Local District 5 Principals Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 92
About This Presentation
Title:

Local District 5 Principals Meeting

Description:

Local District 5 Principals Meeting – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 93
Provided by: Daniel699
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Local District 5 Principals Meeting


1
Local District 5Principals Meeting
  • February 11, 2009

2
Updates
  • Budget Update
  • LD5 Plan of Action
  • CAHSEE Update
  • Periodic Assessment
  • District Corrective Action Implementation
  • LD5 Happenings

3
Budget Update
  • Expecting a state decision this week
  • Current budget shortfall 100 million for 08-09
    and 400 million for 09-10
  • Board Actions
  • February 26th Briefing
  • March 10th Decision on district and school
    budgets
  • March 15th March Letters to all certificated
    and identified teachers
  • Late March/Early April Decision on classroom
    norms

4
LD5 Plan of Action
  • Draft progress update in your packets
  • Progress will be reviewed with Superintendent
    Cortines
  • Will be updating EL Plans in the near future

5
  • CAHSEE Update

6
CAHSEE Update - Seniors
7
CAHSEE Update - Juniors
8
CAHSEE Update
9
CAHSEE Update
10
  • Periodic Assessments

11
  • Participation Summary

12
Periodic Assessment Scanning RatesDistrict-wide
Elementary Assessments
13
Periodic Assessment Scanning RatesDistrict-wide
Secondary Assessments through 11/26/08
14
  • Periodic Assessments
  • Performance Summary
  • Elementary Mathematics

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
  • Periodic Assessments
  • Performance Summary
  • Elementary Science

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
  • Periodic Assessments
  • Performance Summary
  • Secondary Mathematics

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
  • Periodic Assessments
  • Performance Summary
  • Secondary Science

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
  • Periodic Assessments
  • Performance Summary
  • Secondary English Language Arts

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
  • Periodic Assessments and Student Achievement in
    Mathematics and English/Language Arts
  • Participation Rates

44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
  • Proficient and AdvancedOver Time

48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
  • Corrective Action Implementation

54
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action

1
55
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires
    states to implement a system of corrective
    actions for local educational agencies (LEAs)
    that are in PI for three consecutive years.

ç
2
56
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • The State Board of Education (SBE) adopted
    Corrective Action F as a mandate for PI-Year 3
    LEAs. The District therefore is required by the
    State to implement the following
  • 1. Corrective Action F

ç
3
57
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • Revise the LEA plan or addendum identifying
    objectives and action steps to fully implement
    the corrective action
  • 3. Report progress quarterly.

ç
4
58
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • The mandates of Corrective Action F include
  • Implement fully the most recent SBE adopted K-8
    and/or standards aligned 9-10 English-language
    arts (ELA) and mathematics curriculum that
    includes use of most recent SBE standards aligned
    materials in ELA and mathematics
  • Phase in new SBE curriculum adoptions in
    mathematics by September, 2009 and in ELA by
    September, 2010

Mandates of Corrective Action F
5
59
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • 3. Provide materials-based professional
    development
  • SB 472 (AB 466) for appropriate teachers
  • SB 472 English learner (ELPD) for appropriate
    teachers
  • AB 430 (AB75) for administrators
  • 4. Continue to review formative and summative
    assessment data to make modifications that
    support the schools implementation of the 2004
    mathematics and 2005 ELA curriculum.

Mandates of Corrective Action F
6
60
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • Amend LEA-PI objectives and actions steps around
    performance goals
  • Implement interventions for students in need,
    especially English learners and students with
    disabilities.

7
61
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • Focuses on
  • Student need
  • Raising the academic performance of all students,
    including underperforming students  
  • Phase in of math and ELA textbook adoption   
  • Professional development for teachers (SB 472)
    and administrators (SB 430)
  • Intervention for all student working below
    grade-level standards, especially English
    learners and students with disabilities.

Background
8
62
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • Implementation of the core instructional program
    should be delivered through Response
    to Instruction and Intervention (RTI2).

9
63
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • RTI2
  • is an integrated system of instruction and
    intervention informed by student data
  • integrates resources from general education,
    supplemental categorical programs, and special
    education
  • is a 3-tiered approach to teaching and learning
    during the school day for both elementary and
    secondary schools.

10
64
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • LAUSD defines RTI2 tiers of instruction and
    intervention as follows

Tier 3
Tier 3 provides a program that focuses on
accelerated and intensive instruction targeted to
specific student need. Close monitoring allows
for the adjustment of materials and methods of
instruction.
Tier 2
Tier 2 continues to provide the foundation of the
grade-level core curriculum aligned to the
content standards but adds intensive and explicit
instruction and intervention focused on student
need. Close monitoring allows for the adjustment
of materials and methods of instruction.
Tier 1
Tier 1 consists of grade-level core curriculum
aligned to the content standards. Effective
instructional practices are implemented and
intervention consists of the use of supplemental
materials aligned with the core program.
11
65
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
  • LAUSD has provided Tiers of Instruction and
    Intervention charts (Bulletin 4573.0 Attachments
    B-E) for both elementary and secondary ELA and
    mathematics.
  • The Tiers of Instruction and Intervention
    charts
  • Outline the core instructional plan that
    integrate RTI2 as the strategy to support
    teaching and learning
  • Identify
  • Tier I core materials, a means to monitor
    progress, and instructional support
  • Tier 2 supplemental materials, a means to monitor
    progress, and instructional support
  • Tier 3 replacement materials, a means to monitor
    progress, and instructional support.

