Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 29c57-YTQxN


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session


Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session ... 15.2-961. Replacement of Trees during Development Process ... Tree replacement is given more weight that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: mkn3


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session

Tree Conservation Legislation Strategy Session
  • How do we prepare for the next Virginia State
    Legislative Assembly?

  • Background
  • Present authority
  • Pressures and limitations
  • Recent legislative actions
  • Desired outcomes
  • Strategies and tactics
  • Whats missing?
  • Next Steps?

  • Present Authority
  • Direct
  • 10.1-1127.1. Conservation of Heritage,
    Specimen, Memorial and Street Trees
  • Indirect
  • 15.2-961. Replacement of Trees during
    Development Process
  • 10.1-562. Erosion and Sediment Control
  • 10.1-2100. Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and
    the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation
    and Management Regulations 9 VAC 10-20-10
    through -230

  • The ability of Virginias jurisdictions to meet
    Federal and State air and water quality
    regulations is dependent on their ability to
    protect and manage their communitys tree cover
  • Federal Clean Air Act
  • Regional and Local State Implementation Plans
  • Federal Clean Water Act
  • Chesapeake 2000 Agreement
  • Chesapeake Bay Act of Virginia State Code
  • Chesapeake Bay Regulations of Virginia State Code
  • Public Awareness especially in areas with rapid

  • Despite research demonstrating that trees
    provide significant ecological environmental and
    socio-economical benefits, present VA State Code
    that can be used to require tree preservation
    during land development is limited
  • Chesapeake Bay and Erosion and Sedimentation
    Control Code provide the legal basis for many
    local ordinances
  • Tree preservation is not primary focus
  • Water quality, erosion control is focus
  • Tree replacement is given more weight that
  • Preservation of higher quality vegetation is not
  • Heritage, memorial, specimen and street tree VA
    State Code does not provide for the preservation
    of forested tracts

Strengthening Enabling Authority
  • Attempts to strengthen tree conservation
    authority have failed repeatedly
  • The land development and wood products industry
    have influenced these legislative actions

  • Recent Legislative Proposals
  • Proposals to amend 15.2-961. Replacement of
    Trees during development process
  • 2002 session, Sen. Howell SB 484 (left)
  • 2002 session, Del Marshall HB 105 (continued to
  • 2003 session, Sen. Howell SB 1013 (passed, but
    with no tree preservation)
  • 2004 session, Del. Sickles introduced HB 1479
  • 2006 session, Sen. Ticer SB 246/236 (passed by
  • All considered by Committee on Counties, Cities
    and Towns
  • Proposal for DEQ to study tree-related measures
    in Clean Air Act state implementation plans to
    avoid loss of future federal transportation funds
  • 2005 session, Sen. Mims, SJ 343
  • Left in Committee on Rules

Desired Outcomes
  • Legislation that directly empowers jurisdictions
    to require the preservation of tree and forest
    resources in higher levels than that currently
  • Legislation that acknowledges the ecological
    environmental and socio-economical benefits
    provided by trees
  • Enabling language that communicates that it is
    lawful and reasonable for a jurisdiction to limit
    property development rights, especially where
    land development proposals (individually or
    collectively) could significantly impact the
    quality of life experienced by the community at
  • Legislation that links to State and Federal
    environmental mandates

Desired Outcomes (the sequel)
  • Legislation is based on a predictable core
  • Legislation that is flexible, allows for
    modifications and deviations to facilitate other
    social and political considerations
  • Legislation that compliments efforts to conserve
    productive forest lands
  • Legislation that will not experience significant
    opposition by other jurisdictions or special
    interests groups
  • Legislation that meets the needs of all
    jurisdictions where it can be used

Questions Asked July 21, 2006
  • Who are the partners?
  • Who/what are the road blocks?
  • What other Bills are on the horizon?
  • What are pros and cons of statewide versus
    limited geographical application
  • Should we continue to pursue same amendment or
    generate new proposal?
  • Should we submit this year or what till 2008?
  • Should we link to air quality and non-attainment
  • What are other jurisdictions/states doing?
  • How do we engage other jurisdictions?

Strategies and Tactics
  • Influencing state/local policy makers
  • Conduct regional ecosystem service analysis and
    combine into one report
  • Educate and engage private citizens and
  • Letter writing campaign
  • Identify key members of VA Legislative Assembly
  • Meet with critical members
  • Letters to State Forester supporting UF program
    within VDOF
  • Find support within the building and wood
    products industry
  • Continue Building inter-jurisdictional consensus

What did we miss?
  • What other strategies can we use to promote
    stronger tree conservation legislation?
  • Should we attempt to identify/quantify levels of
    jurisdictional support?
  • How does Urban Tree Canopy Goals figure into the

What are the Next Steps?
  • Linkage to Air Quality Plans is this possible,
  • How can we get more folks to participate?
  • How can we support each other?
  • Should work continue within subcommittee
  • How soon should we start working on this?