Strengthening Charter School Finance and Governance: The National Resource Center on Charter School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Strengthening Charter School Finance and Governance: The National Resource Center on Charter School

Description:

gather information on salient issues and challenges; ... New Country School, established as a 'self-directed project-based learning site... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Wat59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strengthening Charter School Finance and Governance: The National Resource Center on Charter School


1
Strengthening Charter School Finance and
GovernanceThe National Resource Center on
Charter School Finance and Governance
  • 2007 National Charter Schools Conference
  • April 25, 2007

2
Goals and Objectives
  • Build capacity for improvements in charter school
    finance and governance in local communities
    nationwide
  • Greater awareness among charter leaders of
    critical importance of effective finance and
    governance to success and sustainability of
    charter schools
  • Keener understanding of how to build and
    strengthen the capacity of charter schools
  • Greater availability of relevant and practical
    information, tools, and technical assistance
    resources to design, implement, and sustain
    finance and governance systems and practices

3
Audiences and Approaches
  • Audiences
  • Charter school operators
  • Charter school authorizers
  • State policymakers
  • Approaches Work closely with leaders in the
    field to
  • gather information on salient issues and
    challenges
  • uncover and understand promising policies,
    systems and practices
  • Develop and deliver useful tools and technical
    assistance

4
Partners
  • The Finance Projectinformation, tools, and
    technical assistance on charter school financing
  • USC Center on Educational Governanceinformation,
    tools, and technical assistance on charter school
    governance
  • WestEdevaluation to inform project development
    measure impact on targets

5
Activities and Products
  • Develop Information Resources
  • Practical information and examples that charter
    leaders can easily access, understand, and use
  • Examples promising practices compendium,
    strategy briefs, resource clearinghouse
  • Create Tools and Training Materials
  • How-to tools to help work through specific
    financing and governance challenges
  • Examples policy and funding guides, cost and
    fund mapping worksheets, handbook for fiscal
    management
  • Provide Technical Assistance
  • Broad-based TA to address common issues help
    desk, teleconferences, webinars, workshops
  • Customized TA to address specific needs 10
    on-site engagements in Year 3 of project
  • Dissemination Activities
  • Website, electronic communications
  • Dissemination of published resources

6
Year 1 Products
  • State Policymaker Guides
  • Legislative reviews
  • State-level interviews
  • Analysis of alternative policy approaches
  • Federal Funding Guide
  • Define funding uses
  • Research funding sources
  • Provide tailored catalog
  • Promising Practices
  • Nominations
  • Profiles
  • Web site to be unveiled this summer!
  • Resource clearinghouse
  • Help Desk
  • Information Exchange

7
Financing Issues and Challenges
  • Operating Funds
  • Adequacy, eligibility for funding sources, flow
    of funds, sustainability of funding
  • Funding for specialized purposes
  • Facilities
  • Transportation
  • Special education

8
Financing Issues and Challenges (cont.)
  • Effective fiscal planning and budgeting
  • Projecting operating and capital costs, finding
    resources to match costs
  • Managing fiscal resources
  • Expertise in managing fiscal processes and
    assets exercise of fiscal controls producing
    and using financial data and reports

9
Preliminary Findings on Financefrom Legislative
Reviews and State Interviews
  • Operating Fundsmost state laws speak of
    equivalent per pupil funding. But
  • Some specify less
  • Administrative fees
  • Local revenues
  • Eligibility for categorical funds
  • Facilities
  • Planning and Start-Up Fundsmost states have no
    provisions. Some offer
  • Grants
  • Loans/loan funds
  • Advance payments

10
Preliminary Findings on Financefrom Legislative
Reviews and State Interviews
  • Facilities Fundingmost states have some
    provision
  • Make unused school district buildings available
  • Facilities allowance/lease aid
  • Bonding
  • Special Education Fundingsome states
  • Designate charter schools as LEAs for purposes of
    accessing special education funding
  • Provide supplemental allocations for high-need
    student populations

11
Preliminary Findings on Financefrom Legislative
Reviews and State Interviews
  • Financial Management and Oversight
  • Annual audits and financial reports required
  • Reviews may be tied to renewal or may occur more
    frequently
  • Some states offer technical assistance or
    training in application process, board or
    authorizer roles and responsibilities, financial
    management

12
Examples of Promising Practices--Finance
  • Leveraging Funds for Program Support and
    Expansion
  • Friendship Public Charter School (DC)
  • Facilities Funding/Partnership
  • Walter D. Palmer Leadership Learning Partners
    Charter School (Philadelphia )
  • Funding Specific Services or Programs Tutoring
  • MATCH Charter Public High School (Boston)
  • Community Partnerships and In-kind Resources
  • Toledo School for the Arts

13
Governance Issues and Challenges
  • Building capacity of governing boards
  • Membership composition, expertise of board
    members, understanding of function/duties,
    relationship with head of school
  • Creating effective charter school networks
  • Educational service providers EMOs CMOs
  • Engaging parents
  • Parent contracts, membership on board,
    participation in decision-making