12
66
Program Improvement LEA Plan Year 3Corrective
Action
Sample Tiers of Instruction and Intervention
Charts
Single Plan for Student Achievement
13
67
What are the multiple measures and decision
points that will determine placement and/or
movement of a student in the appropriate tier of
instruction and intervention?
14
68
What are the multiple measures and decision
points that will determine placement and/or
movement of a student in the appropriate tier of
instruction and intervention?
15
69
What are the multiple measures and decision
points that will determine placement and/or
movement of a student in the appropriate tier of
instruction and intervention?
16
70
SECONDARY TIERS OF INSTRUCTION MATHEMATICS The
following chart illustrates a tiered approach to
teaching and learning. The tiered approach is
based upon research and the practice of
providing high quality instruction or
intervention matched to student needs. Each tier
identifies the instructional materials that must
be used for the core a means to monitor
progress using interim measures identification
of interventions needed based on the measures
and finally, instructional support including
coaching that provides resources to guide
teaching and learning.
What are the multiple measures and decision
points that will determine placement and/or
movement of a student in the appropriate tier of
instruction and intervention?
17
71
  • LD5 Happenings

72
Congratulations
  • Roberto Martinez and Roseann Cazares, AP,
  • and special education teachers from Wilson HS.
  • On January 22nd, the school held its first
    Disability Expo. About 300 students and adults
    participated in the activities. The purpose of
    the Expo was to call attention to the various
    disabilities our students have and show how the
    students deal with their disabilities on a daily
    basis. The Expo gave each student, disabled and
    not-disabled, a deeper appreciation for the
    challenges that special education students must
    face on a daily basis.

73
(No Transcript)
74
Congratulations
  • Principals Susan Saenz, Margaret de la Mora and
  • Delores Manrique from Griffin, Gates and
  • Loreto Elementary Schools. On January 24th,
  • the schools participated in the 2nd Annual
    KIDTYPE-OFF. KIDTYPE-OFF is an annual student
    typing contest.
  • Each school had two student finalists who
    competed
  • against LA Best students. The students were
    joined by Major Riordan and a host of special
    guests from the Riordan Foundation and LAs Best.
    The event was hosted at
  • Griffin Elementary School.

75
(No Transcript)
76
Congratulations
  • Congratulations to Roberto Martinez and the
    college staff from Wilson HS for their Academic
    Recognition Assembly. On January 29th, the
    school celebrated students who had a 3.5 or
    better GPA for three years. This year 61
    students were celebrated and recognized. Parents
    were invited to a scrumptious breakfast and each
    student received a certificate of recognition and
    a Wilson sweat shirt.

77
(No Transcript)
78
Congratulations
  • To all the LD5 teachers who were recognized at
    the Si Se Puede Awards Celebration on February
    2nd. The Si Se Puede Awards plaques were
    awarded to exemplary educators within LAUSD that
    carry on the legacy of Cesar E. Chavez. Julie
    Chavez Rodriguez, granddaughter of Cesar Chavez
    gave out the awards. Teachers from the following
    schools were honored at this reception.
  • Elementary Schools Breed, Farmdale, First
    Street, 49th Street , Hooper, Kennedy, Lizarraga,
    Sierra Park, and Trinity
  • Middle Schools Belvedere, Carver, El Sereno
  • High Schools Bravo Magnet, Jefferson, Lincoln,
    Ramona, Roosevelt, Santee, and Wilson

79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
Congratulations
  • Kevin Baker, staff, parents and students from
    Nevin Elementary School. Nevin has been selected
    to receive the California Department of
    Educations Service-Learning Leader School Award.
    The award was presented yesterday, February 10th,
    during a luncheon at the Annual California
    Service-Learning Leadership Institute at the
    Anaheim Sheraton in Anaheim. Nevin was awarded a
    flag to fly over the school and a plaque
    commemorating the schools achievement.

82
(No Transcript)
83
Display of student work includes CST Goals
written by students..
84
Students, parent center, and teachers prepare for
Black History Month Presentation.
85
Proud office staff contributed to getting out of
SAIT
86
Congratulations
  • Congratulations to all the students who
    participated in the Second Annual LD5 Spelling
    Bee which was held on Saturday, February 7th.
    Special thanks also to the principals and
    teachers who motivated the students to
    participate. Finally, thank you to the LD5 team,
    starting with Ailleth Tom, who made this a
    roaring success.
  • All the student were winners and the three top
    students were
  • Nataly Oliva, 5th Grade, from Main Street
  • Michael Le, 6th Grade, from Solano Avenue
  • Ruben Ilan, 5th Grade, from Latona Elementary.

87
(No Transcript)
88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
(No Transcript)
92
Lifes Priorities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com