TransNIH CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

TransNIH CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Update

Description:

Patricia Newman, NCRR. Iris Obrams, NCRR. Daniel Rosenblum, ... Paul Johnson, NICHD. Genevieve deAlmeida-Morris, NIDA. NCRR. CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Status ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: ncrr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TransNIH CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Update


1
Trans-NIH CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee
Update September 21, 2006 Lori A. Mulligan,
M.P.H. Director Office of Science Policy and
Public Liaison
2
Levels of Evaluation
  • Individual CTSA Level
  • Monitor progress of individual CTSA institutions
    through annual progress reports, self-evaluation
    reports, periodic site visits
  • CTSA Program/Consortium Level
  • Evaluate short and long term impact of the CTSA
    program
  • Assess how the CTSAs function as a collective
    consortium

3
CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Members
  • Lori Mulligan, Chair, NCRR
  • Margaret Ames, Co-Chair, NICHD
  • Jim Corrigan, NCI
  • Kameha Kidd, NCRR
  • Patricia Newman, NCRR
  • Iris Obrams, NCRR
  • Daniel Rosenblum, NCRR
  • Sue Garges, NIAID
  • Matthew Gladden, NICHD
  • Paul Johnson, NICHD
  • Genevieve deAlmeida-Morris, NIDA

4
CTSA Evaluation Subcommittee Status
  • Met three times (6/14, 7/10, 8/28)
  • 1st two meetings focused on
  • Challenges and complexity of evaluating CTSA
    program
  • Sharing relevant experiences and reference
    materials
  • Defining scope, purpose, objectives
  • Need for a draft conceptual framework became
    critical
  • 3rd meeting focused on targeted discussion of
    draft conceptual framework and Set-aside Proposal
    for Feasibility Study

5
CTSA Conceptual Framework
  • Recognize that institutional flexibility may
    yield different contributions to overall success
    of the CTSA consortium
  • Define scope and definition of baseline
    characteristics
  • Consider impact of funding cohorts of CTSAs
    annually and impact of RFA revisions to the CTSA
    intervention
  • Establish and adopt common terms and definitions
    across CTSA consortium at the outset (i.e.,
    translational, interdisciplinary, etc.)

6
(No Transcript)
7
CTSA Evaluation Timeline
  • Sept 1, 2006 Submitted Statement of Work for
    Set-Aside Funds for Phase I CTSA Feasibility
    Study
  • -annual indicators
  • -design and methodology for full scale
    evaluation
  • -to be integral part of NIH CTSA Evaluation
    Subcommittee and National Steering Committee
  • Oct 23, 2006 Discuss need to establish National
    Evaluation Steering Committee at 1st PI
    Meeting
  • Nov 2006 (est.) Award CTSA Evaluation Contract
  • April 2007 (est.) Receive Final report from
    Contractor
  • May 2007 Pursue plans for next Phase for
    Process/Outcome CTSA Evaluation
  • July 1, 2007 Submit Congressional Appropriations
    Committee Report on CTSA Evaluation status
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com