Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning in the Online Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning in the Online Environment

Description:

Authors: Morris, Xu, Finnegan (2005) 'Creating A More Educated Georgia' Faculty Comments ... They (online students) are forced to learn the content on their own. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: elle125
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning in the Online Environment


1
Understanding and Improving Teaching and Learning
in the Online Environment
  • Dr. Catherine Finnegan
  • University System of Georgia
  • Dr. Libby Morris
  • University of Georgia

2
Research Setting eCore
  • Fully online, collaboratively developed, core
    curriculum courses offered jointly by
    institutions in the University System of Georgia.
    Supported by University System.
  • Courses include the humanities, languages, social
    sciences, mathematics, and sciences.
  • Over 25 courses and 2,000 enrollments in Spring
    semester
  • http//www.gactr.uga.edu/ecore/

3
Findings from Four Studies
  • Predicting Student Retention Withdrawal
  • Tracking Student Behavior Achievement Online
  • Examining Student Persistence and Satisfaction
  • Perspectives and Activities of Faculty Teaching
    Online

4
Underlying Problem Student Retention
Overall eCore Course Enrollment Retention Fall
2000-2005
5
Study 1 Predicting Student Retention
Withdrawal
  • Purpose
  • To investigate student withdrawal and retention
    in eCore courses.
  • Research Question
  • How well can a students group membership
    (completion withdrawal) be predicted?
  • Methodology
  • A two group Predictive Discriminant Analysis
    (PDA) is used to predict students withdrawals
    and completions in online courses.
  • Authors Morris, Wu, Finnegan (2005)

6
Variables
  • Two grouping variables
  • student completers
  • student withdrawers
  • Nine predictor variables
  • gender, age, verbal ability, math ability, high
    school GPA, current credit hours, institutional
    GPA, locus of control and financial aid

7
Model A Two-group PDA Predictive Model, Spring
2002
8
Model A Findings
  • The most important predictors in Model A were
  • high school GPA
  • mathematic ability (SAT-math)
  • Model A predicted with 62.8 accuracy

9
Model B Two-group PDA Predictive Model, Fall 2002
10
Model B Findings
  • Completers were more likely to receive financial
    aid that withdrawers.
  • Financial aid showed significant differences
    between the responses of withdrawers and
    completers (x24.84, df1, plt.05).
  • Completers were more likely to have internal
    motivation than withdrawers.
  • Locus of control has significant differences
    between the responses of withdrawer and
    completer(x2 4.205, df 1, plt.05).
  • Model B predicted with 74.5 accuracy.

11
Study 1 Summary
  • Students withdraw for a variety of reasons.
  • Primary instructional reasons for withdrawing
    included too much work in the online course,
    preferred the classroom environment, and disliked
    online instruction.
  • High school GPA and SAT-math were related to
    retention in the online courses.
  • Students who completed courses were more likely
    to have received financial aid.
  • Students who completed courses were more likely
    to have a higher internal locus of control.

12
Study 2 Tracking Student Behavior Achievement
Online
  • Purpose
  • To examine student behavior by tracking what
    students do online and how long they spend on
    each activity.
  • Research Questions
  • What are the differences and similarities between
    completers and withdrawers in various measures of
    student behavior online?
  • How accurately can achievement be predicted from
    student participation measures in online learning
    courses?
  • Methodology
  • Analyzed student access tracking logs in WebCT.
    Coded frequency and duration of over 300,000
    student activities.
  • Authors Morris, Finnegan, Wu (2005)

13
Variables
  • Frequency and Duration of
  • viewing course content
  • viewing discussions
  • creating new discussion posts
  • responding to discussion posts
  • Over 400 students from 13 sections of 3 courses
    over 3 semesters

14
Frequency of Learning Activities
Discussion Posts Viewed
Content Pages Viewed
15
Frequency of Learning Activities
Follow-up Posts Created
Original Posts Created
16
Duration of Learning Activities
17
Differences between completers and withdrawers
  • Completers had more frequent activity and spent
    more time on task on all 4 measures than
    unsuccessful completers and withdrawers.
  • Withdrawers spent significantly less time and had
    less frequent activity than completers on all 4
    measures (pgt.001).
  • Significant differences in participation also
    existed between successful and unsuccessful
    completers.

