Title: The study on first language acquisition is always a delight...
1The study on first language acquisition is always
a delight...
2Programme
- Overview of the system of inflectional morphology
of Estonian - Acquisition of inflectional types and patterns
Acquisition of analytic and synthetic,
agglutinating and fusional formation and some
notes concerning the impact of morphological
richness of the input language on acquisition
rate - Acquisition of case
- Acquisition of tense
- Acquisition of aspect
- Communication styles of Estonian children and
mothers
3 Estonia
- Estonian language belongs to the Finnic group of
the Finno-Ugric language family - 1,1 million speakers
- Estonian language developed on the basis of
dialects spoken in the Estonian area in 13th-16th
centuries, Standard Estonian started to develop
in the 16th century. Estonian was the official
language of the Republic of Estonia in 1919-1940
and regained this status once again in 1988.
4Why to study the acquisition of first language?
- To understand the essential nature of the
language - is the language mainly for communication?
- or is it for thinking?
- is the language something that happens with us or
something we learn step by step? - if the language is something we learn, how do we
learn it so quickly at so early age?
5How do we learn a language?
- If we learn a language by just imitating the
language we hear, why do we make mistakes we
never hear in the input? - Why do children start speaking differently one
with sentences, another with just stems
constructing a language peace by peace? - Why can children in the same family even, for
example, twins of triplets, acquire language in a
different way?
6Why to study the acquisition of first language?
- To help children with SLI (Specific language
impairment, 7 of population, need help before
6), to spot children with SLI, and to help them
to acquire the language - To help those who are acquiring the foreign
language (if a 1-2 year old child can acquire a
structure of a given language, there must be a
universal and very simple acquisition procedure
for acquiring this structure).
7 And why to study the acquisition of Estonian
Why is the acquisition of Estonian different from
the acquisition of English, for example?
- The languages are different
- amount of morphology,
- importance of word order,
- gradation in Estonian, no future, no gender, a
lot of cases etc. - To understand how and to what extent the
structure of language itself can influence the
acquisition course and speed.
8Short description of Estonian language from
typological perspective
- The Estonian language has developed historically
from an agglutinating to a more fusional language
type (Erelt 2003 7) and, as is common in
inflecting-fusional languages, there is often no
clear boundary between the stem and a grammatical
formative (Erelt et al. 1995 129). - For example only 10 of nouns have an
unchangeable stem in all their inflectional forms
(Erelt et al. 1995 156). - Therefore, phonological changes of the stem are
very important in the inflection of Estonian
nouns. (Erelt et al. 1995 129).
9Phonological changes in stems
- Gradation in Estonian includes on the one hand
alternation in quantity, in which a phonetically
stronger stem shape (strong grade/3rd degree of
length), alternates with a phonetically weaker
one (the weak grade/2nd degree of length) - for example vanni bathGEN Q2 vs. vanni
bathILLAT Q3 - On the other hand, there is alternation in
quality, which is mostly reflected in the change,
assimilation or loss of a single onset obstruent
of the second syllable in the weak grade. - for example nägu 'faceNOM' gt näo 'faceGEN'
10How children start to acquire a language?
- The process of language acquisition takes place
quite in a similar way in many languages, but
still there are some differences between
languages. - Estonian children start usually to acquire the
language from reduplication and onomatopoeia.
11Onomatopoeia An interesting part of Estonian
lexicon which is important in early language
acquisition
- Estonian language as also Finnish has a big
amount of onomatopoetic words. All these words
are not loanwords and the formation of such words
is still productive. - For example the are so called open strings of
such words kolisema gt kilisema gt kõlisema gt
kulisema - by modifying the stem vowel we can
modify the sound. - Onomatopoeia is frequently used in the input to
small children for animals (muu, auh-auh,
krooks-krooks, mjäu), for machines (viu-viu,
põrr-põrr), etc.
