Title: The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife
1The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management
for Wildlife
www.hdw-inc.com
www.fws.com
cache.britannica.com
- Helen Holdsworth
- EES 5053
- University of Texas at San Antonio
- December 2, 2006
2Problem Statement
- Habitat fragmentation and urban encroachment are
two of the major factors threatening wildlife
species around the world.
The ability to accurately assess habitat with
remote sensing imagery should allow researchers
to be more specific in their assessments and
recommendations for habitat management.
3Overview
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Management Implications
- Conclusions
fcit.usf.edu
www.treknature.com
animals.timduru.org
4Landscape Metrics Associated with Habitat Use by
Ocelots in South Texas
- Hypothesis Prefer large patches of closed canopy
avoid large patches of unsuitable habitat - Location Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife
Refuge
5Methods
- August 1991 Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery
- Aerial photos
- Digital orthophoto quadrangles
Image from TNRIS
6Methods
- Used supervised and unsupervised classification
for better accuracy - 4 land cover classes
- Urban/barren
- Water
- Closed canopy
- Open canopy
Image from published paper, Journal of Wildlife
Management
7Methods
- Landscape Metrics
- Number of patches
- Shape
- Patch size
- Edge
- Mean nearest neighbor
8Results Management Implications
Image from Google Earth
- Closed canopy shows a great degree of
fragmentation. - Ocelots used the largest patches available.
- Decisions must consider size, shape, and edge.
- Consider conserving areas with smaller patches.
9Landscape Models to Predict the Influence of
Forest Structure on Tassel-Eared Squirrel
Populations
- Question Which characteristic best predicts
squirrel density recruitment? - Location Mogollon Plateau in northern Arizona
Image from www.forestera.nau.edu/vw2/images/wmpala
__assess_area.gif
10Methods
- Data from Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis
- Ground measurements
- Digital orthophotos
- ETM imagery
11Results Management Implications
- Squirrel density best predicted by basel area
- Recruitment best predicted by canopy cover
- Remove smaller trees
- Leave larger patches with moderate-to-high canopy
cover
12Identifying Suitable Sites for Florida Panther
Reintroduction
- Question Which areas would be good for panther
reintroduction? - Location Historic range of panther
13Methods
- GIS map layers at 500 x 500 m
- 1992 National Land Cover Data
14Results Management Implications
- Identified 9 potential sites with the historic
range - Need field survey at local scale to verify
- Need remote inaccessible areas
15Analysis of The Use of Remote Sensing
Ocelot Research
- 1991 Landsat Thematic Mapper
- Spatial resolution of 30 m on bands 1-5, 7
- Spatial resolution of 120 m on band 6
- No problems reported
http//edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/EarthExplorer/
16Analysis of The Use of Remote Sensing
Squirrel Research
- Enhance Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM)
- Spatial resolution of 30 m on bands 1-5, 7
- Spatial resolution of 120 m on band 6
- Spatial resolution of 15 m on band 8
- No problems reported
http//edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/EarthExplorer/
17Analysis of The Use of Remote Sensing
Panther Research
- GIS map layers at 500 x 500 m
- 1992 National Land Cover Data
- Could not incorporate fine scale characteristics
http//edcsns17.cr.usgs.gov/EarthExplorer/
18Conclusions
www.treknature.com
- Many imagery tools available
- What you use depends on your resources
- Should see more research and recommendations
based on remote imagery use - Probably always need some ground-truthing
fcit.usf.edu
animals.timduru.org