Validity: Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Validity: Introduction

Description:

First, define what you want to measure (conceptual basis) ... that items are clear, comprehensible and relevant (face validity, 'sensibility' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: IanMcD2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Validity: Introduction


1
Validity Introduction
2
Reliability and Validity
Reliability Low
High








Validity Low








High








3
Types of Error in Repeated Measurements

True value

4
The Validation Sequence
  • Does it measure what its supposed to measure?
  • First, define what you want to measure
    (conceptual basis)
  • Select indicators or items that represent that
    topic (content validity a sampling issue)
  • Check that items are clear, comprehensible and
    relevant (face validity, sensibility).
  • This produces a pool of items ready for item
    analysis stage, which involves administering the
    test and analyzing responses.

5
Validation Sequence (2) Internal structure
  • Item analysis refers to a series of checks on the
    performance of each item. Some fall under the
    heading of reliability, some validity. Faulty
    items are discarded or replaced. Analyses
    include
  • Item distributions missing values an item that
    does not vary cannot measure anything
  • Correlations among items, maybe with factor
    analysis
  • Item response theory (IRT) analyses

6
Validation Sequence (3)External associations
  • Criterion validation, if a gold standard
    exists. Sensitivity specificity are normal
    statistics.
  • Correlational evidence, leading to construct
    validation, where there is no single, clear gold
    standard. Correlations are the normal statistic.
  • Correlations often divided into convergent and
    discriminant coefficients, according to
    hypothesized associations
  • These analyses tend to use the entire test
    administered to selected samples inadequate
    performance leads back to basic design

7
Validation Sequence (4)Group Discrimination
  • Once you show that the test correlates with other
    measures as intended, its actual performance is
    evaluated in rating groups of respondents.
    Analyses generally use representative samples
  • Known groups (can it distinguish well from
    sick similar to criterion validity)
  • Sensitivity to change over time (relevant to an
    evaluative measure) responsiveness.
  • Do scores show ceiling or floor effects?

8
Conclusion
  • Validation is rarely complete. Many instruments
    continue to be checked for validity 20 years
    after their invention. Times change, phrasing
    makes old items obsolete, etc.
  • It is long and expensive. Basic test development
    and validation may take 3 - 5 years its not a
    thesis project.
  • Remember validity is about the interpretation of
    scores. It is a relative concept a test is not
    valid or invalid, but only valid or not for a
    particular application.
  • The viagara principle a test intended for one
    purpose may prove good for an unanticipated
    application.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com