5' Prophecies of Hope - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

5' Prophecies of Hope

Description:

the watchman passage is used as a transition piece after the anti-foreign ... lowly kingdom = sprawling vine. Pharaoh (Psammetichus II) = second eagle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: davidchar
Category:
Tags: hope | lowly | prophecies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5' Prophecies of Hope


1
5. Prophecies of Hope
  • Ezekiel 33-37

2
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • Isa 40.1-2
  • 1. Recall? A Watchman Again 33.1-20 (3.16-21)
  • ...the watchman passage is used as a transition
    piece after the anti-foreign oracles of Chaps
    25-32. To mark the turning from addresses to the
    nations, the prophet is told Son of man, speak
    to the sons of your people Brownlee,
    Ezekiels Parable of the Watchman, 398
  • 1.1 The role of the watchman 33.2-9
  • 1.2 Repentance and the hope of the despairing
    33.10-11
  • 1.3 Contrastive consequences of turning from
    righteousness and turning from wickedness
    33.12-20

3
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 2. Theological Crux
  • 2.1 Ezek 14.1-11
  • In 14.1-11, . . . we find a call to repentance.
    In fact, 14.6 contains the first explicit case of
    this in the book.... Joyce, Divine Initiative
    and Human Response in Ezekiel, 69
  • 14.12-23 Ironic Comfort Vicarious retribution
    refers to the idea that one persons
    righteousness could positively affect the wider
    community or even his or her own descendants by
    providing a reason for Yahweh to refrain from
    carrying out his judgment. Klein, Ezekiel, 101

4
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 2.2 Ezek 18.1-20, 21-32
  • Ezekiel 18 is clearly concerned with the
    questions about Yahwehs punishment of human sin,
    that is with divine retribution. Despite their
    differences, both the prophet and his audience
    regard the crisis as a punishment of sin by
    Yahweh the contested issue is that of whose sins
    are being punished. The people blame their wicked
    ancestors Ezekiel, on the other hand, argues
    that these events are punishment for the sins of
    the very people who are now suffering. Joyce,
    Divine Initiative and Human Response in Ezekiel,
    38

5
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • What chapter 18 insists upon, therefore, is
    really not individualism, but the moral
    independence of the house of Israel. They are not
    limited by the deeds of previous generations or
    even by the sinful past of their own generation.
    Chapter 18 calls them to do what they can in fact
    do to turn and to live. Klein, Ezekiel, 108
  • Far from constituting an argument for
    individual responsibility, the purpose of the
    chapter is to demonstrate the collective
    responsibility of the contemporary house of
    Israel for the national disaster which she is
    suffering. Joyce, Divine Initiative and Human
    Response in Ezekiel, 36

6
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 2.2.1 A proverb 18.2 The Fathers have eaten
    sour grapes, and the childrens teeth are set on
    edge. (parallel in Jer 31.27-30)
  • ...presumably the audience into whose mouths the
    sour grapes proverb is put are the exiles in
    Babylonia. Joyce, 43
  • 2.2.2 History of Thought Deut 5.9 / Ex 20.5 Jos
    7 2 Kgs 14.1-16 gt 2 Kgs 25.1-9 Lam 5.7
  • The accounts of the Decalogue in the Pentateuch
    report that the iniquity of parents is visited
    upon the children to the third and fourth
    generations (Ex 20.5 34.7 Deut 5.9 cf. Num
    14.18). This may mean no more than that the head
    of the family is responsible for the ethical
    behavior of all his descendants during his
    lifetime, and that they through family solidarity
    (third and fourth generation of those who hate
    me), also reap the effects of his wickedness. It
    is not hard to see, however, that these words
    might be taken to mean that the sins of one
    generation automatically bring subsequent
    generations under the threat of judgment.
    Klein, Ezekiel, 104

