... Bhatt MD, Keith A A Fox MBChB, Werner Hacke MD, Peter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

... Bhatt MD, Keith A A Fox MBChB, Werner Hacke MD, Peter

Description:

... Bhatt MD, Keith A A Fox MBChB, Werner Hacke MD, Peter B Berger MD, Henry R Black ... Bhatt DL, Fox K, Hacke W, et al. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 401. Trial committees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: dlbh2
Category:
Tags: mbchb | bhatt | fox | hacke | keith | peter | werner

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ... Bhatt MD, Keith A A Fox MBChB, Werner Hacke MD, Peter


1
Disclosure
Dr Bhatt has received honoraria from
AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly,
Millennium, Schering-Plough, sanofi-aventis, and
The Medicines Company. This presentation
discusses off-label uses of clopidogrel. This
study was funded by sanofi-aventis and
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
2
Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and
Ischemic Stabilization, Management and
Avoidance(CHARISMA)
Deepak L Bhatt MD, Keith A A Fox MBChB, Werner
Hacke MD, Peter B Berger MD, Henry R Black MD,
William E Boden MD, Patrice Cacoub MD, Eric A
Cohen MD, Mark A Creager MD, J Donald Easton MD,
Marcus D Flather MD, Steven M Haffner MD,
Christian W Hamm MD, Graeme J Hankey MD, S
Claiborne Johnston MD, Koon-Hou Mak MD,
Jean-Louis Mas MD, Gilles Montalescot MD, PhD,
Thomas A Pearson MD, P Gabriel Steg MD, Steven R
Steinhubl MD, Michael A Weber MD, Danielle M
Brennan MS, Liz Fabry-Ribaudo MSN, RN, Joan Booth
RN, Eric J Topol MD, on behalf of the CHARISMA
Investigators
3
Study organization
Investigators
National coordinators
Data safety monitoring board
Sponsors
C5
Clinical event adjudication committee
Operations committee
Executive committee
C5The Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular
Coordinating Center
Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
4
Executive committee
  • Chairman
  • Eric J Topol
  • Co-chairmen / Investigators
  • Keith AA Fox
  • Werner Hacke
  • Member / International principal investigator
  • Deepak L Bhatt
  • Members / Investigators
  • Peter B Berger
  • William E Boden
  • Eric Cohen
  • Marcus Flather
  • Christian W Hamm
  • S Claiborne Johnston
  • Jean-Louis Mas
  • Thomas A Pearson
  • Henry R Black
  • Patrice Cacoub
  • J Donald Easton
  • Steven M Haffner
  • Graeme J Hankey
  • Koon-Hou Mak
  • Gilles Montalescot
  • P Gabriel Steg
  • Michael Weber

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
5
National coordinators
  • Argentina
  • Sebastian F Ameriso
  • Fernando A Cura
  • Australia
  • Phillip Aylward
  • Graeme J Hankey
  • Belgium
  • Benoît J Boland
  • Brazil
  • Angelo Amato
  • Vicenzo De Paola
  • Canada
  • Eric A Cohen
  • André Roussin
  • Phillip Teal
  • Czech Republic
  • Edvard Ehler
  • Denmark
  • Henrik Sillesen
  • Germany and Austria
  • Ulrich Hoffmann
  • Franz-Josef Neumann
  • Greece
  • Alexios P Dimas
  • Hungary
  • Tamàs Forster
  • Italy
  • Diego Ardissino
  • Mexico
  • Ricardo Alvarado
  • The Netherlands
  • Harry Roger Büller
  • Norway
  • Bent Indredavik
  • Poland
  • Zbigniew A Gaciong
  • Portugal
  • Joao Morais
  • Spain
  • Amadeo Betriu
  • Luis M Ruilope
  • South Africa
  • Anthony J Dalby
  • Sweden
  • Jan B Östergren
  • Switzerland
  • Thomas F Luscher
  • Turkey
  • Hakan Kultursay
  • United Kingdom
  • Marcus D Flather
  • Keith AA Fox
  • United States
  • William E Boden
  • J Donald Easton
  • Steven M Haffner
  • Thomas A Pearson

Bhatt DL, Fox K, Hacke W, et al. Am Heart J 2005
150 401.
6
Trial committees
  • Clinical events committee
  • A Michael Lincoff (Chairman)
  • Sorin J Brener (Cardiology)
  • Cathy A Sila (Neurology)
  • Data safety monitoring board
  • Robert L Frye (Chairman)
  • Pierre Amarenco
  • Lawrence M Brass A great doctor, a great
    investigator, a great friend
  • Marc Buyse
  • Lawrence S Cohen
  • David L DeMets
  • Valentin Fuster
  • Robert G Hart
  • John R Marler
  • Charles McCarthy
  • Albert Schömig

