Chapter 9 Land Use Controls and Zoning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 9 Land Use Controls and Zoning

Description:

Effect of large-lot zoning for houses, mobile homes. Increases price of low-income housings ... Increases demand for low-income housing in other areas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:418
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: wes99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 9 Land Use Controls and Zoning


1
Chapter 9 Land Use Controlsand Zoning
2
  • Fact
  • Most cities in U.S., regardless of size, have
    policies that control land-use
  • Questions to Consider for Chapter 9
  • Why do cities control land use?
  • What are the market effects of land use controls?
  • What are the legal foundations of zoning and
    other land-use controls?

3
Why is Zoning Legal?!
  • 1926 U.S. Department of Commerce developed the
    Standard State Zoning Act
  • The act grants power to cities to regulate
    building
  • Height, Stories, Size, Building Density, Open
    Space, Location (commercial, industrial,
    residential).
  • Health, Safety, Morals, and General WelfareThis
    about covers EVERYTHING.

4
Controlling Population Growth
  • Urban Growth Boundary
  • Urban Service Boundary
  • Building Permits

5
  • Urban Growth Boundary -
  • Outlaw development outside urban boundary
  • Portland, Oregon
  • Urban Service Boundary -
  • Development is legal but city doesnt provide
    services
  • Boulder, Colorado
  • Many practice this, even though its not on the
    books
  • Effect of Urban Growth and Service Boundaries
  • Reduces demand for residential land outside the
    boundary
  • ?Lower price of residential land outside boundary
  • Increases demand for residential land inside the
    boundary?
  • ? Higher price of residential land outside
    boundary
  • Restricts supply of labor
  • Fewer jobs
  • Firms must pay higher wage rate
  • Reduces congestionmaybe

6
Precise Growth Controls Land Area City Fixed
and Lot Size Controlled
In a fixed-size city, increasing lot size
requirements or increasing acres per capita
lowers utility of all workers in a region. Start
with 2 cities of 4m, ones pop gets capped at 3m
via land use restrictions. Now, there is a city
of 3m and a city of 5m. Land prices in the
controlled city rises, and utilities between the
two cities equalize againbut now at different
populations.
7
Precise Growth Controls Growth Boundary
The big winners are the owners of land inside the
8-mile growth boundary. Their rent received just
increased. The big losers are those land owners
juuuuust outside the boundary. Their land rent
just dropped and flattened out and stays flat
until it gets to land that was previously valued
at Ra, Which is at 12 miles out. After 12 miles,
there is no effect on land rents.
8
If lot size is allowed to vary, but boundary
still exists
  • This looks pretty much the same as before, only
    now because firms and people can live/operate on
    smaller lots, the efficiency loss is reduced.

9
  • Building Permits -
  • limits population growth by limiting supply of
    new housing
  • Effect of limit on building permits
  • Reduces supply of new housing ?
  • higher price of new houses
  • Few new homes built
  • Lower price for residential land
  • Larger profits for developers getting the permits
  • Current allocation of permits
  • Fixed price by housing type
  • Ways to allocate available permits
  • With impact fee or development tax
  • Auction permits to highest bidder ?
  • Additional revenues for local government
  • Rank proposed projects by
  • Aesthetics, green space, density , etc.

10
Effect of Limiting Building Permits

Supply limited to 80 permits
Initial Supply Curve
Price of Houses (1,000)
250
200
160
Demand
80
120
New Houses per Year
11
Land-Use Zoning
  • Zoning for Industrial Nuisances
  • Retail Zoning
  • Residential Nuisances
  • Fiscal Zoning
  • High Density Zoning
  • Design Zoning
  • Open-Space Zoning

12
Zoning for Industrial Nuisances
  • Industrial firms produce negative externalities
  • Noise
  • Smoke
  • Sight pollution
  • Limiting industrial firms to industrial parks
    reduces impact of negative externalities on
    residential areas

13
Zoning for Retail Nuisances
  • Retail firms also produce negative externalities
  • Noise
  • Traffic congestion
  • Air pollution
  • Parking problems
  • Limiting retail firms to retail centers reduces
    impact of negative externalities such as auto and
    truck traffic on residential areas
  • Performance zoning for retail
  • Allows retail development in residential areas
    when developers meet standards for traffic flow
    improvement, parking, landscaping, etc

14
Zoning for Residential Nuisances
  • High density housing also produce negative
    externalities
  • Noise
  • Traffic congestion
  • Parking problems
  • Sight pollution such as limiting sunlight and
    restricting views
  • Limiting apartments, mobile homes to certain
    areas reduces negative impact on single family
    households
  • Performance zoning for high-density residential
    developments
  • Allows high density housing in certain areas when
    developer provides
  • Off-street parking
  • Street Improvements to limit congestion
  • Building designs
  • aesthetically pleasing
  • preserve sunlight, existing sight lines

