Morphological Descriptors and Spatial Aggregations for Characterizing Damaged Buildings in Very High - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Morphological Descriptors and Spatial Aggregations for Characterizing Damaged Buildings in Very High

Description:

Morphological Descriptors and Spatial Aggregations for Characterizing Damaged ... Top-hat filtering by opening or closing are morphological based operators ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: dall1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Morphological Descriptors and Spatial Aggregations for Characterizing Damaged Buildings in Very High


1
Morphological Descriptors and Spatial
Aggregations for Characterizing Damaged Buildings
in Very High Resolution Images
L. Gueguen, M. Pesaresi, P. Soille and A.
Gerhardinger Geo-Spatial Information Analysis fo
Global Security (ISFEREA) Institute for the
Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC)
Joint Research Centre, European
Commission webpage http//isferea.jrc.ec.europa.e
u/
2
Outline
  • Context
  • Aggregation of morphological descriptors
  • Morphological filtering top-hat
  • Spatial and fuzzy aggregation
  • Damage assessment
  • Driving image analysts attention
  • Assessment of damaged buildings ratio

3
Context
  • Quickbird image
  • Pan of size 20433x14933
  • MS of size 4496x3287
  • Characterize damaged buildings in the image
  • damaged buildings have wall and rooms visible in
    the image

4
Aggregation of morphological descriptors
5
Top-hat filtering and fuzzy memberships
  • Top-hat filtering by opening or closing are
    morphological based operators
  • Top-hat by opening by a structuring element (SE)
    of size s, highlights all bright structures
    smaller than s
  • Top-hat by closing by a (SE) of size s,
    highlights all dark structures smaller than s
  • These filters enable to characterize walls and
    shadowed rooms of destroyed building

6
Top-hat filetring
  • Top-hat by closing by SE of size 4.6x4.6 m2
  • Shadowed room descriptor
  • Panchromatic image (0.6m resolution)
  • Top-hat by opening by SE of size 2x2m2
  • Walls descriptor

7
Fuzzy memberships (stretching done visually)
Shadowed room TH by closing linearly stretched
between 0 and 1 Fuzzy membership image f1
Walls TH by opening linearly stretched between 0
and 1 Fuzzy membership image f2
  • Panchromatic image (0.6m resolution)

7
8
Spatial aggregation of descriptors (1/2)
  • The spatial aggregation should enable to answer
    the question
  • How much of the descriptor is in the region W?
  • Let f(x) be a morphological descriptor,
    characterizing the pixel x. In other words, f(x)
    represents the degree of membership of x to the
    type of structure.
  • The spatial aggregation of f computes the covered
    fuzzy area in W

9
Spatial aggregation of descriptors (2/2)
  • Building are of expected size of 15x15 m2
  • We implement the spatial aggregation of each
    descriptor f with a low-pass filtering. Taking a
    sliding window W of size 15x15 m2
  • Let fW(x), be the spatial aggregation of the
    descriptor f.
  • fW(x) is a fuzzy membership indicating the amount
    of descriptor f in region W centered at pixel x.

10
Fuzzy aggregation (1/2)
  • Fuzzy logic is used to combine multiple
    descriptors
  • Let f1 and f2 be two membership images the fuzzy
    logic fundamental combinations are
  • We combine 3 descriptors with AND operator
  • Spatial aggregation by W of walls f1W
  • Spatial aggregation by W of shadowed rooms f2W
  • (1-NDVI) representing non vegetation

11
Descriptors fuzzy aggregation (2/2)
f3
f1W
f2W
  • The final result describes
  • Structures of 15x15 m2 sizeW
  • Structures containing dark structures smaller
    than 5x5m2 f1W
  • Structures containing bright structures smaller
    than 2x2m2 f2W
  • Structures containing no vegetation f3

AND
result
12
Overlay of results with original image
13
Damage assessment
  • Result image helps for image interpretation
  • draw image analysts attention to damaged parts
  • optimize image analysis time
  • Automatic quantitative measurements
  • Area and ratio of damaged buildings per region of
    interest

14
Drawing image analysts attention
  • Full image (20433x14937)
  • Result low pass filtered and colored

15
Assessing the ratio of destroyed building (1/2)
  • built-up membership map is extracted (Pantex)
  • Texture characteristics
  • Spatial and fuzzy based aggregation
  • built-up and damaged memberships are combined
    with AND operatorgt damage in built-up
  • from built-up and damage in built-up memberships,
    damage ratio are estimated.

damaged buildings
undamaged buildings
16
Assessing the ratio of destroyed building (2/2)
  • With administrative region boundaries, the ratio
    of destroyed buildings per region is estimated
  • Fuzzy area per regions R is computed for
  • Damage in built-up membership D(R)
  • Built-up membership B(R)
  • The ratio of destroyed building is D(R)/B(R)

1 of destroyed buildings
50 of destroyed buildings
17
Conclusion
  • A processing chain for characterizing damaged
    building in VHR images
  • Based on morphological descriptors
  • Based on spatial and fuzzy aggregation
  • Usability of result membership function to damage
    assessment
  • To draw image analysts attention
  • To assess number or ratio of destroyed building
  • Need for procedures automatically adapting to the
    damage type
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com