12Onomatopoeia and the acquisition of Estonian
- Onomatopoetic words are the first words in the
child's speech already at the end of babbling
period. In Estonian usually at age 010-12. - Among very first imitatives are words for
familiar animals, for example, a dog (auh-auh
Hendrik at age 10). The meaning of such an early
word can change at first the word denoted only
our own dog, a month later also other dogs, some
time later all furry animals and things, even a
piece of cotton wool, and after two months it was
used only for referring to our own dog, other
dogs were referred by standard word koer.
13Onomatopoeia and the input
- Onomatopoetic words have highly socio-cultural
value. They are a part of the communication style
used when speaking with small children. They are
used in songs and rhymes and in everyday routines
(mõmm-mõmm mõmm-mõmm nutab karujõmm,
mull-mull-mull-mull väiksed kalad). - Onomatopoetic words are used not only by mothers
but also by fathers (although they do not usually
admit it). - The use of onomatopoeia is changing when the
child is growing for example - at child's age
10 the mother uses construction teeb kop-kop
'make-3SG knock-knock', but when the child is 17
there is the verb koputama 'to knock' in the
speech of the mother. While there were both
variants occurring in the speech of the mother
several months (from 13-16).
14Onomatopoeia and the acquisition of grammar
- Imitatives are not inflecting, they don't have
morphology. So, the child can use these words
without knowing anything about inflectional rules
or patterns. Imitatives are like ready-to-use
pieces of language system at the child's age when
grammar hasn't started to develop. (For example
teeb kiiga-kaaga, teeb piip-piip, teeb ai-ai,
teeb mämm-mämm)? - Onomatopoetic words are reduplicative (tuut-tuut,
kop-kop), and reduplicative elements are used
when the child has not yet started to acquire the
grammar. Reduplication helps the child to
recognize the boundary of the syllable and to
identify the meaningful piece of the speech flow.
15The task for the child the system of
inflectional morphology of Estonian
- In Estonian, nominals, i.e. nouns, adjectives,
numerals and pronouns, are all inflected for
number and case. - Estonian has 14 nominal cases, both in the
singular and plural. - A nominal paradigm may contain case forms
consisting of the bare stem or suffixed stems. - Verbs have finite forms and non-finite forms.
Finite forms are inflected for mood, tense,
voice, person, and number.
16When do Estonian children start to acquire
morphology?
- Estonian children start to acquire morphology
after age 12 and before age 20. - The first productive forms of the oblique case of
the noun appear in the speech of the Estonian
child as early as at the age of 17,
(partitives) the first verb forms (simple
present, simple past) become productive somewhat
later, at the age of 19.
- The richer inflection is in the input, the more
stimulated children are to develop inflection in
this domain, and the more rapid is development
(Dressler et al. 2007 69). - Children acquiring an agglutinating language
develop the inflectional system most rapidly
(Laaha Gillis 2007).
17How can (s)he manage with such a difficult task?
- She starts from highly functional oppositions of
two most frequent forms, for example nominative
and partitive or imperative and simple past. - Nominative can be used for pointing to something
and partitive for demanding something. - Imperative is used for giving orders and simple
past is used for telling of something has
happened.
18Some things are easier to acquire
- What makes things easier to acquire?
- simple and transparent structure of a language
element - simple and transparent way to make forms
- input frequency
19Gradation is typologically a very specific
feature of Estonian
- Phonological changes in stems are principally of
two kinds - gradation changes (affecting the root and medial
sounds) and - other changes (omission, addition and ordering
changes of final phonemes)? - In addition, there are some suppletive stems
- When the stem is subject to gradation it will
occur in strong or weak forms in different
grades in the case of a change concerning the
final phoneme there will be different final
phonemes in different case forms (Erelt et al.
1995 130).
20At first sight...