18
Multiple Regression Model for Impact of
Participation on Achievement
Successful and Non-Successful Completers n 286
19
Participation and Achievement
  • The participation model explained 31 of the
    variability in achievement.
  • 3 of 8 variables were significant at the plt.05
    level and good predictors of successful
    completion (achievement/grades).
  • of content pages viewed
  • of discussion posts viewed
  • Seconds viewing discussions

20
Study 2 Summary
  • Time-on-task matters!
  • withdrawers engaged significantly less in number
    and duration of activities in an online course.
  • Successful completers engaged significantly with
    the online course
  • Going repeatedly to content pages (frequency)
  • Going repeatedly to discussion posts (frequency)
  • Spending significant time reading discussion
    posts (duration)

21
Study 3 Understanding Student Persistence and
Satisfaction
  • Purpose
  • To investigate issues that affect course
    completion, withdrawals, and satisfaction within
    online courses.
  • Methodology
  • Completers and withdrawers were surveyed.
    (n505, response 22)
  • In-depth Interviews
  • 8 withdrawers
  • 8 completers
  • Authors Boop, Morris, Finnegan (2005)

22
Successful Completers
  • Felt membership in the course.
  • Understood course layout, expectations,
    assignments.
  • Faculty feedback was important.
  • Could overcome course-related problems.
  • Used words indicating drive and persistence
    to succeed.

23
Convenience
  • I much prefer an online class to an in-the-room
    class. I like being able to work at my own pace
    and not having somebody stand over me all the
    time. I dont have a lot of time to spend in a
    classroom setting, so this fills that niche for
    me, so that I can be able to take classes and
    eventually earn my degree.

24
Communication
  • If the teacher offers you feedback, and she seems
    to be receptive to your asking questions, then
    you tend to ask more questions, and you tend to
    perform better. My teacher set up a time we could
    go chat with her. With four or five of us
    talking, we could have a good discussion.

25
Withdrawing Students
  • Spoke of being lost confused in the course.
  • Needed more managerial and navigational help from
    faculty.
  • Didnt understand course goals, expectations,
    assignments or design.
  • Needed more explicit help with discussions and
    understanding need for their involvement.

26
Unclear Expectations
  • The only assignment that had a date was the very
    first one. You didnt know what your expectations
    were, what the instructors expectations were. I
    didnt know when discussions were due - actually
    nobody did- and I am not really sure how other
    people managed within that course.

27
Too Much Time
  • It seemed like he wanted us to be online every
    day doing something, and being on there for at
    least an hour a day. I didnt think that that was
    fair. Im in my other classes an 1 hour and 15
    minutes, two or three times a week. I didnt feel
    like I should spend more time in there.

28
Too Much Work
  • Grades should have been based more on
    participation and effort then they actually were.
    I think they only gave 10 or 20 based on
    participation and a lot more on the actual work.
    I dont feel that was the best way to do the
    grades because you are not in the classroom
    setting.

29
Study 4 Perspectives and Activities of Faculty
Teaching Online
  • Purpose
  • To explore the activities and perspectives of
    faculty teaching online.
  • Methodology
  • Interviewed 13 veteran and novice instructors.
    Analyzed discussions in 10 archived courses.
  • Authors Morris, Xu, Finnegan (2005)

30
Faculty Comments
  • Experienced Faculty
  • I always see my role as a facilitator of
    learning.
  • I have gotten more efficient. I go back and use
    posts I used previously. I use orientation
    lessons from previous semester.
  • Novice Faculty
  • They (online students) are forced to learn the
    content on their own.
  • I dont feel like Im doing a lot of teaching
    here. I feel like I am doing a lot grading.
  • I dont allow it to consume me.

31
Different Perceptions of Faculty Roles
Novice faculty engaged mainly in manegerial
roles, while experienced faculty used all three
faculty roles.
32
Summary Study 4
  • Novice instructors are far less engaged with
    students online.
  • Experienced faculty posted with a ratio of 16
    --faculty to student posts
  • Experienced faculty interchanged pedagogical,
    managerial, and social roles online
  • Students in courses with experienced faculty
    engaged more often in discussions
  • Faculty visibility is important to student
    participation.
  • Novice faculty need extensive assistance to
    understand online instruction.

33
Best Practices Students
  • Students should be advised that in online courses
  • May be activity and time intensive
  • Time on task matters for successful achievement
  • Will not be easier for academically marginal (or
    any) students
  • Students must be pro-active and engaged
  • Students should seek help from their instructor
    to understand course structure and course-related
    objects and objectives.

34
Best Practices Faculty
  • Monitor/track students participation early in
    the course term provide extra attention
  • Understand the role of previous academic
    preparation, student expectations attitudes in
    persistence
  • Build community through shared discussion and
    collaboration early in the term
  • Have course activities that challenge and engage
    students provide regular feedback
  • Understand that course layout and instructions
    are not necessarily intuitive to the students

35
Using Data to Understand and Improve
  • Trust, but verify
  • Accountability merges with accreditation
  • Technology allows for individualized outcomes
    monitoring
  • Systematic, ongoing, low effort

36
Thank You!
  • Catherine Finnegan
  • Catherine.finnegan_at_usg.edu
  • Presentations and Citations Available at
    http//alt.usg.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com