Title: NBA 600: Session 3 Strategy and the Internet 28 January 2003
1NBA 600 Session 3Strategy and the Internet
28 January 2003
2Todays Class
- Finish Thursdays discussion on structure of the
Internet - Clarification Internet routers make local
decisions about where to send packets - Packets just have addresses, not active
- Payment models
- Start discussion of Porter-Tapscott debate on
strategy and the Internet - Porter argues the Internet is like any other IT
advance of the past 25 years - Tapscott argues it is a fundamental change, like
electricity or railroads
3Recall Internet Structure
- 1 The Internet is a collection of networks
- Held together by standard protocols (TCP)
- Like road networks
- Local, county, state, national
- Agree on where to connect and how to drive
- 2 Packed switched data
- Information broken up into small packets each
addressed separately to the recipient - Unique addresses IP address
- Like filling up envelopes and sending to same
address - Each is routed separately, reassemble at end
4Payment Structure of the Internet
- End-users pay for bandwidth
- 20/mo 56kb dialup (consumer)
- 40/mo 128kb upstream - 768kb downstream
broadband (consumer) - 900/mo 1.6mb T1 (commercial)
- 40k/mo 155mb OC3 (commercial)
- Commercial users tend make higher use
- Asymmetric broadband market segmentation
- Some leases charge for usage over given level
- Each of these categories generates 100s
millions of monthly revenue
5How Internet is Constructed
- Each network provider (ISP) builds its own
network - Chooses what other network(s) to connect to
- Chooses what traffic to accept from connected
network(s) - Pairwise peering arrangements govern what
inter-network traffic will be carried - Sometimes involves charges, sometimes involves
trades local decisions by two ISPs - Each ISP motivated to provide connectivity needed
by their customers
6Connectivity of Internet and Web
- Evolutionary rather than designed
- Shows many patterns similar to natural or
organic growth phenomena - E.g., neurons, six degrees of Kevin Bacon
- Good routes evolve through needs of end-users
- Any two hosts about 15 hops (degrees) apart
- Aside analogous structure in hyperlinks between
Web pages - This structure is used for search engines, e.g.,
Google
7Geo-Location in Internet
- The cabling and routers (connections) of the
Internet are in physical locations - Often in or near big cities where the traffic is
- These physical locations are not evident in the
IP addressing scheme - Companies sell services that try to determine
geo-location from IP address - For marketing, security, legal and other uses
- Large service providers need to combat physical
location - Packet transit times in the network too slow
- Potential for congestion with single site
8Reflect Conclusions We Can Draw
- Relentless, organic, drive to connectivity
- Services that do not connect to the Internet are
at risk - Case of AOLs free AIM client
- What does this say about text messaging
- Consider Blackberry/RIM or Bloomberg messaging
niche businesses - Global, highly interactive services need multiple
physical locations in the network - Simply slow if interacting users far apart
- Pricing models differentiate consumer and
commercial use
9Porter Strategy and Internet
- Internet has been used as excuse to ignore
strategy yielded bad decisions - Forfeit proprietary advantage by rushing online
- Focus on price rather than quality/features
- Winners will use Internet as complement to, not
cannibal of, traditional competition - Simply another step in IT evolution, like object
oriented programming or relational databases - Internet not necessarily a blessing
- Tends to dampen profitability and have leveling
effect on business practices
10Porter Internet Trends
- Rising power of customers
- Better informed, easier comparison/substitutes
- Lower switching costs, less loyalty
- Real value not just gimmicks
- E.g., Priceline model has limited appeal
- Note PCLN reports selling price as revenue
(about 1B vs. EXPE 750M of commissions) - First-mover not an advantage
- Dis-intermediation not much of a threat
- Enhancing operational effectiveness
- Decrease in communication/coordination costs
11Porter On Business Models
- Destructive way of thinking
- Loose terminology, far cry from creating economic
value - Invitation to faulty thinking and self delusion
- What matters is strategy
- Critical to consider competitive forces and
industry structure - Notions of e-business and e-strategy similarly
problematic - Encourage consideration of Internet in isolation
rather than as complement to existing business
12Tapscott Internet Changes Things
- The Internet provides a fundamental improvement
in communication - Improves outsourcing, contract manufacturing
- Enables true sales partnerships
- Challenges industrial age corporate structure
- Porter takes a truth and misapplies it
- The truth profitability matters
- Not eyeballs, hits, stickiness, etc.
- But does not support false thesis that Internet
is simply another incremental change - Business as usual vertically integrated corp.
