TWO PRESENTATIONSCOMBINED: RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUES: 1' WHEN PAINTING BALLAST TANKS 2' WH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 74
About This Presentation
Title:

TWO PRESENTATIONSCOMBINED: RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUES: 1' WHEN PAINTING BALLAST TANKS 2' WH

Description:

TWO PRESENTATIONSCOMBINED: RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUES: 1' WHEN PAINTING BALLAST TANKS 2' WH – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:593
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 75
Provided by: KenT95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TWO PRESENTATIONSCOMBINED: RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUES: 1' WHEN PAINTING BALLAST TANKS 2' WH


1
TWO PRESENTATIONS-COMBINED RISK ASSESSMENT AND
ECONOMIC ISSUES1. WHEN PAINTING BALLAST
TANKS 2. WHEN PAINTING OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
  • KENNETH B. TATOR, PE
  • KTA-TATOR, INC
  • 115 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
  • PITTSBURGH, PA. 15275
  • WWW.KTA.COM

2
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUESWHEN PAINTING
BALLAST TANKS
  • KENNETH B. TATOR, PE
  • KTA-TATOR, INC
  • 115 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
  • PITTSBURGH, PA. 15275
  • ktator_at_kta.com
  • www.kta.com

3
(No Transcript)
4
Newly coated and inspected ballast tank
5
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC ISSUESWHEN PAINTING
BALLAST TANKS
  • THIS PRESENTATION WILL BRIEFLY COVER
  • The annual cost of corrosion to the U. S. marine
    shipping industry
  • A discussion of changes inherent with double
    bottom ballast tanks
  • Some of the stresses and weak areas within
    ballast tanks for coatings
  • Some causes of coating failures
  • A discussion of Coating Condition Assessment
    requirements
  • Risk assessment methodology
  • Means to extend coating life
  • Costs of coating

6
ANNUAL COST OF U.S. SHIPPING INDUSTRY CORROSION
  • TOTAL ANNUAL CORROSION COST IS ESTIMATED AT 2.7
    BILLION
  • NEW CONSTRUCTION- 41.12 BILLION
  • MAINTENANCE REPAIRS- 810 MILLION
  • CORROSION RELATED DOWN TIME- 785 MILLION
  • COST OF CORROSION Appendix O
  • FHWA-RD-01-156 2001

7
TANKERS AND CARRIERS
  • THERE ARE 9321 TANKERS AND CARRIERS (OIL,
    CHEMICAL, LNG, ORE) IN SERVICE, WHICH CONSIST OF
    10.8 OF THE WORLDS SHIPS AND 34.8 OF THE WORLDS
    TONNAGE.
  • A TYPICAL 250,000 DWT DOUBLE HULL TANKER HAS OVER
    200,000 M2 OF BALLAST AREA.
  • TOTAL BALLAST FOR ALL TANKS AND CARRIERS EXCEED
    135 BILLION M2.
  • COST OF CORROSION Appendix O
  • FHWA-RD-01-156 2001

8
EXXON VALDEZ CHANGES
  • THE EXXON VALDEZ SPILLED 11 MILLION GALLONS OF
    CRUDE OIL, MARCH 24, 1989 .
  • CONGRESS PASSED THE OIL POLLUTION ACT IN 1990.
  • THIS ACT, AMONG OTHER THINGS, REQUIRED ALL NEW
    TANKERS OPERATING IN THE U.S. TO HAVE A DOUBLE
    HULL.

9
DOUBLE HULLS
  • INSULATE CARGO TANKS FROM DAMAGE
  • ARE USED AS WATER BALLAST TANKS
  • INSULATE CARGO TANKS FROM SEA WATER COOLING
  • ARE CONSTRUCTED FROM HIGH-TENSILE STRENGTH STEEL
  • THINNER PLATES
  • MORE FLEXING

10
CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES
  • DEFICIENT SURFACE PREPARATION AND
    DEFICIENT/EXCESSIVE COATING THICKNESS ARE MAJOR
    CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES-but are readily
    corrected with inspection.

