Rowing in the Same Direction: Collaboration Across Disparate Organizations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Rowing in the Same Direction: Collaboration Across Disparate Organizations

Description:

Don't waste time and take risks hiring new people. Just clone your good employees! ... No one is working on the project full-time. Scheduling complications ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: mattg82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rowing in the Same Direction: Collaboration Across Disparate Organizations


1
Rowing in the Same Direction Collaboration
Across Disparate Organizations
2
Goals for Today
  • Overview and update of the PeDALS project
  • Persistent Digital Library and Archives System
  • www.pedalspreservation.org
  • Panel discussion of lessons learned by
    participants from each state
  • Matt Guzzi (South Carolina)
  • Richard Pearce-Moses (Arizona)
  • Alan Nelson (Florida)
  • Bonnie Weddle (New York)
  • Abbie Norderhaug (Wisconsin)

3
PeDALS Goals
  • To develop and sustain multi-state collaborative
  • Began with four states
  • South Carolina joined on its own dime
  • Two additional states to be added in 2009
  • To use middleware to automate processing of large
    volumes of records and publications
  • Follows OAIS reference model
  • Can be audited using RLG/OCLC
  • Cost-benefit of programming v. staff processing
    requires sufficiently large body of consistent
    materials

4
PeDALS Goals
  • Test LOCKSS as storage system
  • Automated integrity checking and error correction
  • Articulate a curatorial rationale suitable for
    electronic records and digital publications
  • Create a community of shared practice
  • Work as inexpensively as possible
  • Build a functioning digital repository in each
    partner state

5
Current PeDALS Status
  • Core Metadata v. 1 completed
  • First iterative review in progress
  • Admin catalog database designed and implemented
  • First iterative review in progress
  • Admin catalog web interface nearing completion
  • Simple AIP schema completed
  • Proof of concept
  • AZ Marriage certificates ingested
  • Marriage certificates code reused for SC
    Commission orders

6
Suggested Research Projects
  • Vulcan mind meld
  • Significantly increased efficiency of
    communication among participants. Faster! Less
    confusion!
  • Cloning
  • Dont waste time and take risks hiring new
    people. Just clone your good employees!
  • Time Travel
  • Easier to meet deadlines without losing sleep or
    sanity
  • Teleportation
  • All the benefits of a face-to-face meeting, with
    the time savings of teleconferences!

7
Lessons Learned
  • Importance of effective collaboration
  • Within agencies
  • Across geographic and political boundaries
  • Structured, consistent activities and
    expectations instill sense of involvement and
    project ownership
  • Lack of face-to-face interaction makes it harder
    to get engaged
  • Working in smaller teams capitalizes on our
    individual strengths

8
Lessons Learned
  • Partner teams need the right mix
  • Archives, library, and IT
  • Team members must be
  • Open to learn as you go
  • Creative and innovative

9
Lessons Learned
  • The project as viewed by our peers
  • Other repositories very interested
  • By government agencies and other stakeholders
  • Often excited
  • Recognize project is ambitious
  • Impatient with a research project they want a
    solution

10
Project Challenge Communication
  • Keeping everyone informed of what each group is
    doing
  • Metadata Group
  • IT Group
  • Keeping project leaders informed of progress
  • Keeping the larger group informed
  • Curatorial Group

11
Tools for Effective Communication
  • Regular communication
  • Bi-weekly update conference calls
  • Committee meetings as needed
  • Quarterly reports
  • Go To Meeting
  • VoIP can keep long distance costs down
  • Simultaneous editing of documents
  • Basecamp
  • Central document repository

12
Scrum
13
Project Challenges Different Institutional
Cultures
  • Library and archives
  • AZ and FL part of same agency, close
    relationship
  • NYS part of larger agency, some collaboration
  • SC different agencies
  • WI no state library, working with the WHS
    library which is the state depository library
  • Archives and records management
  • AZ, FL, NYS, SC archives and RM under one
    agency
  • WI another agency responsible for RM

14
Project Challenges IT
  • Some partners maintain their own IT
  • AZ and SC have complete control over firewalls,
    network, and infrastructure
  • Some partners have agency-level, centralized IT
  • NYS must integrate PeDALS work into its parent
    agencys overarching IT work schedule
  • Some partners have state-level, centralized IT
  • WI has opted to place PeDALS servers at
    U.W.-Madison, not state IT unit
  • One state opted against joining PeDALS because it
    could not work through its IT infrastructure

15
Project Challenges Collaboration
  • No one is working on the project full-time
  • Scheduling complications
  • Partners spread across three time zones
  • State holidays, employee furloughs, office moves,
    vacation plans
  • Perception that were not working quickly enough
    reality that were making good progress, slow and
    steady

16
Project Challenges Learning Each Others Language
  • Working on a technical project with non-technical
    people
  • Archivists and librarians dont always grasp
    limitations of project software
  • Programmatic staff need basic knowledge of IT
    concepts and practices
  • Database structures, etc.
  • Working on an archival/library project with
    technical people
  • IT staff need basic knowledge of core library and
    archival concepts
  • Permanence, trustworthiness, series, etc.

17
Project Challenges Consultants
  • Consultants
  • The adventures of finding the right consultant
  • The decision to make sure each partner state had
    someone who knows BizTalk

18
Future Challenge Sustainability
  • Efforts to sustain the project after the grant
  • Project agreements
  • Models
  • Common practices
  • Informal collaboration
  • Consortiumformal agreements

19
Rowing in the Same Direction
  • PeDALS creates a flexible community of shared
    practice
  • Mandatory metadata and system requirements kept
    to a minimum
  • Partners can continue to follow their own
    workflows
  • Partners can use PeDALS standards as leverage
  • NYS and WI now catalog archival e-records in
    conformance with PeDALS metadata

20
  • Richard Pearce-Moses
  • PeDALS Principal Investigator
  • Deputy Director for
  • Technology Information Resources
  • Arizona State Library, Archives and Public
    Records
  • rpm_at_lib.az.us
  • (602) 926-4035
  • Matthew R. Guzzi
  • Electronic Records Archivist
  • South Carolina Department of Archives and History
  • mguzzi_at_scdah.state.sc.us
  • (803) 896-6103
  • Alan S. Nelson
  • System Project Administrator
  • State Library and Archives of Florida
  • anelson_at_dos.state.fl.us
  • Abbie J. Norderhaug
  • Public Records Accessioner
  • Wisconsin Historical Society
  • abbie.norderhaug_at_wisconsinhistory.org
  • (608) 261-1037 
  • Bonita L. Weddle
  • Coordinator, Electronic Records
  • New York State Archives
  •  bweddle_at_mail.nysed.gov
  • (518) 473-4258
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com