Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus at Fort Benning, GA, 20012005 Force H - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus at Fort Benning, GA, 20012005 Force H

Description:

Presenter: Stephanie M. Morrison, MPH, Epidemiologist. Co-authors: Nikki N Jordan ... James Patrick. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:239
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: morri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus at Fort Benning, GA, 20012005 Force H


1
Community Acquired Methicillin Resistant
Staphylococcus Aureus at Fort Benning, GA,
2001-2005 Force Health Protection
ConferenceAlbuquerque, NMAugust 10, 2006
  • Presenter Stephanie M. Morrison, MPH,
    Epidemiologist
  • Co-authors
  • Nikki N Jordan
  • LTC Samuel Jang
  • James Patrick
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • US Army Center for Health Promotion and
    Preventive Medicine
  • Martin Army Community Hospital

2
Overview
  • Background
  • Literature review
  • Purpose
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion

3
Background
4
  • Staphylococcus Aureus (Staph)
  • Most common skin infection in the United States
  • Bacteria on the skin or in the nose of healthy
    people
  • 25-30 of the population is colonized
  • Most infections are minor seen in the form of
    carbuncles or furuncles
  • Can be treated with or without medication

5
  • Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
    (MRSA)
  • Resistance occurred after the introduction of new
    antibiotics
  • Described as an infected pimple, insect bite,
    spider bite, or sore
  • Colonized in approximately 1 of the population
  • Staph strains resistant to beta-lactam
    antibiotics

6
Types of MRSA
Healthcare acquired (HA)
Community acquired (CA)
7
Health Care Acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA)
  • Recent/frequent hospitalization
  • Prior/frequent antibiotic use
  • Long-term inpatient care

8
Community Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA)
  • Not recently hospitalized
  • No history of recent medical procedures
  • Outbreaks have occurred in a variety of
    populations
  • Players of contact sports
  • Military members
  • Children in daycare
  • Prison inmates
  • Tattoo participants

9
Possible CA-MRSA modes of transmission
  • Skin to skin contact
  • Crowded Conditions
  • Poor Hygiene
  • Hands contaminated by contact with
  • Colonized or infected individuals
  • Colonized or infected body sites of other persons
  • Devices, items, or environmental surfaces
    contaminated with body fluids containing staph or
    MRSA.

10
Possible risk factors for CA-MRSA
  • Other things that make CA-MRSA different from
    HA-MRSA
  • Microbiology
  • Genotype
  • Virulence factor
  • Low susceptibility towards Beta-Lactam
    Antibiotics

11
Antibiotics with low susceptibility against
CA-MRSA
  • Beta Lactam or semi-synthetic beta lactams
  • Penicillins
  • Oxacillin
  • Methicillin
  • Cephalosporins
  • Keflex
  • Others
  • Carbapenems
  • Imimpenem
  • Macrolides
  • Azithromycin
  • Erythromycin

12
Moderately/Highly susceptible antibiotics against
CA-MRSA
  • Moderately susceptibple
  • Macrolides
  • Clarithromycin (Biaxin)
  • Quinolones
  • Ciprofloxacin
  • Levofloxacin
  • Gatifloxacin
  • Highly susceptible
  • Tetracycline
  • Clindamycin
  • Chlorampenicol
  • Rifampin
  • Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
  • Amino Glycocides
  • Amikacin
  • Gentamycin
  • Glycopeptides
  • Vancomycin
  • Highly susceptible
  • Tetracycline
  • Clindamycin
  • Chlorampenicol
  • Rifampin
  • Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
  • Amino Glycocides
  • Amikacin
  • Gentamycin
  • Glycopeptides
  • Vancomycin

13
Previous Prevalence Studies including Military
Populations
14
Previous Outbreak Investigations including
Military Populations
15
CA-MRSA at Fort Benning
  • How did surveillance get started at Ft Benning?

16
Purpose
  • Determine the CA-MRSA rates at Fort Benning
  • Identify antibiotic susceptibility patterns
  • Compare findings
  • Make recommendations regarding use of antibiotics
    and other ways to prevent CA-MRSA

17
Methods
18
Cases
  • Active Duty (AD)
  • BCT trainees, ITB students, post cadre, permanent
    party, and specialized training units
  • 1703 men and 30 women from seen at the Martin
    Army Health Center from January 01, 2001 until
    December 31, 2005

19
CA-MRSA - Case Definition
  • A Case was defined as an AD Soldier with both of
    the following
  • Clinically recognized skin or soft tissue
    infection

2. SA culture with identified resistance to
oxacillin or confirmatory resistance to
cefotaxime
20
Data Collection
  • Medical record review.
  • Queried MHS Mart (M2) for population summary data

21
Database Variables
  • Demographic
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Unit
  • Culture date
  • Hospitalization admissions
  • Wound location
  • Antibiotic information
  • Prescribed
  • Susceptibility tested
  • Other info

22
Data Analysis
  • Descriptive analysis
  • MRSA infection rates calculated
  • Trend analysis of antibiotic susceptibility

23
Results
24
Demographic Data
25
1,733 total cases - multiple wound sites per
case were observed therefore, columns do not add
to totals Total percentages are based on
exclusion of unknowns
26
Days of Hospitalization
  • Infections requiring hospitalization
  • 218 (11.3)
  • Days admitted
  • Total1014 Mean 4.6 3.7
  • Range 1-33 days

27
Rates based on AD monthly MRSA confirmed
positive cultures by monthly AD Ft. Benning
population as derived from M2 (DEERS summary
data)
28
Percentage of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolates
Testing Positive for MRSA from 2001-2005
29
Percent of Antibiotics Prescribed
Multiple antibiotics may have been prescribed
per case
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Discussion and Conclusion
39
Discussion
  • Susceptibility patterns compare to patterns in
    other studies.
  • Healthcare providers are prescribing the correct
    regimens

40
Discussion
  • Studies have been done on proper hygiene

41
Limitations
  • Surveillance artifact.
  • Underestimation of rates due to failure to seek
    care.
  • Case exposure data was not available.
  • Limited demographic and denominator data.
  • Full antibiotic susceptibility patterns were not
    available for all MRSA isolates.

42
Recommendations
  • Improvement of surveillance methods
  • Study of risk factors
  • Include genotypic and phenotypic testing
  • Implement proper hygiene measures
  • Suggest a hand sanitizer study in the summer
  • Keep suggesting appropriate antibiotic measures

43
Conclusion
  • The population evaluated was similar to recent
    investigations.
  • Risk factor information was not available.
  • Correct antibiotics were prescribed over time.
  • Surveillance ongoing

44
Questions?
45
US Army Center for Health Promotion and
Preventive Medicine
  • Provide health promotion and preventive medicine
    leadership and services to counter environmental,
    occupational, and disease threats to health,
  • fitness, and readiness in support of the National
    Military Strategy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com