7
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 2.2.3 Deut 24.16 - The fathers shall not be put
    to death for the children, nor shall the children
    be put to death for the fathers every man shall
    be put to death for his own sin.
  • 18.5-9 Person who observes sacral laws will live.
  • In the first generation (vv. 5-8) the good deeds
    of the righteous person are described. They
    consist of 1) not eating idolatrous sacrifices on
    the mountains 2) not looking to idols for help
    3) not defiling the wife of the neighbor 4) not
    having sexual intercourse with a woman during her
    menstrual period 5) not wrongfully doing a
    person out of property 6)restoring a pledge
    after the payment of a debt 7) not robbing 8)
    giving ones bread to the hungry 9) covering the
    naked with clothing 10) not exacting interest on
    a loan 11) keeping clear of injustice in court
    and 12) arbitrating between people. While this
    list is not comprehensive as the Decalogue
    itself, it does include concerns about idolatry
    and ritual purity as well as about personal and
    social ethics. Klein, Ezekiel, 105

8
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 18.10-13 Wicked son will not live.
  • Seven of the list appear 1, 3, 5, 7, 6, 2, 10.
  • This case does not directly apply to the proverb
    in dispute (v. 2) since here a wicked child of a
    righteous parent is described in verse 10-13, and
    not vice versa as in the proverb. These verses do
    make clear, however, that the law of retribution
    can be applied only within one generation, and
    that the righteousness of a previous generation
    is no guarantee of ones righteousness, let alone
    a guarantee that one will be blessed. Klein,
    Ezekiel, 106
  • 18.14-18 Righteous son who will live although
    father dies.
  • Ten out of the first 12.
  • Direct refutation of the proverb

9
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 18.19-20 Objection to 18.5-18 is found in v
    19-20, but is not upheld
  • If they had admitted the force of the prophets
    argument in vv. 5-18, of course, they would have
    had to draw a different conclusion Their own
    sins had led to their own teeth being set on
    edge, that is, to the punishment of the fall of
    Jerusalem. If intergenerational retribution is
    inoperative, the people would have to admit their
    blame for the current situation. Klein,
    Ezekiel, 106
  • 18.21-32 The final appeal to repent.
  • Question Does a persons wicked behavior limit
    the possibilities for repentance?
  • Vv. 30-32 draw a conclusion based on 1) the
    preceding arguments (vv. 5-20, 21-29) 2)
    Ezekiels

10
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • understanding of the doctrine of retribution (I
    will judge you each according to his ways, v.
    30) and 3) Yahwehs lack of pleasure in the
    death of the wicked (vv. 23, 32) Turn away
    from you rebellions and no longer let them be a
    stumbling block that leads to iniquity. Because
    repentance is the goal of this chapter, the new
    heart and spirit are described as human
    achievements. Elsewhere, where the emphasis is
    more theocentric, the new heart and spirit are
    identified as gifts of Yahweh (11.19 36.26).
    Klein, Ezekiel, 108

11
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 3. Historical Situation 33.21-22 (3.22-27)
  • July 586 BCE Walls breached Jer 39.2 52.6-7
  • August 586 BCE Temple destroyed 2 Kgs 25.8-9
    Jer 52.12
  • January 5, 585 BCE Announcement came to Ezekiel
    33.21

12
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • 4. Two Attitude Problems
  • a. Israel in Palestine 33.23-29
  • 33.24 Quote of their attitude
  • 33.24-26 Continued problem of sin
  • 33.27-29 Judgment
  • The three-fold scourge of sword, pestilence, and
    wild animals is traditional language drawn from
    ancient near eastern treaty curses. By this the
    Prophet meant to suggest to his hearers that the
    curses of the broken covenant would have to run
    their full course (cf. Deut 28.15-26 and Lev
    26.21-33). Though these acts of judgment they
    would have to acknowledge that God was true to
    his word and brought about what had been foretold
    through his prophets. Lemke, 172

13
A. Context of Comfort and Hope
  • b. Israel in Babylon 33.30-33
  • The exiles were gathering to hear and see
    Ezekiel, but not to really acknowledge what God
    was telling them through the prophet.
  • These Ezekiel reminded that neither he nor Gods
    word which he spoke were sent for their
    entertainment or superficial edification. The
    function of a prophet is to announce Gods
    purposes in history and, if possible, to induce
    people to take action which is commensurate with
    Gods announced purpose and intention. Lemke,
    172