- ...the gradation can be considered to be a
language-specific factor that might hamper the
acquisition of the inflectional system because in
the case of gradational words a child has to
select a suitable stem shape in addition to a
suitable suffix. - There are a lot of frequent words with grade
alternation in the input, but gradation is
sometimes avoided in child-directed speech by
numerous diminutive derivatives where a
non-gradational word has been derived from an
originally gradational word - koer dog gt kutsu doggy kass cat gt kiisu
kitten.
21But...
- ...Estonian children acquire quantity alternation
at an early age and use it to distinguish between
two case forms already during the stage when they
have not acquired the case suffixes. - For example, functional oppositions of
- 1) genitive piti (pildi) 'picture' Q2 and the
partitive pitti (pilti) Q3 (18)? - 2) illative nanni (vanni) (into) bath Q3 and
nanni- (vannis) (in) bath Q2 - linna into townQ3 and linna in town Q2
(18). - Functional oppositions for expressing important
semantic roles like direction and location or
possessor and object.
22Almost errorless acquisition of gradation
- No overgeneralizations and errors in the
acquisition of grade alternation were found, only
few errors appeared in case forms with quality
alternation e.g. nuga-ga 'knife-COM' instead of
noa-ga, käsi-ga 'hand-COM' instead of käe-ga. - The functionality of a phenomenon plays the most
significant role in the acquisition of grade
alternation, that is, if a word form in a weak or
strong quantity distinguishes important
grammatical meanings (without making words longer
than 2 syllables!) and if grade alternation is
also frequent, that is, it occurs in those words
that are most frequent in child-directed speech,
then such a phenomenon is acquired early and
without errors.
23Acquisition of case
- The case system is often regarded as one of the
most difficult aspects of Estonian grammar there
are many cases, a single case often has several
different allomorphs and the inflectional classes
of nouns are not always simple or regular. - In spite of the fact that the agglutinating case
formation is not complicated in most cases
historical developments have produced
unpredictable stem changes (especially in the
partitive and illative cases).
24First words and first forms
- Estonian child usually starts to inflect words
when she has at least 50 words in her lexicon. - At the beginning almost all nouns are in the
nominative, only few lexemes occur in the
partitive and genitive. The next cases are the
illative and inessive (age 18110). There are
no instances of marginal cases in children's
speech at early stage.
25First rote-learned forms and oppositions
- Although some adult-like forms of nouns carrying
a suffix do occur already in the premorphological
phase, most of the first rote-learned case forms
do not carry a suffix. - In such forms, the category of case is expressed
by the stem variant corresponding to the case
form and its function in Standard Estonian. - The first forms of nouns contrasting with the
nominative are usually forms of other grammatical
cases, namely the partitive and genitive some
instances of the nominative opposed to the
illative or comitative forms of a given lexeme
are also found.
26Acquisition of analytic and synthetic,
agglutinating and fusional formation
- There is some evidence that agglutinating
formation can be acquired more easily than
fusional formation technique not only in general,
but also within one language because of its
transparency. - For example tüdruku-te-ga 'girl-Pl-COM'
- The acquisition of a morphological system is
easier if inflectional markers in a word form are
ordered so that each suffix corresponds to a
specific grammatical category in case a suffix
carries several grammatical meanings, it is more
difficult to acquire the inflected form (see
Voeikova 2002).
27Agglutination vs Fusion
- For example, it can be supposed that it would be
easier to acquire the agglutinating partitive
form tüdruku-i-d 'girl-PL-PRTV' - than the form maja-sid 'housePL.PRTV' where
partitive and plural are mixed into one suffix. - It is possible to use different formation
techniques for a partitive plural - 1) the fusional stem plural maja (houseNOM) gt
maju (housePLPRTV)? - 2) form with the cumulative formative, the
sid-marker maja-sid (house-PLPRTV)? - 3) agglutinating i-plural forms raamat
(bookNOM) gt raamatu-i-d (book-PL-PRTV).
