The Use of Faceted AnalyticoSynthetic Theory as Revealed in the Practice of Website Construction and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

The Use of Faceted AnalyticoSynthetic Theory as Revealed in the Practice of Website Construction and

Description:

Randomly drawn pages search engines and directories. ... US, Canada, UK, Europe... Reference 66,887. Maps, Education, Libraries... Recreation 122,265 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:263
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: klab2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Use of Faceted AnalyticoSynthetic Theory as Revealed in the Practice of Website Construction and


1
The Use of Faceted Analytico-Synthetic Theory as
Revealed in the Practice of Website Construction
and Design
  • Kathryn La Barre
  • Dissertation Proposal Defense 2-23-05
  • School of Library and Information Science
  • Indiana University, Bloomington

2
Peeling the onion
  • In Calvin Mooers words,
  • Facet provides an analytical tool that is, the
    idea of facet allows you to peel the onion of an
    idea.
  • Brian Vickery. (1965). Faceted Classification
    Schemes. In Susan Artandi (Ed.) Rutgers Series on
    Systems for the Intellectual Organization of
    Information. V. 5. New Brunswick, NJ Graduate
    School of Library Science at Rutgers University

3
Outline
  • Brief overview of development of FAST
  • Basic definitions
  • Brief introduction to proposed research
  • Overview
  • Questions/Limitations
  • Literature Review and current work
  • Discussion of proposed research
  • Questions
  • Methods

4
From Practice (1925-1932)
  • During the years 1925 to 1932, there was no
    theory to guide the design to recognize the
    components and facets. It was all trial and
    error.
  • Ranganathan. (1989). Colon Classification. 7th
    ed. revised and edited by M.A. Gopinath.
    Bangalore DRTC. p. 3-9

5
To a Dynamic Theory of Classification(1947-1961)
  • Readers were observed, their reactions were
    noted and discussions held with them. Thus
    suggestions were slowly collected for improving
    the design.
  • Two International Study conferences were held,
    one at Dorking (1957), the other at Elsinore
    (1964). This provided opportunity to discuss the
    subject with a colleagues This gave further
    stimulus to the development of the dynamic theory
    of classification.
  • It is only, after gaining some experience with
    trial and error method, that Guiding Principles
    are usually evolved. As the saying goes
  • Poetry first, Prosody afterwards.

6
Based on an explicitly stated hierarchy of
normative principles (1962-1986)
  • Consisting of
  • Canons
  • Postulates
  • Principles
  • Ranganathan, S.R.
  • (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification
    3rd ed.
  • see esp. Part R
  • and
  • (1962). Elements of library classification.
    3rd ed.

7
Faceted analytico-synthetic theory
  • Most inclusive terminology
  • / indicates the existence of guiding principles
  • / incorporates
  • Facet Analysis technique
  • entity analyzed into facets (characteristics-thing
    s, concepts-ideas)
  • Faceted Classification structure
  • Consists of schedules for basic classes with
    pre-determined facets for all entities.
  • Analytico-Synthetic Classification
  • Five step process from facet analysis to
    notation.

8
Research overview
  • Exploratory study
  • Information organization and access
  • Faceted approaches
  • Traditional - LIS
  • Websites KM/ IA
  • Methods
  • Content analysis of websites
  • Semi-structured interviews

9
Research questions
  • (1) What types of access and organizational
    structures are used in websites?
  • (2) What is the evidence that there is use of
    faceted analytico-synthetic theory in website
    construction and design of website search tools?
  • (3) In what ways do the products of those Web
    designers who make explicit claims to utilize or
    be informed by faceted analytico-synthetic theory
    conform to or depart from the theory as described
    in LIS literature?

10
Research limitations
  • Focus on website
  • organization and access systems
  • No capture or analysis of metadata
  • No analysis of controlled vocabularies (presence
    will be noted).

