Razlicita videnja sveta posle Hladnog rata - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Razlicita videnja sveta posle Hladnog rata

Description:

I Medunarodni odnosi posle Hladnog rata kao 'druga i treca era globalizacije' ... Swords can now be beaten into ploughshares; harmony can reign among the states ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:172
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: dragan3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Razlicita videnja sveta posle Hladnog rata


1
Razlicita videnja sveta posle Hladnog rata
  • Medunarodni odnosi kao druga i treca era
    globalizacije, povratak u buducnosti
    dolazeca anarhija

2
  • I Medunarodni odnosi posle Hladnog rata kao
    druga i treca era globalizacije videnje Tomasa
    L. Fridmana
  • II Medunarodni odnosi posle Hladnog rata kao
    povratak u buducnost videnje Dona Mirajmera
  • III Medunarodni odnosi posle Hladnog rata kao
    dolazeca anarhija
  • IV Literatura

3
I Druga i treca era globalizacije videnje
Tomasa L. Fridmana
  • Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and Olive Tree,
    Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York, 1999 The
    World is Flat, Farrar Straus and Giroux, 2005

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Hladni rat kao poseban medunarodni sistem
  • Shvatajuci medunarodni sistem kao "dominantni
    okvir u kome se organizuju i deavaju medunarodni
    poslovi ... ali i unutranja politika... koji ne
    oblikuje sve, ali oblikuje mnogo stvari", Fridman
    iznosi miljenje da je proces globalizacije kao
    glavno obeleje poslednje decenije XX veka,
    poseban medunarodni sistem koji je nasledio
    sistem hladnog rata.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
  • Da zakljucimo, u najkracem, medunarodni sitem
    globalizacije nije statican vec dinamican
    proces, za razliku od medunarodnog sistema
    hladnog rata koji je bio veoma statican.

11
II Povratak u buducnost videnje Dona
Mirajmera
  • JOHN J. MEARSHEIMER, BACK TO THE
    FUTURE-INSTABILITY IN EUROPE AFTER THE COLD WAR,
    INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, VOL. 15 No 1, Summer
    1990, pp. 5-56.

12
(No Transcript)
13
  • The profound changes now underway in Europe have
    been widely viewed as harbingers of a new age of
    peace. With the Cold War over, it is said, the
    threat of war that has hung over Europe for more
    than four decades is lifting. Swords can now be
    beaten into ploughshares harmony can reign among
    the states and peoples of Europe. Central Europe,
    which long groaned under the massive forces of
    the two military blocs, can convert its military
    bases into industrial parks, playgrounds, and
    condominiums. Scholars of security affairs can
    stop their dreary quarrels over military doctrine
    and balance assessments, and turn their attention
    to finding ways to prevent global warming and
    preserve the ozone layer. European leaders can
    contemplate how to spend peace dividends. So goes
    the common view.

14
  • This article assesses this optimistic view by
    exploring in detail the consequences for Europe
    of an end to the Cold War
  • As a result, the bipolar structure that has
    characterized Europe since the end of World War
    II is replaced by a multipolar structure. In
    essence, the Cold War we have known for almost
    half a century is over, and the postwar order in
    Europe is ended.
  • would such a fundamental change affect the
    prospects for peace in Europe? Would it raise or
    lower the risk of war?

15
  • I argue that the prospects for major crises and
    war in Europe are likely to increase markedly if
    the Cold War ends and this scenario unfolds. The
    next decades in a Europe without the superpowers
    would probably not be as violent as the first 45
    years of this century, but would probably be
    substantially more prone to violence than the
    past 45 years.
  • This pessimistic conclusion rests on the argument
    that the distribution and character of military
    power are the root causes of war and peace.

16
  • Specifically, the absence of war in Europe since
    1945 has been a consequence of three factors the
    bipolar distribution of military power on the
    Continent the rough military equality between
    the two states comprising the two poles in
    Europe, the United States and the Soviet Union
    and the fact that each superpower was armed with
    a large nuclear arsenal.
  • The departure of the superpowers from Central
    Europe would transform Europe from a bipolar to a
    multipolar system. Germany, France, Britain, and
    perhaps Italy would assume major power status
    the Soviet Union would decline from superpower
    status but would remain a major European power,
    giving rise to a system of five major powers and
    a number of lesser powers. The resulting system
    would suffer the problems common to multipolar
    systems, and would therefore be more prone to
    instability. Power inequities could also appear
    if so, stability would be undermined further.

