Participatory GIS PGIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Participatory GIS PGIS

Description:

through readings of Elwood and Craig, et al. matthew w. wilson ... What are the implications for critical GIS, based on readings of Craig, et al. (2002) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:571
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: matthew317
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Participatory GIS PGIS


1
Participatory GIS (PGIS)
  • Theorizing community as a perspective of
    participatory GIS,through readings of Elwood
    and Craig, et al.
  • matthew w. wilson

2
Overview
  • What is PGIS?
  • How is PGIS an alternative to GIS?
  • What are some challenges of collaborative
    research and of PGIS?
  • What are the implications for critical GIS, based
    on readings of Craig, et al. (2002) and Elwood
    (2002)?
  • Examples of collaborative projects, for S2,
    Homewaters Project, and PGIST

3
What is PGIS?
  • Participatory Geographic Information Systems
  • Or is it PGIScience?
  • Using technology to study or studying the
    technology in use?
  • Public Participation GIS (PPGIS)
  • From planning, mid-1990s
  • Improving access for NGOs and individuals
  • PPGIS, PGIS, CGIS, weGIS

4
How is it any different from GIS?
  • Its fuzzy.
  • Its about process.
  • Its about local knowledge.
  • Its generated bottom-up or top-down.
  • It incorporates quant/qual data.
  • Its about empowerment.
  • Or is it?
  • Its fuzzy-er.

5
A way to study PPGIS
theory
EAST2, participation, socio-technical,
power/knowledge
socio-behavioral, critical reading
societal implications,new technologies
method
substance
6
Challenges for participation
  • Four Cs create complexity
  • Communication
  • Cooperation
  • Coordination
  • Collaboration
  • Collab. research vs. collab. decision making
  • Roles
  • Writing/developing/authoring
  • Content management the Google-factor

7
Challenges for weGIS
  • A need to structure/systematize participation
  • Participation in PPGIS literature often
    uncritically accepts a liberal notion of a level
    playing field
  • Participation often assumes power is checked
    at the door
  • A need to better understand the theoretical
    assumptions of PPGIS

8
Questions to ask
  • What are the limitations for systematizing
    participation?
  • How are the notions of community, democracy,
    citizenship, the individual, the network, etc.
    implicated in PPGIS research?
  • How are marginalization and normalization
    accounted for in PPGIS research?
  • What sort of theoretical framework would best
    represent participation in PPGIS?

9
Craig, et al. (2002)
  • Community defined p. 5
  • Citizen participation ladder p. 6
  • Anti-democratic nature of GIS? p. 7
  • Fuzzy information p. 10
  • Take participation and stir in GIS? p. 11
  • PPGIS projects are political p. 12

10
Elwood (2002)
  • Critical GIS research p. 905
  • Knowledge thats not positivist? p. 906
  • Alternative cartographies p. 907
  • Empowerment p. 908-911
  • Capacity building p. 909

11
Examples of collaborative projects
  • NICI Neighborhood Indicators for Community
    Identity, a project with Sustainable Seattle
  • NSCC Trail Siting North Seattle Community
    College Trail Siting, a Homewaters Project
  • PGIST Participatory GIS for Transportation

12
Bibliography
  • Brinberg and McGrath. 1985.
  • Craig, Harris, Weiner. 1999.
  • Craig, Harris, Weiner. 2002.
  • Elwood. 2002.
  • Nyerges. 2004.
  • Obermeyer. 1998.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com