Sea Anemone'To Treat or not to Treat: That is the Question - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Sea Anemone'To Treat or not to Treat: That is the Question

Description:

Resemble a sea anemone: Friable, white to tan multiple branching ... Sea anemone: To treat or not to treat, that is the question? The best advise is: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: shadwana
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sea Anemone'To Treat or not to Treat: That is the Question


1
Sea Anemone.To Treat or not to Treat That is
the Question?
  • CT Surgery/Cardiology Conference
  • Shadwan Alsafwah, MD
  • Cardiology Fellow
  • University of Tennessee at Memphis

2
Case
  • 53 YO M with OSA was referred for OP routine TTE
    for evaluation of pulmonary HTN.
  • PMH
  • OSA
  • HTN
  • Hyperlipedemia
  • Asthma
  • Colon Polyposis
  • BPH
  • LUE weakness and tremor since 6 months

3
Case
  • Meds
  • Albuterol
  • Lisinopril
  • Simvastatin
  • Terazosin
  • PSH
  • Hernia repair
  • SH
  • Smoker 1ppd X 30 y
  • No ETOH, illicit drugs
  • Allergies
  • Sulfa
  • Metronidazol
  • Codien

4
Case
  • Physical exam
  • Vitals 154/77, 65, 16, 97.7
  • Neck No JVD, No Carotid Bruit.
  • Chest CTAB
  • CVS RRR, normal S1, S2, no extra sounds
  • Abdomen Soft, NT, ND, NABS
  • Ext No E/C/C
  • Neuro Normal except for Motor 4/5 in LUE

5
2 D Echo
  • EF normal estimated 75
  • Borderline mild pulmonary hypertension (peak PA
    pressure 35-40 mm Hg.
  • Mild moderate LVH
  • Fimbria-like structure on the aortic valve, most
    likely papillary fibromatous tumor. Less likely
    to be vegitation or Lambls Excrescence.
  • TEE recommended

6
TEE
  • Fimbriae-like structure on the right coronary
    cusp of the aortic valve C/W Papilary
    fibroelastoma (not likely to be a lambls
    excrescence, or vegetations)
  • Otherwise normal aorta
  • Normal LV function, EF 75

7
Better Be Prepared for Questions like
  • What does this structure mean?
  • What caused it?
  • What should we do about it?

8
Outline
  • Nomenclature
  • Historical Reference
  • Incidence
  • Natural History
  • Etiologies
  • Anatomy - Gross
  • - Micro
  • Clinical Manifestations
  • Diagnostic Modalities
  • Differential Diagnosis
  • Treatment
  • Prognosis
  • Summary

9
Nomenclature
  • Fibroma
  • Cardiac papiloma
  • Valvar papiloma
  • Myxofibroma
  • Fibroelastic hamartoma
  • Endocardiac papillary fibroma
  • Giant Lambls excrescences
  • Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma (CPF)

10
Historical Reference
  • The first cardiac tumor ever described was a left
    atrial myxoma described in 1845 by King TW
  • On simple vascular growth in the left
    auricle
  • of the heart Lancet
    18452428-429.
  • Yater in 1931 was the first to describe the
    valvular tumors
  • Cheitlin et al in 1975 used the term papillary
    fibroelastoma for the first time.
  • Lichtenstein et al in 1979 were the first to
    report a CPF found incidentally during VSD
    repair.
  • Flotte et al diagnosed this tumor on Echo 1980

11
Incidence
  • Historically was the third most common benign
    primary cardiac tumor after Myxomas, Lipomas
  • More recent series has placed it as the second
    most common benign primary tumor of the adult
    heart.
  • The most common primary tumor of the cardiac
    valves (3/4th)
  • Has an estimated incidence of 0.0017-0.33 in
    autopsy series, and an estimated echocardiography
    incidence of 0.019

12
Incidence
  • 90 arise from valvular tissue, most commonly
    aortic (44) or mitral valves (35). They may
    arise from papilary muscles and chordae
    tendineae, but rarely from the mural endocardium
  • Most commonly they arise from the mid portion of
    the valve. They project into the arterial lumen
    of semilunar valves and the atrial surface of AV
    valves
  • Reported from neonates to 92 years, but in
    general rarely seen below age 20, with mean age
    of 60 years, and 29 were 70 years of age or
    older.
  • Males Females

13
Benign Primary Cardiac Tumors
14
Natural History
  • Significant percentage of patients have
    concomittent valvular disease, suggesting that
    prior endocardial damage predisposes to papiloma
    formation
  • Generaly, Small in size
  • - 99 lt20 mm in largest dimension (mean 9
    mm)
  • - Range 2-70 mm in size
  • More than 90 are solitary
  • Slow- grwoing tumor

