Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control

Description:

... in number of cows affected & losses caused by ... Cow-calf producers buy bulls on a regular basis. Handling ... 'Commercial' sized cow-calf herds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: haroldjf
Learn more at: http://www4.ncsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control


1
Farm Level Economics of Johnes Disease Control
  • Geoff Benson, Ph.D
  • Dept. of Agricultural Resource Economics
  • N C State University
  • St. Louis, MO. Oct. 18, 2002

2
Overview
  • Economic Incentives
  • Beef Dairy
  • Industry Structure Disease management
  • Farm Level Economics
  • Implications

3
Economic Incentives
  • When there are no public health policies in
    effect, farmers must look at costs benefits to
    them
  • Regulation, or compensation, changes the
    incentives
  • Industry concerns need industry wide programs for
    reasons of effectiveness and fairness

4
Focus on Farm Profit
5
JD Control
  • Benefits to farmer
  • Reduction in number of cows affected losses
    caused by the disease
  • Collateral benefits from other, non-JD, diseases
    because of changes implemented

6
Beef
  • 900,000 farms have beef cattle, of which 800,000
    have cows
  • 33 mil. beef cows
  • 625,000 of farms with cows have less than 50
  • 175,000 have 50 cows

Source USDA, NASS, Cattle, 2/01/02
7
Beef Farm JD Costs
  • The productive life of a cow in the herd is
    reduced
  • Reduced cow cull value
  • Calf weaning rate may be reduced
  • Breeding stock sales are lost

8
JD Control in Beef Herds
  • Cow-calf producers buy bulls on a regular basis
  • Handling facilities may be poor
  • Practical management or control plans are
    difficult in pasture based systems

9
JD Control in Beef Herds
  • Many small herds are run by part-time farmers or
    as a sideline
  • Commercial sized cow-calf herds are low profit
  • Seed stock producers have the most to lose or gain

10
Breeding Stock Producers
  • Clean breeding stock may sell at a premium
  • But, US market is not well developed yet --Timing
    issue
  • Testing a herd of unknown JD status may show
    infection loss of sales
  • Applies to beef dairy

11
Dairy
  • 97,000 farms, 9.2 mil. cows, specialized
  • Mostly commercial, rely on milk sales, some
    breeding stock purchases
  • Some registered herds sell breeding stock
  • Facilities vary but control is feasible on most
    farms

12
Dairy Farm JD Losses
  • Lost milk income
  • Increased herd turnover culling death losses
  • Reduced value of cull cow
  • Reduced breeding stock sales
  • Indirect opportunity costs

13
Farm Level Losses - NAHMS
14
Farm Level Impacts - NAHMS
  • Herd impact depended mostly on percentage of
    cows that were culled, possibly with clinical
    symptoms
  • Sub-clinical losses per cow were much smaller

15
Farm Level Impacts
  • Wide variation in economic loss - NAHMS reports
    estimates of
  • 389 to 959 per clinical cow
  • 123 to 696 per non-clinical cow
  • Management decisions affect the size of these
    losses somewhat

16
Losses - Infected Herd
  • Economic losses will grow if the disease is left
    untreated and spreads in a herd
  • For JD positive herds the higher the current
    level of infection the more the farmer can afford
    to spend to control it

17
Losses in Negative Herd
  • Infectious status is unknown
  • If infected, losses will increase as the disease
    progresses
  • If clean, there are potential losses if disease
    is introduced
  • If clean and would stay clean then control
    measures yield no return

18
Losses Negative Herds
Are we here?
Or are we here?
19
Time Value of Money -- PV
20
Control Strategies - Neg. Herds
  • Expected Profit
  • (Probability herd is infected Future JD Losses
    Prevented)
  • (Probability herd is free but will become
    infected Losses Prev.)
  • (Probability herd is free would not become
    infected 0)
  • - Control Program Costs

21
Designing Control Strategies
  • Herds that appear to be JD negative cannot
    justify spending much money up front unless they
    are high risk
  • Have a veterinarian perform a broad based
    assessment of health status, bio-security risk
    of JD
  • Test higher risk herds

22
JD Control Strategies
  • Types of control measures
  • Improved hygiene/manure management
  • Separate calves at birth
  • Feed clean colostrum
  • Feed milk replacer not pooled discarded milk

23
JD Control Strategies
  • Control measures, continued
  • Change heifer raising practices, possibly raise
    heifers on contract
  • Buy animals from clean sources
  • Improve biosecurity program
  • Test
  • Cull

24
JD Control Strategies
  • Groenendaal Galligan -- Impact of alternative
    control strategies in an infected herd
  • Good management stabilized the number of cows
    infected
  • Good management plus testing culling reduced
    the number of infected cows

25
JD Control Costs Benefits
  • Too many farm specific variables to generalize
  • Ideally we need an economic assessment for each
    farm to identify likely benefits and costs
    associated with the control plan developed for
    that farm

26
JD Control Program Costs
  • Types of Costs
  • Vet. services, testing
  • Control measures
  • Out-of-pocket costs
  • Additional investment costs
  • Opportunity cost of a managers time -- priorities

27
Designing a Profitable Plan
  • Status -- Positive or negative
  • If positive
  • Severity of infection
  • Feasible control strategies
  • Cost of control measures
  • Length of planning horizon
  • Interest/Discount rate

28
Designing a Profitable Plan
  • Status -- Positive or negative
  • If negative
  • Risk level
  • Feasible control strategies
  • Cost of control measures
  • Length of planning horizon
  • Interest/Discount rate
  • Priority relationship to other problems

29
Present Value Simulation
  • For a JD negative herd, PV range was 54,254 to
    -33,448 per 100 cows depending on infection
    risk, planning horizon, discount rate, costs, and
    assumed size and timing of potential economic
    losses from JD
  • Spreadsheet is available at
  • http//www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/faculty/benson/PubsBen
    son.htm

30
Designing a Profitable Plan
  • Consider a farms financial status and
    performance
  • Varies widely from farm to farm
  • May affect the control strategy adopted,
    particularly if new investment is proposed

31
US Dairy Farms Cows, 1993-2001
32
294 New York Dairy Farms, 2000
  • Range of performance status
  • NFI/Cow -436 to 939
  • RROA -8 to 15
  • Percent Equity 21 to 96
  • Debt Coverage Ratio -1.59 to 6.60
  • Items are ranked independently
  • Source Cornell University

33
Conclusions Implications
  • Practical JD control strategies are lacking for
    cow-calf producers
  • Main economic incentives for a JD control program
    relate to seed stock farms

34
Conclusions Implications
  • Dairy farm losses are large for infected herds
    but cost of alternative control strategies and
    other factors must be considered
  • Potential losses are large for JD Negative herds
    but risk, cost and the timing of potential
    benefits are important issues

35
Conclusions Implications
  • JD should not be considered in isolation
  • Evaluate herd health status, bio-security and JD
    risk
  • Develop a farm specific herd health program and
    evaluate the costs and benefits -- If Plan A
    isnt profitable, develop another plan

36
Geoff Benson
  • Phone 919.515.5184
  • Fax 919.515.6268
  • E-mail Geoff_Benson_at_ncsu.edu
  • Web page
  • http//www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/ faculty/benson/bens
    on.html

37
Remember the Economics

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com