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2005 150
401.e1-401.e7
7
CAPRIE Superior efficacy of clopidogrel versus
ASA
Patients with recent ischemic stroke, recent MI,
or symptomatic PAD
20
8.7 RRR (p0.043)
ASA
16
Clopidogrel
12
Cumulative event rate ()
8
4
0
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
Months of follow-up
MI, ischemic stroke or vascular
death Intent-to-treat analysis (n19 185)
CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996 348
13291339.
8
CAPRIE Clopidogrel reduced the rate of
rehospitalization
Patients with recent ischemic stroke, recent MI,
or symptomatic PAD
Rehospitalization for ischemia (angina pectoris,
TIA, limb ischemia) or bleeding
(gastrointestinal, intracranial, or
other) On-treatment analysis (n19 099)
Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2000 140 67?73.
9
CHARISMA trial design
Clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n7802)
Patients age 45 years at high risk for
atherothrombotic events
Low-dose ASA 75-162 mg/day
R
Double-blind treatment up to 1040 primary
efficacy events
(n15 603)
Low-dose ASA 75-162 mg/day
Placebo 1 tablet/day (n7801)
Final visit (fixed study end date)
Visits every 6 months
1-month visit
3-month visit
MI (fatal or non-fatal), stroke (fatal or
non-fatal), or cardiovascular death
event-driven trial
Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
10
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged 45 years with at least one of
the following 1A) Documented coronary
disease and/or 1B) Documented cerebrovascular
disease and/or 1C) Documented symptomatic
PAD and/or 2) Two major or one major and two
minor or three minor risk factors With written
informed consent Without exclusion criteria
Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
11
Inclusion criteria Patients with documented CV
disease
  • One or more of the following primary criteria
    must be satisfied
  • Documented cerebrovascular disease
  • Previous TIA within the past 5 years
  • Previous ischemic stroke within the past 5 years
  • Documented coronary disease
  • Stable angina with documented multivessel
    coronary disease
  • History of multivessel percutaneous coronary
    intervention (PCI)
  • History of multivessel CABG
  • Previous MI
  • Documented symptomatic PAD
  • Current intermittent claudication with an ABI
    0.85
  • A history of intermittent claudication together
    with a previous related intervention (amputation,
    peripheral bypass, angioplasty, etc.)

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
12
Inclusion criteria Patients with multiple risk
factors
  • For the risk factor-only population, two major or
    one major and two minor or three minor
    atherothrombotic risk factors must be present

ABI Ankle Brachial Index
Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
13
Exclusion criteria
  • Requirement for clopidogrel such as
  • recent acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment
    elevation
  • investigators assessment clopidogrel is required
    long term
  • Need for chronic therapy with high-dose (gt162
    mg/day) ASA or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
    drug (except COX-2 inhibitors)
  • Current use of other oral antithrombotic
    medications with intention for long-term
    treatment (eg, OAC)
  • Planned revascularization procedure (OK after the
    procedure if no open-label clopidogrel is needed)

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148 263268.
14
Primary study endpoints
  • Primary efficacy endpoint
  • The first occurrence of any component of the
    following cluster  MI (fatal or nonfatal)
  •  Stroke (fatal or nonfatal stroke from any
    cause)
  •  Cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic
    death) 
  • Primary safety endpoint
  • Severe bleeding (GUSTO definition1), including
    fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148
263268. 1GUSTO Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993
329 673682.
15
Other study endpoints
  • Principal secondary efficacy endpoint
  • First occurrence of MI (fatal or nonfatal),
    stroke (fatal or nonfatal), cardiovascular death,
    or hospitalization for UA, TIA, or
    revascularization
  • Other efficacy endpoints
  • Individual components of the primary and
    secondary endpoints
  • Other safety endpoints
  • Fatal bleeding
  • Primary intracranial hemorrhage
  • Moderate bleeding (GUSTO definition)1

Bhatt DL et al. Am Heart J 2004 148
263268. 1GUSTO Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993
329 673682.
16
Bleeding definitions GUSTO criteria
  • Severe bleeding
  • Fatal bleeding
  • Primary or post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
  • Substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring
    treatment to sustain cardiac output
  • Moderate
  • Bleeding that required transfusion, but did not
    result in hemodynamic compromise or meet
    definition for GUSTO severe bleeding
  • Minor bleeding
  • Other bleeding, not requiring transfusion or
    causing hemodynamic compromise

