Falls in Ontario LTC Settings: Laura M. Wagner, PhD, RN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Falls in Ontario LTC Settings: Laura M. Wagner, PhD, RN

Description:

Falls in Ontario LTC Settings: Laura M. Wagner, PhD, RN Nursing Scientist Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit at Baycrest Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: fallsinlt
Category:
Tags: ltc | phd | falls | laura | ontario | settings | wagner

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Falls in Ontario LTC Settings: Laura M. Wagner, PhD, RN


1
Falls in Ontario LTC Settings
Laura M. Wagner, PhD, RN Nursing
Scientist Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit
at Baycrest
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit
2
Acknowledgments and Funding
  • Canadian Patient Safety Institute
  • Ontario LTC Association
  • Krista Robinson-Holt, RN, MN (Co-I)
  • Jennifer Langston
  • OLTCA Applied Research Committee
  • Family representative Ms. Krystyna Schmidt
  • Participating LTC Facilities
  • Research Team
  • Nina Mafrici, Julie Andrassy, Joanna Dionne,
    Hannah Gao, Xiao Jin Chen, Yannie Aass
  • Thecla Damianakis, PhD, MSW

3
Background
  • Falls are the most frequently reported adverse
    incident in LTC settings
  • Approximately 50 of residents fall each year
  • Numerous studies have addressed falls in LTC,
    very few have focused on the processes of
    identification, implementation, and communication
    regarding the management of falls

4
Research Questions
  • What fall risk factors are identified by nursing
    staff and which factors result in associated
    interventions documented on the fall risk care
    plan?
  • What fall prevention strategies are listed in the
    fall risk care plan and are these interventions
    correctly implemented into actual practice?
  • How is care plan information regarding falls
    communicated and implemented to the health care
    team?

5
Methodology
  • Descriptive correlational design in 8 randomly
    selected homes in and around central Ontario
    (gt100 beds)
  • Range 120-170 avg. monthly census
  • Data collection
  • Monthly incident report review
  • Medical record review
  • Quarterly rounds to examine care plan
    interventions
  • Focus groups

6
Resident Demographics
  • N 635
  • Average age 82.27years (10.22SD)
  • Average Length of stay 28 months
  • Female 67
  • Risk factors
  • Fall history 66 Dizziness 14
  • Wandering 26 Anxiolytic 32
  • Antidepressants 44 Restraint 6

7
Falls
  • 1901 Total Reported Falls among the 8 facilities
    over 1 year period
  • Average 20 falls per facility/per month
  • Range 6 - 37
  • Average 3 falls per faller/per year
  • Range 1 - 35

8
Care Plan/Medical Record Review
  • Risk Factor
  • Medical Problems
  • Mobility Problems
  • Footcare Problems
  • Urinary/Bowel Incontinence
  • Vision Problems
  • Unsafe Behaviours
  • Psychological condition
  • Environmental/external
  • hazard
  • Medications
  • Example
  • Stroke/TIA
  • Gait dysfunction
  • Neuropathy
  • Nocturia
  • Glaucoma
  • Combativeness
  • Depression
  • Cluttered room
  • Antidepressant

9
Results Medical Record Review
  • Risk Factor
  • Medical Problems
  • Mobility Problems
  • Footcare Problems
  • Urinary/Bowel Incontinence
  • Vision Problems
  • Unsafe Behaviours
  • Psychological Condition
  • Environmental
  • Medications
  • Identified / Follow-up
  • 86 / 41
  • 88 / 73
  • 11 / 54
  • 74 / 15
  • 51 / 14
  • 43 / 60
  • 76 / 58
  • 3 / 21
  • 67 / 6

10
Quarterly Environmental Rounds
  • N 1517 observations
  • Observations focused on risk factors
  • Mobility, unsafe behaviours, vision, environment,
    incontinence, etc.
  • Overall 66 adherence to care plan interventions

