Milan Vojnovic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Milan Vojnovic

Description:

Milan Vojnovic – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mil1150
Category:
Tags: men | milan | pog | vojnovic

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Milan Vojnovic


1
On the Origins of Power Laws in Mobility Systems
  • Milan Vojnovic

Joint work with Jean-Yves Le Boudec
Workshop on Clean Slate Network Design,
Cambridge, UK, Sept 18, 2006
2
Abstract
Recent measurements suggest that inter-contact
times of human-carried devices are well
characterized by a power-low complementary
cumulative distribution function over a large
range of values and this is shown to have
important implications on the design of packet
forwarding algorithms (Chainterau et al, 2006).
It is claimed that the observed power-law is at
odds with currently used mobility models, some of
which feature exponentially bounded inter-contact
time distribution. In contrast, we will argue
that the observed power-laws are rather
commonplace in mobility models and mobility
patterns found in nature.
See also ACM Mobicom 2006 tutorial
3
Networks with intermittent connectivity
  • Context
  • Pocket switched networks (ex Haggle)
  • Ad-hoc networks
  • Delay-tolerant networks
  • Apps
  • Asynchronous local messaging
  • Ad-hoc search
  • Ad-hoc recommendation
  • Alert dissemination
  • Challenges
  • Mobility intermittent connectivity to other
    nodes
  • Design of effective packet forwarding algorithms
  • Critical node inter-contact time

4
Human inter-contact times follow a power law
Chainterau et al, Infocom 06
  • Over a large range of values
  • Power law exponent is time dependent
  • Confirmed by several experiments (iMots/PDA)
  • Ex Lindgren et al CHANTS 06

P(T gt n)
Inter-contact time n
5
The finding matters !
  • The power-law exponent is critical for
    performance of packet forwarding algorithms
  • Determines finiteness of packet delay Chainterau
    et al, 06
  • Some mobility models do not feature power-law
    inter-contacts
  • Ex classical random waypoint

6
A brief history of mobility models(partial
sample)
  • Manhattan street network (87)
  • Random waypoint (96)
  • Random direction (05)
  • With wrap-around or billiards reflections
  • Random trip model (05)
  • Encompasses many models in one
  • Stability conditions, perfect simulation

7
Need new mobility models (?)
Mobility models need to be redesigned !
Exponential decay of inter contact is wrong !
Current mobility models are at odds with the
power-low inter-contacts !
  • Do we need new mobility models ?

8
Why power law ?
  • Conjecture Heavy tail is sum of lots of cyclic
    journeys of
  • a small set of frequency and phase difference
  • Crowcroft et al 06 (talk slides)

Why power law ?
9
This talk two claims
  • Power-law inter-contacts are not at odds with
    mobility models
  • Already simple models exhibit power-law
    inter-contacts
  • Power laws are rather common in the mobility
    patterns observed in nature

10
Outline
  • Power-law inter-contacts are not at odds with
    mobility models
  • Power laws are rather common in the mobility
    patterns observed in nature
  • Conclusion

11
Random walk on a torus of M sites
  • T inter-contact time

930
900
1000
1300
1330
1030
1100
1130
1200
1230
T 4 h 30 min
  • Mean inter-contact time, E(T) M

12
Random walk on a torus (2)
Example
13
Random walk on a torus (3)
Example
14
Random walk on Manhattan street network
P(T gt n)
M 500
Inter-contact time, n
P(T gt n)
M 500
Inter-contact time, n
15
Outline
  • Power-law inter-contacts are not at odds with
    mobility models
  • Power laws are rather common in the mobility
    patterns observed in nature
  • Conclusion

16
Power laws found in nature mobility
  • Albatross search
  • Spider monkeys
  • Jackals
  • See Klafter et al, Physics World 05, Atkinson et
    al, Journal of Ecology 02
  • Model Levy flights
  • random walk with heavy-tailed trip distance
  • anomalous diffusion

17
Random trip model permits heavy-tailed trip
durations
  • But make sure that mean trip duration is finite
  • Ex 1 random walk on torus or billiards
  • Simple take a heavy-tailed distribution for trip
    duration (with finite mean)
  • Ex. Pareto P0(Sn gt s) (b/s)a, b gt 0, 1 lt a lt
    2
  • Ex 2 Random waypoint
  • Take fV0(v) K ?v1/2 1(0 ? v?? vmax)
  • E0(Sn) lt ?, E0(Sn2) ?

18
Conclusion
  • Power-law inter-contacts are not at odds with
    mobility models
  • Already simple models exhibit power-law
    inter-contacts
  • Power laws are rather common in the mobility
    patterns observed in nature
  • Future work
  • Algorithmic implications
  • Ex delay-effective packet forwarding (?)
  • Ex broadcast (?)
  • Ex geo-scoped dissemination (?)
  • Realistic, reproducible simulations (?)
  • Determined by (a few) main mobility invariants

19
?
  • milanv_at_microsoft.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com