GPS information requirements and how to transfer a REACH dossier into GPS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

GPS information requirements and how to transfer a REACH dossier into GPS

Description:

Confidential For ICCA Use Only. 2. Content. GPS Base set of information' ... Before conducting any new testing, all available relevant hazard and exposure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: baus7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GPS information requirements and how to transfer a REACH dossier into GPS


1
GPS information requirements and how to transfer
a REACH dossier into GPS
  • From REACH to Global Product Strategy (GPS) and
    Product Stewardship (PS) workshop.
  • 03 and 04 Dec 2009
  • Zagreb, Croatia

L. Heezen Cefic
2
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

3
Base set of Information Standard parameters
for all substances
  • Substance Identity
  • CAS Number(s)
  • Name(s)
  • Structural Formula
  • Composition being assessed
  • Use Pattern (categories types)
  • Sources of Exposure

3
4 December 2008
4
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

5
Base Set of Information - Final toxicological
data requirements
  • Standard Parameters
  • Identity
  • Phys-Chem
  • Tox / Ecotoxicity (accidental exposure)
  • Biodegradability

Tier 2 (e.g low exposure or low hazard potential)
Irritation (Eye / Skin) Mutagenicity (Ames)
Sensitization (Structure)
Irritation (Eye / Skin) Sub acute
(28-days) Mutagenicity (Ames) Sensitization
Tier 3 (e.g medium exposure or hazard potential)
Tier 1 - 4
Irritation (Eye / Skin) Sub acute
(28-days) Mutagenicity Sensitization Repro /
Develop toxicity
Tier 4 (e.g high exposure or high hazard
potential)
6
Base Set of Information -Final
ecotoxicological data requirements
  • Standard Parameters
  • Identity
  • Phys-Chem
  • Tox / Ecotoxicity (accidental exposure)
  • Biodegradability

Tier 2 (e.g low exposure or low hazard potential)
Acute Toxicity (most sensitive species)
Acute Toxicity (Fish) Acute Toxicity (Daphnia)
Acute Toxicity (Algae)
Tier 3 (e.g medium exposure or hazard potential)
Tier 1 - 4
Acute Toxicity (Fish) Acute Toxicity (Daphnia)
Acute Toxicity (Algae) Chronic toxicity
Tier 4 (e.g high exposure or high hazard
potential)
7
Hazard Identification - Human and environmental
  • Collect information on physical-chemical
    properties (e.g. ignition temperature, boiling
    point)
  • Evaluate human health hazard potential as
    required by the allocated tier of the base set
    (e.g. acute Toxicity, eye / skin irritation,
    genotoxicity, reproductive and developmental
    toxicity)
  • Characterize environmental hazard potential as
    required by the allocated tier of the base set
    (e.g. degradation/biodegradation, acute aquatic
    toxicity, chronic toxicity)

GPS is not intended as a program to generate new
data. Before conducting any new testing, all
available relevant hazard and exposure
information should first be collected and
assessed (leverage information from regulatory
programs e.g. REACH)
8
GPS Risk Assessment Process How to conduct the
risk characterization
  • Hazard Evaluation Identify adverse health and
    environmental effects (e.g. the severity, the
    dose-response curve, etc.)
  • Exposure Evaluation - Consider exposures to
    humans and the environment from the production,
    distribution, use, and disposal or recycling of a
    chemical including
  • Risk Characterization Decision Point
    Characterize the risk and if information is
    sufficient proceed to next step (management), if
    insufficient information additional data may be
    needed.
  • Documentation of the risk assessment - Process
    can be documented as MSDS, eSDS, CSR, etc. Final
    output of GPS is a summary of relevant risk
    characterization / management information for
    communication with the public (GPS Safety
    Summary)

9
Examples of Risk Management Measures
  • As a result of the risk assessment certain risk
    reduction measures might be necessary, they may
    include, but are not limited to
  • Risk management actions specified by regulations
  • Reduce exposure, limiting certain uses or
    specific markets
  • Qualifying and training customers
  • Changing physical form or dosage unit size to
    reduce exposure potential
  • Implementing engineering controls (e.g. exhaust
    ventilation)
  • Utilizing specific personal protective equipment