11
Rounds Adherence
  • Mobility (e.g., proper footwear) 64
  • Unsafe behaviours (e.g., bed alarm, call bell,
    bed in lowest position) 57
  • Vision (e.g., glasses clean and on while out of
    bed) 60
  • Environmental (e.g., common items within reach)
    80
  • No Falls Risk Care Plan n104

12
Facility Policies
  • Admission policy (n6 facilities)
  • Risk level (e.g., high) (n2)
  • Staff education (n3)
  • Prevention program reviews (n3)
  • Medication reviews (n6)
  • Interdisciplinary participation/communication
    (n3)
  • Post fall policy (n8)
  • Immediate evaluation (n8)
  • Contact family member (n7)
  • Facility fall committee (n5)
  • Explicit QI Program (n2)

13
Fall Risk Assessment
  • Fall history (n8)
  • Secondary diagnosis (n7)
  • Ambulatory aid (n4)
  • Gait/Balance (n8)
  • Mental status (n6)
  • Medications (n7)
  • Continence (n6)
  • Sensory impairment (n5)
  • Orthostasis (n1)

14
Focus Group Design Selection
  • 8 focus groups in 4 randomly selected LTC
    facilities
  • 1 RN/RPN and 1 PSW/HCA group per facility
  • 21 RNs and RPNs
  • 21 PSWs HCAs
  • Purposive sampling
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Informed consent

15
Method Focus Group Demographics
  • Sex
  • 35 female 5 male
  • Ages
  • 17 26-35 years
  • 17 36-45 years
  • 24 46-55 years
  • 12 gt 56 years
  • 30 Preferred not to respond
  • Type of Position
  • 11 (27) Registered Nurses (RNs)
  • 9 (22) Registered Practical Nurses (RPNs)
  • 21 (51) Personal Support Workers (PSWs)
  • Time Working in Current Job
  • 15 lt 1 year
  • 34 1 to 5 years
  • 20 6 to 10 years
  • 10 11 to 15 years
  • 5 16 to 20 years
  • 16 21 years or gt
  • Highest Level of Education
  • 20 High school diploma
  • 39 Associate degree/diploma in nursing
  • 32 Some college or university
  • 9 Preferred not to respond

16
Method Data Collection
  • Semi-Structured Interview Format
  • 30 min per focus group
  • Audiotaped Transcribed
  • Facilitator and Recorder
  • Interview Guide
  • Falls Risk Identification Assessing High Risk
    Residents
  • Post Fall Reporting Procedures
  • Communication Processes
  • Falls Quality Improvement and Prevention
    Strategies

17
Method Data Analysis
  • Data Analysis
  • Open and hierarchical coding
  • Within and cross-case analysis
  • Thematic analysis
  • Observational recordings
  • Interrater reliability of coding and analysis
    with research team triangulation thick
    description

18
OVERALL Perceptions
  • Falls monitoring and incident reporting good
    overall
  • Good communication RNs PSWs
  • Teamwork is important
  • Staff shortages
  • Multiple barriers

19
Fall Risk Identification High Risk Resident
  • Variation in meaning of High Risk Resident
    across locations and sample groups
  • Some falls considered non-preventable
    (inevitable) and others preventable
  • Prioritize Seriousness of Falls

20
RNs PSWs
Assessing High Risk Residents
  • CCAC report
  • Visual
  • Physiotherapy
  • Nurses
  • Identifiers
  • bracelets bed alarms, signs
  • Information from families
  • RN Report(s)
  • primarily verbal
  • Visual
  • Physiotherapy
  • Identifiers
  • bracelets bed alarms, signs


21
Falls Risk Identification How do you know
which of your residents are at high risk for
falling?
  • RN sometimes we have some information from the
    previous place, but its not always correct and
    we cant rely on that, so the best thing is to
    have our own assessment.
  • PSW I believewe have new metal id
    braceletssome of them are colour codedred,
    blue, green, blah, blah, blahbut I cant
    remember the one thats has a history of falls.

