Test & Evaluation/Science &Technology Net-Centric Systems Test (NST) Focus Area Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Test & Evaluation/Science &Technology Net-Centric Systems Test (NST) Focus Area Overview

Description:

Test & Evaluation/Science &Technology Net-Centric Systems Test (NST) Focus Area Overview NAVAIR Pt. Mugu Executing Agent Gil Torres * * * * * * * * * * * Technology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: csseUscE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Test & Evaluation/Science &Technology Net-Centric Systems Test (NST) Focus Area Overview


1
Test Evaluation/Science TechnologyNet-Centric
Systems Test (NST)Focus AreaOverview
  • NAVAIR Pt. Mugu
  • Executing Agent

Gil Torres
2
TE/ST Program Overview
  • The TE/ST program
  • Exploits new technologies and processes to meet
    important TE requirements
  • Expedites the transition of new technologies from
    the laboratory environment to the TE community.
  • Leverages commercial equipment, modeling and
    simulation, and networking innovations to support
    TE
  • Examines emerging requirements derived from joint
    service initiatives
  • Identifies needed technology areas and develops a
    long-range roadmap for technology insertion
  • Leverages research efforts from the highly
    developed technology base in the DoD labs, test
    centers, other government agencies, industry, and
    academia

3
TRMC OrganizationOSD Test Resource Management
Center
Director
Deputy Director Joint Investment, Policy,
Planning
Deputy Director Strategic Planning
Deputy Director Budget Resources
Policy
CTEIP Program
JMETC
ST Program
4
Net-Centric Systems Test (NST) Focus Area
Overview
5
NST Vision
Accelerate the delivery of Mission Ready
Net-Centric capabilities to the warfighter
Net-Centric
Tomorrows Plug Test Net-Centric Environment
Todays Netcentric Environment
  • Stove-Piped Information
  • Centralized Control
  • Unique Software Solutions
  • Data Not Shared
  • Inefficiency
  • Net-Centricity
  • Decentralized Control
  • Enterprise Services
  • Shared Data
  • Autonomous Agent
  • Enterprise Architecture
  • Web 2.0

NST PortfolioNST TE Advanced Technologies/Capabi
lities
Broad Agency Announcement
NST TE Needs Technology Gaps
6
NST TE Needs(1 of 2)
  • Recreate the Net-Centric Test Battlespace
  • Emulate tactical edges
  • Test mission threads with limited participants
  • Integration/Responsiveness of Virtual Component
    with Live Component
  • Integration of Cyber/Information Operations with
    Kinetic Simulations
  • Representation of the Network Infrastructure and
    Network Environment
  • Representation of Cyber threat to NSUT
  • Simulate/Stimulate Irregular Warfare for urban
    environment
  • Verification Validation (VV) of the Synthetic
    Battle Environment (SBE)

7
NST TE Needs(2 of 2)
  • Measure Analyze Net-Centric Test Environment
  • Monitor/Analyze Critical Chaining Issues
  • Improving Near Real Time Analysis
  • Improve Instrumentation Analyzing Cyber/IO
  • Manage Net-Centric Test Battlespace
  • Quality of Service to Critical Nodes
  • Synchronize Synthetic Environments
  • Manage Test Environment for Net Based Systems
  • Manage Tactically Dynamically Configured Networks

8
NST ChallengesTechnologies to. . . .
  • Recreate Net-Centric Test Battlespace
  • Flexible, Scalable LVC Environment For JMe
    Testing
  • GIG SOA Sim / Stim Capabilities
  • Integrate Validate Net-Centric Simulations
    SoS
  • Emulate Red Cyber Warfare Capabilities
  • Automate C2 Decision Process
  • Measure Analyze Net-Centric Test Environment
  • Analyze Joint Mission Threads Near Real-Time
  • Evaluate Net-Centric Data Services
  • Automated NR-KPP Analysis
  • Measure Joint Mission Effectiveness (JMe)
  • Analyze Visualize Information Assurance
    Operations
  • Manage Net-Centric Test Battlespace
  • Dynamically Manage Test Infrastructure
  • Automated Planning and Scenario Development
  • Cross Domain Solution Over Distributed Test
    Infrastructure

