DICOM Working Group 10 London, 23 June 2003 Integrating Imaging and Reporting using DICOM SR and HL7 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DICOM Working Group 10 London, 23 June 2003 Integrating Imaging and Reporting using DICOM SR and HL7

Description:

Requires reporting vendor to adopt and support DICOM protocol ... To become a balloted Template when (someday) HL7 Templates are available? A DICOM standard? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: fredb6
Learn more at: https://dicom.nema.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DICOM Working Group 10 London, 23 June 2003 Integrating Imaging and Reporting using DICOM SR and HL7


1
DICOM Working Group 10London, 23 June
2003Integrating Imaging and Reporting using
DICOM SR and HL7 CDA
  • Fred M. Behlen, Ph.D.
  • Co-Chair, DICOM WG20 / HL7 IISIGMember, HL7
    Structured Document TC

LAItechnology
Longitudinal Application Integration Solutions
for Health Records
2
Use Cases for CDA inDICOM Application Domains
  • Report created in DICOM SR, transformed to CDA
    for export
  • Report created in CDA, including image references
    and annotation
  • DICOM evidence production requires input from
    external CDA documents
  • Imaging application needs to present rendered CDA
    content

3
1. Report created in SR, trans-formed to CDA for
export
  • SR Reporting application tightly integrated with
    image viewing and annotation application
  • CDA document references SR source document
  • Need
  • SR-to-CDA standards and tools
  • Constraints on SR for reliable transformation
  • Trial transformations of existing SR Templates
  • Rules defining boundaries for new templates
  • Robust CDA reference pointers to DICOM objects
    (WADO DIMSE access)

4
2. Report created in CDA
  • Image viewing and CDA reporting may be different
    applications, on the same or different platforms
  • Reporting including image references and
    annotation is done in CDA document
  • Reporting application may require access to DICOM
    SR evidence documents
  • Potential encapsulation of CDA in DICOM for
    management with other DICOM objects?
  • Need
  • Messaging between image viewing and CDA reporting
    application
  • Robust CDA reference pointers to DICOM objects
    (WADO DIMSE access)

5
3. Import CDA data for DICOM evidence production
  • CDA Structured content needs to be imported into
    DICOM application
  • Requires a query and retrieve mechanism from
    DICOM appli-cation to CDA repository (crosses
    DICOM/HL7 boundary)
  • May overlap with Relevant Patient Information
    Query
  • CDA content may include image references
  • Need
  • May not require additional standards work if RPIQ
    is used
  • If RPIQ is not used, then need to define Q/R
    mechanism and possible encapsulation in DICOM
    environment
  • Even if RPIQ is used, Query/display may be
    required
  • Need to define templates for specific content
    extracts from CDA

6
4. Display rendered CDA
  • CDA content not required in DICOM application
  • Requires a query/display mechanism from DICOM
    application to CDA repository
  • CDA content may include image references
  • Need
  • Query facilities already planned as IHE CDA
    Query/Display
  • Display may need to extract DICOM image reference
    and annotation from CDA document for rendering in
    diagnostic quality display

7
Use Cases for CDA
  • Report created in DICOM SR, transformed to CDA
    for export? Subspecialty domains only
  • Report created in CDA, including image references
    and annotation
  • DICOM evidence production requires input from
    external CDA documents? May be served by RPIQ
  • Imaging application needs to present rendered CDA
    content ? No additional standards work required

8
CDA Reporting Integration
  • Create authenticated reports directly in target
    format
  • CDA Release 2 (first committee ballot August
    2003) has equivalent of DICOM SCOORD and image
    referencing
  • Image viewing and reporting done in different
    appli-cations, on same or different (adjacent)
    platforms
  • Network communications model serves both cases

9
CDA Reporting Integration
Communications over TCP/IP(to server if
Web-based)
Image Viewing Application
Reporting Application
Measurements, Annotation
Display control optional (User, Patient and
Exam context)
10
CDA Reporting Integration
Communications over TCP/IP(to server if
Web-based)
Image Viewing Application
Reporting Application
Measurements, Annotation
Display control optional (User, Patient and
Exam context)
  • Display control.
  • Use CCOW?
  • DICOM Normalized Services?
  • OLE automation?
  • Special-purpose XML messaging?
  • Measurements and Annotation
  • DICOM Application Event Notification Service
    (Supp. 66)?
  • HL7 V.3 Messaging?
  • Special-purpose XML messages?

11
Display control optional
  • CCOW
  • Expensive
  • High entry level
  • DICOM Normalized Services
  • New standards development
  • Costly implementation
  • Requires reporting vendor to adopt and support
    DICOM protocol stack and tools
  • OLE Automation
  • Microsoft Windows only
  • May not work / security problems over network
  • Special-purpose XML messaging?
  • New to DICOM, but IHE audit trail uses similar
    approach
  • Uses same connection as XML measurement/annotation

12
Measurements Annotation
  • DICOM Application Event Notification Service
    (Supp. 66)?
  • Annotation in SR document fragments
  • Costly implementation on reporting system end
  • Requires reporting vendor to adopt and support
    DICOM protocol stack and tools
  • HL7 V.3 Messages?
  • Standards development required, not really HL7
    application domain
  • Special-purpose XML messaging?
  • Annotation in CDA document fragments
  • New to DICOM, but IHE audit trail uses similar
    approach
  • Uses same connection as XML measurement/annotation

13
Special-purpose XMLmessaging?
  • Point-to-point TCP/IP socket connection
  • Could be secured using TLS Record Layer Protocol
    if desired
  • W3C XML Schema validation of messages
  • Single Schema for messages in each direction
  • Event notification function only, minimal
    protocol overhead
  • Instance UID allows receiver to ignore duplicate
    sends, but otherwise no flow control

14
Conclusion Viable Protocols
  • DICOM Normalized services
  • Standards exist (Supp. 66) for event logging
  • Standards development
  • SR root templates for annotation measurements
  • SR-to-CDA mapping for annotation measurements
  • CDA Diagnostic Imaging Report document
    specification
  • Special-purpose XML protocol
  • Standards development
  • XML message schemas for annotation measurements
  • Socket transport specification
  • CDA Diagnostic Imaging Report document
    specification
  • ? More work for standards developers, less work
    for implementers

15
Open Issues
  • If XML protocol, where would it go in the
    Standard?
  • A new Part?
  • An Annex?
  • Where would the CDA Imaging Report document
    profile go?
  • The IHE Technical Framework?
  • An HL7 Informative Document?
  • To become a balloted Template when (someday) HL7
    Templates are available?
  • A DICOM standard?

16
A Possible Schedule
17
Accelerated Schedule
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com