22
Post Fall Reporting Procedures
  • Limitations Noted
  • Lack of communication b/w licensed and
    non-licensed staff contributes to poor incident
    reporting
  • Lack of knowledge of inexperienced staff

23
Post Fall Reporting Procedures How are you
informed that the fall has occurred, and how is
this information communicated to other staff
members working on the following shift?
  • RN I do a reporta written report at the end of
    the shift, and that report goes down to
    management.And then we report at the end of the
    shift to the next shift coming on.
  • RN Pretty good here. They (PSWs) let us know
    whatever they discover, anythingif there is
    anything new with the resident.anything
    unusualtheir walking patterns, or if they get
    drowsy or somethingthey let us know.

24
Post Fall Reporting Procedures How is the
fall incident communicated to family members?
  • PSW Whomever is in charge on the floor.
    Automaticallyit doesnt matter what time of day.
  • RN Usually the person whose filling out the
    report, or the registered staff.always
    registered staff.
  • RN It depends on when they fall tooif its late
    at night they put it on the report for the next
    shift.the day shift to call the family.

25
Post Fall Reporting Procedures How are you
informed of any changes in the residents Care
Plan following his/her fall?
  • RN Well, they (PSWs) read the care plan.
  • - F And how often do they read it?
  • - RNC They dont (with a chuckle)
  • RN you go to the person right away, the person
    who is taking care of the person, like the PSW
    whose taking care of them, and you let them know
    the changes and its in the daily report as
    well.

26
Post Fall Reporting Procedures Do you have
any concerns when it comes to reporting when a
fall occurs on your unit? 
  • RN Id like them in a more timely manner not
    three hours after the fall dont tell me at like
    11 oclock when Im trying to close my shift off,
    that oh, so-and-so fell at 7 oclock and I
    wasnt even aware of it to do the incident
    report.(in a mocking voice) oh I forgot to tell
    you three hours ago that the person fell, and
    they might have hit their head even?!
  • PSW It comes back to the same thing about the
    knowledgeyou go to report it and the
    nurseuhwhateverthe nurse will turn around and
    say oh well, you know, you should have done
    this, you should have done thatyou should have
    knownBut if the knowledge isnt there, then how
    wouldve know? So shes getting upset because a
    certain person isnt doing something right, but
    they werent taught the right way, so if they
    dont have the knowledge, were still going to
    have falls.
  • PSW I think, in general, the staff in this
    facility take a lot to prevent falls from
    happening on the units.

27
Communication Processes
Registered Staff
Administrators Directors of Care
Health Care- Interdisciplinary Professionals
Personal Support Workers
Families
28
Communication Processes
  • At Risk Identification Post Fall Recording
  • Direct and indirect
  • Verbal and written
  • Quality of relationship important non-punitive
    trusting safe

29
Communication Gaps
  • Post-Fall Reporting
  • Not witnessed resident gets up on their own
  • Not reported at the time but reported afterwards
    if there are visible signs (e.g., bruising)
  • Like if we are washing the residentsthen we
    have to lookif we locate anything or see
    anything, we have toit gets documented right
    away (PSW)
  • Near-misses not identified

30
Barriers Preventing Falls or Implementing
Interventions
  • Staff (RNs and PSWs) acknowledge multiple
    factors which contribute to falls
  • Despite lack of both formal and informal
    discussion on falls, seen as important
  • Discrepancy in falls quality improvement actions
    among units at the facilities
  • Interventions toward fall quality improvement
    tend toward retroactive not preventative
    strategies
  • Infrequent in-service training

31
What barriers do you face in preventing falls or
carrying out specific interventions on your unit?
  • PSW I think knowledgenot to say that we dont
    have the knowledge, but we could always use more
    knowledge. Because falls is not somethingwe talk
    about all the time unless it happens.
  • RN the PSW has eight or ten residents to look
    after, and when they are busy with one, of
    course, anything can happen with another, and
    they cant be there every single minute.
  • PSW some of the barrier, I think would be the
    family members.
  • PSW Its like too longsometimes they need a
    proper wheelchairwaiting for monthsOh months!
    How long?!! Six months already and we never get
    it.