11
Outline
  • Brief overview
  • development of FAST
  • basic definitions
  • Brief introduction to proposed research
  • overview
  • questions/limitations
  • Literature Review and current work
  • Discussion of proposed research
  • Questions
  • Methods

12
Distribution of FAST publications/topic themes
1950-present
2000-present IR applications Faceted search,
browse and retrieval, Web design for IA and KM
1990-99 Metadata, Database theory, Image
archives, AAT, Web applications Software reuse
repositories
1980-89 Revision CC/BC2, Criticism, Automation,

1969-79 Thesauri/Indexing systems-Thesaurofacet N
ASA/ UNESCO Extension BC2/ CC, BSO, PRECIS,
POPSI
1950-68 Library and Documentation
applications-early IR work
13
Summary Traditional FAST
14
FAST in Cyberspace 2000-present
  • September 2001 - Peter Merholz
  • Innovation in classification
  • January 2002 - Travis Wilson FacetMap
  • March 2002 Phil Murray KMConnection
  • April 2002 - Discussion on SIG/IA list
  • May 2002 Peter Van Dijck XFML
  • July 2002 Rosenfeld and Morville Information
    Architecture for the World Wide Web. 2nd Ed.
  • December 2002 Van Dijck/ Murray establish
  • Faceted Classification discussion list

15
FAST in Cyberspace
  • Epicurious http//www.epicurious.com
  • Wine.com http//www.wine.com
  • Siderean software http//www.siderean.com/
  • Endeca software http//endeca.com/
  • Adiuri systems http//www.adiuri.com/

16
(No Transcript)
17
White Wines winery A C D H I K L M N
S T Z price 25 and Below 25 - 50 50 -
75 75 and Above


18
Review of similar studies
  • Website flow (Hoffman Novak, 1996)
  • Website feature analysis (Fogg, 2002)
  • E-commerce sites (Ho, 1997)
  • E-commerce and FC (Adkisson, 2003)

19
Outline
  • Brief overview
  • development of FAST
  • basic definitions
  • Brief introduction to proposed research
  • overview
  • questions/limitations
  • Literature Review and current work
  • Discussion of proposed research
  • Questions
  • Methods

20
Proposed research process Phase I
  • STEP I Framework and criteria for sampling and
    analysis of websites.
  • Prepare coding manual (pilot).
  • STEP 2 Content analysis (preliminary) of
    websites in sample for components// creation of
    wireframes
  • STEP 3 Analyze sites for FAST.
  • Determine site grouping by type of sites
    identified as using FAST. Content analysis
    (secondary) of sample for evidence of FAST.
  • (Q1) What types of access and organizational
    structures are used in websites?
  • (Q2) What is the evidence that there is use of
    FAST in website construction and design of
    website construction tools

21
Proposed research processPhase II
  • (Q2) What is the evidence that there is use of
    FAST in website construction and design of
    website search tools?
  • (Q3) In what ways do the products of those Web
    designers who make explicit claims to utilize or
    be informed by faceted analytico-synthetic theory
    conform to or depart from the theory as described
    in LIS literature?
  • Prepare interview instrument/ prompts
  • (informed by Phase I Step 3 secondary
    analysis of websites)
  • Identify designers
  • Conduct semi-structured interviews

22
Phase I Research question 1
  • (Q1) What types of access and organizational
    structures are used in websites?
  • STEP 1
  • Sampling issues
  • Web
  • website
  • Framework for analysis
  • Coding manual preliminary site analysis

23
Web Sampling issues
  • Krippendorf (1980). A sampling plan must assure
    that within the constraints imposed by available
    knowledge about the phenomena, each unit has the
    same chance of being represented in the
    collection of sampling units
  • Size of the Web
  • Variable persistence
  • Fluid content

24
Sampling approaches
  • Randomly drawn pages search engines and
    directories. (Bates Lu, 1997 Bucy et al.,
    1999 Ha James, 1998 Haas Grams, 2000
    Koehler, 1999).
  • Method for representative random sampling of the
    web. O'Neill, McClain, and Lavoie (1997).

