Thank you for viewing this presentation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Thank you for viewing this presentation.

Description:

Thank you for viewing this presentation. We would like to remind you that this material is the property of the author.It is provided to you by the ERS for your ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: ersnetOrg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thank you for viewing this presentation.


1
  • Thank you for viewing this presentation.
  • We would like to remind you that this material is
    the property of the author.It is provided to you
    by the ERS for your personal use only, as
    submitted by the author.
  • 2011 by the author

2
XDR TB in South Africa From clinical management
to public health action Time to bring back
sanitoria now overdue!
  • Keertan Dheda, FCP(SA), FCCP, PhD (Lond), FRCP
    (Lond)
  • Associate Professor and Head
  • Lung Infection and Immunity Unit
  • Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine,
  • University of Cape Town
  • email keertan.dheda_at_uct.ac.za
  • Conflict of interest none

3
Overview
  • The burden of XDR-TB and why is it important in
    the global context?
  • Pathogenesis- some local work
  • Diagnosis (GeneXpert, Hain SL)
  • Prognosis of XDR-TB and treatment of TB in the
    pre-chemotherapeutic era
  • Current status in hospitals in Africa what do we
    do with the accumulating pool of untreatable
    cases?
  • Impact on health care workers and other ethical
    dilemmas

4
Definitions
  • MDR-TB
  • XDR-TB (H and R plus any FQ and at least one of
    the three injectables i.e amikacin, kanamycin,
    capreomycin)
  • Global XDR-TB Task Force- 2006 (MMWR, Nov
    2006)
  • (i) Significantly poorer treatment outcomes
  • (ii) DST to these drugs more reliable and
    reproducible
  • and more accessible in resource-limited settings
  • TDR-TB, XXDR-TB, super XDR-TB (resistance to all
    known classes)- prognostic significance unclear
  • Velayati AA, Chest, 2009
  • Shah S, Emerging Infect Dis, 2011

5
Proportions of MDR-TB among previously treated TB
cases.
M/XDR-TB Surveillance and Control 2010 Global
Update
6
What is the size of the problem globally?
  • Worldwide 440 000 cases of MDR-TB in 2008 (36
    of the total incident TB episodes)
  • (360 000 new cases)
  • Only 7 reported and 1-2 actually treated to WHO
    standards
  • XDR-TB globally 25000 XDR-TB cases annually

7
Size of the problem in SA
  • 2004 3278 MDR cases
  • 2005 4305 MDR cases
  • 2006 6716 MDR cases
  • 2007 7369 MDR cases
  • (16000 to 18000 estimated cases for 2007/8)
  • About 5 to 10 thought to be XDR-TB
  • Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance in the World
    Report 2008Fourth Global Report, WHO, 2008
  • South African National Department of Health
    Report, 2008
  • WHO. Global TB Control. A short update to the
    2009 report.

8
Why is XDR-TB a threat?
  • Mortality rates are substantially higher (annual
    mortality in patients with XDR TB approaches 40)
  • Dheda K, Lancet, 2010
  • ODonnell M, IJTLD, 2010
  • Gandhi N, Lancet, 2006
  • Drastically increases the costs of running a TB
    program (despite annually treating 500 000 cases
    of drug-susceptible TB and lt 10 000 MDR/XDR-TB,
    the latter eats up gt 50 of the annual TB drug
    budget).  
  • Gandhi NR, Lancet. 2006.

