Web Advances Continue: From Best Pedagogical Practices to Evaluation and Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Web Advances Continue: From Best Pedagogical Practices to Evaluation and Assessment

Description:

Free Flowing Discussions/Forums. Email interviews. Symposia or ... Learners have varied backgrounds that we need to adapt to (i.e., allow flexible access) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: publiccomp2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Web Advances Continue: From Best Pedagogical Practices to Evaluation and Assessment


1
Web Advances Continue From Best Pedagogical
Practices to Evaluation and Assessment
  • Curt Bonk, Indiana University
  • President, CourseShare.com
  • cjbonk_at_indiana.edu
  • http//php.indiana.edu/cjbonk
  • http//CourseShare.com
  • Vanessa Dennen, San Diego State University
  • vdennen_at_mail.sdsu.edu

2
Brains Before and After E-learning
After
Before
And when use synchronous and asynchronous tools
3
Part I. Best PracticesWho are some of the key
scholars and players???
4
Southern Hemisphere Pedagogy
5
Karen Lazenby, Instructor Qualities,
Deputy-Director, Telematic Learning and Education
Innovation (now Director, Client Service
Center)(University of Pretoria, Nov., 2001,
klazenby_at_tsamail.trsa.ac.za)
  • Flexible (ability to shift between roles)
  • Patient, responsive
  • Friendly, positive, supportive
  • Limit lecture
  • Publish best student work
  • Set clear rules for posting and interaction
  • Involve outside experts

6
Guy Kemshal-BellTechnical Further Education
(TAFE) in Australia (guykb_at_iprimus.com.au) (Had
Instructors Rate 21 Online Teaching Competencies
From TAFE Questionnaire)
7
Online Teaching SkillsThe Online Teacher, TAFE,
Guy Kemshal-Bell (April, 2001)
  • Technical email, chat, Web development
  • Facilitation engaging, questioning, listening,
    feedback, providing support, managing discussion,
    team building, relationship building, motivating,
    positive attitude, innovative, risk taking
  • Managerial planning, reviewing, monitoring, time
    management
  • From provider to content to designer of learning
    experiences.
  • From oracle to guide and resource provider
  • From solitary teacher to member of team

8
Key Skills or Attributes (scale 0-3)The Online
Teacher, TAFE, Guy Kemshal-Bell (April, 2001)
  • Ability to provide effective online fdbk (2.86)
  • Ability to engage the learner (2.84)
  • Ability to provide direction and support (2.82)
  • Skills in online listening (2.76)
  • Ability to use email effectively (2.70)
  • Ability to motivate online learners (2.66)
  • Positive attitude to online teaching (2.66)
  • Skills in effective online questioning (2.65)

9
Less Impt Skills or Attributes (scale 0-3)The
Online Teacher, TAFE, Guy Kemshal-Bell (April,
2001)
  • Higher-level Web page development (.606)
  • Use of video/audioconferencing (1.06)
  • Ability to develop simple Web pages (1.45)
  • Skills in using online chat (1.84)
  • Ability to build online teams (2.10)
  • Skills in planning, monitoring trng (2.20)

Ability to say dumb things. Ability to offend
people. Ability to sleep.
10
Three Most Vital SkillsThe Online Teacher, TAFE,
Guy Kemshal-Bell (April, 2001)
  • Ability to engage the learner (30)
  • Ability to motivate online learners (23)
  • Ability to build relationships (19)
  • Technical ability (18)
  • Having a positive attitude (14)
  • Adapt to individual needs (12)
  • Innovation or creativity (11)

11
Lets brainstorm comments (words or short
phrases) that reflect your overall attitudes and
feelings towards online teaching
12
Feelings Toward Online TeachingThe Online
Teacher, TAFE, Guy Kemshal-Bell (April,
2001)(Note 94 practitioners surveyed.)
  • Exciting (30)
  • Challenging (24)
  • Time consuming (22)
  • Demanding (18)
  • Technical issue (16) Flexibility (16)
  • Potential (15)
  • Better options (14) Frustrating (14)
  • Collab (11) Communication (11) Fun (11)