25
Proposed website sampling framework (two-part)
  • Typology Alexander, J. Tate, M. (1999). Web
    wisdom How to evaluate and create information
    quality on the Web. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    New York. )Alexander and Tate typology
    http//www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/
    webevaluation/webeval.htm
  • Advocacy Web Page sponsored by an organization
    attempting to influence public opinion (that is,
    one trying to sell ideas). URL frequently ends in
    .org (organization)
  • Business/Marketing Web Page sponsored by a
    commercial enterprise (usually it is a page
    trying to promote or sell products). URL
    frequently ends in .com (commercial).
  • News Web Page primary purpose is to provide
    extremely current information. URL usually ends
    in .com (commercial).
  • Informational Web Page purpose is to present
    factual information. URL frequently ends in .edu
    or .gov Examples Dictionaries, thesauri,
    directories, transportation schedules, calendars
    of events, statistical data, and other factual
    information such as reports, presentations of
    research, or information about a topic.
  • Personal Web Page published by an individual who
    may or may not be affiliated with a larger
    institution. URL may have a variety of endings
    (e.g. .com, .edu, etc.), a tilde () is
    frequently embedded somewhere in the URL

26
Proposed sampling framework
  • DMOZ -categories

27
Website analytical framework
  • (Budd, 1967).
  • Coding unit smallest segment of content being
    counted and scored
  • Context units body of material surrounding the
    coding unit
  • (McMillan, 2000).
  • Subdividing sampling units into smaller
    recording units eases coding, reliability,
    analytic flexibility.

28
Website considerations
  • (McMillan, 2000).
  • Most common context unit is the website, or home
    page. Wide variance in coding units.
  • (Ha, 2000).
  • Home page as ideal unit of analysis as it
    determines whether or not site visitors will
    staysearchbrowse
  • (Weare and Lin, 2000).
  • Focus on single Web page as defined by URL
    first page presented when entering a website.
    Most appropriate for research focusing on
    structural aspects of the WWW
  • (O'Neill, McClain, and Lavoie, 1997)
  • Web page a machine-readable file which can be
    displayed within a Web browser without requiring
    additional software. This includes HTML
    (Hypertext Markup Language) files and pure text
    files.
  • A Web site is the collection of all Web pages
    located at the same top-level or base URL
    (Uniform Resource Locator).

29
Phase I Research question 1
  • (Q1) What types of access and organizational
    structures are used in websites?
  • STEP 2
  • (Preliminary) Content analysis
  • Coding categories
  • Wireframe creation

30
Content analysis issues
  • Coding units (McMillan, 2000)
  • Can be expected to vary depending on the
    theory upon which the study is based, the
    research questions explored, and the hypotheses
    tested. No standard seems to have emerged for the
    Web.
  • Common coding unit structural features of a
    website.

31
W3C DOM nodes website components
lt!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
Transitional//ENgt lthtmlgt ltheadgt lttitle
DHTML amp CSS for the WWW Understanding DOM
lt/titlegt lt/headgt ltbodygt ltform action method
getgt ltinput typetext size24
/gt lt/formgt ltdivgt ltimg srcalice28a.gif
idalice1 /gt your message
here lt/divgt lt/bodygt lt/htmlgt
Teague (2004), p.209
32
Document Object Model
  • The Document Object Model (DOM) is an application
    programming interface (API) for valid HTML and
    well-formed XML documents.
  • It defines the logical structure of documents and
    the way a document is accessed and manipulated.
  • The DOM presents documents as a hierarchy of Node
    objects that also implement other, more
    specialized interfaces.
  • With the DOM, programmers and designers can build
    documents, navigate their structure, and add,
    modify, or delete content.
  • As a W3C specification, one important objective
    for the DOM is to provide a standard programming
    interface that can be used in a wide variety of
    environments and applications. The DOM is
    designed to be used with any programming
    language.