14
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • 1. Problems with Old Leaders Chapter 17
  • Judah cedar
  • King of Babylon first eagle
  • Jerusalem Lebanon
  • the King (Jehoiachin) and the princes of Judah
    top part of the cedar tree
  • deportation to Babylon taking the top of the
    cedar to the land of Canaan
  • royal seed (Zedekiah) with whom covenant is made
    planting the slip from the seed of the land
  • lowly kingdom sprawling vine
  • Pharaoh (Psammetichus II) second eagle
  • dispatching of emissaries to Egypt twining the
    roots and
  • branches toward second eagle

15
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • 1. Problems with Old Leaders Chapter 19
  • ...chapter 19 makes violence (oppression) and
    pride the cardinal faults of the monarchy rather
    than treaty infidelity (chap. 17) or
    self-aggrandizement and failure to protect the
    people (chap. 34). The lion imagery is not
    positive but thoroughly violent. The cubs take
    booty from their citizens and do not shrink from
    violent acts. In 11.6 Ezekiel made similar
    accusations against the house of Israel.... In
    chapter 22 he compared the kings to wild
    animals.... The punishment visited on the
    vine/mother and her bough (the dynasty and its
    last king) is an expression of wrath (v. 12),
    first of all the wrath of the nations and finally
    also the wrath of Yahweh (cf. 7.8-9 23.24-25).
    The dead of the people/dynasty confirms that
    there is not hope for the future of the monarchy
    beyond the judgment depended entirely on divine
    intervention (vv. 22-24). The dirge spoken about
    the kings in chapter 19, however, is not a taunt.
    It occurs in a context that affirms that Yahweh
    has not pleasure in the death of the wicked
    (18.32). Klein, Ezekiel, 120-121

16
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • 2. God will become the Shepherd 34.1-31
  • a. Judgment of former shepherds 34.1-10
  • Characteristic for Ezekiel, the promise is
    preceded by an indictment of the bad shepherds of
    Israel. Lemke, 173
  • 34.4 Rule harshly The Hebrew expression radah
    beparek to rule with harshness (v4) occurs in
    only two other passages of the OT. In Ex 1.13-14,
    it refers to the manner in which the Egyptians
    treated their Hebrew slaves and in the Holiness
    Code (Lev 17-26), it is forbidden to treat a
    fellow Israelite in such a manner (cf. Lev 25.43,
    46). Ezekiels polemic is thus quite pointed He
    accuses Israels rulers of doing what their own
    history should have taught them to abhor and what
    the law of Moses expressly forbade! Lemke, 173
  • The end of v. 6 returns to the charge of
    searching out the lost in v. 4 and underlines the
    perverse neglect of royal responsibility. It also
    introduces a new key term of the oracle, vrd, the
    shepherds duty to put himself out and look for
    the missing sheep in order to bring them home. .
    . . Yahweh declares that he will take on the
    monarchy and - with a deft re-use of the keyword
    vrd - hold it liable for its negligence.
    Allen, WBC, 162

17
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • b. Promise of God as Shepherd 34.11-16
  • Yahweh declares that he is to take over his
    negligent agents responsibilities. Pride of
    place is given to the keyword vrd in a promise
    that the subjects future is assured by his
    determination to look for them. Yet, by now,
    their situation was dire indeed. They needed to
    be saved not only from royal rapacity (v10) but
    from the homelessness. Allen, WBC, 162
  • c. Judgment of some former sheep/rams/male goats
    34.17-22
  • Here the rams and male goats are accused in a
    long, indignant question of unfair exploitation
    by dominating the flock. Both nouns are used
    elsewhere as metaphors for human leadership (cf.
    e.g., 17.13 32.21 Isa 14.9 Zech 10.3). The
    setting is not divulged, but it is noteworthy
    that exile, if such it is, is now a minor theme
    (v. 21b) and that the emphasis on judgment in
    reminiscent of 20.35-38. These factors suggest
    that we are to envisage social exploitation not
    in pre-exilic Judah but among the exiles
    themselves, which Ezekiel endeavors to correct.
    Allen, WBC, 163

