Violence at the Workplace: Health Outcomes and Burnout Among Nursing Personnel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Violence at the Workplace: Health Outcomes and Burnout Among Nursing Personnel

Description:

Registered Nurse, (%) 1656 (75.9) 515 (81.8) 1061 (72.1) ... Johns Hopkins School of Nursing. Safe at Work Study Research Team (PI: Dr. Jacquelyn Campbell) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:394
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: lareina9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Violence at the Workplace: Health Outcomes and Burnout Among Nursing Personnel


1
Violence at the Workplace Health Outcomes and
Burnout Among Nursing Personnel
  • Findings from the Safe at Work Study
  • Johns Hopkins University Schools of Nursing
    Public Health JH Hospital
  • Lareina La Flair, MPH Jill Messing, PhD, MSW
    Jacquelyn Campbell, PhD RN, FAAN Joan Kub, PhD,
    RN Sheila Fitzgerald PhD, RN, Jacqueline Agnew,
    PhD, RN Barbara Fowler, PhD Richelle Bolyard,
    Callie Vincent

Funded by The National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (R01 OH007953-01A2)
2
Background
  • Adverse health effects from psychological,
    physical, and sexual abuse by an intimate partner
    (IPA) have been well-documented
  • IPA survivors and the workplace
  • Source of support or source of additional stress
    and a place of victimization?
  • Workplace violence (WPV) implicated in adverse
    occupational outcomes increased burnout,
    absenteeism, job dissatisfaction decreased
    productivity.
  • This research explores risk factors for burnout,
    a precursor to job instability, among victims of
    both IPA and WPV

(Aiken et al., 2002 Campbell, 2002 Vahey et
al., 2004)
3
Methods
  • Self report questionnaire
  • Online and confidential www.jhmisafework.org
  • Follow-up at 6, 12 18 months after baseline
    (T1, T2, T3)
  • Case Control Design
  • Survivors of WPV compared with random sample of
    nursing personnel who did not experience WPV
  • Multivariate linear regression
  • Predictive models of patient, work, and personal
    burnout at 6-month follow-up

4
Participants and Sampling
  • Eligibility 4410 nursing personnel
  • Recruited from 3 Baltimore, MD area hospitals
  • Employed for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Nurses and nursing personnel
  • Baseline Sample N2193 (49.7 recruitment)
  • Case Control Design
  • Cases 652 (those experiencing WPV)
  • Controls 1038
  • T1 Sample (6 months post-baseline) N1690
  • Final T1 Sample N1348 (80 Retention)
  • Sample for this presentation (Baseline and T1)
  • N 1025

5
Measures
  • Burnout Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)
  • State of prolonged physical and psychological
    exhaustion
  • 3 Domains
  • Patient Burnout related to work with patients
  • Work-related Burnout related to work in general
  • Personal Burnout physical and emotional
    exhaustion
  • Response Categories
  • Always, Often, Sometimes, Seldom, Never/almost
    never
  • Total score (1-100) item average

(Kristensen, T.S. et al., 2005)
6
Measures (contd)
  • Workplace Violence
  • Physical violence
  • Psychological violence
  • Intimate Partner Abuse
  • Sexual abuse
  • Physical abuse
  • Emotional abuse
  • Work characteristics
  • Shift type
  • Supervisor/Coworker Support Karasek
  • Health Status
  • Mental Health CESD-10
  • Physical Health SF8 (PCS8)

7
Baseline Demographics
  • Table 1. Socio-demographic information at baseline

8
Burnout
  • Table 2. Distribution of Burnout by Type at
    Follow-up
  • Burnout scales are scored 1-100 (100 most
    severe)

9
Workplace Violence (WPV)
  • Threats or experiences of physical or
    psychological workplace violence (WPV) in the
    last 12 months
  • Of those participants who experience WPV (N630),
    what types of violence do they experience?
  • Psychological 222 (35.2)
  • Physical 213 (33.8)
  • Both 195 (31)

10
Intimate Partner Abuse (IPA)
  • Definition sexual abuse, physical abuse,
    emotional abuse or hit by an IP in the last 12
    months prior to baseline survey

11
Multivariate Linear Regression
  • Outcome of Burnout at
  • 6-month Follow-up

12
Bivariate Analyses
Type of Burnout at 6 Month-Follow-up Predicted by
Baseline Violence
13
Multivariate Regression
  • Predictive models of patient, work, personal,
    total burnout score
  • Baseline predictors outcome at 6 months
  • Main effects violence, mental and physical
    health status, work variables,
    socio-demographic variables
  • Hospital variable to account for clustering
  • Methodology
  • Backward selection GLM
  • Removal of insignificant variables (p lt0.05)
  • Adjusted R2

14
Final Model Patient Burnout
15
Final Model Work Burnout
16
Final Model Personal Burnout
17
Final Model Total Burnout
18
Summary
  • Past-year physical WPV was a significant
    predictor of all 4 types of burnout, with its
    strongest effect on patient burnout
  • Past-year psychological WPV, income, supervisor
    support, and monthly mandatory overtime were
    significantly associated with work burnout only
  • Past-year IPA appeared to predict personal
    burnout, but relationship became insignificant
    after other variables were added to model

19
Summary (contd)
  • Depressive symptoms were significantly associated
    with all four types of burnout
  • Being a nurse (in contrast to nursing personnel)
    was significantly predictive of all four measures
    of burnout
  • Baseline coworker support was a significant and
    strong protective factor against all types of
    burnout, as well as total burnout, at 6 month
    follow-up.

20
Implications for Mental Health
  • Nursing personnel who experience physical or
    psychological WPV are at risk for emotional
    distress in the form of burnout with regard to
    their work with patients, personal exhaustion,
    and job burnout and frustration.
  • Interventions?
  • strengthening workplace climate
  • improving staffing
  • recognizing and addressing staff depressive
    symptoms
  • developing effective workplace policy to reduce
    both physical and psychological WPV

21
Strengths Limitations
  • Generalizability Employed, well educated sample
  • Not longitudinal from childhood
  • Methodological challenges Missing data, response
    bias, information bias (correlated measurement
    error)
  • Multiples measures of violence
  • Prospective study design
  • Past-year measures Minimization of recall bias
  • Online, confidential survey
  • 80 retention at first 6 month follow-up
  • Limitations
  • Strengths

22
Acknowledgements
  • Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of
    Public Health, Department of Mental Health
  • Johns Hopkins School of Nursing
  • Safe at Work Study Research Team
    (PI Dr. Jacquelyn Campbell)
  • Safe at Work Study Participants
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com