28But how it actually happens Acquisition order of
different partitive plural types
- 1. First partitive plural form lilli flowers
was the fusional stem plural, at the age of 18,
fusional formation productively used at age 20. - 2. The fusional sid-formative, maja-sid
house-PLPRTV, patarei-sid batterie- PLPRTV
at the age of 20, productively used at 20. - 3. The agglutinating i-formative appeared at age
20, katule-i-d potato-PL-PRTV), the use of the
i-plural productive only at 24.
29What makes the acquisition of fusional partitive
plural easier to acquire
- 1. Lexical patterns
- First partitive plural nouns occurred often in a
quantifier construction (palju loomi a lot of
animals). - 2. Phonological factors
- a) Trochaic stage - the speech of an Estonian
child consists of less than 10 words which are
longer than 2 syllables at age 20. Towards the
end of the trochaic stage, from 20 the child
begins to use also sid-marked and agglutinating
i-plural forms, which make the words longer than
two syllables. - b) Inability to pronounce a closed non-initial
syllable - no words with closed non-initial
syllables were found before the age of 20. - 3. Input frequency 60 of the partitive plural
forms in child-directed speech represent fusional
formation.
30Error Analysis Partitive plural
- In the case of the stem plural the plural differs
from the singular only by the stem vowel. - On the one hand, it is easy to make a distinction
between the singular and the plural because the
plural form has a different final vowel, on the
other hand, the conditions of vowel alternations
complicate matters. - Many mistakes were made in the choice of the
correct stem vowel, especially in a-stem words,
as silme instead of silmi eyePL.PRTV at age
26, kinge instead of kingi shoePL.PRTV at
age 28.
31Partitive plural
- The formation of the partitive plural by the
cumulative formative -sid revealed only some
mistakes onu-seid instead of onu-sid
uncle-PL.PRTV and tädi-seid instead of
tädi-sid aunt-PL.PRTV at the age of 26. - Analogy of ne-words (punane gt punase-i-d
'red-PL-PRTV'). - A child declines the adjective võõras strange
similarly to typical Estonian ne-ending
adjectives (e.g. punane punase-i-d
red-PL-PRTV). A child was able to form fusional
partitive plural forms without any mistakes only
at the age of 30. -
- Estonian children acquire the fusional vowel
plural earlier than the agglutinating plural, but
error analysis shows that the correct use of the
fusional technique poses more difficulties for a
child.
32Rote-learned forms are followed by miniparadigms
- Miniparadigms are sets of most important forms of
the same stem. - The first miniparadigms are clearly lexeme-based
there is a certain choice of case forms for each
lexeme. - Thus, the noun kast box is used in the
genitive, inessive and elative (Andreas at age
20) while other lexemes may be used with
different cases. - For some pragmatically important lexemes, such as
issi daddy, emme mummy, piss pee-pee, see
this, the child needs more forms while for
others, three seem to suffice (e.g. müts hat). - Adverb-like nouns usually have only two local
case forms, illative and inessive (e.g. õue
(to go) outsideNOM and õue-s (to be)
outside-INESS) tuppa roomILL( (to go)
inside) vs. toas room-INESS ( (to be) inside)
Andreas 21).
33Miniparadigms
- The choice of case forms appearing in
miniparadigms seems to depend on the semantic
category of the noun. - There are three main kinds of miniparadigms to be
found in Andreas data at 26 - miniparadigms of nouns for food containing three
grammatical cases (e.g. pähkli nutGEN,
pähkli-d nut-NOMPL, pähklei-d
nut-PARTITPL), - miniparadigms of animated nouns and baby-talk
words containing grammatical cases and the
allative (e.g. issi daddyNOM issi daddyGEN
issi-t daddy-PARTIT issi-le daddy-ALL)
and finally - miniparadigms of words expressing location
consisting of two or more local cases (e.g.
sahtli-sse drawer-ILL, sahtli-s drawer-INESS,
sahtli-st drawer-ELAT.
34Abundance of inflectional types and patterns and
the speed of acquisition of morphology
- Estonian has many inflectional classes and a
quite complex morphophonology. Children use
different strategies to simplify this complicated
inflectional system. - One such strategy is the overextension of a
regular inflectional pattern to irregular nouns.
