Taxation of Financial Instruments: Is the DebtEquity Distinction Relevant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Taxation of Financial Instruments: Is the DebtEquity Distinction Relevant

Description:

The tax code distinguishes between debt and equity and between interest, ... Times Mirror effectively deferred tax on $75 million of capital gains. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: robertm89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Taxation of Financial Instruments: Is the DebtEquity Distinction Relevant


1
Taxation of Financial Instruments Is the
Debt/Equity Distinction Relevant?
  • Presentation to the Presidents Advisory Panel on
    Federal Tax Reform
  • Robert McDonald
  • Erwin P. Nemmers Distinguished Professor of
    Finance
  • Kellogg School of Management
  • Northwestern University

2
Overview
  • Traditional distinctions among kinds of financial
    income
  • The role of dealers
  • Prevalence and growth of derivatives
  • Examples
  • Complexity of rules governing taxation of
    financial transactions

3
Types of Financial Income
  • The tax code distinguishes between debt and
    equity and between interest, dividends, and
    capital gains
  • It is well-known that in certain cases the
    debt-equity distinction is problematic, for
    example junk bonds and convertible bonds have
    both debt and equity characteristics
  • Distinctions between forms of financial income
    are not economically meaningful
  • All represent returns to a financial investment

4
Derivatives Blur the Distinctions
  • In modern financial markets, derivatives can be
    constructed that have characteristics of both
    debt and equity.
  • Derivatives are financial claims that have a
    payoff determined by the price of some other
    asset
  • Futures, options, and swaps are examples of
    derivatives (as is automobile insurance!)
  • The technology for creating new financial claims
    is well understood and creation of new claims is
    common

5
What do Dealers Do?
  • Securities dealers make markets in financial
    instruments, accommodating customer demand to buy
    and sell financial instruments
  • Dealers buy and sell stocks, forward contracts,
    options, and customized financial claims
  • A forward contract is an agreement to buy or sell
    in the future at a price fixed today
  • Call options and put options are like forward
    contracts --- the transaction price is fixed
    today --- except that the customer only buys the
    asset (call) or sells (put) if they profit by
    doing so.
  • This activity leaves dealers with exposure to
    price risk
  • Dealers generally hedge this resulting exposure,
    i.e., they acquire an offsetting position that
    makes money if the position due to their
    customers loses money.

6
The Role of Dealers Example
  • A customer owning shares worth 100 wants to sell
    the shares 5 years from today for a guaranteed
    price of 125 (this is a forward sales contract)
  • The dealer agrees to buy the shares in 5 years
    for 125.
  • The dealer has the risk that the share price in 5
    years will be less than 125
  • To offset the risk stemming from this agreement,
    the dealer needs a position that will make money
    if the stock price declines. Thus, the dealer
    short-sells borrows shares from a third party
    and sells them, investing the sale proceeds in
    bonds.
  • If the share price falls, the dealer can buy
    replacement shares at a low price, making money
    on the short sale.
  • The dealer has a forward purchase contract and an
    economically equivalent offsetting position that
    is short stock and long bonds.

7
The Role of Dealers, cont.
  • With the help of the dealer, the customer has
    converted a share position into the economic
    equivalent of a bond (a certain return in 5
    years)
  • The dealer bears no share price risk
  • This particular transaction would be deemed a
    sale under the constructive sale rules, but there
    are close variants in which the customer retains
    some risk and can defer tax

8
The Revolution in Financial Technology
  • Black, Scholes, and Merton showed in the early
    1970s how to price and hedge options and other
    derivatives more complicated than forward
    contracts their analysis created financial
    engineering
  • Dealers routinely use this technology to price
    and hedge claims such as options
  • Dealers trade stocks and bonds to hedge options
    and other derivatives
  • Dealers can also create synthetic stocks and
    bonds by trading derivatives
  • Dealers mark-to-market, and all dealer income is
    ordinary, so distinctions between kinds of income
    are often not preserved when dealers are
    intermediaries
  • Virtually all derivatives are equivalent to a
    long position in some asset and a short position
    in some other asset.
  • For example, a call option has a synthetic
    equivalent of borrowing to buy stock

9
Effects of the New Technology
  • With dealers able to create hybrid claims --- or
    assist firms in designing them --- traditional
    distinctions between debt and equity and types of
    financial income are harder to identify and
    support
  • The market for derivatives has grown tremendously
    in the last 30 years.

10
Growth in Derivatives Swaps and Exchange-Traded
Options
Sources Chicago Board Options Exchange and ISDA
11
The Traditional View of Debt and Equity
  • Equity has no promised maturity payment and is
    risky
  • Debt has a promised maturity payment and is
    relatively safe
  • It is easy to design hybrid instruments that
    have characteristics of both debt and equity.

12
What are These?
  • DECS (Debt Exchangeable for Common Stock) is
    here used as generic shorthand for a hybrid
    debt-equity claim
  • Both payoffs have characteristics of debt and
    equity
  • Depending on circumstances, characteristics, or
    documentation, claims like these can resemble
    debt or equity for tax purposes.
  • Existing positions can be modified to resemble
    these diagrams by adding options and forward
    contracts

13
Example Individual Capital Gains Deferral
  • Suppose a wealthy investor has 1 billion dollars
    in appreciated stock.
  • The investor collars the position in 5 years the
    investor has the right to sell the stock to a
    dealer for 1 billion and is required to sell to
    the dealer for 1.75 billion if it is worth more
    than that. The investor pays nothing for this
    position.
  • The investor is protected against losses and
    gives up gains above a certain level
  • Capital gains on the position are deferred for at
    least 3 to 5 years
  • At the outset, such a position might be
    economically equivalent to 75 debt and 25
    equity, yet it is completely untaxed (except for
    dividends paid on the stock) for 3-5 years
  • The implicit interest income on the position is
    taxed as capital gain, if at all

14
Example Corporate Uses of DECS-like Structures
  • In one well-known transaction, Times Mirror
    (which owned an appreciated position in Netscape
    stock) sold a DECS-like note with a principal
    payment linked to the price of Netscape. Times
    Mirror effectively deferred tax on 75 million of
    capital gains. The net result was like a collar.
  • In a common transaction, firms issue a DECS-like
    security (also called Feline PRIDES) in the
    form of a bond coupled with a forward sales
    contract. The economic result is a deferred issue
    of equity, but a portion of payments on the
    security are deductible as interest.

15
A Multitude of Rules for Investors
  • Rules have been added ex post to stop egregious
    abuses. Examples include
  • Income on a position that looks like a bond
    should be taxed as interest
  • Bonds that do not pay explicit interest should be
    taxed as if they do pay interest.
  • A completely hedged position is deemed to have
    been sold
  • Hedging stops the capital gains holding period
  • But there are special exceptions for
    exchange-traded options
  • There are special rules for the taxation of
    futures contracts
  • The tax law tries to draw distinctions that are
    not economically supportable.
  • Sophisticated taxpayers can use tax rules and
    financial instruments to obtain substantial tax
    benefits.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com