11
Ballast tank-thin paint breaking down
12
Poor weld coated over
13
Runs Sags
14
CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES contd
  • WHEN THE COATING IS PROPERLY APPLIED, COATING
    FAILURES ARE DUE TO
  • Shrinkage of coating due to curing/cross-linking
  • After shrinkage due to migration/loss of
    plasticizer
  • Stress/chemical degradation (oxidation, water
    uptake, aging, chemical attack)
  • Increased flexing
  • Mechanical damage/impact
  • Entrapped solvent blistering

15
Critical corrosion areas
16
AREAS OF HIGH STRESS CONCENTRATION
17
Low temperature cure coating-stress cracking at
welds
18
Blisters from poor ventilation, solvent
entrappment
19
SURVEYS AND CERTIFICATION INSPECTIONS
  • International Association of Classification
    Societies (IACS)
  • REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING SURVEYS AND
    CERTIFICATIONS
  • SCOPE- to ensure a ship is fit for its intended
    purpose for the next 5 year period, subject to
    proper maintenance and operation.

20
COATING CONDITION ASSESSMENT
  • THREE COATING CONDITION CATEGORIES
  • GOOD - only minor spot rusting general coating
    breakdown lt3 edge weld breakdown lt20.
  • FAIR - local breakdown at edges of stiffeners
    and weld connections, light rusting over 20 or
    more of areas under consideration, but less than
    that defined for POOR condition.
  • POOR - breakdown of coating at 20 or more of
    areas or hard scale at 10 or more of areas under
    consideration.

21
IACS COATING CONDITIONS
22
DNV COATING CONDITIONS
23
TANKER STRUCTURE CO-OPERATIVE FORUMTSCF COATING
CONDITIONS
24
(No Transcript)
25
Lloyd's-poor
Lloyd's-good
26
Ballast tank-10 years old, good condition
27
Old ballast tank in good condition
28
Ballast tank-10 years old, failure starting at
welds
29
Old ballast tank in poor condition
30
COATING CONDITION ASSESSMENT contd
  • FOR SALT WATER BALLAST DOUBLE BOTTOMS IN FAIR
    or POOR CONDITION
  • MAINTENANCE OF CLASS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SPACES IN
    QUESTION BEING INSPECTED ANNUALLY.
  • EXTENSIVE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS OF STEEL MAY BE
    REQUIRED.
  • COSTS TO AN OWNER ARE CONSIDERABLE.

31
Surveyor incorrectly assessed this tank as fair
32
Surveyor incorrectly assessed this tank as fair
33
Surveyor incorrectly assessed this tank as fair
34
RISK MANAGEMENT
  • RISK MANAGEMENT-identification of hazards and a
    prioritization of risk.
  • HAZARD -the potential to cause harm or damage
  • RISK -likelihood of the hazard happening and the
    consequence of that happening.

35
RISK BASED INDEX MATRIX
36
RISK MANAGEMENT contd
  • RISK MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES ARE A SUB-SET OF A
    CORPORATIONS OVERALL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR
    MAINTAINING A FACILITY FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY
    ISSUES.

37
RISK MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY
  • ESTABLISH A CORPORATE POLICY -upper management
    must authorize and buy-into.
  • CONVENE APPROPRIATE STAFF -knowledgeable,
    concerned, involved, have time.
  • PLAN SET STANDARDS -systematic strategy to
    accomplish policy (step 1). Set acceptance
    standards and determine how to measure
    performance against the standards.
  • MEASURE PERFORMANCE -inspection, surveillance,
    observations (time consuming, requires
    documentation).
  • ACTIVE MONITORING -on-going basis
  • REACTIVE MONITORING after-failure post-mortem
  • AUDIT/REVIEW -change process as required for
    better effectiveness.

38
RISK BASED INSPECTION
  • AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) GUIDE FOR
    SURVEYS USING RISK-BASED INSPECTION FOR THE
    OFFSHORE INDUSTRY
  • RISK BASED INSPECTION AN EXCELLENT MEANS TO
    EVALUATE THE CONSEQUENCES AND LIKLIHOOD OF
    COMPONENT FAILURE FROM SPECIFIC DEGRADATION
    MECHANISMS, AND TO DEVELOP INSPECTION APPROACHES
    THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY REDUCE THE ASSOCIATED RISK
    OF FAILURE.