32
Do you have meetings to discuss falls on your
unit?
  • PSW We have one inservice two times a yearif
    residents are falling.
  • PSW SoIve never had one (referring to meeting
    about falls).. And I worked on there for a year,
    and weve never had one.
  • RN inservice, we had one last year, regarding
    falls and these similarsituations
  • RN If there is an increasein the number of
    falls and if a resident would have fallenwe
    discuss whats going on, and what we can do.

33
Barriers to Falls Prevention
  • 1. Family Non-Compliance
  • Resident footwear
  • 2. Lack of Staff
  • Staff-resident ratio
  • Limited time to monitor
  • 3. Lack of Resident Stimulation
  • Lack Quality of Planned Activities
  • Resident Boredom
  • 4. Cognitive Impairment
  • Instability Aggression
  • 5. Medications
  • Agitation, Weakness

Resident Falls
34
Barriers to Falls Prevention
  • 6. Lack of Education-Staff Training
  • Infrequent in-service training
  • 7. Restraint Policies
  • Pose ethical tensions for staff
  • Self-determination vs. safety
  • Families lack of understanding
  • 8. Proper Equipment
  • Delays in getting equipment
  • 9. Environmental Conditions
  • Physical-on floor obstructions

Resident Falls
35
Falls Quality Improvement What is the most
pressing issue that needs to be addressed when it
comes to residents falling?
  • RN Well, staffing issues becauseright nowI
    think there is one lady upstairs and shes out of
    the chair six times an hourand Ive got two
    staff members and thats been taking them away
    from their normal duties.and theyre getting
    stressed out.
  • PSW or guilt.because, you know, mom used to be
    up and down here and there, and you know,
    ummthey dont want to have mom restrainedthey
    dont accept that mom is not as strong
    anymoremom is weaker and potential for falls is
    there. So, theyre majorI find the major concern
    is the family members and falls
  • RN ..when you have to prevent a fall, you have
    to put every nurse in every roomand this is
    twenty or thirty roomswe have nobody. It is very
    difficult, especially at night.

36
Deliverables
  • Website live in April 2007
  • www.fallsinltc.ca
  • OLTCA, ALTCA, Manitoba LTC Assn (Spring 2007)
  • LTC magazine article June 2007
  • Communicating with Families about Falls

37
Key Messages
  • Implications for
  • Practice-
  • Education-
  • Management-
  • Research-
  • Policy-

38
Implications for Policy, Clinical Practice and
Research
  • Policy Administration
  • Need for more staff
  • Increase in-service training
  • Focus on prevention not only incident reporting
  • Encourage non-punitive reporting
  • Ensure quality programming which facilitates
    resident N
  • stimulation and activities decreases boredom
  • Establish an interdisciplinary approach with
    families to
  • provide education and facilitate understanding
    of care
  • procedures
  • Environmental impact geriatricproof to
    minimize impact
  • of falls provide frequent audits

39
Implications for Policy, Clinical Practice and
Research (contd)
  • Clinical Training Practice
  • Standardized Assessment Tools
  • In-service
  • Common meanings of high-risk resident
  • Restraint procedures, including policies (e.g.,
    least restraint)
  • Dealing with ethical challenges
  • Standardize knowledge across floors
  • Communication frameworks which focus on quality
    of interaction and promote teamwork
  • Includes families

40
Implications for Policy, Clinical Practice and
Research (contd)
  • Future Research
  • Develop valid and reliable fall risk assessment
    tools
  • Point-of-care approaches to improve communication
    of care plan interventions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com