Title: Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning in the Online Environment
1Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning
in the Online Environment
- Dr. Catherine Finnegan
- University System of Georgia
- Dr. Libby Morris
- University of Georgia
2Research Setting eCore
- Fully online, collaboratively developed, core
curriculum courses offered jointly by
institutions in the University System of Georgia.
Supported by University System. - Courses include the humanities, languages, social
sciences, mathematics, and sciences. - Over 25 courses and 2,000 enrollments in Spring
semester - http//www.gactr.uga.edu/ecore/
3Findings from Four Studies
- Predicting Student Retention Withdrawal
- Tracking Student Behavior Achievement Online
- Examining Student Persistence and Satisfaction
- Perspectives and Activities of Faculty Teaching
Online
4Underlying Problem Student Retention
Overall eCore Course Enrollment Retention Fall
2000-2005
5Study 1 Predicting Student Retention
Withdrawal
- Purpose
- To investigate student withdrawal and retention
in eCore courses. - Research Question
- How well can a students group membership
(completion withdrawal) be predicted? - Methodology
- A two group Predictive Discriminant Analysis
(PDA) is used to predict students withdrawals
and completions in online courses. - Authors Morris, Wu, Finnegan (2005)
6Variables
- Two grouping variables
- student completers
- student withdrawers
- Nine predictor variables
- gender, age, verbal ability, math ability, high
school GPA, current credit hours, institutional
GPA, locus of control and financial aid
7Model A Two-group PDA Predictive Model, Spring
2002
8Model A Findings
- The most important predictors in Model A were
- high school GPA
- mathematic ability (SAT-math)
- Model A predicted with 62.8 accuracy
9Model B Two-group PDA Predictive Model, Fall 2002
10Model B Findings
- Completers were more likely to receive financial
aid that withdrawers. - Financial aid showed significant differences
between the responses of withdrawers and
completers (x24.84, df1, plt.05). - Completers were more likely to have internal
motivation than withdrawers. - Locus of control has significant differences
between the responses of withdrawer and
completer(x2 4.205, df 1, plt.05). - Model B predicted with 74.5 accuracy.
11Study 1 Summary
- Students withdraw for a variety of reasons.
- Primary instructional reasons for withdrawing
included too much work in the online course,
preferred the classroom environment, and disliked
online instruction. - High school GPA and SAT-math were related to
retention in the online courses. - Students who completed courses were more likely
to have received financial aid. - Students who completed courses were more likely
to have a higher internal locus of control.
12Study 2 Tracking Student Behavior Achievement
Online
- Purpose
- To examine student behavior by tracking what
students do online and how long they spend on
each activity. - Research Questions
- What are the differences and similarities between
completers and withdrawers in various measures of
student behavior online? - How accurately can achievement be predicted from
student participation measures in online learning
courses? - Methodology
- Analyzed student access tracking logs in WebCT.
Coded frequency and duration of over 300,000
student activities. - Authors Morris, Finnegan, Wu (2005)
13Variables
- Frequency and Duration of
- viewing course content
- viewing discussions
- creating new discussion posts
- responding to discussion posts
- Over 400 students from 13 sections of 3 courses
over 3 semesters
14Frequency of Learning Activities
Discussion Posts Viewed
Content Pages Viewed
15Frequency of Learning Activities
Follow-up Posts Created
Original Posts Created
16Duration of Learning Activities
17Differences between completers and withdrawers
- Completers had more frequent activity and spent
more time on task on all 4 measures than
unsuccessful completers and withdrawers. - Withdrawers spent significantly less time and had
less frequent activity than completers on all 4
measures (pgt.001). - Significant differences in participation also
existed between successful and unsuccessful
completers.
18 Multiple Regression Model for Impact of
Participation on Achievement
Successful and Non-Successful Completers n 286
19Participation and Achievement
- The participation model explained 31 of the
variability in achievement. - 3 of 8 variables were significant at the plt.05
level and good predictors of successful
completion (achievement/grades). - of content pages viewed
- of discussion posts viewed
- Seconds viewing discussions
20Study 2 Summary
- Time-on-task matters!