13
Ron Oliver Edith Cowan University in
Australiahttp//elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au//oliver/
r.oliver_at_cowan.edu.au
Professor of Interactive Multimedia, and the
Director of the Centre for Research in
Information Technology and Communications
14
Collaborative and Constructivist Web Tasks
(McLoughlin Oliver, 1999 Oliver McLoughlin,
1999))
  • Apprenticeship QA Ask an Expert (chats
    async).
  • Case-Based and Simulated Learning exchange
    remote views enact events online.
  • Active Learning Design Web pages and project
    databases.
  • Reflective/Metacognitive Learning Reflect in
    online journals, bulletin boards
  • Experiential Learning Post (articulate ideas) to
    discussion groups
  • Authentic Learning PBL, search current databases

15
John Hedberg, Univ of WollongongResearch centre
for Interactive Learning Environments (RILE),
Co-Director of the Educational Media (em) Lab,
Professor, School of Educ john_hedberg_at_uow.edu.au
  • Built multi-award winning CD-ROM products -
    Investigating Lake Iluka, Exploring the Nardoo
    and StageStruck

16
John Hedberg, Univ of WollongongChapter
CybereducationRILE Monograph 2001 Online
Learning Environments Research and Teaching
  • Learner must be active in learning process
  • Provide variety of contexts and viewpoints
  • Learning is a process of construction
  • Immerse learners in authentic contexts
  • Reflective thinking is the ultimate goal
  • Learning involves social negotiation
  • Need to develop realistic strategic, pedagogical,
    commercial models for online learning

17
  • Portal/Hub
  • (Stuckey, Hedberg, Lockyer, in press)
  • Users as passive consumers
  • Varied membership
  • May not need to register
  • No ties between or access to other members
  • Links to resources and indexed sites
  • Database driven
  • Success of hits

18
  • Factors in Developing Online Community
  • (Stuckey, Hedberg, Lockyer, in press)
  • 1. Users are producers, consumers, and builders
  • 2. Strong reciprocal ties real names used
    (members might even seek F2F contact
  • 3. Shared or team projects/activities joint
    artefacts
  • 4. Access to experts and mentoring
  • 5. Commitment from developers and members
  • 6. Varied roles for members (moderators,
    facilitators, mentors, etc.)
  • 8. Success engagement, ideas, development,
    trends

19
European Pedagogy
20
E-ModeratingE-Moderating The Key to Teaching
and Learning Online, (Gilly Salmon, (1999) Kogan
Page G.K.Salmon_at_open.ac.uk)
  • Know when to stay silent for a few days.
  • Close off unused or unproductive conferences.
  • Provide a variety of relevant conference topics.
  • Deal promptly with dominance, harassment, etc.
  • Weave, summarize, and archive often.
  • Be an equal participant in the conference.
  • Provide sparks or interesting comments.
  • Avoid directives and right answers.
  • Acknowledge all contributions.
  • Support others for e-moderator role.

21
Robyn Masons (1991) 3 Roles(The Open
University r.d.mason_at_open.ac.uk)http//iet.open.
ac.uk/pp/r.d.mason/main.html
  • Organizationalset agenda, objectives, timetable,
    procedural rules
  • Patience, vary things, spur discussion, invites
  • Socialwelcome, thank, provide feedback, and set
    generally positive tone
  • Reinforce good things, invite to be candid
  • Intellectualprobe, ask qs, refocus, set goals,
    weave comments, synthesize comments
  • Know when to summarize and to leave alone

22
Robyn Mason (Models of Online Courses)
http//www.aln.org/alnweb/magazine/vol2_issue2/Mas
onfinal.htmALN Magazine Volume 2, Issue 2 -
October 1998
  • The Web often acts as the resource around which
    the activities are designed Students are often
    asked to construct a group Web site as the focus
    for their joint work. Alternatively they could be
    asked to work through problems, experiments or
    simulations presented online and to compare their
    solutions.