15
Etiologies
  • Remains under discussion, possible etiologies
  • Truly neoplastic
  • Viral
  • Iatrogenic
  • 1. Post cardiac surgery
  • 2. Post radiation therapy
  • Other possible etiologies

16
(?) Viral
  • Small study at Hospital Cardiologique, Chulille,
    France.
  • 4 patients with valvular CPF
  • 2 with prior neuro embolic events
  • 2 without prior embolic events
  • CPFs were surgically removed, and all samples
    were histologically confirmed
  • Specific immunohistochemical (IHC) studies were
    conducted on all samples

Grandmougin D,
et al. Heart Valve Dis 20009(6)832-41
17
(?) Viral
  • The first 2 patients there was good correlation
    between the neuro events and the presence of
    thrombus aggregated on the injured superficial
    endothelial layer.
  • The other 2 patients no endothelial damage
    or thrombus were found.
  • IHC studies showed
  • -A centrifugal mesenchymal cellular
    migration arising from the
  • central layer to the superficial layer
    with differentiation steps.
  • -The presence of dendritic cells and
    remnants of CMV in the
  • intermediate layer.
  • Is CPF a chronic form of viral endocarditis.


Grandmougin D, et al. Heart
Valve Dis 20009(6)832-41
18
(?) Iatrogenic
  • A study at Mayo clinic and Armed forces Institute
    of Pathology in washington, DC found 12
    iatrogenic CPF cases (6 post CT surgery, 6 post
    thoracic irradiation) between 1990-2000
  • 1. Common It represented 18 of all
    surgically
  • excised CPF during that period!
  • 2. Timing mean interval was 18 years
    (range 9-31 years)
  • 3. Multiple about 58 were multiple!
  • 4. Location found in the chamber closest
    to the procedure, or
  • within the radiation field
  • 5. Atypical often involve nonvalvular
    endocardial surfaces

Kurup AN, et al. Hum
Pathol 200233(12)1165-9
19
(?) Other Possible Etiologies
  • Mechanical damage to the endothelium
  • Organizing thrombi
  • Hamartomous origin or congenital etiologies in
    neonates/infants (very rare)

20
Gross Anatomy
  • Resemble a sea anemone
  • Friable, white to tan multiple branching
  • and nonbranching fingerlike fronds
    emanating from a stalked central core

21
Microscopically
  • Each frond is avascular
  • and consists of a
  • collagenous core surrounded
  • by elastic fibers and loose
  • mucopolysaccharide matrix
  • with rare smooth muscle cells
  • And covered by a single layer
  • of endocardial endothelial cells

22
Clinical Manifestations
  • More than 60 asymptomatic, found incidentally
  • Do not generally cause valvular dysfunction
  • But, sometimes can cause
  • 1. Embolic Phenomena leading to TIAs and
    CVAs
  • - Can be as high as 25 over 3 years, and
    6 in
  • asymptomatic incidental CPF
  • -Results from fragmentation of the
    papillary spikelets
  • of the tumor or from thrombi formed by
    platelets
  • and fibrin adhering to the uneven
    surface of CPF
  • -A/C of ? effect (3 cases with recurrent
    strokes while on A/C)

23
Other Clinical Manifestations..
  • - The tumor mobility was the only independent
    predictor of CPF related death or
    nonfatal embolization
  • 2. Angina Pectoris, sometimes AMI if it
    involves the coronary ostium
  • 3. Outflow tract obstruction, presyncope or
  • syncope
  • 4. Sudden death
  • 5. It can get infected! (SBE prophylaxis?)

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
                                             
                              
28
Diagnosis
  • Should be suspected in young patients with no
    evidence of cerebrovascular disease who present
    with an embolic cerebral stroke, especially in
    the presence of NSR
  • Before 1977, they were diagnosed exclusively at
    postmortem examination
  • Up to 1991 only 132 cases were reported in the
    literature
  • Now, it is generally an incidental finding by
    routine TTE echocardiography (sensitivity 62)
  • Best seen by TEE (sensitivity 77)
  • Either TTE, TEE sensitivity is up to 90 if size
    gt20 mm

29
Typical Echocardiographic Features
  • Round, oval, irregular in appearance
  • Well-demarcated borders
  • Homogenous texture
  • Nearly half have small mobile stalk
  • TEE with its high resolution, may distinguish the
    collagen center of the tumor from other cardiac
    structures, due to its shining echo appearance
  • It can rarely become calcified

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
Cardiac MRI and Ultrafast CT
  • CPF are usually not seen at MRI or CT, due to
    their size (very small in general) and location
    (moving valves)
  • Detects only exceptionally large CPF, or
  • atypical CPF (away from valves)
  • MRI is generally preferred to CT as it reflects
    the chemical microenvironment within the tumor
    (better soft-tissue characterization), offering
    clues to the type of tumor
  • Will have more role in near future with new
    emerging advances in technology?