GUSTO Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993 329
673682.
17
Overall population Baseline characteristics
Clopidogrel ASA Placebo ASA Characteristic
(n7802) (n7801) Age Median (range) 64.0
(39-95) 64.0 (45?93) Female 29.7
29.8 Ethnicity Caucasian 80.4
79.9 Hispanic 9.9 10.7 Asian 5.0 5.0 Black 3.2
3.0 Other 1.5 1.4 Inclusion group
Documented CVD 77.7 78.1 Multiple risk
factors 21.3 20.8 Neither criterion 1.0 1.1 Sm
oking Status Current 20.1 20.3 Former 48.8 48.7
Data for age are in years, all other data
expressed as percent
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
18
Overall population Concomitant medications
Clopidogrel ASA () Placebo ASA
() Medication (n7802) (n7801)
ASA 99.7 99.7 Open-label clopidogrel 9.9 10.4 Diu
retics 48.2 47.1 Nitrates 23.2 24.1 Calcium
antagonists 36.7 36.9 Beta blockers 55.0 55.7 Angi
otensin II receptor blockers 25.5 25.9 ACE
inhibitors 60.1 60.7 Other antihypertensives 12.4
12.4 Statins 76.8 76.9 Antidiabetic
medications 41.8 41.5
Maximal frequency of usage of each agent at any
time during the trial (assessed after baseline
and at every follow-up visit)
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
19
Overall population Primary efficacy outcome (MI,
stroke, or CV death)
First occurrence of MI (fatal or nonfatal),
stroke (fatal or nonfatal), or cardiovascular
death All patients received ASA 75-162
mg/day The number of patients followed beyond 30
months decreases rapidly to zero and there are
only 21 primary efficacy events that occurred
beyond this time (13 clopidogrel and 8 placebo)
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
20
Overall population Principal secondary efficacy
outcome (MI/stroke/CV death/hospitalization)
Placebo ASA 17.9
Clopidogrel ASA 16.7
RRR 7.7 95 CI 0.5, 14.4 p0.04
First occurrence of MI, stroke, CV death, or
hospitalization for UA, TIA, or
revascularization All patients received ASA
75-162 mg/day The number of patients followed
beyond 30 months decreases rapidly to zero and
there are only 38 secondary efficacy events that
occurred beyond this time (23 clopidogrel and 15
placebo)

Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
21
Overall population Primary and secondary
efficacy results (MI/stroke/CV death/hospitalizati
on)
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA
ASA Endpoint - n () (n7802) (n7801) RR
(95 CI) p value Primary efficacy endpoint 534
(6.8) 573 (7.3) 0.93 (0.83,1.05) 0.22 All cause
mortality 371 (4.8) 374 (4.8) 0.99 (0.86,
1.14) 0.90 CV mortality? 238 (3.1) 229
(2.9) 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) 0.68 Myocardial
infarction (nonfatal)? 146 (1.9) 155 (2.0) 0.94
(0.75, 1.18) 0.59 Ischemic stroke (nonfatal)
132 (1.7) 163 (2.1) 0.81 (0.64,
1.02) 0.07 Stroke (nonfatal)? 150 (1.9) 189
(2.4) 0.79 (0.64, 0.98) 0.03 Principal secondary
endpoint 1301 (16.7) 1395 (17.9) 0.92 (0.86,
0.995) 0.04 Hospitalization 866 (11.1) 957
(12.3) 0.90 (0.82, 0.98) 0.02
First occurrence of MI (fatal or nonfatal),
stroke (fatal or nonfatal), CV death (including
hemorrhagic death), or hospitalization for UA,
TIA, or revascularization Intention-to-treat
analysis ?Components of the primary efficacy
endpoint. Patients that did not die from CV
causes, are counted for the first nonfatal event
of MI or stroke. For UA, TIA, or
revascularization
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
22
Overall population Safety results
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA ASA Safety
outcome - n () (n7802) (n7801) RR (95
CI) p value GUSTO severe bleeding 130 (1.7) 104
(1.3) 1.25 (0.97, 1.61) 0.09 Fatal
bleeding 26 (0.3) 17 (0.2) 1.53 (0.83,
2.82) 0.17 Primary ICH 26 (0.3) 27
(0.3) 0.96 (0.56, 1.65) 0.89 GUSTO moderate
bleeding 164 (2.1) 101 (1.3) 1.62 (1.27,
2.08) lt0.001
Adjudicated outcomes by intention-to-treat
analysis ICH Intracranial Hemorrhage
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
23
Primary efficacy results (MI/stroke/CV death) by
prespecified entry category
Population RR (95 CI) p value Qualifying
CAD, CVD or PAD 0.88 (0.77, 0.998)
0.046 (n12 153) Multiple risk factors
1.20 (0.91, 1.59) 0.20 (n3284) Overall
population 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) 0.22 (n15
603)
1.4
1.2
1.6
0.6
0.8
0.4
Clopidogrel ASA Better
Placebo ASA Better
A statistical test for interaction showed
marginally significant heterogeneity (p0.045) in
treatment response for these prespecified
subgroups of patients 166 patients did not meet
any of the main inclusion criteria but were
followed (intent-to-treat analysis)
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
24
Primary efficacy results (MI/stroke/CV death) by
category of inclusion criteria
Population N RR (95 CI) p value Qualifying CVD
12 153 0.88 (0.77, 0.998) 0.046
Coronary 5835 0.86 (0.71, 1.05) 0.13
Cerebrovascular 4320 0.84 (0.69, 1.03) 0.09
PAD 2838 0.87 (0.67, 1.13) 0.29 Multiple risk
factors 3284 1.20 (0.91, 1.59) 0.20 Overall
population 15 603 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) 0.22
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
25
Patients with qualifying CV disease (CAD, CVD,
PAD) Primary and secondary efficacy results
(MI/stroke/CV death/hospitalization)
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA
ASA Endpoint - n () (n7802) (n7801) RR
(95 CI) p value Primary efficacy endpoint 420
(6.9) 480 (7.9) 0.88 (0.77, 0.998) 0.046 All
cause mortality 278 (4.6) 306 (5.0) 0.91 (0.78,
1.07) 0.27 CV mortality? 172 (2.8) 191
(3.1) 0.90 (0.74, 1.11) 0.34 Myocardial
infarction (nonfatal)? 120 (2.0) 127 (2.1) 0.95
(0.74, 1.22) 0.67 Ischemic stroke (nonfatal)
114 (1.9) 140 (2.3) 0.82 (0.64, 1.05) 0.11 Stroke
(nonfatal)? 128 (2.1) 162 (2.7) 0.79 (0.63,
0.999) 0.048 Principal secondary endpoint 1066
(17.6) 1169 (19.2) 0.91 (0.83, 0.98) 0.02 Hospital
ization 720 (11.9) 803 (13.2) 0.89 (0.81,
0.99) 0.03
First occurrence of MI (fatal or nonfatal),
stroke (fatal or nonfatal), CV death (including
hemorrhagic death), or hospitalization for UA,
TIA, or revascularization Intention-to-treat
analysis ?Components of the primary efficacy
endpoint. Patients that did not die from CV
causes, are counted for the first nonfatal event
of MI or stroke. For UA, TIA, or
revascularization
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
26
Patients with qualifying CVD (CAD, CVD or PAD)
Primary efficacy outcome (MI/stroke/CV death)
n12 153
Placebo ASA 7.9
Clopidogrel ASA 6.9
RRR 12.5 95 CI 0.2, 23.2 p0.046
All patients received ASA 75-162 mg/day
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
27
Patients with qualifying CVD (CAD, CVD, PAD)
Principal secondary efficacy outcome
Placebo ASA 19.2
n12 153
Clopidogrel ASA 17.6
Cumulative event rate, ()
RRR 9.5 95 CI 1.7, 16.7 p0.02
Months from randomization
All patients received ASA 75-162 mg/day
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
28
Multiple risk factor population Primary and
secondary efficacy results (MI/stroke/CV
death/hospitalization)
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA ASA Endpoint
n () (n1659) (n1625) RR (95 CI) p
value Primary efficacy endpoint 109 (6.6) 89
(5.5) 1.20 (0.91, 1.59) 0.20 All-cause
mortality 89 (5.4) 62 (3.8) 1.41 (1.02,
1.95) 0.04 CV mortality? 64 (3.9) 36 (2.2) 1.74
(1.16, 2.62) 0.01 Myocardial infarction
(nonfatal)? 25 (1.5) 26 (1.6) 0.95 (0.55,
1.64) 0.84 Ischemic stroke (nonfatal) 16
(1.0) 23 (1.4) 0.68 (0.36, 1.29) 0.24 Stroke
(nonfatal)? 20 (1.2) 27 (1.7) 0.73 (0.41,
1.29) 0.27 Principal secondary endpoint 224
(13.5) 216 (13.3) 1.01 (0.84, 1.22) 0.88 Hospitali
zation 140 (8.4) 147 (9.0) 0.93 (0.74,
1.18) 0.55
First occurrence of MI (fatal or nonfatal),
stroke (fatal or nonfatal), CV death (including
hemorrhagic death), or hospitalization for UA,
TIA, or revascularization Intention-to-treat
analysis ?Components of the primary efficacy
endpoint. Patients that did not die from CV
causes, are counted for the first nonfatal event
of MI or stroke. For UA, TIA, or
revascularization
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
29
Multiple risk factor subgroup Primary efficacy
outcome (MI/stroke/CV death)
Clopidogrel ASA 6.6
Placebo ASA 5.5
RRR -20 95 CI -58.8, 9.3 p0.20
All patients received ASA 75-162 mg/day
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
30
Multiple risk factor population Principal
secondary efficacy endpoint
Clopidogrel ASA 13.5
n3284
Placebo ASA 13.3
Cumulative event rate, ()
RRR -1.4 95 CI -22.2, 15.9 p0.88
Months from randomization
All patients received ASA 75-162 mg/day
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
31
Multiple risk factor population Safety results
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA ASA Safety
outcome - n () (n1659) (n1625) RR (95 CI)
p value GUSTO severe bleeding 34 (2.0) 20
(1.2) 1.67 (0.96, 2.88) 0.07 Fatal 7
(0.4) 4 (0. 2) 1.71 (0.50, 5.84) 0.38
Primary ICH 7 (0.4) 6 (0.4) 1.14 (0.38, 3.39)
0.81 GUSTO moderate bleeding 36 (2.2) 22
(1.4) 1.60 (0.95, 2.71) 0.08
Adjudicated outcomes by Intention-to-treat
analysis
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
32
Patients with qualifying CVD (CAD, CVD, PAD)
Safety results
Clopidogrel Placebo ASA ASA Safety
outcome - n () (n6062) (n6091) RR (95 CI)
p value GUSTO severe bleeding 95 (1.6) 84
(1.4) 1.14 (0.85, 1.52) 0.39 Fatal 19
(0.3) 13 (0.2) 1.47 (0.73, 2.97) 0.28
Primary ICH 19 (0.3) 21 (0.3) 0.91 (0.49,
1.69) 0.76 GUSTO moderate bleeding 128 (2.1) 79
(1.3) 1.63 (1.23, 2.15) lt0.001
Adjudicated outcomes by intention-to-treat
analysis
Bhatt DL et al. NEJM 2006.
33
Conclusions
  • 7.1 RRR for the primary endpoint (first
    occurrence of MI/stroke/CV death) in the overall
    population did not reach statistical
    significance.
  • 7.7 RRR for the secondary endpoint which
    included hospitalizations was statistically
    significant.
  • The overall outcome was influenced by divergent
    findings in the two main subgroups enrolled in
    the trial.