17
  • The departure of the superpowers would also
    remove the large nuclear arsenals they now
    maintain in Central Europe. This would remove the
    pacifying effect that these weapons have had on
    European politics. Four principal scenarios are
    possible. Under the first scenario, Europe would
    become nuclearfree, thus eliminating a central
    pillar of order in the Cold War era. Under the
    second scenario, the European states do not
    expand their arsenals to compensate for the
    departure of the superpowers' weapons. In a third
    scenario, nuclear proliferation takes place, but
    is mismanaged no steps are taken to dampen the
    many dangers inherent in the proliferation
    process. All three of these scenarios would raise
    serious risks of war.
  • In the fourth and least dangerous scenario,
    nuclear weapons proliferate in Europe, but the
    process is well-managed by the current nuclear
    powers.
  • However, it would still be more dangerous than
    the world of 1945 - 90. Moreover, it is not
    likely that proliferation would be well-managed.

18
  • Three principal policy prescriptions follow from
    this analysis. First, the United States should
    encourage a process of limited nuclear
    proliferation in Europe. Specifically, Europe
    will be more stable if Germany acquires a secure
    nuclear deterrent, but proliferation does not go
    beyond that point. Second, the United States
    should not withdraw fully from Europe, even if
    the Soviet Union pulls its forces out of Eastern
    Europe. Third, the United States should take
    steps to forestall the re-emergence of
    hyper-nationalism in Europe.

19
  • None of these tasks will be easy to accomplish.
    In fact, I expect that the bulk of my
    prescriptions will not be followed most run
    contrary to powerful strains of domestic American
    and European opinion, and to the basic nature of
    state behavior. Moreover, even if they are
    followed, this will not guarantee the peace in
    Europe. If the Cold War is truly behind us, the
    stability of the past 45 years is not likely to
    be seen again in the coming decades.

20
III Medunarodni odnosi posle Hladnog rata kao
dolazeca anarhija
  • Robert D. Kaplan, The Coming Anarchy, The
    Atlantic Monthly, February 1994, pp. 44 77.

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
  • The cities of West Africa are some of the
    unsafest places in the world. Streets are unlit
    the police often lack gasoline for their
    vehicles armed burglars, carjackers and muggers
    proliferate. Direct flights between the United
    States and the Murtala Muhammed Airport, in
    neighboring Nigerias largest city, Lagos, have
    been suspended by the Us Secretary of
    Transportation because of ineffective security at
    terminal and its environs In Abidjan,
    effectively the capital of the Cote dIvoire or
    Ivory Coast an Italian ambassador was killed by
    gunfire when robbers invaded an Abidjan
    restaurant. The family of the Nigerian ambassador
    was tied up and robbed at gunpoint in the
    ambassador residence.

24
  • Sierra Leone is a microcosm of what is occurring
    in West Africa and much of underdeveloped world
    the withering away of central governments, the
    rise of tribal and regional domains, the
    unchecked spread of disease, and the growing
    pervasiveness of war

25
  • West Africa is becoming the symbol of worldwide
    demographic, environmental and societal stress,
    in which criminal anarchy emerges as the real
    strategic danger. Disease, overpopulation,
    unprovoked crime, scarcity of resources, refugee
    migrations, the increasing erosions of
    nation-states and international borders, and the
    empowerment of private armies, security firms and
    international drug cartels are now most tellingly
    demonstrated through a west African prism.
  • There is no other place on the planet where
    political maps are so deceptive where, in fact,
    they tell such lies as in West Africa.
    According to the map, it is a nation state of
    defined borders, with a government in control of
    its territory

26
  • Thomas Malthus, the philosopher of demographic
    doomsday is now the prophet of West Africa.
  • Fifty five percent of the Ivory Coasts
    population is urban, and the proportion is
    expected to reach 62 percent by 2000. The yearly
    net population growth is 3. 6 percent. This means
    that the Ivory Coasts 13. 5 million people will
    become 39 million by 2025
  • It is time to understand the environment for
    what it is the national security issue of the
    early twenty-first century. The political and
    strategic impact of surging populations,
    spreading disease, deforestation, and soil
    erosion, water depletion, air pollution, and
    possibly rising sea levels in critical,
    overcrowded regions such as the Nile delta and
    Bangladesh developments that will prompt mass
    migrations and in turn, incite group conflicts
    will be the core foreign policy challenge from
    which most others will ultimately emanate,
    arousing the public and uniting assorted intests
    left over from the Cold war.

27
  • From the vantage point of the present, there
    appears every prospect that religious fanaticism
    will play a larger role in the motivation of
    armed conflict in the West that at any time for
    the last 300 years Martin van Creveld (The
    Transformation of War)
  • The real news wasnt at the white House, I
    realized. It was right below.

28
(No Transcript)
29
HVALA NA PANJI
30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com