sadsadf - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

sadsadf

Description:

Cheryl Fambles, Responsible Official. King County Construction and Facilities Management ... Contact Project Manager Robin Cole: (206) 296-4261. E-mail the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: metr6
Category:
Tags: cheryl | cole | sadsadf

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: sadsadf


1
East Lake Sammamish Trail NEPA/SEPA Scoping
Meeting February 20, 2001
2
What is NEPA?
  • The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is
    the basic national charter for protecting the
    environment. Its purpose is to
  • Encourage productive and enjoyable harmony
    between man and his environment
  • Promote efforts which will prevent damage to the
    environment
  • Enrich the understanding of ecological systems
    and natural resources important to the nation
  • It is the continuing policy of the federal
    government, in cooperation with state and local
    government and other concerned public and private
    organizations, to use all practicable means and
    measures to create and maintain conditions under
    which man and nature can exist in productive
    harmony

3
Why NEPA applies
  • Federal Transportation Enhancement funds (TEA 21)
    are being used to design the East Lake Sammamish
    Trail
  • Federal permits will be required to build the
    East Lake Sammamish Trail

4
How will NEPA and SEPA be coordinated?
  • Both Washington State and the federal government
    require that we conduct environmental reviews
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the
    Washington State Department of Transportation
    (WSDOT) cooperate to manage transportation
    projects
  • FHWA, WSDOT, and King County have determined that
    an integrated process is most efficient
  • A combined NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact
    Statement (EIS) will be prepared under the
    guidance of FHWA, WSDOT, and King County

5
How alternatives were developed for the November
2000 scoping meeting
  • Five neighborhood workshops
  • Maps
  • Worksheets
  • Small group meetings
  • User group mailing
  • Worksheets
  • Three user group meetings
  • Technical expertise of consultants and park
    professionals

6
Refinement of alternatives presented in November
2000
  • Consolidated railbed and rail corridor alignments
  • Specified equestrian trail location for analysis
    purposes
  • Quantified parking spaces at neighborhood
    locations for analysis purposes
  • Limited parking at neighborhood locations where
    corridor width is widest

7
3 trail alignment alternatives
  • ALTERNATIVE A No Action
  • No permanent trail would be built, and the
    Interim Use Trail would be decommissioned
  • ALTERNATIVE B Railbed/Rail Corridor
  • Alignment would be primarily on the railbed and
    completely within the rail corridor. This
    includes a few locations where the trail leaves
    the railbed to consolidate crossings and to
    eliminate the need for adjacent homeowners to
    park on the opposite side of the trail from their
    residences.
  • ALTERNATIVE C Rundle/Haro Plan
  • Citizen proposed alternative that leaves the
    railbed frequently, and completely leaves the
    rail corridor in the vicinity of East Lake
    Sammamish Place SE for about 1.6 miles.

8
How do the alternatives differ?
  • ALTERNATIVE A No Action
  • Does not provide a trail at all
  • ALTERNATIVE B Railbed/Rail Corridor
  • Uses the railbed alignment almost entirely for
    all trail users. Equestrian users are separated
    from the paved trail by 5 ft. for the most part,
    where the width of the corridor allows. For some
    sections, equestrians share the multi-use trail.
  • ALTERNATIVE C Rundle/Haro Plan
  • Goes outside of the County-owned rail corridor,
    and is adjacent to other public roads. Equestrian
    use remains on the railbed where this condition
    exists. In other locations, it is typically
    separated by 5 ft., or combined for short
    distances as in ALTERNATIVE B.

9
What information is available at this scoping
meeting?
  • Issues and concerns identified through the
    scoping process to date
  • SEPA and NEPA information
  • Refined trail alternatives
  • Location of proposed trail amenities
  • Information regarding trail art

10
How do we submit scoping comments?
  • Write your comments on a flip chart
  • Complete a comment form
  • Talk to a court reporter
  • E-mail your comments to
  • dcfm.sepacomments_at_metrokc.gov
  • Send your written comments
  • Cheryl Fambles, Responsible Official
  • King County Construction and Facilities
    Management
  • 500 Fourth Ave. Room 320
  • Seattle, WA 98104

11
Your submitted comments will be used to
  • Ensure that the Environmental Impact Statement
    covers all issues and concerns
  • Provide information about impacts
  • Help inform the decision makers who will be
    making Master Plan recommendations

12
Want more information?
  • Visit the project web site
  • www.metrokc.gov/dcfm/elst.htm
  • Contact Project Manager Robin Cole
  • (206) 296-4261
  • E-mail the responsible official
  • dcfm.sepacomments_at_metrokc.gov
  • Send a letter to the Federal Highway
    Administration
  • Elizabeth Healy
  • 711 South Capital Way, Suite 501
  • Olympia, WA 98501
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com