • Limited interference to adjacent link even at
    same frequency
  • Spatial and frequency reuse enabled
  • Multiple users at closely space channels in very
    near proximity possible
  • Inherent degree of security
  • Very difficult to intercept a signal

16
Why 60 GHz?
  • Demonstrated multi-gigabit performance
  • Motorola, IBM, NEC and others have published
    results showing sustained rates up to at least
    3.5 Gb/s for LOS applications
  • IBM, Sibeam and others have implemented solutions
    in low cost SiGE and CMOS technologies
  • Because of the available bandwidth, very low
    complexity modulation schemes can be implemented
    for robust operation and high QoS
  • Example Motorola demonstrated over 3 Gb/s at low
    BER at 10m using OOK modulation (2005)

17
Standards and Alliances for 60 GHz WPAN
  • IEEE 802.15.3c
  • ECMA (European Computer Manufacturers Association
    ) - 387
  • 802.11 VHT60/Tgad
  • WirelessHD?
  • Other SDOs and Alliances

18
IEEE 802.15.3c
  • IEEE Open SDO
  • Task Group (TG) formed March 2005
  • Define an alternate physical layer (PHY)
    operating in the new and clear US band including
    57 64 GHz
  • At least one mode capable of gt 1 Gb/s _at_ at least
    10m
  • Key players
  • - Motorola - Intel
  • - NICT - IBM
  • - Panasonic - Sibeam
  • - Qualcomm - Samsung
  • - OKI - Phillips

19
IEEE 802.15.3c
  • Notable features and accomplishments
  • Media access layer (MAC)
  • 802.15.3 MAC with enhancements
  • Developed for 802.15.3a UWB standard
  • Enables ad-hoc networks
  • PHY
  • Four channels of 2.16 GHz/channel defined
  • First three for US applications
  • Common mode is ?/2 BPSK at 25.3 MHz
  • Single carrier data rates up to 5.18 Gb/s
  • Optional single carrier and OFDM modes

20
IEEE 802.15.3c
  • Notable features and accomplishments
  • Channel Model
  • Developed comprehensive indoor model based on
    measured data for line of sight (LOS) model
  • NLOS model derived from LOS model and verified
    through selective measurement
  • Required an large amount of resources and time to
    complete
  • Implemented in MATLAB
  • Recommended for Tgad 60 GHz model

21
IEEE 802.15.3c
  • Status
  • In Sponsor Ballot (closes today)
  • Next to final step
  • Expected release September 2009

Alternate millimeter-wave PHY for 802.15.3
timeline
22
ECMA-387
  • International, private (membership-based) SDO
  • Key member companies for this standard
  • Panasonic
  • Phillips
  • IBM
  • Ericsson
  • Newlans
  • GEDC (Georgia Electronic Design Center)

23
ECMA-387
  • Notable features
  • MAC
  • Based on ECMA-368 MAC, with changes to support
    directional communication in 60 GHz
  • Uses discovery beacon to establish network
  • Similar to 802.15.3 MAC but appears simpler
  • PHY
  • Homogeneous Networking - all device PHYs have
    the same capabilities
  • On-OFF Keying (OOK) is mandatory for all devices
  • Type A SCBT, DBSK, OOK
  • Type B DBSK, OOK
  • Type C OOK
  • Other SC and OFDM modes are optional
  • Very simple compared to 802.15.3c

24
ECMA-387
  • Status
  • Revision 1 completed and published December 2008
  • Approved for JTC-1 fast-track procedure for
    approval by IEC and ISO members
  • Typically six month process, full approval
    expected by June/July 2009

25
IEEE 802.11 VHT60/Tgad
  • Very high throughput (VHT) group - study options
    for obtaining higher throughput for .11n
  • VHT 60 subgroup for gt 1 Gb/s using 60 GHz band
  • Project Authorization Requirement (PAR) approved
    January 2009
  • First Task Group meeting January 2009