18
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • d. My servant David 34.23-24
  • Nasi Another designation which David receives
    in this passage is the title prince (Hebrew
    Nasi), which literally means exalted one....
    Ezekiel seems to have preferred this term to the
    more common word for king, which in his day may
    have had misleading or even negative
    connotations. For Ezekiel the nasi was the
    person who in the coming age of salvation would
    be the success or the former Davidic kings and
    who would exercise limited cultic and rulership
    functions as a subordinate of Yahweh God.
    Lemke, 174
  • e. New Peace 34.25-31
  • ...imagery of peace and blessing which the
    restored people of Israel would enjoy in the
    future. Lemke, 174

19
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • 3. Leader of the re-unified Israel 37.24-28
  • The first, formulaic promise announces that they
    the people Israel will dwell in the land
    generation after generation - they, their
    children and their grandchildren will live there.
    The land is also identified as the land given to
    my servant Jacob. Klein, Ezekiel, 152
  • A second formula promises, And David my servant
    will be prince over them forever (v. 25b). David
    is the only person other than Jacob who is
    referred to in Ezekiel as my servant. Like
    Jacob, he too was the recipient of great promises
    (2 Sam 7), but his line came to a dreary end....
    Klein, Ezekiel, 152-153

20
B. New Leadership 34 37.24-28 (17, 19)
  • 3. Leader of the re-unified Israel 37.24-28
  • . . . Ezekiel did not hold to the unbroken
    covenant with Israels ancestors as the basis for
    assurance during the Exile or shortly hereafter.
    Rather, like Jeremiah, he looked forward to a
    new, or renewed, covenant representing wholeness,
    peace, and plenty, a covenant of peace (cf.
    34.25-29). This is the third promise in this
    paragraph. This covenant relationship would be
    accompanied by a great population increase (v.
    26 cf. 36.10-11, 33, 37-38), and, of course, it
    would last forever. Klein, Ezekiel, 153
  • In a fourth promise, Yahweh declares that he
    would put his own sanctuary (mqdsh) in the midst
    of the people in an attempt to sanctify it (qdsh)
    Israel (37.27).... The promise of the tabernacle
    in any case leads directly into the covenant
    formula I will be their God and they will be my
    people. Note the striking parallel in Leviticus
    26.11-12.... Klein, Ezekiel, 153

21
C. Re-unified Israel 37.15-23
  • The unity of the restored people of God is the
    theme of this action, signaled by the 11 uses of
    the word one. Klein, Ezekiel, 151
  • The unity Yahweh promises is a gift, not a human
    achievement. The one king embodies this unity,
    and Yahweh makes provisions protecting against
    any dissolution of this unity. The prophet
    apparently held that involvement with idols,
    abominations, rebellions, and backslidings were
    the surest rout to schism. Klein, Ezekiel, 152

22
D. Dynamics of Deliverance 35.1-36.15 36.22-38
37.1-14
  • 1. Edom Destroyed and Israel re-established
    35.1-36.15 (38-39)
  • History of relations with Edom Jacob and Esau
    (Gen 27-33) barred from crossing in the conquest
    (Num 20.14-21) Conquered by David, but
    continually revolted (2 Sam 8.13-14) After
    destruction of Jerusalem they exploited Israel
    (Obadiah Ps 137.1 Lam 4.21-22).