23
Robyn Masons (1998) http//www.aln.org/alnweb/mag
azine/vol2_issue2/Masonfinal.htmALN Magazine
Volume 2, Issue 2 - October 1998
  • Computer conferencing ideal medium to break down
    distinction between teacher and taught
  • Online resources, places, and people make
    possible online learning communities
  • Need to motivate students to participate
    actively, providing some synchronous events to
    maintain their interest and enthusiasm
  • Need to design activities for nonparticipators
  • Lack of time is a challenge for DL (learners want
    short courses, learning objects, and just-in-time
    teaching)

24
Pedagogical Techniques of CMC(Paulsen, 1995, The
Online Report on Pedagogical Techniques for
Computer-Mediated Communication morten_at_nki.no)
  • Collective databases, Access to Online Resources
  • Informal socializing (online cafes)
  • Seminars (read before going online)
  • Public tutorials
  • Peer counseling, learning partnerships
  • (Online Support Groups)
  • Simulations, games, and role plays
  • Free Flowing Discussions/Forums
  • Email interviews
  • Symposia or speakers on a theme
  • The notice board (class announcements)

25
Framework for Pedagogical CMC Techniques(Paulsen,
1995, The Online Report on Pedagogical
Techniques for Computer-Mediated Communication)
  • One-alone Techniques Online journals, online
    databases, interviews, online interest groups.
  • One-to-one Techniques Learning contracts,
    internships, apprenticeships.
  • One-to-many Techniques Lectures, symposiums,
    skits.
  • Many-to-many Techniques Debates, simulations,
    games, case studies, discussion groups,
    brainstorming, Delphi techniques, nominal group
    process, forums, group projects.

26
PROF. DR. BETTY COLLISUniversity of Twente (UT)
, Faculty of Educ Science Technology (TO)
collis_at_edte.utwente.nl
  • Lead successful development and implementation of
    the TeleTOP (http//teletop.edte.utwente.nl)
    Web-based course-management system (1997), now in
    use throughout university and beyond.
  • Learning is active, collaborative, construction,
    and contribution (i.e., learner-centered)
  • Learning environment should stimulate different
    forms of collab and communication
  • Give the learner support tools and options
  • Built based on extensive research and wide
    experiences

27
PROF. DR. BETTY COLLISUniversity of Twente (UT)
, Faculty of Educ Science Technology (TO)
  • Use technology to extend good teaching, not
    replace teachers
  • Learners have varied backgrounds that we need to
    adapt to (i.e., allow flexible access)
  • Skill acquisition is important but content is not
    the main focus of the learning environment
  • Instructors can restructure the environment (they
    should control not the instructional designer)
  • Envir must be simple for instructors and students

28
North American Pedagogy
29
Jennifer Hoffman, InSync Training
(jennifer_at_insynctraining.com)
30
Ideal Environment of Synchronous Trainer
Jennifer Hoffman, Online Learning Conference
(2001, Oct.)
  • A private, soundproof room.
  • High-speed connection telephone powerful
    computer additional computer tech support phone
  • Studio microphone and speakers
  • A Do Not Disturb sign
  • Near restroom pitcher of water

31
Pedagogical Recommendations(Berge, 1995, The
role of the online instructor/facilitatorberge_at_u
mbc.edu)
  • Draw attention to conflicting views
  • Dont expect too much/thread
  • Do not lecture (Long, coherent sequence of
    comments yields silence)
  • Request responses within set time
  • Maintain non-authoritarian style
  • Promote private conversations

32
Managerial Recommendations(Berge, 1995, The role
of the online instructor/facilitator)
  • Distribute lists of participants
  • Provide timely administrative infobooks,
    enrollment, counseling, etc.
  • Change procedures that are not working
  • Change misplaced subject headings
  • Decisively end discussion sessions
  • Dont overload

33
Linda Harasims Model of Online Collaborative
LearningSimon Fraser University,
linda_harasim_at_sfu.ca
  • In 1985, Dr. Harasim was one of the first to
    teach a totally online graduate course. The
    following year, she and her colleagues at the
    Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
    delivered the first professional development
    courses taught online.
  • Harasim, L. (2001). Shift Happens Online
    Education as a New Paradigm in Learning. The
    Internet and Higher Education, 3(1). Elsevier
    Science, New York, NY
  • Harasim, L.. The Virtual University A State of
    the Art. Advances in Computers, Book Series -
    Volume 54. Academic Press, London, UK.

34
Linda Harasim, Simon Fraser and TeleLearning
Centres of Excellence(Quote June 4, 2002,
Global Educators Network))
  • Bruffee (1999) argues that knowledge is a
    construct of the communitys form of discourse,
    maintained by local consensus and subject to
    endless conversation. Learning is a social,
    negotiated, consensual process.  Discourse is
    keystudents collaborate in small groups, then in
    larger or plenary groups to  increasingly come to
    intellectual convergence.