33
Page components (recording units)
  • Rosenfeld and Morville (2002)IA Component
    categories
  • Browsing aids-
  • Organization systems
  • Site-wide navigation/ Local Navigation
  • Sitemaps/ Table of contents
  • Site indexes/ guides/ wizards
  • Contextual linking systems
  • Search aids
  • Search interface
  • Query language
  • Retrieval algorithms
  • Search zones
  • Search results

34
RM component categories - continued
  • Content and tasks
  • Headings
  • Embedded links/Metadata
  • Content chunks
  • Lists
  • Sequential aids
  • Invisible components
  • Controlled vocabularies
  • Thesauri
  • Rule sets

35
Components of interest
  • Site map
  • Website navigation
  • Ordering principles
  • Search features
  • Advanced search
  • Results display

36
Wireframe process


37
Wireframe/ epicurious.com
  • Logo
  • recipesfeaturescookingdrinkingrestaurantsdrin
    kingshop
  • recipe box/recipe collections/slidshows/forums/f
    ind a recipe
  • BROWSE advanced search
  • ____________ browse all recipes
  • Main ingredient Preparation method
  • Cuisine Season/ Occasion
  • Special considerations Course/ Meal
  • Dish
  • Helpsite mapcontactmastheadmagadslog in
    signup edit log out

38
Phase I Research question 2
  • (Q2) What is the evidence that there is use of
    FAST in website construction and design of
    website construction tools?
  • STEP 3
  • Framework for site analysis / FAST.
  • Coding manual secondary analysis draws upon
    Step 1 and 2.
  • FAST identified - Site groupings by type.

39
Phase II Research question 2
  • (Q2) What is the evidence that there is use of
    FAST in website construction and design of
    website search tools?
  • Process informed by Phase I Step 3
  • Prepare interview instrument
  • Prepare wireframe prompts (generic)

40
Phase II Research question 3
  • (Q3) In what ways do the products of those Web
    designers who make explicit claims to utilize or
    be informed by faceted analytico-synthetic theory
    conform to or depart from the theory as described
    in LIS literature?
  • Process
  • Identify designers
  • Prepare wireframe prompts (specific)
  • Conduct semi-structured interviews

41
Interview Instruments
  • Semi-structured interview
  • Pre-test of instruments
  • Questions
  • Prompts

42
Conclusion
  • Potential contributions
  • Descriptive contribution to the literature about
    the types of access and search structures
    currently used on websites.
  • May provide new understanding of the ways in
    which faceting is or is not used on websites in
    the design and construction of website access and
    organizational structures.
  • Study provides a novel way to address issues
    about the relation of theory and practice in the
    context of a particular domain.

43
Questions
44
(No Transcript)
45
Choices
  • Combined findings (phase 1 and 2) may
  • indicate ways in which org/access structures may
    be improved/strengthened by consistent
    application of theory
  • Uncover novel areas of practice augment/ improve
    dynamic theory
  • First step other paths possible
  • Potential for adoption?
  • Guidelines to enhance practice
  • Theoretical extensions
  • Design process (longitudinal)
  • Usability

46
People of interest
  • IA Summit Lists Blogs
  • Heidi Adkisson Web Design Practices
  • Karl Fast, PhD student in library and information
    science at the University of Western Ontario.
  • Louis Gruenberg Answers Research Communication
    Services (ARCS)
  • Fred Leise President of ContextualAnalysis, LLC,
    is an information architecture consultant
  • Yves Marleau Vice-President, Knowledge Management
  • Peter Merholz, Adaptive Path
  • Peter Morville Semantic Studios
  • Steve Mulder, Senior consultant in User
    Experience / Molecular
  • Phil Murray KMConnection
  • Louis Rosenfeld /co-founder Argus
  • Amy Warner Lexonomy.com consulting firm
  • Travis Wilson FacetMap
  • Academic/practitioners
  • David Batty (here and there)
  • Vanda Broughton (UC London UDC)
  • Claudio Gnoli/ Luciana Rossetti (U. Pavia)
  • Marti Hearst Flamenco UC Berkeley
  • Jack Mills (CRG/ BCA)
  • Steve Pollitt HighBrowse for Embase
  • Aida Slavic (UC London)
  • Doug Tudhope (U. Glamorgan)
  • Brian Vickery (there and back again)

47
Interview material
  • Background knowledge, books, resources used in
    practice
  • Visual prompts (generic pages)
  • Visual prompts (specific pages)
  • Design and construction process
  • System constraints
  • Awareness of theory? Use in practice?

