Seeing the Invisible a sociopsychological review of the disappearing computer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Seeing the Invisible a sociopsychological review of the disappearing computer

Description:

... invisible, everywhere computing that does not live on a personal device of any ... we believe that people live through their practices and tacit knowledge so that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jeffre95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Seeing the Invisible a sociopsychological review of the disappearing computer


1
Seeing the Invisiblea sociopsychological review
of the disappearing computer
  • jeffrey heer
  • peter khooshabeh
  • cs294-2 ubiquitous computing
  • prof. anind dey, instructor

2
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus beyond them on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere.
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
a user-centered, human-centered humane technology
where todays personal computer has disappeared
into invisibility
3
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus beyond them on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere.
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
a user-centered, human-centered humane technology
where todays personal computer has disappeared
into invisibility
4
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus j focus on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere.
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
a user-centered, human-centered humane technology
where todays personal computer has disappeared
into invisibility
5
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus j focus on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
a user-centered, human-centered humane technology
where todays personal computer has disappeared
into invisibility
6
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus j focus on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
a user-centered, human-centered humane technology
where todays personal computer has disappeared
into invisibility
7
the goal of ubicomp?
the most profound technologies are those that
disappear. they weave them-selves into the fabric
of everyday life until they are indistinguishable
from it.
we believe that people live through their
practices and tacit knowledge so that the most
powerful things are those that are effectively
invisible in use.
a less-traveled path I call the "invisible" its
highest ideal is to make a computer so imbedded,
so fitting, so natural, that we use it without
even thinking about it.
only when things disappear in this way are we
freed to use them without thinking and so to
focus j focus on new goals.
we call our work ubiquitous computing. ... it
is invisible, everywhere computing that does not
live on a personal device of any sort, but is in
the woodwork everywhere
the computer is really an infrastructure, even
though today we treat it as the end object.
infrastructures should be invisible
8
roadmap
  • why invisibility? what it is and isnt
  • peripheral awareness invisibility-in-use
  • behind the scenes infrastructural invisibility

9
why examine invisibility?
  • place ubicomp research endeavors upon a firm
    philosophical foundation
  • what does invisibility mean, what does it entail?
  • and is it an appropriate organizing principle?
  • make feasible a hippocratic oath of computing
  • bad technology draws attention to itself, not the
    task
  • more fundamentally, flawed design brings to the
    forefront those things that might otherwise be
    invisible

10
what invisibility is not
  • physically invisible
  • achieved through design
  • walk up and use
  • a goal unto itself

11
what invisibility is not
  • physically invisible
  • understanding how a computer system functions
    internallyextended visibilitycan make it easier
    for a user to tailor the use of the system
    directly to specific actionsincreased
    invisibility.
  • Wenger, 1991
  • achieved through design
  • walk up and use
  • a goal unto itself

12
what invisibility is not
  • physically invisible
  • achieved through design
  • Such a disappearance is a fundamental consequence
    not of technology, but of human psychology.
    Whenever people learn something sufficiently
    well, they cease to be aware of it.
  • Weiser, 1991
  • walk up and use
  • a goal unto itself

13
what invisibility is not
  • physically invisible
  • achieved through design
  • walk up and use
  • to fulfill their potential, new technologies
    require new genres.
  • Brown Duguid, 1995
  • a goal unto itself

14
what invisibility is not
  • physically invisible
  • achieved through design
  • walk up and use
  • a goal unto itself
  • systems always exist in contexts of production
    and use that make them part of the social world.
  • Wenger, 1991
  • Working infrastructures standardize both people
    and machines.
  • Star Bowker, 2002

15
what invisibility is
  • invisibility-in-use
  • infrastructural invisibility

16
what invisibility is
  • invisibility-in-use
  • working through a tool, rather than with it
  • Heideggers ready-to-hand vs. present-at-hand
  • phenomenological philosophical tradition, Dourish
    2001
  • can involve significant perceptual remapping
  • Berti 2000 (tool use), Gibson 1938 (driving)
  • infrastructural invisibility

17
what invisibility is
  • invisibility-in-use
  • properties of distributed cognitions (Salomon,
    1993)
  • flow optimizes experience
  • skill effects
  • embodiment of tools, seeing through the equipment
  • examples
  • airline cockpit automation, calculus and
    Cartesian graphs
  • infrastructural invisibility

18
what invisibility is
  • invisibility-in-use
  • infrastructural invisibility
  • services performed on the users behalf
  • electricity, network packet routing, cell service
  • infrastructure is mediated by visible artifacts
  • light switch/power plug, web browser, cell phone

19
what invisibility is
  • invisibility-in-use
  • infrastructural invisibility
  • properties of infrastructure (Star Bowker,
    2002)
  • embeddedness, modularity, scope
  • learned through membership, links with
    conventions of practice
  • embodiment of standards
  • built upon installed base
  • becomes visible upon breakdown
  • examples
  • the power grid, plumbing, the internet

20
implications for design
  • leveraging expertise
  • ethnography as tool to unearth the invisible
  • situated learning
  • learn like experts, rather than think like
    experts (Klein, 1998)
  • build on existing, successful infrastructure
  • understanding the standardization process
  • exposing infrastructure
  • appropriation accountability (Dourish 1998)
    facilitate learning seamful design (Chalmers
    2003)

21
seeing the invisible
  • Perhaps if we stopped thinking of computers as
    information highways and began to think of them
    more modestly as symbolic sewers, this realm
    would open up a bit.
  • Star, 1999
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com