Title: Safety Rounds in Ambulatory and Inpatient Settings Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:00 1:00 p.m. EDT
1Safety Rounds in Ambulatory and Inpatient
SettingsWednesday, October 25, 20061200
100 p.m. EDT
2 - Moderator
- Uma Kotagal, MD, MBBS, MSCE, FAAP
- Vice President for Quality and Transformation
- Director, Center for Health Policy Clinical
Effectiveness - Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center
- Cincinnati, Ohio
3This activity was funded through an educational
grant from the Physicians Foundation for Health
Systems Excellence.
4Disclosure of Financial Relationships and
Resolution of Conflicts of Interest for AAP CME
Activities Grid
- The AAP CME program aims to develop, maintain,
and increase the competency, skills, and
professional performance of pediatric healthcare
professionals by providing high quality,
relevant, accessible and cost-effective
educational experiences. The AAP CME program
provides activities to meet the participants
identified education needs and to support their
lifelong learning towards a goal of improving
care for children and families (AAP CME Program
Mission Statement, August 2004). - The AAP recognizes that there are a variety of
financial relationships between individuals and
commercial interests that require review to
identify possible conflicts of interest in a CME
activity. The AAP Policy on Disclosure of
Financial Relationships and Resolution of
Conflicts of Interest for AAP CME Activities is
designed to ensure quality, objective, balanced,
and scientifically rigorous AAP CME activities by
identifying and resolving all potential conflicts
of interest prior to the confirmation of service
of those in a position to influence and/or
control CME content. The AAP has taken steps to
resolve any potential conflicts of interest. - All AAP CME activities will strictly adhere to
the 2004 Updated Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards
for Commercial Support Standards to Ensure the
Independence of CME Activities. In accordance
with these Standards, the following decisions
will be made free of the control of a commercial
interest identification of CME needs,
determination of educational objectives,
selection and presentation of content, selection
of all persons and organizations that will be in
a position to control the content, selection of
educational methods, and evaluation of the CME
activity. - The purpose of this policy is to ensure all
potential conflicts of interest are identified
and mechanisms to resolve them prior to the CME
activity are implemented in ways that are
consistent with the public good. The AAP is
committed to providing learners with commercially
unbiased CME activities.
5DISCLOSURES
6DISCLOSURES
7DISCLOSURES
8CME CREDIT
- The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is
accredited by the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education to provide
continuing medical education for physicians. -
- The AAP designates this educational activity for
a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit.
Physicians should only claim credit commensurate
with the extent of their participation in the
activity. -
- This activity is acceptable for up to 1.0 AAP
credit. This credit can be applied toward the
AAP CME/CPD Award available to Fellows and
Candidate Fellows of the American Academy of
Pediatrics.
9OTHER CREDIT
- This webinar is approved by the National
Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners
(NAPNAP) for 1.2 NAPNAP contact hours of which
0.0 contain pharmacology (Rx) content. The AAP
is designated as Agency 17. Upon completion of
the program, each participant desiring NAPNAP
contact hours should send a completed certificate
of attendance, along with the required recording
fee (10 for NAPNAP members, 15 for nonmembers),
to the NAPNAP National Office at 20 Brace Road,
Suite 200, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034-2633. -
- The American Academy of Physician Assistants
accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM from
organizations accredited by the ACCME .
10 - Featured Speaker
- Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE, FAAP
- Chief, Division of Emergency Medicine
- The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
11OBJECTIVES
- Upon completion of this activity, participants
- will be able to
- Describe the process and explain the rationale
for senior leader-driven Safety Rounds in
ambulatory and inpatient settings. - List the types of safety issues identified on
Safety Rounds, and distinguish similarities and
differences between safety issues in ambulatory
and inpatient settings. - Select and apply at least one strategy to ensure
issues identified on Safety Rounds are
efficiently and effectively discussed with all
appropriate individuals and improvements are
implemented.
12The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia Emergency
Department Unit-Based Patient Safety WalkRounds
- Kathy N. Shaw, M.D., M.S.C.E.
- Chief, Division of Emergency Medicine
- Professor of Pediatrics at CHOP
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
- The Nicholas Crognale Endowed Chair
- in Pediatric Emergency Medicine
13Purpose of WalkRounds
- Mechanism for communicating with staff
- about safety issues
- Signal staff on the front lines that there is
- commitment to a culture of safety
- Foster open communication and
- a blame-free environment
- Gather ideas to take action to make
- a safer work place
14Unit-based PSWR
- Stakeholders vs. visitors
- Ubiquitous vs. sporadic
- Rapid response and dissemination
- of information vs. not . . .