48
Guiding Principles
  • Postulates
  • Five fundamental categories PMEST
  • Three planes of work Idea Verbal Notational
  • Canons
  • Parsimony
  • Symmetry
  • 5 laws of LS (Books are for use) (Books are for
    all) (Every book its reader) (Save the time of
    the reader) (A library is a growing organism).
  • Others
  • Consistent sequence
  • Currency
  • Enumeration
  • Context
  • Reticence
  • Relativity
  • Mnemonics
  • Viewpoint
  • Classics
  • Distinctiveness

49
Comparison AT/DMOZ
  • Alexander and Tate
  • (1) Advocacy influence public opinion
  • (2) Business/Marketing promote or sell products
  • (3) News- provide extremely current information
  • (4) Informational- present factual information
  • (5) Personal-published by an individual
  • DMOZ category
  • (1) Society
  • (2) Adult, Business, Computers,
    Recreational,Shopping
  • (3) News
  • (4) Arts,Games,Health,Kids and Teens, Reference,
    Regional, Science
  • (5) May be scattered throughout the categories,
    though editorial guidelines may preclude
    inclusion of personal homepages in some
    categories.

50
Typologies By Domain By Type
  • By domain
  • Rough guide .gov/ .com /.org/ .net
  • By type
  • Esrock and Leichty (2000) Corporate site
    typology
  • Business to business
  • Shopping
  • Single Product
  • Search engine marketing (2004)
  • Content Site CNN and CNET
  • Forum
  • Blog
  • Directory Site
  • Brochure or Organization Site
  • Business site (promotion)
  • Commerce (selling)
  • Download site
  • Information site
  • Shock site
  • Game site

51
Typologies By Content By Function
  • By Content / components
  • Ha and James (1998)
  • Navigation aids
  • Search engines
  • Site maps
  • Rosenfeld and Morville (2002)
  • Organization
  • Labeling systems
  • Navigation systems
  • Search systems
  • Hwang, McMillan and Lee (2003). Corporate sites
  • Graphics
  • Text
  • Multimedia
  • By Function
  • Hwang, McMillan and Lee (2001). Corporate sites
  • Communication
  • About company About brand About sales
  • Audience Special interest/news/ads
    RecruitmentSurvey

52
Typologies For evaluation Link
structure
  • For evaluative purposes
  • Argus (1997)
  • Level of Resource Description objective
  • Level of Resource Evaluation subjective
  • Design (aesthetics/usability)
  • Organization (scheme)
  • Metainformation
  • Alexander and Tate(1999)
  • Advocacy
  • Business/Marketing
  • News
  • Informational
  • Personal
  • Link structure
  • Jackson (1997)
  • Connectedness (hypertext, satellite)
  • Dominance (index, linear)
  • Brin and Page (1998) PageRank (Google)
  • Haas, S.W., Grams, E.S. (1998).

53
Peter Van Dijcks Guide to Ease (blog) Comments
on the Bliss Classification Association
Bibliographic Classification Guide. 10
October, 2002. http//www.poorbuthappy.com/ease/ar
chives/001603.html
  • The standard categories recognized in
    classical facet analysis are Thing kind
    part property material process operation
    patient product by product agent space
    time. ltBCA websitegt
  • Why do these people try to specify what facets
    are useful? Surely if I want to classify my
    content using a facet called How impressed I was
    with this content when I first saw it then that
    is a perfectly valid facet? This underlying
    assumption that there are generic or correct
    ways of categorizing the world is just, well,
    wrong. The world doesnt have an inherent
    classification that we just have to discover. All
    classification gets its meaning from the people
    using it, not from the objects being classified.

