Challenges and Opportunities of Education Reforms: the case of Russia Dr. Yaroslav Kuzminov, Rector - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Challenges and Opportunities of Education Reforms: the case of Russia Dr. Yaroslav Kuzminov, Rector

Description:

13% -- Bachelors in engineering. 23% -- executive qualifications ... A new stage of development will also require changes to the organisational ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Pika5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Challenges and Opportunities of Education Reforms: the case of Russia Dr. Yaroslav Kuzminov, Rector


1
Challenges and Opportunities of Education
Reforms the case of Russia  Dr. Yaroslav
Kuzminov, Rector State University Higher
School of Economics MoscowRussia
2
Challenges and Opportunities of Education
Reforms the case of Russia(Presentation
content)
  • I Challenges facing Tertiary Education System in
    Russia
  • II Opportunities
  • Development scenarios (inertia-based and reform
    based) for Russian education up to 2010
  • III Institutional level example the SU-HSEs
    Quality Strategy

3
Main Challenges facing Tertiary Education in
Russia
  • Systemic distortion
  • Inadequate Financing
  • Distorted demand motivations
  • Inequality of opportunities in education
  • Declining research activities of universities

4
Systemic distortion
  • The system is closed to external influences
    maintaining the Soviet tradition of training
    specialists of narrow qualifications in higher
    education.
  • The tradition existed in a situation of
    100-percent government contract for specialists
    education, with a majority of graduates being
    committed to work for a three years period in a
    job specified by the government.
  • In the modern market environment when graduates
    have to look for a job which is no longer there
    for them, it will be often impossible to find an
    employment matching specific and sometimes
    outdated qualifications.

5
Inadequate Financing Expenditures on education
per one pupil (student) (in thousands of US
dollars on the parity purchasing power of the
national currencies).
Canada
USA
France
UK
Russia
Including family expenses
6
Distorted demand motivations Why do Russians
choose higher education?
  • Alternative costs of continuing education are
    relatively low.
  • Ineffectiveness of alternative paths such as
    vocational school employment technical college
    university employment, etc.
  • Military conscription.
  • Higher education becoming the necessary element
    of social success for the majority of the
    population as a result of the above.

7
Distorted demand motivations
  • Aims of obtaining higher education.

To make more money To know more, to obtain
special knowledge To occupy a higher social
status To have an interesting job To develop
comprehensive intellectual potential To enjoy
peoples respect It is common To avoid army
service To spend youth enjoyably Do not think it
necessary to get higher education Have nothing to
say
8
Distorted demand motivations Higher education
deformation of choice
  • More than 60 of HEI students expect to get
    GENERAL HIGHER EDUCATION.
  • More than 20 of HEI students agree to get just A
    TITLE (not knowledge and skills) of HEI graduate.

9
Distorted demand motivations Correlation between
the number of graduates and demand for them
without account for specific qualifications
  • Shares of graduates from different levels of
    education system
  • 45 -- HEIs.
  • 15 -- Technical Colleges.
  • 30 -- Vocational Schools.
  • 10 -- General and compulsory schools.
  • Demands of the labor market
  • 30 -- HEIs.
  • 25 -- Technical Colleges
  • 35 -- Vocational Schools
  • 10 -- no qualification.

10
Inequality of opportunities in education Family
expenses on education areas of ineffectiveness
  • Funds reaching the education system (white
    flows)
  • Official tuition fees
  • Repairs, security, stationery, books, equipment,
    photocopying.
  • Official extra-curricula classes
  • Official fee for tutoring for entrance exams to
    the next education stage
  • Mock tests
  • Paid entrance exams, paid assistance with
    documentation and medical commission
  • Sight-seeing tours, hiking tours, holiday events
  • Donations to school and class funds
  • Organized catering
  • Hostel rent
  • Funds not reaching education system (shadow
    flows)
  • Remuneration to private tutors
  • Bribes, gifts, unofficial payments for special
    preferences, scores, enrollment in a particular
    institution, etc.
  • Payments to external people for writing course
    papers and diploma projects
  • Private accommodation
  • Other types of expenses

11
Inequality of opportunities in education
Ineffective management of HEIs
  • Federal budget financing of HEIs is not
    performance based
  • Consumers of education are not informed about
    comparative quality of educational programs.
    These assessments are simply not carried out
  • The HE entry system does not guarantee the
    selection of the most talented individuals
  • Equity barriers as a result of restrictions
  • Forced acquisition of money at the expense of
    acquisition of talent.
  • Resistance to transparency and reforms of the
    entry system

12
Declining research activities of universities
  • Universities research is the basis of
    innovational potential for social and economic
    development
  • 80 of higher education curricular is not based
    on researches conducted within given institution.
  • Financing of institutions
  • R D amounts to 10 a month per professor.
  • Organizational structure gap between science and
    education.