9
Cost of treating TB with different DST
patternsMDR-TB 110 to 180 fold more
expensiveXDR-TB 400x more expensive
Can destabilize well or modestly functioning
National TB Programs (NTPs).
10
Pathogenesis of drug resistant TB

-Never add a single drug to a failing regimen -FQ
usage in the community Devasia RA, AJRCCM, 2009
Compliance (many factors) Drug quality and
supply Improperly trained HCW Poorly functioning
system Infection control Delay in diagnosis
Gandhi N and Dheda K et al, Lancet, 2010
11
Pathogenesis of drug resistant TB
  • Unclear why despite good compliance DR develops
  • (i) Evidence that Beijing strains have a greater
    propensity to propagate after acquiring DR
    mutations
  • S. Borrell, S. Gagneux, IJTLD, 2009
  • (iii) May be better pre-adapted to survive
  • (ii) May exhibit an increased mutation rate
    (mutator phenotype)- no evidence
  • Dos Vultos T, PLOS One, 2008
  • (iv) Other mechanisms- efflux pumps, cell wall
    permeability
  • (iv) Immunopathology (Kaplan, Inf Imm, 2003)

12
Pathogenesis of drug resistant TB
  • DR mutations are associated with compensatory
    mutations evolutionary adaptation
  • S. Borrell, S. Gagneux, IJTLD, 2009
  • Hypothesised that this impacts on biochemical and
    physiological pathways- altering proteome and
    hence structure

Pseudomonas and other infections adaptive
mutations have effects on virulence, airway
colonization, transmissibility, and lung function
decline. Oliver A, Clin Microbiol Infect, 2010
13
  • Proteins differentially expressed in different
    strains grey bars proteins more abundant in the
    hypo-virulent strain, and black bars in the
    hyper-virulent strain.
  • Desouza GA. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010

Structurally XDR-TB has thickened cell wall with
different type of cell division Velayati AA, ERJ,
2009 Farnia P, Int J Clin Exp Med 2010
14
Immunology studies SUBJECT GROUPS
15
Does an altered proteome modulate the host
immune response?
  • XDR-TB patients may have an altered
    immuno-phenotype when compared to DS-TB and LTBI,
    even when taking into account disease chronicity
    increased Tregs, decreased IFN?.

16
INCREASE LEVELS OF CD4CD25FOXP3 CELLS
  • XDR-TB converters and XDR-TB non converters
    VS DS-TB and LTBI
  • XDR-TB non converters VS XDR-TB
    converters

17
MYCOBACTERIAL SURVIVAL ASSAY SUMMATION
The ability of effector cells to kill monocyte
derived macrophages (MDM) is attenuated with the
addition of Tregs
18
(No Transcript)
19
So, what exactly is Xpert MTB/RIF?
  • Xpert is an automated real-time PCR platform for
    the diagnosis of TB and genotypic rifampicin
    resistance
  • Recently gained approval as a frontline dx for
    individuals suspected of TB-HIV co-infection
  • SA DoH plan to replace smear with Xpert for all
    TB suspects

20
Gandhi and Dheda, Lancet, 2010 Schaaf and Dheda,
Clin Chest Med, 2009 Dheda and Warren, Inf Dis
Clin N Am, 2010
21
  • C Boehme, FIND Diagnostics

22
Gene Xpert (WHO endorsed)
  • Cost R1003 (Path Care)- 19 Jan 2010
  • Indication Suspected active TB in HIV-infected
    and uninfected persons, including those suspected
    of DR-TB
  • Sample and TT Sputum (within 2 hours)
  • Where sited reference or district level
    laboratory (? clinic)
  • How good is it Sensitivity 97 Specificity
    99 (smear negative TB 70). User-friendly and
    quick. Closed system.
  • Low inconclusive rate 2.

23
How does Xpert MTB/RIF perform?
TB
? slightly better than a single solid LJ culture
(3 weeks)
RifR
  • Boehme et al, NEJM, 2010 (N 1730) Boehme et al,
    Lancet, 2011 (n 5000)

24
Gene Xpert (WHO endorsed)
  • Interpretation ve test treat for TB in the
    clinical context. Negative test rules out TB in
    uninfected but not HIV-infected persons.
  • Theron and Dheda, AJRCCM, 2011
  • Drawbacks PPV for DR-TB is only 75 so overcalls
    DR-TB but new cartridge being trialed. Expensive.