54
Travis Wilson (creator of FacetMap) Thread
Special vs. General Schemes Date Wed, 12 Mar
2003 091411 0000 http//article.gmane.org/gmane
.comp.infodesign.facetedclassification/170/matchf
acet
  • At the other extreme, the universal qualities
    espoused by Ranganathan and others just don't
    apply to many resources that deserve
    classification. The "space" facet only works in
    the context of resources that have physical
    incarnations in a spatial location perhaps this
    is obvious, but it confirms that there is indeed
    a context -- one that many data-based resources
    don't share.
  • In the end, the whole idea of a set of general
    facets as a "framework for facets typical of each
    discipline" simply limits the number of
    disciplines that can use FC (to those that fit
    within the framework). Ranganathan was really not
    concerned with disciplines outside of biology. I
    don't think that kind of limitation is
    appropriate for faceted classification in
    general, and I hope we don't impose it.

55
Example Literature Hierarchical/ Faceted
  • English
  • Prose
  • Poetry
  • sonnet
  • ballad
  • French
  • Prose
  • Poetry
  • sonnet
  • ballad
  • German
  • Prose
  • Poetry
  • sonnet
  • ballad
  • Language
  • EN
  • FR
  • GR
  • Form
  • Prose
  • Poetry
  • sonnet
  • ballad

56
Illustration of faceted and hierarchical website
structures
  • Rosenfeld, L. Morville, P. (2002). Information
    architecture for the World Wide Web. Cambridge,
    MA OReill. P. 205.

57
Definition

58
Facet
  • Facet
  • A generic term used to denote any component of a
    compound subject, ltincludinggt ranked forms, terms
    and numbers (Ranganathan, 1967, p. 88).
  • A general manifestation of a subject
    (Ranganathan, 1962, p. 82).
  • Groups of terms derived by taking each term and
    defining it, per genus et differentiam, with
    respect for its parent class (Vickery, 1960, p.
    12).
  • Facet analytical approach Proper and rigorous
    practice of facet analysis by observing the rules
    of logical division. (Broughton, 2001, p. 67
    Mills, 2004, p. 268).
  • one characteristic of division is applied at a
    time conceptual analysis
  • division steps should be logical and proximate
  • division should be exhaustive (Mills, 2004, pp.
    551).

59
Planes of work
  • Idea The work of FA takes place in the Idea
    plane, where an entity is analyzed into component
    parts
  • Verbal FA continues here as further sorting and
    transformation of the selected categories/facets
    or terms occur.
  • Notational work of FC -- translating selected
    terms into notation.

60
Facets continued
  • Supports the notion that information can be
    assigned to multiple dimensions and may have
    individual attributes not intrinsic to the
    information.
  • Small components of larger entities/units.
  • Properties
  • Attributes
  • Characteristics
  • Slots
  • Relations
  • Functions
  • Concepts

61
High level categories
62
Classification
  • The placing of subjects into categories
  • The process of determining where an information
    package fits into a given hierarchy and then
    assigning the notation with the appropriate level
    of hierarchy to the information and to its
    surrogate.
  • Taylor, A. (1999). The organization of
    information. Englewood, CO Libraries Unlimited.

63
Classification- assigning objects to classes
  • Objects to be classified into a system are called
    elements, cases, units, exemplars, specimens or
    items. They are the sources or carriers' of
    properties, characteristics or variables.
  • A property can only be useful in a
    classification, if it varies within the set of
    objects, that is, if at least two different
    values (categories, states, labels) on the
    respective property occur in the sample.
  • When more than one property is used to
    characterize an object, the object can be
    described as a vector of values, a profile, a set
    of symptoms, or a pattern of features. The
    crucial assumption underlying classification is
    that objects are elements of a class, of a set,
    of a partition or-in biology-of a taxon. In other
    terminologies, the terms category' or cluster'
    are also used.
  • Classification is the process of finding classes
    and of assigning entities to these classes. The
    end product of this order-creating process,
    however, is often also referred to as
    classification.' To stress this distinction, the
    term classification system' can be used for the
    end-product, although in clinical psychology and
    biology the word taxonomy' is more common.
    Identification is the assignment of a specific
    case or object to (usually only) one of the
    classes.
  • H. Feger (2001). Classification Conceptions in
    the Social Sciences. International Encyclopedia
    of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp.
    1966-1973.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com