13
Basic conclusions
  • Russian people are strongly oriented towards
    obtaining higher education and are ready to pay
    considerable sums of money for that purpose.
  • The structure of education does not correspond to
    the requirements of the labor market. The
    phenomenon of the general higher education
    disguised as professional education becomes
    increasingly apparent.
  • There is no more truly free of fees education in
    Russia. Only in primary professional education
    the share of family expenses can be regarded as
    not significant.
  • Shadow (ineffectual) expenses make up to a half
    of family expenses.
  • The majority of those employed in education have
    unreasonably low incomes even with account of
    additional and unofficial incomes. This creates
    favorable conditions for the spread of
    corruption.
  • On the whole educational institutions display
    rather high level of market adaptability, quickly
    filling in any obvious market niche.
  • Managers of education institutions are oriented
    towards a constant growth of solvent demand for
    education and are not interested in taking
    measures to reduce ineffectual education
    programs.

14
Inertia-based and Reform-based Development
Scenarios for Russian education up to 2010
15
Development scenarios In view of the above
problems, the education system in Russia should
be reformed to achieve the following objectives
  • Focusing the education system on social and
    economic needs of society
  • Rebuilding the innovation potential of
    universities
  • Ensuring minimum financing required to reproduce
    and upgrade curricula
  • Encouraging teachers to carry out research.

16
Development scenarios Basic prerequisites for
the forecast
  • High rate of economic growth (about 7).
  • Maintaining of the consolidated budget
    expenditures on education remain at the level of
    3.8 of the GDP.
  • Maintaining the structure of the education
    expenditures of the consolidated budget.
  • Growth of family expenses on education per
    student at the same rate as the family income.
    Continuing tendency for forestalling growth of
    the family income in relation to the GDP.
  • Maintaining the current studentship structure by
    the age group.

17
Inertia-based development scenario Correlation
between the number of graduates and demand
without account of definite qualifications in
2010
  • Graduation per education system
  • 60 -- higher education.
  • 13 -- technical colleges.
  • 18 -- vocational schools.
  • 9 -- no specific qualifications.
  • Requirements of the labor market
  • 35 -- higher education.
  • 30 -- technical colleges.
  • 27 -- vocational schools.
  • 8 -- unqualified labor.

18
Reform-based development scenario Correlation
between the number of graduates and demand in
2010
  • Graduation per education system
  • 6.5 -- Masters degree
  • 6.5 -- MBA
  • 21 -- Specialists with higher professional
    education
  • 21 -- Bachelors in academic fields
  • 13 -- Bachelors in engineering
  • 23 -- executive qualifications
  • 9 -- no specific qualifications
  • Requirements of the labor market
  • 4-6 -- Masters degrees (analysts, researchers)
  • 5 -- MBA (business managers)
  • 20 -- specialists-practitioners with high
    qualifications
  • 20-30 -- open qualifications
  • 20-30 -- managers and executives with high
    qualifications
  • 20-30 -- executive qualifications
  • 10 -- unqualified labor

19
Development scenarios State budget and family
expenditures per student
Forecast for 2010
2010 inertial
2010 reformation
2003
20
Development scenarios Financing system for
higher education
  • A proposed one
  • Federal budget financing on the basis of results
    of the Unified National Test and Olympiads.
  • Competitive financing and co-financing within the
    framework of the target federal programs.
  • Social and academic scholarships from the federal
    budget.
  • Contract payments for education services
    (including education loans).
  • Additional state investments for cost consuming
    education programs (engineering, natural
    sciences, medicine.)
  • Subsidies and subventions to train specialists
    for the state and municipal institutions.
  • Medium-term programs of developing educational
    institutions.
  • An acting one
  • Budget funding of educational institutions.
  • Competitive financing within the framework of
    targeted federal programs.
  • Social and academic scholarships from the federal
    budget.
  • Contract payments for education services.

21
Development scenarios Development programs for
educational institutions
  • Medium-term development programs
  • Research activity.
  • Educational programs.
  • Marketing and financing.
  • Personnel.
  • Material and technical infrastructure.
  • Informational infrastructure.
  • Grant approach to the distribution of resources,
    mutual liabilities and the responsibilities of
    the grant-givers and grant-receivers.
  • This approach may be implemented after
    appropriate amendments to the Budget Code of the
    Russian Federation are made.