At 20, Andreas forms the partitive of the
irregular noun juhe wireNOM based on the
genitive stem juhtme, as is usual with regularly
inflecting nouns without grade alternation,
producing juhtme-t instead of juhe-t
wire-PARTIT without quality alternation.
35Abundance of inflectional types and patterns and
the speed of acquisition of morphology II
- A child does not acquire all inflectional
patterns at once rather at first (s)he picks up
those words in child-directed speech that belong
only to certain (extremely productive)
inflectional types - preferred inflectional types are highly frequent
inflectional types in the input language and
productive and open types. For example the type
with monosyllabic gradational words with
weakening stems, model word sepp blacksmith),
e.g. poeg son, lill flower, klots block.
36Children acquire only some of these types at first
37Rate of the acquisition of case
- Estonian children have acquired the core of
Estonian case system (7-10 cases of 14) and the
core of verbal inflectional system - all persons,
simple present and past, past perfect (in
indicative, imperative voice) at age 30 .
- The number of cases in a language does not play
a special role at the early stage of acquisition
because a child does not acquire all the cases at
a time but only the core at first (Voeikova
2002 3437)?
38Acquisition of case from first rote-learned forms
to miniparadigms
- What was supposed to make the acquisition
difficult? - Were these factors really making the acquisition
process difficult? - What makes the acquisition easier?
39Acquisition of Tense
- Why to study the acquisition of tense?
- to understand how children start to acquire
temporal relations, for example, how they start
to differentiate past from non-past - tense morphology has been a most vulnerable area
of language system for children with SLI
40Tense in Estonian
- Estonian has a comparatively small core tense
system. In traditional grammars of Estonian
language, four tenses are distinguished. - Estonian has no morphological form for the
future, which is expressed with present tense
form and by some kind of lexical means. - Present tense is unmarked kuku-n 'fall-1Sg'.
- Imperfect uses agglutinative means in indicative
(kukku-si-n 'fall-PAST-1Sg') and analytic means
in other moods and analytic means also in
negative. - Perfect and past perfect use analytic means.
41How I studied the acquisition tense
- Experiment
- Design the road and three landmarks on the road
referring to the past, present and future, the
protagonist who has to perform the same action
near these landmarks. - Comprehension and production Sentences in
comprehension were presented to the child and she
had to point to one of landmarks. The beginnings
of these sentences were presented to the child in
production part and child had to elicit these
sentences. - COMPREHENSION The king was snoring ...
- PRODUCTION Near the plant the king ...
- TEST!
42Comprehension (N20, aged 50-60)
- Children can understand present.
- They can not fully understand past and future,
but they still have started to acquire these
tenses. - There could be a initial present-centered
tense-system for children (they start to
differentiate tenses from one big present tense
system - me-here-now)?
43Production (N20, age 50-60)?
- Children produce correctly past, but no present
and future. - Why?
44Future in Estonian
- Present tense form
- Present tense form time adverbial
- Periphrastic construction to start to....
- Perphrastic construction to go to...
- Only last two options are grammaticalized as a
future forms tense - Three last options are differentiable from the
present
45ProductionTenses used
46Conclusions acquisition of tense
- The design of the experiment can influence the
use of past tense in present situations. - There is no uniform present-centered tense-system
in the acquisition of Estonian. - The future was interesting children used a lot
of negative constructions (has not done yet, has
not snored, is not snoring) they differentiate
future from present using past! The future is
problematic also cognitively you have not seen
the situation yet, how can you decide if the
action will take place or not... - The tense is not acquired at age 50-60 in
Estonian.
47Aspect some general remarks
- Similarly to the other Finno-Ugric languages, the
aspect in Estonian has not developed into a
consistent grammatical category. The aspect can
be expressed by means of progressive and
resultative constructions (mostly with adverbs
and verb particles) as well as by the case
alternation of the object. - The case alternation of the object is a
manifestation of the aspect expressed by
grammatical means in Estonian. It is the most
regular means of expressing the aspect in
Estonian.