25
How should Xpert be integrated with existing
diagnostic algorithms?
  • Assessed the diagnostic accuracy and/or
    cost-effectiveness of smear-microscopy,
    chest-radiography, IGRAs combined with a single
    Xpert-MTB/RIF assay in 480 patients with
    suspected TB
  • Grant Theron and Anil Pooran (submitted)

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
How should Xpert be integrated with existing
diagnostic algorithms?
  • Smear-microscopy combined with Xpert (if smear
    negative) is more cost-effective than either
    technique alone yet retains the advantage of same
    day diagnosis.
  • Xpert negative- although CXR has poor rule-in
    value, it can reliably rule-out TB in
    approximately 1 in 4 of such cases.
  • IGRAs had limited value
  • Grant Theron and Anil Pooran (submitted)

29
(No Transcript)
30
Bacterial burden and infectiousness
  • Theron, Peter and Dheda, AJRCCM, 2011

31
Bacterial burden and infectiousness
  • Evaluated CT values in 496 patients with
    suspected TB
  • Xpert CT values have poor rule-in cut-point
    20.2 sensitivity 32.3 specificity 97.1
  • Moderately good rule-out value for smear
    positivity cut-point 31.8 NPV 80.0. Thus,
    20 of individuals with CT values gt31.8 were
    smear-positive patients erroneously ruled out as
    smear-negatives.
  • Theron, Peter and Dheda, Clin Infect Dis, 2011
    (in press)

32
Xpert MTB/RIF research gapsBeyond diagnostic
accuracy to patient outcomes
33
DST Line probe assay
  • Hain Lifescience GenoType MTBDRplus (CE marked)
  • Clinical samples (sens, spec) Rif (99 99) INH
    (85 99)
  • Morgan M, BMC Infect Dis, 2005
  • Ling D, Eur Resp J, 2008
  • Barnard M, AJRCCM, 2008
  • Hain sl (FQ, capeomycin or AGs, ethambutol)
  • 63 isolates FQ (91), AG/capreo (85), and
    ethambutol (69)
  • Hillemann D, J Clin Micro, 2009

34
  • Main drawback is that Hain MDR and Hain sl works
    poorly in smear negative TB
  • Barnard M, AJRCCM, 2008

35
N 199 XDR-TB
36
Hain MDR sl version- suggested to be used when
there R resistance is noted. Rapid evaluation of
drug-resistance for FQ, AG, capreomycin and
ethambutol
Only 1 small study (total 64 sputum samples ( 26
DR-TB)) FQ (89 8/9), AG/capreo (87 7/8), and
ethambutol (39 10/26) 100 specificity Hillema
n D, J Clin Micro, 2009
37
  • N 140 sputum samples
  • sensitivity for 2nd line agents is sub-optimal
    and differs by smear status.
  • - 42 of XDR-TB samples were indeterminate.

Smear positive
Smear negative
38
  • Initial optimism of encouraging outcomes in
    XDR-TB
  • Mitnick C, NEJM, 2008 Keshavjee S, Lancet, 2008
    Sotgiu G, ERJ, 2009
  • replaced disappointing data
  • Review of 199 patients with XDR-TB
  • Dheda K, Shean K, Warren R, Willcox P Lancet
    2010
  • Become apparent that outcomes in high burden
    settings like South Africa are poorer than in
    intermediate to low burden settings
  • Gandhi N, Lancet, 2006
  • ODonnell M, IJTLD, 2009

39
Kaplan-Meier probabilities of XDR-TB
culture-conversion (n 174)
  • The overall culture-conversion rate was 19
    (33/174)

40
Death in the whole cohort of patients from the
date of treatment-initiation
  • Overall and 12-month mortality rates were 42,
    36 (n 174)
  • Contrast Mitnick et al, NEJM, 2008 median time
    to conversion was 90 days, and mortality in 48
    XDR-TB patients was only 23 (11/48)

41
Sondalo (1938)- 3500 beds
St Helliere
42
  • Surgical techniques promoting partial or complete
    lung collapse were also used.  
  • With the advent of effective anti-TB therapy, the
    need for sanatoria dwindled.