- withdrawers engaged significantly less in number
and duration of activities in an online course. - Successful completers engaged significantly with
the online course - Going repeatedly to content pages (frequency)
- Going repeatedly to discussion posts (frequency)
- Spending significant time reading discussion
posts (duration)
21Study 3 Understanding Student Persistence and
Satisfaction
- Purpose
- To investigate issues that affect course
completion, withdrawals, and satisfaction within
online courses. - Methodology
- Completers and withdrawers were surveyed.
(n505, response 22) - In-depth Interviews
- 8 withdrawers
- 8 completers
- Authors Boop, Morris, Finnegan (2005)
22Successful Completers
- Felt membership in the course.
- Understood course layout, expectations,
assignments. - Faculty feedback was important.
- Could overcome course-related problems.
- Used words indicating drive and persistence
to succeed.
23Convenience
- I much prefer an online class to an in-the-room
class. I like being able to work at my own pace
and not having somebody stand over me all the
time. I dont have a lot of time to spend in a
classroom setting, so this fills that niche for
me, so that I can be able to take classes and
eventually earn my degree.
24Communication
- If the teacher offers you feedback, and she seems
to be receptive to your asking questions, then
you tend to ask more questions, and you tend to
perform better. My teacher set up a time we could
go chat with her. With four or five of us
talking, we could have a good discussion.
25Withdrawing Students
- Spoke of being lost confused in the course.
- Needed more managerial and navigational help from
faculty. - Didnt understand course goals, expectations,
assignments or design. - Needed more explicit help with discussions and
understanding need for their involvement.
26Unclear Expectations
- The only assignment that had a date was the very
first one. You didnt know what your expectations
were, what the instructors expectations were. I
didnt know when discussions were due - actually
nobody did- and I am not really sure how other
people managed within that course.
27Too Much Time
- It seemed like he wanted us to be online every
day doing something, and being on there for at
least an hour a day. I didnt think that that was
fair. Im in my other classes an 1 hour and 15
minutes, two or three times a week. I didnt feel
like I should spend more time in there.
28Too Much Work
- Grades should have been based more on
participation and effort then they actually were.
I think they only gave 10 or 20 based on
participation and a lot more on the actual work.
I dont feel that was the best way to do the
grades because you are not in the classroom
setting.
29Study 4 Perspectives and Activities of Faculty
Teaching Online
- Purpose
- To explore the activities and perspectives of
faculty teaching online. - Methodology
- Interviewed 13 veteran and novice instructors.
Analyzed discussions in 10 archived courses. - Authors Morris, Xu, Finnegan (2005)
30Faculty Comments
- Experienced Faculty
- I always see my role as a facilitator of
learning. - I have gotten more efficient. I go back and use
posts I used previously. I use orientation
lessons from previous semester. - Novice Faculty
- They (online students) are forced to learn the
content on their own. - I dont feel like Im doing a lot of teaching
here. I feel like I am doing a lot grading. - I dont allow it to consume me.
31Different Perceptions of Faculty Roles
Novice faculty engaged mainly in manegerial
roles, while experienced faculty used all three
faculty roles.
32Summary Study 4
- Novice instructors are far less engaged with
students online. - Experienced faculty posted with a ratio of 16
--faculty to student posts - Experienced faculty interchanged pedagogical,
managerial, and social roles online - Students in courses with experienced faculty
engaged more often in discussions - Faculty visibility is important to student
participation. - Novice faculty need extensive assistance to
understand online instruction.
33Best Practices Students
- Students should be advised that in online courses
- May be activity and time intensive
- Time on task matters for successful achievement
- Will not be easier for academically marginal (or
any) students - Students must be pro-active and engaged
- Students should seek help from their instructor
to understand course structure and course-related
objects and objectives.
34Best Practices Faculty
- Monitor/track students participation early in
the course term provide extra attention - Understand the role of previous academic
preparation, student expectations attitudes in
persistence - Build community through shared discussion and
collaboration early in the term - Have course activities that challenge and engage
students provide regular feedback - Understand that course layout and instructions
are not necessarily intuitive to the students
35Using Data to Understand and Improve
- Trust, but verify
- Accountability merges with accreditation
- Technology allows for individualized outcomes
monitoring - Systematic, ongoing, low effort
36Thank You!
- Catherine Finnegan
- Catherine.finnegan_at_usg.edu
- Presentations and Citations Available at
http//alt.usg.edu