48The choice of the object case...
- ...is determined
- 1) by the perfectivity or imperfectivity of the
action and, - 2) by the quantitative boundedness or
non-boundedness of the object item. - The total object (object in the genitive or the
nominative) is used when both the action and the
object item are bounded, and the partial object
(object in the partitive case) is used when the
action, object item, or both are unbounded (Erelt
et al. 1995 5152 Tamm 2004 29). - Thus, the Estonian object may occur in three
grammatical cases - the partial object in the partitive,
- and the total object in the genitive (singular)
and the nominative.
49What was my question?
- Case alternation is a very difficult part of
Estonian grammar for learners of Estonian as a
second language. - is it difficult also for
children? -
- When do Estonian children acquire case
alternation? - Would it be easier in certain kinds of
situations or not?
50How I studied the acquisition of aspect
- Experiment comprehension and production
- Four conditions Completed situation Perfective
form, Completed situation Imperfective form,
Incompleted situation Imperfective form,
Incompleted situation Perfective form - Two conditions in production test Completed
situation and Incompleted situation - Tense is constant (past), aspect (genitive -
partitive form) varies - Situation is presented visually (video clips) in
comprehension test the child must decide if the
sentence is tru or not, in production test
children must elicit sentences - There are some triggers between test items to
keep the child's attention on the task. - TEST!
51Example
- Video
- Comprehension
- Introduction Here is a clown, he has to draw
several things. Sometimes she will get ready
sometimes not. At first the sun. - Trigger When the music stopped, was the pencil
touching the board? - Question (Com-I) While the music was playing the
clown was drawing the sun. True or not? - Production
- Introduction Now the moon. Tell me about the
moon and drawing. - Test sentence While the music was playing the
clown...
52Results control group (N20)Comprehension
53AdultsProduction
54Children (N20, age 50-60)Comprehension
55Correct answers with different verbs
56Conclusions
- What is the common feature of verbs with low
results? - What kind of conclusions we can draw of these
results?
57ChildrenProduction
58Answers and verbs (and objects)?
59Conclusions about the experiment used
- Estonian children acquire the case alternation
(the aspect) quite late, after age 5. - The semantics of used verbs is extremely
important! So the aspect in Estonian can not be
considered to be fully grammaticized in the case
alternation. - There is some inconsistent use of case
alternation also in adult data.
60Conclusion How does the Estonian Child Acquire
Estonian language
- The richness of the Estonian morphological system
stimulates the acquisition of inflectional
morphology at an early age, whereas the large
number of inflectional types and patterns does
not slow down the acquisition of morphology. - The child uses the so-called compensatory
strategies for copying with a fragmented system
of inflectional patterns and restricts at first
the number of inflectional types to two or three
most productive and most frequent types in
child-directed speech.
61How does the Estonian Child Acquire Estonian
language II
- Grade alternation, which is a characteristic
feature of the Finnic languages, is acquired at
an early age, whereas quantity alternation is
acquired earlier than quality alternation. - A child acquiring the Estonian language starts to
pay attention to the case alternation of the
object, that is, to use both the partial and the
total object with one and the same verb, rather
early, but the correct choice of the object case
will be acquired as late as at the age of six.
62- When coping with the categories and the large
number of inflectional patterns, the child uses
the acquisition of an initial restricted system
as a compensatory strategy. - On the other hand, in the case of morphologically
complicated forms (partitive plural) and the
choice of the case of the object or the
acquisition of the most difficult rule the child
relies on some special lexical pattern. - It can be claimed, however, that in the case of
all the studied structures a child begins the
acquisition of Estonian inflectional morphology
from those parts of the language that are
typologically characteristic, unmarked, and
central. Parts of language structure which are
not stable (case alternation in objects), are
acquired later.