14
Governance Issues and Challenges (cont.)
  • Forming public-private partnerships
  • Attracting partners, resources and expertise
    maintaining a shared vision and mission
  • Nurturing effective charter school leadership and
    management
  • Recruitment, training, transitions
  • Involving teachers in governance
  • Collective bargaining, teacher cooperatives

15
Preliminary Governance Findings The
Legislative Reviews
  • Range of provisions and level of prescription
  • Some laws differentiate among different types of
    charter schools (independent Vs dependent,
    site-based V non site-based)
  • Legislative reviews focused on 6 areas
  • Governing boards
  • Networks
  • Parent involvement
  • Public-private partnerships
  • Leadership and management
  • Teacher involvement in governance

16
Preliminary Governance Findings The
Legislative Reviews (cont.)
  • Most governing boards operate independently,
    while others tied to local district school board
  • IA The school board, in consultation with the
    advisory council, shall decide matters related to
    the operation of the school, including budgeting,
    curriculum, and operating procedures.
  • Some laws specify how network schools are counted
  • CA Sites that share educational programs and
    serve similar pupil populations may not be
    counted as separate schools.
  • Applications often require parent involvement or
    support some states require parent satisfaction
    for renewal
  • NY A renewal application shall include
    indications of parent and student satisfaction.

17
Preliminary Governance Findings The
Legislative Reviews (cont.)
  • Partnerships generally restricted around
    for-profit and sectarian involvement
  • NC If a charter school leases space from a
    sectarian organization, the charter school shall
    not use the name of that organization.
  • A few states address leadership management
    training
  • MI An authorizing body shall not charge a fee
    that exceeds a combined total of 3 of the total
    state school aid and may use this fee only for
    training and technical assistance.
  • Teacher involvement often one of the purposes of
    the law
  • PA It is the intent of the General
    Assemblyto create new professional
    opportunities for teachers, including the
    opportunity to be responsible for the learning
    program at the school site.

18
Preliminary Governance Findings The
State-level Interviews
  • Purpose of interviews to uncover issues and
    challenges as well as identify promising
    practices
  • Governing board most common governance issue
    cited by interviewees
  • Attracting high quality board members
  • Defining role of governing board
  • Avoiding possible conflict of interest if
    principal on governing board
  • Addressing tendency of parents to defer to
    professionals in decision-making

19
Promising Governance Practice 1 EdVisions
Cooperative
  • Minnesota interviewee pointed to EdVisions
    Cooperative as promising governance finance
    practice
  • Started in 1992 with Minnesota New Country
    School, established as a self-directed
    project-based learning site organized around a
    teacher-owner cooperative (EdVisions Web site)
  • EdVisions now provides fee-based services to 28
    charter schools in MN, WI, FL, NV, CA, NH, OR, WA
    11 more planning to open in Fall 07 and Fall 08
  • Each school has site-management team responsible
    for curriculum, budgeting and determining
    salaries/benefits can pay to be voting members
    of EdVisions, eligible for patronage dividends
    and scholarships
  • Eliminates traditional dichotomy of labor Vs
    management, as teachers are both!

20
Promising Governance Practice 2 Authorizer-led
Trainings
  • Michigan interviewee described university
    authorizers that provide training/technical
    assistance to charter schools
  • These authorizers are high quality because
    theyre in charter schooling because they want
    to be in charter schooling, i.e., not forced to
    be authorizers against their will
  • Idea is that since they have to collect data, we
    could just be oversight regulators and collect
    information, but why dont we help feed this back
    to the schools in some meaningful way
  • Eastern Michigan University (authorizer for 7-9
    schools) holds peer evaluations by doing a round
    robin with their schools as they evaluate
    School A, theyll bring in School B, C, D and E
    as part of the evaluation process, and everybody
    looks at each others schools a little bit, so
    they learn from each other.

21
Opportunities to Inform and Contribute to the
Resource Center
  • Expert informants and reviewers
  • Cooperative Inquiry Service
  • Promising practice nominations and sites
  • Pilot test tools and TA
  • Exchange information on website

22
Sharing Promising Practices
  • What promising charter school finance or
    governance approaches or practices have you or
    others used?
  • What were the goals and objectives of the
    practice?
  • How did it work? What resources were required?
  • What evidence of positive impact or results
    exists?
  • What were the conditions for success? Is the
    practice replicable?
  • What lessons can others learn from this
    experience or innovation?

23
Contact Information
  • Carol Cohen, Project Director and Co-PI
  • National Resource Center on Charter School
    Finance and Governance
  • The Finance Project
  • 1401 New York Ave., NW
  • Suite 800
  • Washington, DC 20005
  • 202-587-1000
  • ccohen_at_financeproject.org
  • Priscilla Wohlstetter, Co-Principal Investigator
  • Joanna Smith, USC Research Team Lead
  • USC Rossier School of Education, Center on
    Educational Governance
  • Waite Phillips Hall, Rm 901
  • Los Angeles, CA 90089
  • 213-740-0697
  • wohlstet_at_usc.edu
  • joannasm_at_usc.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com