9
NST Roadmap Recreate the Net-Centric Test
Battlespace
TE/ST Investments
NE2S Network Effects Emulator System TRCE
TENA in a Resource Constrained Environment
  • Emulate Tactical Edges
  • Test Mission Thread w/Limited Participants
  • Technologies to VV NST Env.
  • Integration/Responsiveness of VC with
    Theatre/Live Component
  • Representation of Cyber Threat to NSUT
  • Sim/Stim Irregular Warfare
  • Representation of Network Infrastructure and Env.

NE2S
  • Integrate Internet into Family of Tested Nets

TRCE
  • Integrate IO with Kinetic Sims

Challenges
Emulate Red Cyber Warfare Capabilities
Flexible, Scalable LVC Environment For JMe Testing
Integrate Validate Netcentric Simulations SoS
Automate C2 Decision Process
GIG SOA Sim / Stim Capabilities
TE Capability
Recreate the Net-Centric Test Battlespace
10
NST Roadmap Measure and Analyze the Net-Centric
Test Environment
TE/ST Investments
NECM NST Evaluation Capability Module NEIV
Net-Centric Environment Instrumentation
Visualization NSAT NR-KPP Solution Architecture
Toolset
NECM
NEIV
NSAT
  • Monitor/Analyze Critical Chaining Issues
  • Improving Near Real Time Analysis
  • Analyze impact of Cyber and IO

Challenges
Analyze Joint Mission Threads Near Real-Time
Measure Joint Mission Effectiveness (JMe)
Evaluate Netcentric Data Services
Analyze Visualize Information Assurance
Operations
Automated NR-KPP Analysis
TE Capability
Measure and Analyze the Net-Centric Test Env.
11
NST Roadmap Manage the Net-Centric Test
Battlespace
TE/ST Investments
MENSA Middleware Enhancements for Net-Centric
Simulation Architecture ANSC Analyzer for NST
Confederations MLSCLS Multi-Level Security
Cross Layer Scheme PAM Policy Based Adaptive
Network Management RRM Rapid Reconfiguration
Module
MENSA
ANSC
MLSCLS
  • Synch Synthetic Environments

PAM
  • Manage Test Env. For Net-based systems

RRM
  • Manage Tactically Dynamic Configured Networks
  • QoS to Critical Nodes

Challenges
Dynamically Manage Test Infrastructure
Cross Domain Solution Over Distributed Test
Infrastructure
Automated Planning and Scenario Development
TE Capability
Manage the Net-Centric Test Battlespace
12
TE/ST Project Critical Factors
  • TE Need (Gaps)
  • Address a known TE technological gap.
  • Understanding of the current TE capabilities and
    techniques
  • Understand capabilities and techniques for the
    future of TE
  • ST Challenge
  • What needs to be done to effectively address the
    TE Need
  • Efficiencies and test capacity improvements as a
    result of the technology developed or matured
  • Results of project will significantly advance
    technology and thereby significantly enhance
    current test capabilities
  • High Risk-High Payoff
  • The project improves testing rigor and
    capabilities relevant to Net-Centric technology
    improvements
  • Reduces the cost of government operations
  • Provides an improved capability to test operators

13
TE/ST Project Critical Factors
  • Wide Application
  • The technology can be applied at multiple sites,
    on multiple systems, in multiple organizations
    simultaneously
  • The technology effectively supports a distributed
    LVC Net-Centric test event
  • Transition Strategy
  • Identify potential partners, future consumers of
    the technology (government lab, agency, test
    activity, industry, etc).
  • Identify the intended use of the technology, and
    a plan to obtain buy-in to the technology from
    potential transition partners
  • Demonstrate a concise and sensible plan that will
    create a higher probability of a successful
    transition to the identified transition partners

14
Project Execution Plan (PEP)
  • PEP required contents
  • Purpose and Work Scope
  • TE Needs
  • ST Challenges
  • Technology Readiness Levels
  • Budget
  • Project Schedule
  • Project Specifications
  • Phase Exit Criteria
  • Project Transition
  • List of Deliverables

