Title: From the Image to the Map Geometrical Preprocessing for Security
1From the Image to the MapGeometrical
Preprocessing for Security
- Karlheinz Gutjahr
- Joanneum Research
- Institute of Digital Image Processing
2Motivation
- Requirements in a crisis situation
- Fast mapping
- Comparability with available data sources
- Objectives
- Support of various remote sensing (imaging)
sensors - Detailed knowledge of error sources
3Image analysis workflow
Geometrical pre-processing
4Image distortions
Perspective, optical line scanners
SAR
5Rectification methods
- Based on non linear parametric sensor model
- Co-linearity, Range/Doppler,...
- Two directions
- Backward / indirect / map-to-image
- Forward / direct / image-to-map
6Backward rectification
- Map-to-image transformation
- State-of-the-art method
- Fast algorithm
- Rectification artefacts
- Algorithm
- E,N of output frame
- H of DEM/ellipsoid/
- Line-of-sight
- Intersect with image plane
7Forward rectification
- Image-to-map transformation
- Algorithmic background simple
- Height start value and increment
- Algorithm
- Line-of-sight
- H Start height
- Intersect with surface gt E, N
- ? H DEM value at E, N
- If ? ok end else H H incr. gt 3.
8Error impacts
Displacement due to height errors
Displacement due to errors of sensor model
(pointing errors)
9Sensor development
- with respect to pointing accuracy (circular
error at confidence level of 90)
10A-priori scenarios
- Position and orientation unknown (e.g. Landsat)
- State vectors (orbit positions) for defined
acquisition time given (e.g. every second)
different level of accuracy (Spot ....) - Orientation (off-nadir incidence angle, along
track tilt angle) approximately known (Spot,
JERS, Aster, .....) - Precise measurement of position and orientation
parameters (Spot 5, ERS, Envisat, airborne
optical and SAR scanners) - Verification of accuracy
- Optimisation of orientation elements if
insufficient
11Basis (Ground) Control points
12Least Squares parameter adjustment
- Per control point 2 equations
- Optical (modified) co-linearity equations
- SAR azimuth and range equation
- Rational polynomial coefficients
- Measured image coordinates (x, y)
- Known ground coordinates (X, Y, Z)
- Approximately known elements of exterior and (if
applicable) inner orientation (?unknowns) - Objective optimisation of elements of exterior
and (if applicable) inner orientation
13Error impacts
Displacement due to height errors
Displacement due to errors of sensor model
(pointing errors)
14Sensor development
- with respect to nominal pixel resolution
(panchromatic channel at nadir)
15Topographic effects vs. pixel resolution
16Reference (SRTM) DTM
- Resolution
- Horizontal 25 m (GLOBE 1 km)
- Vertical 1 m
- Accuracy
- Horizontal 20 m
- Vertical 4 m (1?)
- Tiles
- 15 x 15
SRTM
GLOBE
Source http//www.dfd.dlr.de/srtm
17Height definition
ellipsoidal, orthometric, dynamic,
18Example Quickbird multispectral
Rectified using SRTM C-band DEM and sensor
geometry
19Example Quickbird multispectral
Additional image-to-image co-registration
20Summary
- Motivation of geometric pre-processing
- Fast and comparable mapping
- Basis of image analysis workflow
- Rectification methods
- Rigorous / polynomial / interpolative
- Forward / backward
- Error impacts
- Topography / sensor geometry
- Sensor development
21Conclusions
- Theoretical background of geometric
pre-processing is known - Limited number of generic sensor geometries
- Limited number of generic rectification methods
- Interpretation is different
- Not applicable for security scenarios
- New topics are arising (height definition)
- Optimization of some pre-processing steps still
required (stereo DSM extraction) - Comparability of results has to be ensured
22What GMOSS can offer
- Definition of geometric pre-processing methods
- Common understanding of geometric pre-processing
- Benchmarking of methods used within NoE
- Alternatives to conventional techniques
- Best practice rules
- Definition of quality parameters
- Definition of data / metadata exchange format(s)