15When Unit-based PSWR
- Minimum of 2 times / month
- All days of the week
- All times of the day
16Participants Unit-based PSWR
- Team leaders
- PEM attending / 2 RNs
- Staff Participants
- Resident
- ED nurse
- Clerical staff
- Social worker or Child Life therapist
- Respiratory therapist or Radiology tech
- Environmental Services or ED tech
17Where Unit-based PSWR
- CQI in patient care area of the ED (15-20 min)
- Group meeting in the ED conference room (15-20
min)
18Tool Kit Unit-based PSWR
- Step by Step Guide to Conducting PSWR
- Quality Improvement Indicator Tools
- General Questions for Group Discussion
19ED Based CQI Activities
- 4 team members complete CQI tools in ED
- Clinical observations
- Interviews with staff / parents
- Review of chart, electronic tracking and
- ordering system
20Quality Improvement Tools
- 1. Accuracy of weight and allergy documentation
- RN or tech joins PSWR
- Appropriateness of patient monitoring
- and alarm parameters / central monitoring
- RN joins PSWR
- 3. Reasons for prolonged ED length of stay 3
hrs - Resident joins PSWR
21Quality Improvement Tools
- Accuracy of medication orders, administration,
- and documentation
- ED RN or MD joins PSWR
- 5. Compliance with hand washing
- RN joins PSWR person from Environmental
Services identified to complete room check part
of QI - 6. Patient / family communication (directed at
patient/caregiver) - Clerk or Social Work / Child Life or RN join PSWR
22 23Conference Room Discussion
- Review purpose of PSWRs
- Open-ended general questions and discussion
- with 5 individuals chosen from clinical area
- Discussion / information is reported without
- identifiers to an individual
24General Questions for PSWR Participants
- In your last few shifts, have you experienced any
near misses that almost caused patient harm but
were avoided? Have you noticed any incidents
that actually did result in patient harm?
(please describe) - What should be done to encourage reporting of
- near misses events?
25General Questions for PSWR Participants
- Based on discussion of near misses, please
provide suggestions on how we could improve the
safety of patients in our ED. - Have you developed any personal practices to help
- you prevent making errors in the ED?
- If you could fix one thing in the ED to make it a
safer - place for patients, what would it be?
26PSWR Follow-up
- Multidisciplinary team meets twice per month
- - Reviews latest PSWR data and IRs
- - Follow-up report generated regarding issues
- observed, resolution, and who is accountable
- Dissemination of ideas / results to staff
27Our Experience(First 9 Months)
- 20 Unit-based PSWR
- 30 on weekends,
- 65 on evenings / overnights
- 99 staff members participated
28Lessons Learned
- 20 aborted and rescheduled
- Orientation and Communication are Essential
- General each group of constituents
- Individual leaders prior to PSWR
29Discoveries and Actions
- Numerous issues identified
- Action items involved
- - Multiple services
- - Education of staff
- - New policies and procedures
- - Occasional quick fixes
30Patient / Family Communication Tool
- Systems Issue
- Families could not identify staff roles
- Solutions (unit-based)
- Dry erase board in each room
- with providers names
- Bedside report and rounding
31Hand-Washing Tool
- Systems Issue
- Lack of alcohol hand-rub in each room
- Solutions (multiple services)
- Environmental Services
- Environmental Health and Safety
- Purchasing
32Monitoring and Alarms
- Systems Issue
- No standard for initiating CR mentoring
- Lack of age-appropriate alarm parameter
- Inaudible alarms
- Solutions (unit-based and hospital-wide)
- Standards established
- Mandatory education on age-based parameters
- Biomedical engineering to increase alarm volumes
33Patient Safety Discussion
- Systems Issue
- Staff unclear as to when or why to complete
incident reports tattling vs. identification - and prevention
- Solutions
- Staff communication (emails, meetings)
- Emphasis on systems issues and solutions
- Praising near-miss reporting
- Feedback on PSWR / IRs monthly
34Medication Near-Miss Incident Reports
Rate per 1000 ED Patients
35Conclusions Unit-based PSWR
- Inspire staff to participate in making their unit
safe - Identify multiple issues not reported
- by usual practice
- Lead to multiple systems improvements
- to improve patient safety
36Further Information
- Creating Unit-based Patient Safety Walkrounds in
a Pediatric Emergency Department - Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE
- Jane M. Lavelle, MD
- Kelly Crescenzo, RN, BSN, CEN
- Jacqueline Noll, RN, BSN, CEN
- Nancy Bonalumi, RN, MS, CEN
- Jill Baren, MD
- Clin Pediatr Emerg Med, December, 2006, Elsevier,
Inc.