15
Project Specifications
16
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (1 of 7)
17
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (2 of 7)
18
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (3 of 7)
19
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (4 of 7)
20
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (5 of 7)
21
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (6 of 7)
22
Netcentric Systems Test Technology Investments
Transitions (7 of 7)
23
Questions?
24
T-E Web Monthly Reports
  • Monthly reporting timeliness is critical
  • Timeliness of report submission is important to
    effectively communicate project status
  • Submission to Deputy EA required by the 5th of
    the month for prior month
  • Content
  • Executive Summary of the project
  • Funding OE
  • Activities for the month just completed
  • Significant accomplishments
  • Planned efforts for the next month
  • Problems/Issues
  • Brief explanation on use of funds

25
FAM Monthly Reports
  • Focus Area Monthly (FAM) reports
  • EA required to submit to PMO on the last Friday
    of each month
  • Highlight significant (positive and negative)
    events or issues in projects
  • Not a substitute for more timely notification to
    PMO of highly significant issues or events
  • Issues requiring immediate action
  • Events that could result in bad press
  • FAM reports are now auto-generated from T-E Web,
    so significant accomplishments and issues are
    very important to report each month

Keep the Focus Area Monthly Reports simpleno
lengthy description of normal, scheduled
activitiesjust good news and problems
26
Back-Up Slides
27
Weekly Activity Reports
  • Due to EA every Wednesday by noon Pacific Time
  • Sample Content
  • Netcentric Systems Test (NST) NST Evaluation
    Capability Module (NECM) The NECM project is
    developing an automated object-relationship graph
    algorithm . . . .
  • This technology will automate the arrangement of
    operational activities, control logic, sequence
    flows, and . . .
  • This algorithm enables improved user interaction
    to create a. . .
  • During the week of 11 January 2010, the NECM team
    implemented an initial Joint Personnel Recovery
    (JPR) joint mission thread (JMT). . .
  • The future efforts will include. . .
  • Status/Assessment Green Early engagement of
    transition partners to define appropriate use
    case to verify useful test technologies, and
    project is operating on schedule and on budget.

28
TE/ST Program Roles and Responsibilities
  • TE/ST Program Manager
  • Provides guidance to focus areas to ensure
    disciplined project selection and funding process
  • Provides program funds for administering and
    executing TE/ST Program
  • Reviews technical execution of focus areas and
    projects to ensure TE/ST Program objectives are
    being met
  • Reviews financial execution of focus areas and
    projects to ensure best value and fiscal
    responsibility
  • Provides TESTWeb and the TE/ST Acquisition
    Community Connection (ACC) Special Interest Area
    to support exchange of financial, technical, and
    programmatic information throughout the TE/ST
    Program
  • TE/ST Program Office Staff
  • Supports the TE/ST Program Manager
  • Reviews focus areas and projects to ensure
    technical objectives are being met
  • Reviews focus areas and projects to ensure
    financial objectives are being met
  • Provides recommendations to the TE/ST Program
    Manager on Program related matters
  • Interfaces with EAs, Deputies, WG members and PIs
    on behalf of TE/ST Program Manager as required

29
TE/ST Program Roles and Responsibilities
  • Focus Area Executing Agents
  • Primary point of contact for TE/ST Program
    Office within focus area
  • Maintain awareness of DoD TE needs within focus
    area and technology developments related to focus
    area
  • Actively seek out high payoff TE/ST projects
    that address critical DoD TE needs and mitigate
    identified TE risks
  • Issue Requests for Information (RFIs) and Broad
    Agency Announcements (BAAs) through contractual
    channels
  • Responsible for technical and financial execution
    of projects approved by TE/ST Program Manager
  • Chair for focus area working group (WG) and
    responsible for maintaining Tri-Service WG TE
    and ST representation
  • Coordinate replacements with TE/ST Program
    Manager
  • Responsible for maintaining current project and
    focus area information in TESTWeb and TE/ST ACC
    Special Interest Area

