Toxin production in migrating dinoflagellates: a modelling study of PSP producing Alexandrium PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Toxin production in migrating dinoflagellates: a modelling study of PSP producing Alexandrium


1
Toxin production in migrating dinoflagellates a
modelling study of PSP producing Alexandrium
  • Kevin J. Flynn

2
(No Transcript)
3
Introduction
  • Nutrient status affects toxin synthesis
  • Migration and PSP production not mutually
    exclusive (MacIntyre et al. 1997)
  • N-limited batch cultures had lower PSP
  • Poorly understood complex interaction between
    light, N and P nutrition

4
From http//dinos.anesc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/HP2002/Jpeg/
Alexandrium/aff-tam-cat.-fun.jpg
5
Model development
6
Model development (Flynn and Fasham, 2002)
  • Light attenuation is function of depth, as well
    as the overlaying biomass of other populations
    and its own biomass
  • All four populations grown together
  • Photo-inhibition overrode any ascent stimulus
    highest position in water column optimized
    photosynthesis

7
Model development
  • Toxin synthesis promoted in low light, high N,
    and low P
  • Three different NP ratios used
  • Four populations grown in each of the four NP
    scenarios
  • Depth max 10m, migration rate 24m/day
  • Normal light/dark cycle for summer at 45ÂșN

8
Results
Best Pop 1 high Nred, recycled toxic-N Worst
Pop 4 low Nred, lost toxic-N
9
Migration patterns
10
Migration patterns
  • Phase 1 migrate down to avoid photo-inhibition,
    ends upon nutrient limitation
  • Biomass accumulation leads to shallower depth
  • Phase 2 intermediate depths, sufficient light,
    surface migration unnecessary
  • Duration depends on biomass accumulation
  • Phase 3 extreme migration to surface for light
    due to light attenuation
  • Asynchronous populations not subject to
    self-shading

11
Toxin content per biomass
12
Toxin content per biomass
  • Scenario 1 highest in phase 1, N-limitation
    after day 5, remained low throughout
  • Scenario 2 recovery in phase 3, light limitation
    lowered relative mineral-nutrient limitation,
    greater migration resulted
  • Scenario 3 same P as Scenario 2, but twice N
  • Higher Nred higher toxin content
  • Scenario 4 lowest P and biomass, highest toxin
    content

13
Toxin per liter of water (external of cell?)
Content per biomass
14
Discussion
  • Subsurface maximum biomass depended on nutrient
    status
  • Photo-inhibition prevented migration to surface
    unless accumulation caused light attenuation
  • Migration patterns not always rhythmic or truly
    diurnal
  • Unclear toxin content graphs (within same graph)
  • Difficult to differentiate population lines
  • Text did not always coincide with graph

15
Discussion
  • Highest toxin content in prolonged P-stress
  • Lowest in N-starvation (but never starved?)
  • Fastest synthesis during N-refeeding(?)
  • Toxicity depends not only on NP ratios, but also
    absolute concentrations
  • Still to test natural irradiance, temperature

16
Alexandrium fundyense
Alexandrium fundyense
Alexandrium tamarense
Alexandrium tamarense cysts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com