Why is coal back in vogue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Why is coal back in vogue

Description:

Carbon Sequestration Options. Injection into oil/gas reservoirs ... Under a cap and trade system, these capture/sequestration costs may not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: RWB67
Category:
Tags: back | carbon | coal | trading | vogue

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why is coal back in vogue


1
IPED COAL POWER CONFERENCE
Planning in a Carbon- Constrained World
January 18-19, 2007 St. Petersburg, FL
  • presented by

Evis C. Couppis, PhD, P.E.
R. W. Beck, Inc.
2
Agenda
  • Characterize CO2 emissions
  • Identify possible CO2 capture/sequestration
    options
  • Review CO2 capture/sequestration costs
  • Review possible CO2 allowance pricing
  • Identify planning options going forward

3
Will We Get CO2 Legislation?
  • In 2004, 60 of utilities surveyed believed we
    will get legislation
  • In 2006, 93 of utilities surveyed believed we
    will get legislation
  • We already have legislation in California and
    other programs such as RGGI in Northeast
  • The real issue isnt whether it will happen but
    when it will happen

4
2006 U.S. CO2 Emissions
Sector
MMetric Tons
Power 2357
Transportation 1962
Industrial 1050
Residential 351
Commercial 221
5941
TOTAL
EIA (2006)
5
U.S. CO2 Emissions by Sector
Residential
6
Commercial
4
Industrial
Power
18
39
Transportation
33
EIA (2006)
6
U.S. CO2 Emissions by Fuel Type
Other
0
Coal
37
Petroleum
43
Natural Gas
20
EIA (2006)
7
U.S. CO2 Emissions From Power Generation
Other
1
Petroleum
3
Gas
14
Coal
82
EIA (2006)
8
U.S. Electricity Sector by Fuel Type, Qbtu
Imports
Renewables
0
10
Nuclear
20
Coal
53
Petroleum
2
Gas
15
EIA (2006)
9
CO2 Emissions by Technology/Fuel Type
Emissions, Tons/Mwhr
Technology/Fuel Type
  • PC
    0.95
  • Gas Combined Cycle 0.41
  • IGCC
    0.88

10
Carbon Capture Options
  • Amine scrubbing
  • Amine-based solid sorbent
  • Selexol process
  • Rectisol process
  • Aqueous ammonia scrubbing
  • Aqueous ammonia multi-pollutant capture
  • PC oxy-fuel combustion, cryogenic ASU
  • PC oxy-fuel combustion, oxygen-selective membrane
    ASU
  • Co-sequestration of CO2/SO2/NOx

11
Carbon Sequestration Options
  • Injection into oil/gas reservoirs
  • Injection into deep, unmineable coal seams
  • Injection into saline aquifers
  • Injection into deep oceans
  • Indirect sequestration (trees)

12
Cost Impacts of CO2 Capture/Sequestration
  • What are impacts if new plants were equipped with
    CO2 capture/sequestration?
  • Under stringent regulations approximately 90
    removal
  • Under a cap and trade system, these
    capture/sequestration costs may not represent the
    most cost effective option
  • The costs presented are order of magnitude at
    best
  • The costs of CO2 control under a cap and trade
    would depend on all available options to generate
    credits/reductions/offsets
  • Costs would be dependent on the stringency of the
    regulations

13
Heat Rate Impacts
40
PC
35
PCSC
30
25
Percent Increase
IGCC
20
15
NGCC
10
5
0
Technology Type
NETL(2006), MPR Associates (June 2005), Bechtel
(November 2002)
14
Capital Cost Impacts
90
PC
80
PCSC
70
60
50
Percent Increase
NGCC
40
IGCC
30
20
10
0
Technology Type
NETL(2006), MPR Associates (June 2005), Bechtel
(November 2002)
15
Cost of Electricity Impacts
80
PC
PCSC
70
60
50
Percent Increase
40
IGCC
NGCC
30
20
10
0
Technology Type
NETL(2006), MPR Associates (June 2005), Bechtel
(November 2002)
16
CO2 Avoided Costs
  • Cost of CO2 avoided
  • (/Mwhr)capture (/Mwhr)reference /
  • (tCO2/Mwhr)reference (tCO2/Mwhr)capture

Note Mwhr based on net power
17
Possible Allowance Pricing
  • In Europe, 5-30 Euros/ton with an average
    approximately 15 Euros (2005-2006)
  • Southern Company Report (May 2005) estimates,
    high of 7 in 2010-20/ton in 2030 (2004)
    medium of 6-7/ton
  • National Energy Commission recommended 7/ton in
    2010 escalating 5/year
  • ICF (January 2006) estimates, high of 10 in
    2010-20/ton in 2025 (2003) expected
    5-15/ton

18
Will CO2 Costs be Fully Recoverable?
  • Depends on your generation mix
  • Depends on regulated vs. unregulated market
  • Depends on whether gas or coal is on margin
  • Gas will likely be impacted more than coal

19
Utility Planning Steps
  • Quantify present emissions
  • Take advantage of easy efficiency improvements
    (pick low hanging fruit)
  • Consider CO2 regulations/legislation in planning
    (particularly in technology selection)
  • Conduct risk analysis (level of regulation,
    timing, etc.)

20
Questions
IPED COAL POWER CONFERENCE
  • Evis C. Couppis, PhD, P.E.
  • R. W. Beck, Inc.
  • ecouppis_at_rwbeck.com
  • (303) 299-5230
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com