39
RISK BASED INSPECTION-contd
  • ABS GUIDE FOR SURVEYS USING RISK-BASED
    INSPECTION FOR THE OFFSHORE INDUSTRY
  • Appendix 4 Contribution of Inspection Plan
    Elements defines 6 elements of an inspection
    plan
  • COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION -an itemization of
    critical items that would endanger health, safety
    and operation should they fail.
  • INSPECTION METHODS -means and equipment to
    properly inspect.
  • SCOPE -inspection location, extent of inspection,
    sampling rate.
  • INSPECTION DATA DOCUMENTATION -record of
    inspection results.
  • FREQUENCY OF INSPECTION -how often
  • UPDATE OF INSPECTION PLAN -revise and improve

40
MEANS TO EXTEND COATING LIFE
  • NEW CONSTRUCTION-best time to properly paint.
    Present systems not suitable, longer lasting
    systems needed.
  • EDGE RETENTIVE COATINGS-for new construction and
    maintenance, to build up areas prone to thin
    film failure.
  • BETTER PAINT SYSTEMS-designed for 10, 15 and 25
    year service (TSCF).
  • OTHER CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEMS
  • Thermal spray aluminum/zinc
  • 100 solids high build (polyurea, polyurethane,
    hybrids, elastomerics)
  • Epoxy novolacs, cresols
  • Powder coatings
  • Polyfluorinated sheet wallpaper laminates
  • Metal alloy wallpapering

41
COSTS OF COATING
  • COST TO REPLACE STEEL IS FROM 4-14X COST OF
    COATING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  • ANNUAL REPAIR/DOWNTIME CORROSION COSTS
  • OIL TANKERS 340,000
  • CHEMICAL TANKERS 440,000
  • DRY BLUK CARRIERS 106,000
  • CARGO ROLL/ON-OFF 123,000
  • COST OF CORROSION Appendix O
  • FHWA-RD-01-156 2001

42
COSTS OF COATING-contd
  • COST OF COATING A DOUBLE SKIN VL CRUDE OIL
    CARRIER (2 MILLION BARRELS) WITH 250,000 M2
    BALLAST TANK SURFACE AREA
  • 250 DAYS
  • 20 MILLION
  • Eliasson and Mills

43
COSTS OF COATING-contd
  • HIGH SOLIDS EPOXY PAINT WITH 20 YEAR SERVICE
    LIFE
  • 6.25 FT2 (62-69 M2)
  • Webb, Brinkerhoff, Rice, Bizol
  • FOR VLCC (250,000 M2 ballast area)- 17.25
    MILLION

44
(No Transcript)
45
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS WHEN
COATING OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
  • KENNETH B. TATOR, PE
  • KTA-TATOR, INC
  • 115 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
  • PITTSBURGH, PA. 15275
  • ktator_at_kta.com
  • www.kta.com

46
(No Transcript)
47
OVERVIEW
  • THIS PAPER WILL BRIEFLY REVIEW
  • THE ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION IN THE U.S. OIL
    GAS INDUSTRY
  • A CATEGORIZATION OF CORROSION LOCALES ON OFFSHORE
    PLATFORMS
  • COATING SYSTEMS USED IN THE SPLASH ZONE AND FOR
    ATMOSPHERIC SERVICE
  • COATINGS FOR PASSIVE FIREPROOFING
  • CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES
  • RISK and RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
  • COSTS OF COATING OFFSHORE FACILITIES

48
ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION IN THE U.S. OIL AND GAS
INDUSTRY
  • THE ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION IN THE U. S. OIL
    GAS INDUSTRY
  • TOTAL COST 1.372 BILLION
  • SURFACE PIPELINE FACILITY COST 589 MILLION
  • DOWNHOLE TUBINING EXPENSE 463 MILLION
  • CORROSION CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 320 MILLION
  • COSTS OFFSHORE CAN BE 10X COSTS ONSHORE
  • Cost of Corrosion Appendix S Oil and Gas
    Exploration and Production FHWA-RD-O1-156 2001

49
CORROSION OF OFFSHORE PLATFORMS
  • CLASSIFIED INTO 4 GENERAL CATEGORIES
  • INTERIOR CORROSION -within process and production
    equipment, piping, tanks. Use alloys, plastics,
    inhibitors, coatings.
  • IMMERSION CORROSION -controlled by coatings and
    cathodic protection.
  • SPLASH ZONE CORROSION -most corrosive offshore
    environment due to wetting/drying, marine
    fouling, repair difficulty.
  • ATMOSPHERIC CORROSION -above splash zone
    exposure to weather, salt spray, operating
    chemicals.