15
Fiscal Zoning
  • excluding households or firms that impose fiscal
    burden on local government
  • Fiscal burden
  • when household or firm consumes more local public
    services than it pays for through local taxes
  • Fiscal surplus
  • when household or firm pays more in local taxes
    than it consumes in local public services

16
High Density Housing
  • Households in apartments, duplexes, mobile homes,
    and small houses consume more in local services
    than they pay in local taxes.
  • Large-lot zoning
  • Establishes minimum lot size for residential
    developments
  • Results in a minimum house value public services
    than it pays for through local taxes
  • Effect of large-lot zoning for houses, mobile
    homes
  • Increases price of low-income housings
  • Decreases number of low-income housing units,
    households
  • Reduces tax bills of households providing fiscal
    surplus
  • Increases demand for low-income housing in other
    areas
  • Increases tax bills of households providing
    fiscal surplus in other areas

17
Design Zoning
  • Where a city planner designs a city, then
    arranges activities to
  • promote efficient use of infrastructure
  • preserve open space
  • Directed development
  • Where city directs development to certain areas
    by changing the zoning
  • Example
  • Want to preserve southern end of Carroll County
    for agricultural use
  • Zone southern part of county for agricultural,
    low density residential only
  • Effect of directed development
  • Increases price of land in area development
    directed toward
  • Deceases price of land in area development
    directed away from

18
Transferable Development Rights
  • Movement today toward establishing preservation
    zones
  • where development is limited to preserve land use
    in present state
  • Establishment of preservation zone creates
    inequity
  • Reduces the market value of land in preservation
    zone
  • Landowners inside zone are worse off
  • Increases market value of land near preservation
    zone
  • Landowners outside zone are better off
  • Transferable development rights (TDR) -
  • way to compensate landowners who are worse off
  • Establish a limit to total development allowed
    inside, outside preservation zone
  • Issue development rights to landowners inside,
    outside zone
  • Landowners inside preservation zone can sell
    their development rights

19
Open-Space Zoning
  • Open-space zoning (two methods for providing
    greenspace)
  • 1) purchase and preserving land for open space,
    greenbelts, agricultural preserves, nature
    preserves, etc.
  • 2) Restrict the use of private land (zoning)
  • Winners
  • Owners of residential, commercial land nearby
  • City dwellers who benefit by walking by or
    driving by
  • Losers
  • Landowners who are restricted in use of the land
  • 1 is the more expensive optionCity acquires
    land at market price
  • 2 is cheaper from citys point of viewno
    purchase required

20
Open Space Zoning-Inefficient
If the city purchases the land for OS, it
compares the cost and benefits as it does for
trucks, schools, etcat the market value. Partial
compensation results in more than efficient
amounts of OS. When land is zoned to create open
space, the cost is shifted to the land owner.
Because the city and voters doesnt bear the full
cost, it zones more than the efficient amount. If
the city doesnt compensate the owner, the MC is
0so, it zones open space until the marginal
benefit is 0the last acre of OS is worthless.
21
Zoning and the Law
  • Land use controls in effect today are result of
    60 years of legal decisions based on challenges
    by affected landowners
  • Constitutionality of zoning laws is based on
  • Substantive due process
  • Nuisance zoning is constitutional if it promotes
    public health and safety
  • Equal protection
  • Fiscal or exclusionary zoning has been challenged
    on basis that it harms low-income residents
    outside the jurisdiction
  • Just compensation
  • Does zoning violate the taking clause ?
  • If government converts land from private to
    public use, the landlord must be compensated
  • Courts generally rule that landlord does not have
    to be fully compensated when zoning takes value
    from the land

22
Zoning cant be arbitrary
  • Euclid v. Ambler (1924) Established the
    standards of substantive due process for zoning
    regs.
  • Zoning must be for legitimate public purpose
    using reasonable means
  • Ambler Realty bought land for commercial
    development, but the land was zoned
    residentialthey suedthey lostland use and
    separation of uses is reasonable.
  • Public benefits criteria does not require
    benefits to EXCEED costs.
  • San Franciscos tried to explicitly segregate its
    Chinese populationbut, they were declared
    unconstitutionalThe city then went after
    laundries (a Chinese-dominated industry at the
    time). This did not violate the Constitution,
    because it focused on the separation of business
    and residencesand, thus allowed SF to provide a
    legal means to segregate.

23
Interesting Things to Read on Eminent Domain
  • Kelo v. City of New London CT (2005)
  • Berman v. Parker (1954)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com