Title: Part I: Statistical issues in WHI Part II: Further analyses of prior hormone therapy on breast cance
1Part I Statistical issues in WHIPart II
Further analyses of prior hormone therapy on
breast cancer The WHI Estrogen Progestin Trial
- Garnet Anderson
- WHI Clinical Coordinating Center
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
- October 7, 2003
2Statistical methods
- Design and primary analyses based on weighted
logrank statistic - T ? w (O-E)
- Weights
- Specified for each disease endpoint
- Defined as time since randomization
- Used to increase efficiency
3Weights by time since randomization for the
logrank statistic
4Trial monitoring Early stopping for benefit
required
- Evidence of CHD benefit
- Statistical rules based on OBrien-Fleming (OBF)
procedures using a 0.025-level, one-sided test - AND
- Global index supportive of benefit
- Statistical rules based on OBF procedures using a
0.05-level, one-sided test
Freedman, et al. Control Clin Trials.
199617509-525.
OBrien PC, Fleming TR. Biometrics.
197935549-556.
5Trial monitoring Early stopping for adverse
effects required
- Evidence of increase in breast cancer
- OBF procedure using a 0.05-level one-sided
weighted logrank test. - OR
- Evidence of increase in CHD, stroke, PE, hip
fracture, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer,
or death from other causes - OBF procedure using a 0.05-level one-sided
(weighted/unweighted) logrank test, with
Bonferroni correction. - AND
- Global index supportive of overall harm (Z
Freedman, et al. Control Clin Trials.
199617509-525.
6Statistical approaches in reporting
- Intention-to-treat
- Unweighted hazard ratios
- Nominal and adjusted 95 confidence intervals
from unweighted analyses - Primary and designated safety endpoints adjusted
for multiple interim analyses - Designated secondary endpoints adjusted for
multiple endpoints and interim analyses - P-values may be shown from weighted analyses
7Statistical approaches in reporting subgroup
analyses
- Inference based primarily on tests for
interaction - No adjustment for multiple testing required
- Considered hypothesis generating
- Must state
- Number of interactions tested
- Number expected to be significant by chance alone
8Prior hormone use and breast cancer
- More detailed analysis of prior exposure
- Type of prior hormone use
- Duration of prior hormone use
- Recency of prior hormone use
- Extent of disease comparisons by prior hormone
use - Mammography performance
9Breast cancer risk with EP by prior hormone use
Unweighted p for interaction .04 Weighted p
.10
10Breast cancer incidence by prior PHT use
Unweighted p .04, Weighted p .10
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
11Breast cancer risk by type of prior PHT use
P-values from test for interaction with type of
prior use
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
12Breast cancer incidence among prior users of
E-alone and combined hormones
Unweighted p .08 Weighted p .17
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
13Breast cancer risk by duration of prior hormone
use
P-values from test for interaction with duration
of prior use
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
14Breast cancer incidence by duration of prior
hormone use
Unweighted p .09 Weighted p .15
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
15Breast cancer risk by recency of prior hormone use
P-values from test for interaction with recency
of use
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
16Breast cancer incidence by recency of prior
hormone use
PHT use at enrollment
PHT use within last 5 years
Unweighted p .59, Weighted p.65
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
17Breast cancer incidence by recency of prior
hormone use, continued
Last PHT use 5-10 years ago
Last PHT use 10 years ago
Unweighted p .59, Weighted p.65
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
18Breast cancer risk by prior hormone use and body
mass index
P-values from test for interaction with prior use
and BMI
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
19Breast cancer
BMI BMI 30
No prior hormone use
Unweighted p .11 Weighted p .12
Prior hormone use
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
20Characteristics of prior hormone users
- Younger, leaner
- More frequently
- White
- Have at least a high school education
- Former smokers
- Drink alcohol
- Exercise
- Have used oral contraceptives
- Have vasomotor symptoms
- Have parental history of fracture after age 40
- Had a mammogram in previous 2 years
- Have different pregnancy history
21Duration of prior use by type
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
22Recency of prior use by type
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
23Estimated effects of EP in multivariate models
Unweighted p .03 Weighted p Controlling for differential characteristics of
prior hormone users and other breast cancer risk
factors and main effect of prior hormone use
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
24Estimated effects of EP in multivariate models
Unweighted p .05 Weighted p .64
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
25Estimated effects of EP in multivariate models
Unweighted p .08 Weighted p Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
26Estimated effects of EP in multivariate models
Unweighted p .17 Weighted p Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
27Estimated effects of EP in multivariate models
Unweighted p .05 Weighted p Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
28Extent of disease by prior use and randomization
assignment
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
29Breast cancer incidence post-intervention(diagnos
es from 7/8/02 8/31/03)
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
30Cumulative breast cancer incidence, including
post-intervention diagnoses
Data through August 31, 2003
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
31SummaryBreast cancer
- Suggestion of greater EP hazard ratios in women
with prior hormone exposure - Potential confounding by differential
characteristics of prior users - Potential delay in diagnosis not taken into
account - More extensive modeling suggests
- Prior combined hormone use has a stronger effect
than prior E-alone use - Increasing duration of prior exposure is
associated with greater risk - Recency of exposure an unclear factor
- Modest evidence for interaction of EP with prior
use and BMI
32SummaryBreast cancer, continued
- Data too sparse to jointly examine
- Type
- Duration
- Recency
- Difference in extent of disease by randomization
status consistent across prior use groups - Some hints of differential effects by prior use
- Data on post-intervention comparisons are limited
33Frequency of abnormal mammograms
Not to be reproduced or distributed without
permission from WHI
34SummaryMammography
- EP increases rates of abnormal mammograms
- Among women who never had a breast cancer
diagnosis, the proportions with abnormal
mammograms were - 32 for EP
- 22 for placebo
- Role of prior hormone use on mammography
performance is small
35(No Transcript)