50
COATING SYSTEMS FOR SPLASH ZONE
  • ORIGINALLY
  • COAL-TAR EPOXY-3 coats, 12 to 16 mils ( 375-450
    µm).
  • EPOXY POLYAMIDE PRIMER (5-7 mils 125-175 µm)
  • TOPCOATED WITH GLASS FLAKE EPOXY (16-20 mils
    400-500 µm).

51
COATING SYSTEMS FOR SPLASH ZONE-contd
  • PRESENTLY
  • SURFACE TOLERANT EPOXIES-12 to 16 mils 300-400
    µm.
  • GLASS FLAKE POLYESTERS-2 coats _at_ 30 mils (750
    µm).
  • GLASS FLAKE EPOXIES-2 coats _at_ 20 mils (500 µm).
  • EPOXY CERAMIC-3 coats _at_ 5 mils (125 µm).
  • ULTRA HIGH BUILD EPOXIES-80-120 mils 2000-3000
    µm.
  • THERMAL SPRAY METTALICS-
  • Long life-20 years
  • Expensive

52
COATING SYSTEMS FOR SPLASH ZONE-contd
  • RISER PROTECTION IN SPLASH ZONE-Higher
    temperatures in the riser due to reservoir
    conditions- accelerated corrosion.
  • NORTH SEA
  • NEW RISERS-EPDM RUBBER MONEL SHEETS (1200 mils,
    5 mm).
  • OLD RISERS-HIGH BUILD EPOXY (40 mils, 1 mm)
    PETROLATEUM TAPE (60 mils, 1.5 mm) HDPE JACKET
    (80 mils, 2 mm) EXPANDED POLYETHYLENE MESH-
    secured with plastic strapping.

53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
COATING SYSTEMS FOR ATMOSPHERIC SERVICE
  • A NUMBER OF COATING SYSTEMS ARE USED, BUT
    COMMONLY
  • ZINC RICH SILICATE, OR ZINC RICH EPOXY PRIMER
    EPOXY INTERMEDIATE (with or without glassflake)
    TOPCOATED WITH AN ACRYLIC- OR POLYESTER-
    POLYURETHANE TOPCOAT.
  • THERMAL SPRAY METALLIC-zinc, aluminum,
    zinc-aluminum, aluminum-magnesium), sealed with
    epoxy/polyurethane.

56
(No Transcript)
57
COATING SYSTEMS FOR ATMOSPHERIC SERVICE-contd
  • HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL-
  • ECONOMICAL FOR ITEMS WITH A HIGH SURFACE
    AREAWEIGHT RATIO SUCH AS SMALL DIAMETER PIPING,
    STAIR TREADS, GRID DECKING, ETC.
  • GALVANIZERS CHARGE BY WEIGHT AND NOT SURFACE
    AREA. GALVANIZING IS NOT ECONOMICAL FOR HEAVY
    STEEL WITH LOW SURFACE AREA.
  • LIFE EXPECTANCY APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS.
  • TIME TO FIRST RUST IS NOT END OF SERVICE LIFE
    BECAUSE ZINC-STEEL ALLOY WILL INITIALLY CORRODE
    LIGHT BROWN. A DARKER BROWN COLOR INDICATES
    STEEL PITTING.

58
(No Transcript)
59
COATINGS FOR PASSIVE FIREPROOFING
  • PIPER ALPHA EXPLOSION AND FIRE ON JULY 6, 1988
    KILLED 167 MEN. THE MAIN LOSS OF LIFE WAS DUE TO
    SMOKE AND CO2 ENTERING THE ACCOMODATION MODULE
    WHERE MEN GATHERED FOR HELICOPTER EVACUATION.
  • NEED FOR INSULATION AND FIREPROOFING FOR
    EVACUATION ROUTES AND PERSONNEL SPACES.
  • PASSIVE FIREPROOFING-INSULATING SYSTEMS TO DETER
    HEAT TRANSFER FROM A FIRE TO THE STRUCTURE.
  • USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMS SUCH AS
    WATER SPRAYS, DELUGES, FOAM, INERT GAS
    SUPPRESSION.
  • USUALLY MINERAL AND/OR ORGANIC COATINGS