26
IEEE 802.11 VHT60/Tgad
  • Notable features
  • MAC
  • May use 802.11n MAC for .11n functions
  • Could use 802.15.3 MAC for high rate/high
    frequency hybrid
  • Or modified .11n MAC for both
  • PHY
  • Dual PHYs - .11n and .15.3c like
  • Not set how it would be implemented
  • Two main points that differentiate from .15.3c
  • PHY would automatically and quickly fallback from
    60
  • GHz to 5 or 2.4 GHz 802.11 networks when
    blockage or other problems occur maintaining
    quality of service (QOS)
  • Compatible with existing 802.11 services, access
    points and base stations as well as its network
    management features

27
IEEE 802.11 VHT60/Tgad
  • Status
  • Project Authorization Requirement (PAR) approved
    January 2009
  • First Task Group meeting January 2009
  • Plan to finalize standard through full approval
    2012
  • Periodic conference calls with Tgac (VHT6) and
    802.15.3c on coexistence issues

28
WirelessHD
  • WirelessHD?
  • Formed in 2006
  • Generate next generation specification for
    consumer targeted A/V applications
  • Coalition includes Intel, Broadcom, LG,
    Panasonic,
  • Sibeam and others
  • Lots of press, hype, CES demos and so on
  • Specification released January 2008
  • First generation production chip set limited
    availability and access
  • Key features OFDM exclusively, beam steering
    (low rate PHY only)

29
Other SDOs and Alliances
  • NGmS
  • Next generation millimeter-wave specification
  • Members
  • Broadcom, Intel, others
  • Details
  • Possibly will leverage work done in 802.15.3c
  • May focus primarily on OFDM PHY
  • Little else know at this time
  • Bluetooth
  • Still appears to be some interest in order to
    obtain high speed (not necessarily large file)
    data transfers
  • Others?

30
Recent Developments
  • Gefen reportedly to begin producing WirelessHD?
    compliant adapters with first production
    available Q2 2009. Cost is around 700 per link.
    (Jan 8, 2009)
  • IBM announces initial results of new chip with
    hybrid antenna in a single package. Rates up to
    five Gb/s at five meters were reported.
    Technology is based on SiGe HBT. (Jan 23, 2009)
  • IMEC reports on results for several key blocks of
    a 60 GHz radio based on 45nm CMOS. Results
    included a power amplifier with 11 dBm 1 dB
    compression point right at the requirements for
    10m range .(March 2009)

31
Why do we care?
  • OPPORTUNITIES still early enough to get into
    the game
  • Integrated semiconductor solutions
  • RF
  • Baseband
  • ADC DAC
  • Antenna
  • Packaging
  • Network architecture
  • Software
  • Systems
  • Consumer products
  • Enterprise products

32
Summary
  • Standards are needed for interoperability and
    conformance
  • Various types of standards each address a
    specific space
  • 60 GHz band is the front runner for addressing
    multi-gigabit wireless requirements
  • Several SDOs are targeting this space
  • Opportunities to leverage this developing market
    are emerging presently and could be exploited

33
Acknowledgments
  • Steve Rockwell SKR Consulting LLC
  • Abby Mathew - Newlans

34
References
  • Cambridge Online Dictionary http//dictionary.camb
    ridge.org/
  • IEEE 802.15 website http//www.ieee802.org/15/
  • ECMA website http//www.ecma-international.org
  • IEEE 802.11 website http//www.ieee802.org/11/inde
    x.shtml
  • Wireless HD website http//www.wirelesshd.org/
  • B. Bosco, S. Franson, R. Emrick, S. Rockwell, J.
    Holmes, A 60 GHz Transciever with Multi-Gigabit
    Data Capability, RAWCON 2004
  • IEEE Publication 15-09/0245R0 Project Timeline
  • IEEE Publication 15-06-0369-09-003c Summary
    Usage Models
  • http//www.engadget.com/tag/60ghz/

35
THANK YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com