35
Linda Harasims Model of Online Collaborative
Learning
  • Idea Generating implies divergent thinking,
    brainstorming, verbalization and thus sharing of
    ideas and positions.
  • Idea Linking involves evidence of conceptual
    change, intellectual progress and the beginning
    of convergence as new or different ideas become
    clarified and identified and clustered into
    various positions.
  • Intellectual Convergence is typically reflected
    in shared understanding (including agreeing to
    disagree) and is especially evident in
    co-production, whether a theory, a publication,
    an assignment, a work of art.

36
But how to determine the pedagogical quality of
courses and course materials you develop?
37
The Sharp Edge of the Cube Pedagogically Driven
Instructional Design for Online
EducationSyllabus Magazine, Dec, 2001, Nishikant
Sonwalkar
  • five functional learning stylesapprenticeship,
    incidental, inductive, deductive, discovery.
  • http//www.syllabus.com/syllabusmagazine/article.a
    sp?id5858

38
New Methodology for Evaluation The Pedagogical
Rating of Online CoursesSyllabus Magazine, Jan,
2002, Nishikant Sonwalkar
  • The Pedagogical Effectiveness Index
  • (1) Learning Styles (see previous page)
  • (2) Media Elements text, graphics, audio, video,
    animation, simulation
  • (3) Interaction Elements feedback, revision,
    e-mail, discussion, bulletin
  • http//www.syllabus.com/syllabusmagazine/article.
    asp?id5914
  • For more info, e-mail Nish_at_mit.edu

39
New Methodology for Evaluation The Pedagogical
Rating of Online CoursesSyllabus Magazine, Jan,
2002, Nishikant Sonwalkar
  • Summative evaluation instrument for rating online
    courses
  • (1) Content Factors quality, media, authentic
  • (2) Learning Factors interactivity, testing
    feedback, collaboration, ped styles
  • (3) Delivery Support Factors accessible,
    reporting, user management, content
  • (4) Usability Factors clarity, chunk size,
    layout
  • (5) Technological Factors bandwidth, database
    connectivity, server capacity,browser

40
Dennens Research on Nine Online Courses
(sociology, history, communications, writing,
library science, technology, counseling)
Poor Instructors Good Instructors
  • Provided regular qual/quant feedback
  • Participated as peer
  • Allowed perspective sharing
  • Tied discussion to grades, other assessments.
  • Used incremental deadlines
  • Little or no feedback given
  • Always authoritative
  • Kept narrow focus of what was relevant
  • Created tangential discussions
  • Only used ultimate deadlines

41
Common Instructor Complaints
  • Students dont participate
  • Students all participate at the last minute
  • Students post messages but dont converse
  • Facilitation takes too much time
  • If they must be absent, the discussion dies off
  • Students are confused

42
Reasons why...
  • Students dont participate
  • Because it isnt required
  • Because they dont know what is expected
  • Students all participate at last minute
  • Because that is what was required
  • Because they dont want to be the first
  • Instructor posts at the last minute

43
Solutions
  • A well-designed discussion prompt, followed by
  • Clear guidelines
  • Clear modeling
  • Regular feedback

44
Guidelines and Feedback
  • Qualitative discussion guidelines and feedback
    helped students know what their participation
    should look like
  • Quantitative discussion guidelines and feedback
    comforted students and was readily understood by
    them
  • Feedback of both varieties was needed at regular
    intervals, although the qualitative feedback need
    not be individualized

45
Pedagogical Tips(Bonk 1998 Indiana University)
  • Build peer interactivity
  • Design Interaction to extend beyond class
  • Embed choices on tasks
  • Simplify (everything!!!)
  • Scheduling something due early
  • Create Variety tasks, topics, participants,
    accomplishments, etc.

46
Just a Lot of Bonk
  • Make learners also the teachers
  • Provide multiple ways to succeed
  • Provide clear easy to navigate course
  • Market/Share what do
  • Archive work, repurpose it, use it
  • Take a course onlinebe a student
  • Find a tech mentor
  • Be flexible

47
(No Transcript)
48
6. Cognitive Task Structuring "You know, the
task asks you to do...," "Ok, as was required,
you should now summarize the peer responses that
you have received...," This is a difficult task,
so you might start with..."
49
Surebut Cat Herder???
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com