30
TE/ST Program Roles and Responsibilities
  • Focus Area Working Group Members
  • Act as government leads on projects where there
    is no intrinsic government lead
  • Provide coordination of TE/ST projects with
    Service related efforts
  • Identify and prioritize TE needs
  • Support the EA on source selection efforts
  • Review ongoing focus area projects
  • Identify transition opportunities for projects
  • Project Principal Investigators
  • Execute projects approved by TE/ST Program
    Manager
  • Conduct research efforts
  • Provide technical progress reports to EA
  • Identify and actively pursue transition
    opportunities for TE/ST projects
  • Responsible for maintaining accurate financial
    information in TESTWeb

31
TE/ST Program Roles and Responsibilities
  • Government Lead
  • Attend major focus area reviews (when able)
  • Provide guidance to the project to ensure a
    disciplined engineering approach
  • Review technical execution of project to ensure
    NST Program objectives are being met gaps are
    being satisfied
  • Provides quick review of monthly reports to
    ensure accuracy
  • Interfaces with EAs, Deputies, WG members and
    Principle Investigators as required
  • Maintain awareness of identified TE needs within
    the NST focus area and technology developments
    related to focus area
  • Support the EA on source selection efforts
  • Support EA in Identifying transition
    opportunities for project

32
Publications
  • Professional publications are encouraged by the
    TRMC and PMO
  • Provides opportunities for transition of
    technology
  • Raises awareness of TE/ST Program to new
    communities
  • Public Release of Technical Information
  • EAs adhere to local procedures for release of
    technical information in EAs focus area
  • Copies of all technical information to be
    released are to be sent to the TE/ST Principal
    Scientist prior to release
  • Use the ACC Special Interest Area
    https//acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx
  • Include acknowledgement of the TE/ST Program in
    all publications
  • Example The authors would like to thank the
    Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Test and
    Evaluation/Science and Technology
    (TE/ST) Program for their support.  This work
    is funded (or is partially funded) by the TE/ST
    Program through the (Put your organizations name
    here) contract number xxxxxx.

33
Release of Programmatic Information
  • The PMO must review and approve release of
    programmatic information prior to transmission
    outside the program
  • Applies to detailed project status, funding
    levels and execution, schedule, problem areas,
    and potential management issues
  • Also applies to Solicitations (BAAs, PRDAs, RFIs)
  • Not intended to restrict information exchange
    between EAs or core focus area working groups
  • This applies to written and verbal release of
    information
  • For publications, PMO requires a minimum of 10
    days before EAs next suspense on the publication
  • For verbal or email Request for Information, call
    or email PMO for approval before information is
    released
  • Option is to refer requestor to PMO for the
    programmatic information

34
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)
35
TRL (Cont)
36
Definitions
  • Breadboard A breadboard is an experimental
    model composed of representative system
    components used to prove the functional
    feasibility (in the lab) of a device, circuit,
    system, or principle without regard to the final
    configuration or packaging of the parts.
    Breadboard performance may not be representative
    of the final desired system performance, but
    provides an indication that desired performance
    can be achieved.
  • Brassboard A brassboard is a refined
    experimental model that provides system level
    performance in a relevant environment. The
    brassboard should be designed to meet (at a
    minimum) the threshold performance measures for
    the final system.
  • Prototype A prototype is a demonstration system
    that has been built to perform in an operational
    environment. A prototype device meets or exceeds
    all performance measures including size, weight,
    and environmental requirements. This device is
    suitable for complete evaluation of electrical
    and mechanical sub-system form, fit, and function
    design and characterization of the full system
    performance.

37
Accounting Definitions
  • Obligations
  • The amount of an order placed, contract awarded,
    service rendered, or other transaction that
    legally reserves a specified amount of an
    appropriation or fund for expenditure
  • Accruals
  • The costs incurred during a given period
    representing liabilities incurred for goods and
    services received, other assets acquired and
    performance accepted, prior to payment being made
  • Disbursements
  • The charges against available funds representing
    actual payment and evidenced by vouchers, claims,
    or other documents approved by competent
    authority
  • Expenditures
  • The total of disbursements plus accruals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com