34
Conclusions
  • In patients with multiple risk factors, without
    clearly documented CV disease, dual antiplatelet
    therapy was not beneficial ? excess in CV
    mortality as well as an increase in bleeding.
  • In patients with documented CV disease (CAD, CVD,
    or PAD) long-term clopidogrel plus ASA resulted
    in a significant 12.5 RRR in MI/stroke/CV death
    with no significant increase in severe bleeding
    compared to ASA alone.

35
THANK YOU!!!To all the CHARISMA investigators
and CHARISMA patients
36
Backup slides
37
Clinical implications
  • In the acute setting, prior studies have shown
    the benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy for 1
    year post-ACS or PCI.
  • For stable patients, CHARISMA suggests
    differential long-term effects of dual
    antiplatelet therapy by patient type
  • NOT recommended for primary prevention.
  • Benefit in secondary prevention (CAD, CVD, or
    PAD)
  • CV death/MI/stroke ? 9 events prevented per 1000
    patients treated.
  • Balanced by 2 severe GUSTO bleeds per 1000
    patients treated.
  • These data and future trials will help physicians
    decide which nonacute/stable patients should
    receive long-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

38
Primary endpoint (MI/stroke/CV death) in patients
with previous MI, IS, or PADCAPRIE-like cohort
n9478
Post hoc analysis
Bhatt DL. Presented at ACC 2006.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com