13Tapscott Impact of Internet
- An added piece of the wealth creation
infrastructure - Power grid, railroads/highways, telephone
- Now the Internet too
- Internet growing to take over or connect to most
other communication mechanisms - Voice over IP, Internet radio, cell phones
- Distribution of content print, audio, video
- Internet enables new business models
- Strategy has tended to ignore, because
traditionally each industry has a fixed model
14Tapscotts B Webs
- Companies that draw on all resources to create
profitable business - Deep partnerships
- Only possible through Internet communication
- E.g., coordinating joint sales efforts between
two companies - Example of IBM customer relationship management
(CRM) business - Dropped own software, partnered with Siebel and
others joint selling services - Now multi-billion dollar business for IBM
- Also driving hundreds of millions of DB2 sales!
15Analysis of the Debate
- Agree on some terminology
- Strategy being profitable by choosing what to do
and what not to do - Consistent direction not all things to all
people - Based on analyzing structure of industry
- Competitors, suppliers, customers, new entrants,
substitutes - Business model where the revenue is going to
come from - Who will pay, for what, when, why, how much?
- Operations doing better at what doing
- Industry-wide best practices
16What do You Think?
- Have I mis-characterized Porter or Tapscotts
positions? - Missed something important?
- Have they mis-characterized each other?
- Where do they agree more than they might
initially appear to? - Who or what do you think is right?
- What do you think is really going on regarding
strategy and the Internet? - Support arguments with company examples or your
own experience
17Internet Changes Landscape
- Increases need for strategy
- Increases bargaining power of customers
- Can decrease bargaining power of suppliers
- Either lowers or raises switching costs
- Change to substitutes generally easier, except in
industries where network effects - Less clear general effects on barriers to entry
or competitors - Creates need to consider business models
- May enable new sources of revenue or undermine
current sources
18First Mover Myth
- Being there first does not by itself provide much
advantage - E.g., Priceline was early in online travel
- But its model not what people wanted
- Even for business with network effects
- Where customers benefit from a single product or
service (e.g., computer software) - Though eBay has exploited this
- Good strategy and execution what count
- Provide what customer wants, deliver more
effectively
19First Mover Myth Beyond Internet
- Betamax vs. VHS videotape formats
- Huge network effect for rental market
- Started as on-air recording business shifted
- Sonys go-it-alone strategy lost to consortium
- Microsoft repeated dominance
- DOS vs. CPM, Windows vs. Mac or OS/2, IE vs.
Netscape, Excel vs. 123, Word vs. Wordperfect/
Winstar, - HP dominance of laser printer market
- Invented by Xerox but didnt want to undercut
high end printing business
20Internet and Bargaining Power
- Provides vastly improved ability to search and
compare - Uncensored public opinion
- Advertising and product descriptions
- Discounted pricing
- Empowers purchasers
- Both consumers and companies
- Tilts balance so that suppliers become weaker and
customers become stronger - Exceptions where effective monopolies
21Internet and Industry Structure
- Fundamental changes to any content creation or
distribution business - Music, movies, telephone, broadcasting,
- Digital content opens totally new means of
distribution and protection - Technologically possible to control the
experience of the content after purchase - E.g., force watching previews on DVDs
- Experts able to circumvent controls
- Possibility of unfettered illicit copying
- Raging battle over degree of control
22Internet Substitutes
- Newspaper industry major source of revenue is
classifieds (about 20B/yr) - Web provides substitute for classifieds
- Arguably better once credible
- What is happening, where might it end up
- Collectibles already have moved to eBay
- But were low revenue for newspapers
- Employment moving to Monster, Yahoo
- Perhaps not yet replacing, but high revenue risk
- Real estate still strong, but online just
starting - Major revenue source
23Substitutes Online vs. Offline
- Book sales
- Amazon dominates the online market
- Borders strategy is to supplement stores
- Outsourced online sales to Amazon
- Prominent link to stores site
- Provide access to store inventory
- Competitive advantages and disadvantages
- Does attraction of in stock over-ride
disadvantages of out of stock - Barnes and Noble separates businesses
- Only offer online directions and in store returns
24Internet and Outsourcing
- Contract manufacturing
- Has become a large business
- Top 5 over 50B annual revenue
- Requires close interaction, facilitated by
Internet - Outsourcing of operations functions
- Travel, benefits management done on Web
- Joint sales
- IBM has been champion in this regard
- Solutions and business bundles hardware,
software, services - Joint selling with other vendors
25Summing Up
- Importance of Internet to strategy
- Changes to industry structure require strategic
analysis that accounts for effects - Internet does change the rules in many industries
- But primarily changes that are well handled by
strategic analysis - Customers, suppliers, competitors, substitutes,
new entrants - First mover advantage does not exist
- Business models are more important now
26Next Time
- Discuss business models and the Internet
- What business models are, how they are important
- Relationship to strategy
- Clear articulation of industry business model(s)
and potential alternatives - Especially alternatives enabled or facilitated by
Internet - New models are rare, but that doesnt make it any
less important to consider