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
Differential Diagnosis
  • Lambls excrescences
  • Myxoma
  • Bacterial vegetations
  • Organizing marantic (thrombotic) endocarditis

44
CPF Vs Lambls
Excrescences
  • Location Valve surface
  • Rarely multiple
  • Gross Small, branching
  • Micro abundant subendothelial myxoid ground
    substance
  • Etiology Multiple theories
  • Very rare
  • At sites of valve closure
  • gt 90 multiple
  • Smaller, non branching
  • Less abundant subendothelial myxoid ground
    substance
  • Endothelial damage, followed by thrombosis
  • and organization.
  • Common more than 70 of adults

45
Treatment
  • Controversial, due to the absence of randomized
    controlled data available
  • Long-term oral A/C /- Antiplatelet therapy
    could be offered to symptomatic patients who are
    not surgical candidates, but its efficacy in
    preventing embolic events is unclear.
  • SBE prophylaxis (?)

46


Sun JP,
et al. Circualtion 20011032687
47
Study Design
  • Retrospective Prospective 16-year study (1983-
    1999) using echo (total 109502 echos) and
    pathology data base at CCF.
  • 162 patient found to have pathologically
    confirmed CPFs
  • - in 141 an Echo (126 TTE, 107 TEE) was
    performed
  • -of those 93 CPFs identified - 26
    identified pre-surgery

  • (prospectively)

  • - 67 identified post-surgery

  • (retrospectively)
  • An additional 45 patients with presumed CPF
    identified by echo database were followed for
    symptoms attributable to CPF.

Sun
JP, et al. Circulation 20011032687
48
Sun, JP, et al. Circulation 20011032687Results
  • 23/26 patients in the Prospective group developed
    symptoms.
  • 5/45 patients in the presumed group developed
    symptoms.
  • Stalks with mobility were present in almost all
    the symptomatic ones

Sun
JP, et al. Circulation 20011032687
49
Treatment of Right-sided CPF
  • Right-sided CPF are less risky, surgery is not
    completely agreed upon, but generally surgery is
    indicated if
  • 1. Symptomatic
  • 2. Large mobile tumors
  • 3. Presence of PFO with a sizable right to
    left
  • shunt

50
Treatment of Left-sided CPF
  • Somewhat less controversial
  • In general it should be removed, especially
  • 1. Symptomatic
  • 2. CPF 1 cm, especially if mobile
  • 3. Young patients with low risk of
    surgery and
  • high risk for embolization
  • 4. Patients with other cardiovascular
    disease.
  • Asymptomatic patients with small, left-sided
    nonmobile CPF can be followed-up closely with
    periodic clinical evaluations and echo, and
    receive surgical intervention whenever symptoms
    develop or the tumor becomes mobile

51
Prognosis
  • Surgical removal is usually curative after
    complete resection, never reported to recur in
    the same location
  • CPF can recur in another location
  • More than 90 can be resected using conservative
    valve- sparing approaches
  • Incidental CPF found on the aortic or mitral
    valves during other surgery should be removed.
  • Long-term f/u is recommended

52
Back to Our Question
  • Sea anemone To treat or not to treat, that is
    the question?
  • The best advise is
  • Individualize, look at each case separately

53
Consider in your Decision..
  • The Patient -Age the younger the pt the
    higher the
  • cumulative risk
    of embolization
  • -Other co-morbidities
  • Symptomatic CPF or not
  • If symtomatic what strength of association of
    the tumor with symptoms
  • CPF Size ( or lt 1 cm)
  • CPF Location (L sided or R sided, valvular or
    nonvalvular)
  • CPF mobility (i.e. presence of stalk or not)

54
Now Back to Our Patient
  • He is 53 Y.O.
  • No major co morbidities/contraindications for
    surgery.
  • His CPF is on the Aortic valve
  • lt 1 CM
  • nonmobile
  • The major question is whether the LUE weakness
    represent an ischemic event or not.

55
Summary
  • CPF is increasingly recognized with the
    widespread use of TTE, TEE, and with new imaging
    modalities
  • It should be differentiated from other valvular
    pathologies especially Lambls excrescences.
  • It can be symptomatic, mainly manifesting as
    embolic disease
  • Controverseries still ongoing about the
    pathogenesis and treatment of incidental CPF
  • More studies are needed to clarify its
    pathogenesis, and treatment.

56
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com