Evidence Based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disturbances - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Evidence Based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disturbances

Description:

Evidence Based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Serious ... to prove what we do, which takes a big hunk of time away from doing what we do' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:314
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: richar139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evidence Based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disturbances


1
Evidence Based Practices for Children and
Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disturbances
  • Session 2
  • The Role of Assessment In Evidence-Based Mental
    Health Practices for Children and Adolescents
  • Beth Troutman, PhD, ABPP
  • Iowa Consortium for Mental Health
  • September 1, 2005

2
Assessment Data Can Be Used To Enhance Clinical
Decision Making At The Level Of
  • System of care
  • Program
  • Individual patient/family

3
Assessments Evaluated According To
  • Psychometric Properties
  • Reliability
  • Validity

4
Assessment Data Can Be Used For
  • Treatment planning
  • Monitoring treatment
  • Assessing outcomes

5
Using Initial Assessment Data For Treatment
Planning
  • What type of intervention does my patient need to
    address target symptoms?
  • What are the appropriate interventions for our
    target population?

6
Treatment planning
  • Assessments can be used to inform
  • Type of intervention
  • Level of care/service intensity
  • Other factors that need to be addressed

7
Describing Patient/Target Population
  • Diagnosis
  • Target Symptoms
  • Other Factors
  • Functional Status

8
Using Initial Assessment Data for Treatment
Planning
  • Diagnosis

9
Initial Assessment Treatment Planning
  • Diagnosis
  • Primary
  • Comorbid

10
Disadvantages of Diagnosis
  • Labels or stigmatizes child
  • Labeling or stigmatizing a child with a diagnosis
    is of particular concern if the diagnosis does
    not lead to effective, evidence-based treatment.

11
Disadvantages of Diagnosis
  • Poor interrater reliability of clinical diagnosis
  • Short-hand method of communicating that fails to
    capture special strengths and weaknesses of
    particular child and family

12
Advantage of Diagnosis
  • Clinical eligibility for services
  • Funding for services
  • Method for organizing vast amount of treatment
    data so provider/program can select an effective,
    evidence-based intervention

13
Using Initial Assessment Data For Treatment
Planning
  • Describing Target Symptoms

14
Describing Target Symptoms
  • Symptom measures
  • Broadband
  • Symptom specific

15
Factors To Consider When Selecting Assessment
Instrument
  • Source of information
  • Child
  • Parent
  • Teacher

16
Factors To Consider When Selecting Assessment
Instrument
  • Clinician rated vs. respondent rated
  • Norm-referenced vs. criterion-referenced

17
Examples of Broadband Symptom Measures
  • Parent Report Measures
  • Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second
    Edition (BASC-2) (AGS)
  • Personality Inventory for Children, Second
    Edition (PIC-2) (Western Psychological Services)
  • Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (ASEBA)
  • Note Parent report tends to underestimate
    anxiety and depression compared to self report.

18
Examples of Broadband Symptom Measures
  • Self-Report Measures
  • Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second
    Edition (BASC-2) (AGS)
  • Personality Inventory for Youth (Western
    Psychological Services)
  • Achenbach Youth Self Report (ASEBA)
  • Note Self-report tends to underestimate
    disruptive behavior problems compared to parent
    report.

19
Examples of Broadband Symptom Measures
  • Teacher Report Measures
  • Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second
    Edition (BASC-2) (AGS)
  • Achenbach Teacher Report Form (ASEBA)
  • Note Teacher report tends to underestimate
    anxiety and depression compared to self-report.

20
Example of Using Broadband Symptom Measure To
Describe Target Population
  • Target population Children aged 5 through 18 in
    long-term family foster care in Iowa (gt 6 months
    in same foster home)
  • Broadband symptom measure Achenbach Child
    Behavior Checklist completed by foster parents
  • Source Momany et al., University of Iowa Public
    Policy Center

21
Rates and Types of Mental Health Problems in
Iowas Family Foster Care Population
Momany et al., University of Iowa Public Policy
Center
22
Example of Symptom Specific Measure Attention
Problems
  • Parent/teacher report
  • Conners rating scales (Psychological Corporation)

23
Examples of Symptom Specific Measures - Depression
  • clinician ratings
  • Childrens Depression Rating Scale - Revised
    (CDRS-R) (American Psychiatric Publishing)
  • self-report
  • Child Depression Inventory (CDI) (Psychological
    Corporation)
  • Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition
    (BDI-2) (Psychological Corporation)
  • Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale Second
    Edition (RADS-2) (PAR)

24
Using Initial Assessment Data For Treatment
Planning
  • Assessing Other Factors That May Affect Treatment
    Planning

25
Child Factors That May Affect Treatment Planning
  • Cognitive functioning
  • IQ tests
  • Academic functioning
  • Standardized academic tests
  • Speech and language functioning
  • Standardized speech and language tests

26
Family Factors That May Affect Treatment Planning
  • Parenting stress
  • Parenting Stress Index Third Edition (PSI-3)
    (PAR)
  • Maternal or paternal depression
  • Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition
    (BDI-2) (Psychological Corporation)

27
Using Initial Assessment Data For Treatment
Planning
  • Assessing Functioning Level and Level of Services
    Needed

28
Determining Level of Functioning/Level of
Services Needed
  • What level of care/service intensity does my
    patient need?
  • What level of care/service intensity do the
    patients in our program/system of care need?