23
2. Foundations to Re-establishment 36.16-38
  • a. Sola Gracia 36.21, 22-23 The ground is none
    other than Gods own holy name.
  • Ezekiel ...laid the sure foundation for the
    future hope of his people. For with human merit
    and capabilities found so radically wanting, and
    with Israels historical existence in exile so
    abysmally bleak, nothing short of Gods own
    character and overarching purposes in history
    could become the basis for renewed hope among
    Gods people. Whatever future Israel had would
    come from God and be the result of Gods
    sovereign freedom to act as God saw fit. Lemke,
    176-177

24
2. Foundations to Re-establishment 36.16-38
  • b. A New Heart 36.26-27 Jer 31.31-34
  • Heart The heart and spirit in Hebrew psychology
    were the seat of human volition, thinking,
    feeling, and aspiration. Thus what Ezekiel in
    effect is promising is that God will affect a
    profound renewal and reorientation in the hearts
    and minds of his people, so that they will want
    to, and be empowered to, walk in Gods ways.
    Lemke, 177

25
2. Foundations to Re-establishment 36.16-38
  • b. A New Heart 36.26-27 Jer 31.31-34
  • "In by far the greatest number of case it is
    intellectual, rational functions that are
    ascribed to the heart i.e., precisely what we
    ascribe to the head and, more exactly, to the
    brain." Wolff, Hans Walter, Anthropology of the
    Old Testament, 46

26
2. Foundations to Re-establishment 36.16-38
  • c. My Spirit 36.27 37.14
  • ". . . r. is to a large extent the term for a
    natural power, the wind, this meaning being
    applicable in no less than 113 out of 389. . . .
    r. more often refers to God (136x) than to men
    (sic), animals and false gods (129x), that is to
    say about 35 of all instances, whereas n. is
    only applied to God in 3 of the cases in which
    it is used, and b. never applies to God at all. .
    . . a theo-anthropological term." Wolff, Hans
    Walter, Anthropology of the Old Testament, 32

27
2. Foundations to Re-establishment 36.16-38
  • c. My Spirit 36.27 37.14
  • "Man as he is Empowered" "It should be
    remembered that r. stands twice as often for wind
    and for the divine vital power as for man's
    breath, feeling and will. Most of the texts that
    deal with the r. of God or man show God and man
    in a dynamic relationship. That a man as r. is
    living, desires the good acts as authorized being
    none of this proceeds from man himself."
    Wolff, Hans Walter, Anthropology of the Old
    Testament, 39

28
3. Vision of the Valley of Dry Bones 37.1-14
  • ...the prophet is transformed from being the
    spokesman of human impotence into the spokesman
    of divine omnipotence. The stress on the
    impossibility of any self-achieved change of the
    peoples situation is again a foil by means of
    which to affirm Gods unconditional will for his
    peoples life (chap. 18). The magnitude of the
    promise proclaimed is seen even more vividly when
    one recalls the repeated earlier message which
    announced death to a people whose stubborn
    confidence led them to deny that message. Now
    that the threatened death had become undeniable
    and presumably inescapable reality, and the
    hearers of the prophet were willing to confess
    that his earlier words had been fully validated,
    the prophet proclaims life where it has become
    clear that the life of the one called by God is
    now definitely at an end. Hals, FOTL Ezekiel,
    271

29
3. Vision of the Valley of Dry Bones 37.1-14
  • spirit It occurs no fewer than ten times in
    these fourteen verses, with varying nuances which
    embrace virtually the whole gamut of meanings
    which the term has in the Hebrew Bible.
  • In verse 1, ruah refers to the spirit of the Lord
    as the source of visionary rapture and prophetic
    inspiration.
  • The term ruah may also denote the life-giving
    breath or spirit coming from God, which creates
    living beings out of inanimate matter (cf. v 5,
    6, 8, 9, 10 and cf. Gen 2.4b-7 or Ps 104.29-30).
  • In verse 9, the term ruah occurs in the plural
    and refers to the four winds of heaven.
  • Finally, in verse 11 a suffixed form of ruah
    clearly refers to Yahwehs spirit as the ultimate
    source of life in the full range of both its
    physical as well as its spiritual connotations.
    That these dimensions should never be separated
    too far, as religious people are sometimes
    tempted to do, is perhaps another lesson of which
    Ezekiels vision would remind us. Lemke, 179

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
E. Theology of Restoration in Ezekiel
  • 1. Message of Judgment and deliverance are
    connected. Note this is the same as that of the
    Doctrine of Justification in Romans
  • 2. God is motivated by the honor for His own
    Name.
  • 3. There is responsibility in the restoration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com