60
CLASSES OF FIREPROOFING MATERIALS
  • CEMENTICIOUS-concrete, gunite, vermiculite
    lightweight concrete, gypsum calcium silicate.
    Heat of fire evaporates water in coating. The
    water turns to steam, absorbing heat and
    repelling fire, keeping substrate temperature at
    approximately 212 0F, 100 0C.
  • FIBEROUS BOARDS/BLANKETS-
  • MINERAL WOOL- rated to 850 0C, 1560 0F
  • CERAMIC FIBER- rated to 1150 0C, 2100 0F

61
CLASSES OF FIREPROOFING MATERIALS-contd
  • 3. COMPOSITE PANELS -metal cladding over
    cementicious board or fiber board/blanket.
  • 4. INTUMESCENT COATINGS -usually epoxy coatings
    applied as thick mastics. In a fire, the coating
    melts and endothermic blowing agents release
    gas, expanding the coating into a foam 8X thicker
    than the original coating. The foam char layer
    absorbs heat and insulates the substrate. 3/8
    coating produces a 2 hour fire rating.
  • The intumescent is applied onto a wire, glass or
    carbon mesh over an epoxy primer using heated
    plural component spray equipment.

62
CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES
  • DEFICIENT SURFACE PREPARATION AND
    DEFICIENT/EXCESSIVE COATING THICKNESS ARE MAJOR
    CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES-but are readily
    corrected with inspection.

63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
CAUSES OF COATING FAILURES contd
  • WHEN THE COATING IS PROPERLY APPLIED, COATING
    FAILURES ARE DUE TO
  • Shrinkage of coating due to curing/cross-linking
  • After shrinkage due to migration/loss of
    plasticizer
  • Stress/chemical degradation (oxidation, water
    uptake, aging, chemical attack)
  • Increased flexing
  • Mechanical damage/impact
  • Entrapped solvent blistering

66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
MEANS TO EXTEND COATING LIFE
  • NEW CONSTRUCTION-best time to properly paint.
    Present systems not suitable, longer lasting
    systems needed.
  • EDGE RETENTIVE COATINGS-for new construction and
    maintenance, to build up areas prone to thin
    film failure.
  • BETTER PAINT SYSTEMS-designed for 10, 15 and 25
    year service (TSCF).
  • OTHER CORROSION PROTECTION SYSTEMS
  • Thermal spray aluminum/zinc
  • 100 solids high build (polyurea, polyurethane,
    hybrids, elastomerics)
  • Epoxy novolacs, cresols
  • Powder coatings
  • Polyfluorinated sheet wallpaper laminates
  • Metal alloy wallpapers

69
COSTS OF COATING OFFSHORE FACILITIES
  • GRIEG-The cost of procurement and application of
    all coatings, including passive fireproofing is
    1.5 to 3 of the total cost of construction of a
    platform topside.
  • CAVASSI, CORNADO and MALFANTI-Coating cost is
    approximately 8 of the total cost of total
    corrosion control costs for platform (jackets and
    decks).
  • Coating costs are 4.7 for sealines 4 for well
    tubing.
  • High capital costs for corrosion resistant alloys
    and high quality coating systems are more
    economical over the life of the platform.

70
COSTS OF COATING OFFSHORE FACILITIES-contd
  • RUSCHAU AND AL-NEZI
  • Estimate the cost of corrosion for offshore oil
    facilities as 0.40 per barrel produced compared
    to 0.20 for an onshore facility.
  • The cost of offshore painting is up to 10 times
    the cost of performing the same activities
    onshore.

71
SUMMARY
  • IN ORDER TO SUCCESSFULLY COAT IN THE FUTURE
  • COATING MANUFACTURERS -must develop new longer
    performing coating systems.
  • FABRICATION YARDS AND REPAIR FACILITIES -must
    take time to properly apply coatings in a
    high-quality fashion.
  • CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES -must develop better
    coating inspection standards, and train surveyors
    to assess coating condition.
  • OWNERS -must pay for up-front quality, and
    conduct timely maintenance of coatings. Coatings
    must be factored into any risk assessment
    methodology.
  • GOVERNMENT Consider revising tax law to
    encourage credits for corrosion control.
    Currently, capital costs (new construction)
    related to corrosion control must be amortized
    over structure life, while costs for maintenance
    and repair can be expensed. This is a
    dis-incentive for spending monies up-front to
    reduce corrosion.

72
(No Transcript)
73
www.kta.com
74
www.kta.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com