22
Development scenarios The structure of the
higher and technical college education
years
Current model
New model
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Technical college
Engineering Bachelor program
Specialists
Bachelors degree
Bachelors degree
Specialists
Masters degree
Masters degree
23
Development scenarios Integration of science
and education
  • Development of effective management of researches
  • Research universities.
  • Permanently-based university chairs at research
    institutes and permanently-based laboratories of
    research institutes at higher education
    institutions.
  • Centers of excellence.
  • Science and education centers.
  • Increasing the effectiveness of budget spending
  • Restructuring the science budget in favor of
    project and grant financing.
  • Articulation of priorities
  • Long-term financing of projects.
  • Transition to large-scale complex projects.
  • Introducing the assessment of the process and
    projects outcomes.

24
Development scenarios Integration of science
and education
  • Eliminating of administrative and legal barriers
  • No state accreditation for academic institutions
  • Legal recognition of state contracts on RD
    projects as income from commercial activities.
  • Wages and social guarantees for academic staff of
    higher educational institutions.
  • Attracting and retaining talented young people in
    science and education
  • Enhancing prestige.
  • Considerable 5-years grants for young scientists.
  • Adequate research equipment.
  • Supporting the commercialization of research and
    development projects
  • Intellectual property rights transfer
    institutions.
  • Support for small startup firms and centers for
    technology transfer.
  • Assistance in the export of scientific research
    and education services.

25
Development scenarios Governmental Individual
Financial Obligations (GIFO)
  • are based on the principle funding depends on
    the students performance
  • provide shared responsibility for education
  • cover expenses of educational institutions for
    maintaining the educational process (up to 77 of
    the existing budget financing.)
  • pursue the state policy of influencing the HR
    capacity building in higher education
    institutions.
  • stimulate the higher education institutions to
    train students in socially significant and
    strategically required professions.
  • are combined with additional state subsidies for
    cost consuming education programs (engineering
    and natural sciences coefficient 1.2 medicine
    coefficient 1.35.)
  • are accompanied by additional state investments
    into the leading universities.

26
Conclusions
  • Reform-based scenario provides
  • Transition to multilevel structure of higher
    education results in greater compliance of
    graduates structures to the labor marker needs
  • Introduction of a flexible and diversified
    financing mechanisms ensures creation of a higher
    education system adequate to challenges of the
    new economy

27
Institutional level example the SU-HSEs Quality
Strategy
  • www.hse.ru

28
HSE mission in the professional community
  • Quality improvement and dissemination of
    international standards in education programs.
  • Retraining teachers and professors and
    advancement of social and economic sciences.

Retraining programs
Excellence centers
  • Training of professionals for state
    administration and business.

29
Addressing Financing and Governance Problems in
the SU-HSEs Quality Strategy Concept of the
university development provides for a number of
measures aimed at achieving financial
sustainability
  • -  attracting additional federal budget funds
    under the SU-HSE Development Programme
  • -  interaction with the business community to
    finance specific academic and research projects
  • - designing and introduction of a system of
    incentives for employees to seek funds

30
Institutional level example the SU-HSEs Quality
Strategy Some other measures aimed at
achieving financial sustainability
  • creation of a system of ongoing monitoring and
    long-term forecasting of the market for
    educational services maintaining a balance
    between increase in enrolment of
    students/postgraduates and price increase with
    account of the demand for high-quality education
  • -   expanding enrolment of students to continuous
    professional education programmes
  • -   introducing a costs monitoring system of
    continuous education programmes for timely
    decision-making on their viability, and enhancing
    control over administrative costs
  • -  accumulating extrabudgetary and development
    funds to compensate for market-induced
    fluctuations in revenues.

31
Institutional level example the SU-HSEs Quality
Strategy A new stage of development will also
require changes to the organisational structure
and managing system of the university, including
  • -   attraction and retaining of professional
    managers in functional positions while
    maintaining the key (policy-making) managerial
    positions in the hands of the academic community
  • -  enhancement of the role of academic councils,
    Collegium of Professors and student governments
  • -   expanding of the autonomy of departments
    while assigning them a considerable number of
    financial, economic and organisational functions,
    and enhancing responsibility for decision-making.

32
success of any programme depends on dedication
and engagement of all stakeholders, desire and
ability of everyone to lead changes in his or her
area of responsibility. We know our community
and we are confident of success .
  • Thank you for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com