43
What is happening to these many culture
non-converters?
  • Given the poor conversion rates, there are large
    numbers of treatment failures (defined as failure
    to culture-convert after twelve months of
    intensive in-patient XDR treatment with regimens
    including an injectable drug like capreomycin).
  • While some patients die within weeks or months, a
    significant proportion of patients do survive for
    months or years.
  • How should these living treatment failures be
    dealt with?

44
Treatment failures
  • Western Cape multi-disciplinary review committee
    that decides on XDR-TB treatment failures.
  • Social assessment and a home visit culture
    positive patients are discharged back into the
    community.
  • There are limited resources to track these
    patients and work is ongoing to determine their
    longevity and outcomes.

45
Is discharging such patients into impoverished
communities (often living in single roomed
dwellings) justified?
46
  • XDR-TB treatment facilities in SA are filled to
    capacity. Thus, there are long waiting lists for
    beds facilitating disease transmission in the
    community.
  • In some provinces like the Northern Cape,
    outpatient treatment of XDR-TB is already
    occurring.

47
Further dilemmas
  • There are no, or limited, palliative care
    facilities.
  • Should treatment be withheld in recurrent
    defaulters when there is a risk of resistance
    amplification and no further therapeutic options?
  • Forced detention is a contentious issue that has
    been debated but cannot currently be enforced in
    SA.
  •  
  • The same problems are occurring in low burden
    settings, where isolation facilities are limited
  • Migliori GB. Eur Respir J, 2010
  • Raviglione M. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2006
  •  

48
KZN Health Care Workers
(23 XDR-TB and 208 MDR-TB HCWs in KZN)
O Donnell, Padayachi, Dheda Annals Intern Med
2010 Jarand J Dheda K, TMIH, 2010
49
What are the priorities?
  • Building a robust NTPs with improved laboratory
    and clinical capacity, and introduction newer
    rapid diagnostics
  • Build community stay and palliative care
    facilities to prevent ongoing transmission by
    large numbers of untreatable or dying XDR-TB or
    failed MDR-TB patients.
  • Thus, the time for rebuilding new sanatoria has
    now not only come but is overdue!
  • The pool of untreatable cases is accumulating and
    will require swift action to avoid a human
    catastrophe...

50
Summary
  • Tuberculosis has now evolved into a
    therapeutically destitute disease, which is
    virtually untreatable
  • The burden of XDR-TB is increasing worldwide
  • Understanding the pathogenesis, virulence
    characteristics, and transmission patterns of
    XDR-TB are urgently required
  • Improved rapid diagnostics for smear ve TB
  • New drugs but must be protected and regulated
  • TB is a good example of how a MDR pathogen can
    become a global threat
  • Time to build sanitoria now overdue!

51
(No Transcript)
52
Acknowledgements
  • Division of Pulmonology and The Lung Infection
    and Immunity Unit Greg Symons, Caroline Whale,
    Elize Pietersen, Lititia Pool, Karen Shean,
    Samuel Murray, Lwazi Mhlanti, Vonnita Louw,
    Malika Davids, Motasim Badri, Paul Willcox
  • Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery - Luven
    Moodley, Mark de Groot
  • Brooklyn Chest Hospital (Cape Town) - Erma
    Mostert, Richard Burzelmann, Pieter Roussouw,
    Avril Burns
  • Gordonia Hospital (Northern Cape) - Barbara
    Mastrapa
  • UKZN Staff/Collaborators - Nesri Padayachee
  • University of Stellenbosch - Robin Warren, Thomas
    Victor, Paul D. Van Helden
  • WHO Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and
    Lung Diseases - Giovanni B. Migliori, Giovanni
    Sotgiu
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine - Max R.
    ODonnell
  • University of Florida- Kevin Fennelley
  • University of Calgary- Julie Jarand

53
Funding Agencies
  • EUFP7
  • Discovery
  • NIH Fogerty

South African National Research Foundation
  • South African
  • MRC
  • EDCTP
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com