Board of Scientific Counselors Program Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

Board of Scientific Counselors Program Review

Description:

... for Discussion Over the Course of the Conference and at the Town Hall Meeting ... Journal supplements provide more independence to State authors but expensive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: nch84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Board of Scientific Counselors Program Review


1
Welcome to the 2007 Joint Annual Meeting of
NAPHSIS and NCHS
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention National Center for Health Statistics
2
Two Suggested Items for Discussion Over the
Course of the Conference and at the Town Hall
Meeting
  • VSCP and NDI Contracts where we are and how we
    will proceed
  • Publishing strategies for new data items on
    births Demonstrate to potential funders that
    critical issues can be addressed by these items

3
Future VSCP Funding Mechanism
  • No Cooperative Agreements - just Contracts - VSCP
    and NDI Combined
  • Contracts will be different than in the past - we
    need to have the funds to complete an entire
    segment within the contract thus
  • We may need to contract by data set and quarter
    which will allow for funding availability and
    opportunities as they arise.
  • We will be working with PGO on a contract shell
    and will share it with you when available
  • We may need to continue Purchase Orders during an
    interim period.

4
New Data Items-How to Publish?
  • To attract funding we need to find a way to give
    high visibility to the new data items by
    publishing results and still meet current NAPHSIS
    restrictions on new data items based on existing
    funding constraints
  • Solution 1 Collaborative effort to publish
    papers on new items in an NCHS publication
  • Solution 2 Collaborative effort to publish
    papers on new data items in a public health
    journal supplement purchased by NCHS
  • Solution 3 Use the MMWR

5
Pros and Cons
  • All assume the availability of NCHS files to
    State authors
  • For NCHS pubs - more control and lower cost
  • Journal supplements provide more independence to
    State authors but expensive if no one submits!
  • MMWR -a forum to other CDC programs who initially
    were interested in these items good for short
    reports
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com