29
Examples of Functional Assessment/Service
Intensity Instruments
  • Clinician ratings
  • Childrens Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
  • Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale
    (CAFAS)
  • Child and Adolescent Level of Care Utilization
    System (CALOCUS)
  • Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Mental
    Health (CANS-MH)

30
Using Assessment Data For Program Improvement
31
Using Assessment For Program Improvement
  • Assessments can be used to
  • Monitor treatment
  • Assess outcomes

32
The Evidence Based Practice Cycle
Optimize Priority Outcomes
33
Role of Assessment in EBP Cycle
  • Target Population
  • Diagnosis
  • Target symptoms
  • Functional status
  • Other factors
  • Outcomes
  • Identify
  • Prioritize
  • Quantify

34
Treatment Monitoring
  • Is my patient benefiting from the intervention?
  • Are there any negative consequences (side
    effects/iatrogenic effects) associated with the
    intervention?

35
Example of Symptom Scale Used For Treatment
Monitoring Disruptive Behavior
  • Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory administered at
    each session in Parent Child Interaction Therapy
  • Parent rates a series of specific items
    addressing noncompliance and disruptive behavior
    according to
  • How often the behavior occurred.
  • Whether it was a problem for the parent.

36
Example of Assessment Used For Treatment
Monitoring Separation Anxiety
  • Exposure treatments for anxiety have child or
    adolescent rate items on their systematic
    desensitization hierarchy at each session
  • E.g. walking from front door of school to
    classroom alone, walking from car to school alone

37
Using Assessment Data For Program Improvement
  • Assessing Outcomes

38
Assessing Outcomes
  • Did my patient benefit from the intervention?
  • Are patients in our program/system of care
    benefiting from interventions?

39
Assessments Used to Evaluate Outcomes
  • Diagnosis
  • Target Symptoms
  • Other Factors
  • Functional Status

40
Use Of Diagnosis To Evaluate Outcome
  • Recovery/remission of diagnosis is relevant for
    some diagnoses
  • E.g. depressive episode, adjustment disorder

41
Use Of Diagnosis To Evaluate Outcome
  • Diagnosis may not be useful for evaluating
    outcomes for other disorders
  • E.g. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

42
Use Of Symptom Specific Measures To Assess
Outcomes
  • The more reliable the symptom measure is, the
    better it will be at detecting improvement
  • Important that symptom measure is valid for
    intervention i.e. does it assess what your
    intervention is targeting?

43
Examples Of Symptom Assessments Used To Evaluate
Outcomes
  • Depression self-report
  • Childrens Depression Inventory
  • Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition
    (BDI-II)

44
Examples Of Symptom Assessments Used To Evaluate
Outcomes
  • Attention and distractibility
  • Parent report/teacher report
  • Conners Rating Scales

45
Examples Of Symptom Assessments Used To Evaluate
Outcomes
  • Anxiety
  • Self-report
  • Revised Childrens Manifest Anxiety Scale
  • Parent report
  • Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist
    internalizing scale

46
Use of Other Assessments to Assess Outcomes
  • Some intervention studies have assessed changes
    in parenting stress or mood
  • Parenting Stress Index Third Edition (PSI-3)
  • Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition
    (BDI-2)

47
Use of Functional Assessments To Assess Outcome
  • CGAS is most widely used assessment of
    functioning in treatment outcome studies
  • Often a delay between symptom improvement and
    improvement in functioning

48
Using Outcome Data For Program Improvement
  • Is there a particular group of patients we should
    target for improved outcomes?
  • age
  • diagnosis
  • type of problem

49
Improving Outcomes For Target Population
  • Is there an Evidence Based Treatment available
    for this group of patients?

50
Program Improvement Process
  • Review of outcomes
  • Systematic modification of intervention

51
Most Clinicians Do Not Use Standardized
Assessments
  • Reference Garland, A., Kruse, M., Aarons, G.
    (2003). Clinicians and outcome measurement
    Whats the use? Journal of Behavioral Health
    Services Research, 30(4), 393-405.

52
Garland, Kruse, Aarons, 2003
  • Interviews and focus groups conducted with
    clinicians providing publicly funded mental
    health services in California after law was
    passed requiring collection of standardized
    assessment data performance outcome project
  • at intake
  • follow-up intervals

53
Garland, Kruse, Aarons, 2003
  • Required Assessments for California Performance
    Outcome Project
  • Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist/Youth Self
    Report
  • Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale
    (CAFAS)
  • Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

54
Garland, Kruse, Aarons, 2003
  • Estimated costs of California Performance Outcome
    Project
  • 15 to 62 per patient
  • Approximately 1 million to 3 ½ million dollars
    per year
  • Since outcome project mandate did not include
    additional funding for collecting outcome
    measures costs were assumed by agencies and
    clinicians

55
Garland, Kruse, Aarons, 2003
  • 92 of clinicians reported never using scores
    from standardized measures for
  • Treatment planning
  • Treatment monitoring
  • Assessing outcomes

56
Barriers to Use of Standardized Outcome Measures
  • Feasibility
  • As clinicians, we are burdened by more and more
    paperwork to prove what we do, which takes a big
    hunk of time away from doing what we do
  • Garland, Kruse, Aarson, 2003

57
Barriers to Use of Standardized Outcome Measures
  • Cost
  • Testing materials
  • Time
  • Patients
  • Parents
  • Teachers
  • Providers

58
Barriers to Use of Standardized Outcome Measures
  • Difficulty interpreting results of assessments
  • Qualifications needed to use assessments
  • Additional training needed to use assessments

59
CONCLUSIONS
  • Use of standardized assessments can improve
    clinical decision making and outcomes for
    children and adolescents with mental health
    problems

60
CONCLUSIONS
  • In order for standardized assessments to improve
    outcomes the following issues need to be
    addressed
  • Feasibility
  • Training

61
CONCLUSIONS
  • In order for standardized assessments to improve
    outcomes the following issues need to be
    addressed
  • Process that uses assessment data to improve
    outcomes
  • Process that informs patients, families, and
    clinicians of how assessment data has been used
    to improve outcomes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com