10
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

11
Exceeding the Base Set of Information Triggers
for additional information requirements
  • To avoid unnecessary duplication of work and
    possible needless use of animals for testing, it
    is important that all existing available relevant
    data be located and reviewed before proceeding.
  • The guidance illustrate the decision trees used
    to determine what additional hazard information
    is potentially triggered beyond the initial base
    set of information might be required.
  • Trigger decisions are based on the hazard potency
    of a substance as well as the potential for human
    exposure e.g. possible anti-androgenic /
    estrogenic activity, cancerogenicity, etc.
  • The guidance contains specific flowcharts that
    help users to evaluate whether there is need for
    additional information beyond the scope of the
    base set

12
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

13
REACH information requirements and CPH
14
CEFIC Analysis GPS versus REACH
  • REACH information requirements cover almost 100
    CPH requirements
  • Lower volumes and high tier exposure under CPH
    will require small additional info gt REACH
  • However under these conditions a responsible
    company would generate this info anyway
  • Strictly controlled intermediates under REACH
    will compare with tier 1 CPH requirement
    Conclusion
  • If a company has prepared a solid REACH dossier,
    no additional information is required besides a
    short GPS Safety Summary

15
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

16
Does REACH fulfill the GPS objectives -
Synergies and differences
  • Safety-based assessment of substances, not driven
    by quantities
  • Sharing of relevant information for safety
    assessment and management without cost
    compensation
  • Communication and transparency beyond technical
    information, relevant information need to be
    accessible to stakeholders and public (e.g.
    Product Safety Summary).
  • GPS covers the global portfolio of companies
  • GPS will leverage existing regulatory commitments
    and voluntary programs as global industry
    contribution

17
GPS Risk Assessment - Synergies with REACH
Implementation
  • GPS implementation for European companies will be
    analogous to their REACH work, dossiers prepared
    under REACH are leveraged / fully valid for GPS
  • Data requirements under REACH exceed in many
    cases the commitments under GPS, European
    companies by complying to REACH exceed GPS
    performance without duplication of efforts
  • Existing prioritization processes already
    implemented within companies will not be affected
    and any prioritization of substances will be
    applied in light of the existing regulations
    (e.g. REACH, ChAMP, etc.) in a region.
  • Conclusion A significant additional burden for
    European companies due to GPS is not to be
    expected. Existing national regulations fit well
    into the global target of GPS

18
GPS Information Exchange Additional work
compared to REACH
  • Final output of the assessment is the GPS Safety
    Summary
  • We will provide best practice recommendation on
    the European format of the GPS Safety Summary to
    minimize extra workload for EU companies e.g.
    analog to eSDS
  • We will start a project to translate the standard
    REACH phrases into lay term language GPS
    sentences for automated generation
  • The GPS Safety Summary is a valuable tool for
    emergency responses and to improve communication
    with customers and the general public
  • Company-specific GPS Website to exchange
    information
  • In order to reduce the burden, we will develop an
    GPS standard web template available at the ICCA
    IT portal companies without corporate website
    can link the GPS specific information directly to
    the template

19
What should a REACH company do for ICCA GPS?
  • Priority of dossier creation will follow REACH
    priorities
  • Once REACH dossier is ready, a GPS safety summary
    can be prepared
  • Non-confidential part of REACH dossier can be
    used for hazard and risk communication
  • Public communication
  • Company strategy is to make REACH information
    available via ICCA GPS program, one of your key
    strategic elements
  • Prepare your website for ICCA GPS communication

20
Content
  • GPS Base set of information
  • How to allocate a substance to a specific tier of
    the base set
  • Triggers for additional requirements
  • REACH information requirements versus GPS
  • What to do when you register under REACH
  • Information / Data Exchange under GPS

21
How to share information and / or data ?
  • Global GPS IT-Portal
  • Information on a substance collected solely for
    risk assessment / management purposes will be
    shared among co-producers with no cost
    compensation
  • Data on a substance used to obtain a valid
    government registration would qualify for a
    simplified cost compensation scheme based on
    fixed prices for several types of tests and
    studies .
  • Fixed cost categories are a best practice
    recommendation for companies under GPS. Existing
    cost sharing agreements (e.g. HPV or REACH
    consortia) should be maintained as such.

22
Central Global Source of Information -Access
via web based portal
e.g Company, Association, Public Server
Web-Portal
23
Central Global Source of Information -Links to
company websites
Open Access (Phase 1)

Link to
OECD SIDS Dossiers ICCA HPV Dossiers EU Risk
Assessments Other Sources
e.g. ICCA Website
Click on
GPS Substance Inventory
Search for EINECS / CAS / Substance
  • Substance- specific Information
  • GPS Safety Summary
  • Robust Study Summaries
  • eSDS
  • other formats, etc.

Link to
or contact info
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com