NCBER LAEDC Los Angeles County Business Census - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

NCBER LAEDC Los Angeles County Business Census

Description:

25 or more employees. 5,000 completed surveys. Early-warning system for at ... Greater Antelope Valley Economic Alliance. Inland Empire Economic Partnership ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: bobma74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NCBER LAEDC Los Angeles County Business Census


1
NCBER / LAEDC Los Angeles CountyBusiness Census
  • Greg Whitney
  • Vice President, Business Development
  • March 12, 2004

2
Program Overview
  • 6 month program
  • 25,000 businesses
  • 25 or more employees
  • 5,000 completed surveys
  • Early-warning system for at-risk businesses
  • Identify key business issues

3
Response Summaryby Region(Responses recd vs.
Total of Cos in Region)
4
Response SummarySize of Firm(Responses recd
vs. Total Firms by Size in County)
5
Response Summary By Major
Industry(Responses recd vs. Total of Cos in
the Industry in the County)
6
Survey Findings
  • Greatest job growth- finance, construction,
    technology, business services and services
  • Greater emphasis on new equipment technology
    than employees
  • Skilled labor and recruiting an issue for most
    businesses 89
  • 85 of firms profitable last year
  • Manufacturing sector hardest hit by government
    regulations taxes

7
Survey Findings- continued
  • 37 of all business acquire revenue by exporting
  • 26 import goods
  • 48 of manufacturers are exporting
  • 44 are importing
  • Small and medium sized companies project the most
    employment growth

8
Projected EmploymentGrowth Rate by Industry
9
Needs of Expanding Companies
10
Barriers to Future Expansion
11
Reasons for Relocating
12
Reasons for Downsizing or Closing
13
Difficulty Hiring Critical Occupations by Industry
14
Summary
  • Business attitudes improving
  • LA County economy resilient improving
  • Real jobs are still at stake
  • Regulation, taxation and labor force are still
    major issues
  • We need to help our businesses grow- not go!

Visit www.laedc.org for full NCBER report
15
Presents Manufacturing in California Executive
Summary
Prepared by Kosmont Partners The Rose
Institute of State and Local Government February
2004
16
The Keystone Group
  • Who are we?
  • A collaborative of the following economic
    development executives responding to reports
    about the loss of manufacturing jobs in
    California
  • Coachella Valley Economic Partnership
  • Economic Alliance of San Fernando Valley
  • Economic Development Collaborative Ventura
    County
  • Gateway Cities Partnership
  • Greater Antelope Valley Economic Alliance
  • Inland Empire Economic Partnership
  • Los Angeles County Economic Development
    Corporation
  • Orange County Business Council
  • San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership
  • South Bay Economic Development Partnership
  • Tulare County Economic Development Corporation
  • Westside Economic Collaborative

17
Manufacturing Jobs in California January 1998
September 2003
Net Job Loss lt288,000gt
18
Change in Manufacturing Employment in California
Selected CountiesJuly 1999 -
October 2002
19
Loss in Manufacturing Employment and Sales by
County (July, 1999 October, 2002)
  • Largest net losses in manufacturing employment by
    county
  • Largest net losses in manufacturing sales by
    county

20
Conclusion
  • California is losing substantial amounts of
    manufacturing employment and sales.
  • 261,000 jobs and 98 billion in sales from July,
    1999 October 2002
  • Manufacturing jobs pay especially well and are a
    ticket to the middle class.
  • Almost 50 higher than the median income
  • Manufacturing jobs have a high multiplier
    effect helping to create jobs in other sectors.
  • Twice as high as retail jobs
  • Manufacturing losses have the greatest negative
    impact on Latinos.
  • Large population in California and predominance
    in manufacturing jobs

21
Conclusion (cont.)
  • California legislation in recent years has not
    helped manufacturing.
  • Local land use policies exacerbate the loss of
    manufacturing businesses and jobs in California.
  • Fiscalization of land uses
  • The cost of doing business in California is
    higher than in neighboring states.
  • workers compensation, paid leave, employer
    liability, health care
  • 2004 Kosmont-Rose Cost of Doing Business Survey
  • The social and economic consequences of this
    trend, unless reversed, will be increasingly
    detrimental to the overall quality of life in
    California.

22
The 60 Mile Circle Region
  • More people live here than in Florida
  • Our manufacturing base is larger than Michigans
  • Our GDP is the 10th largest in the world
  • We are a top tourist destination
  • We comprise one of the worlds
  • most important consumer markets

23
Population Growth 1930-2020
Source California Department of Finance
24
Economic ReportsOn-Line
  • NCBER Business Survey www.laedc.org
  • Keystone Mfg Rpt- www.kosmont.com, www.laedc.org
  • LA County 2004-2005 Economic Forecast,www.laedc.i
    nfo
  • 60 Mile Circle, www.laedc.org

25
Thank you
  • LAEDC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com