Anatomical Determinants of Forearm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Anatomical Determinants of Forearm

Description:

Increased use of forearm BP when upper arm inaccessible or when available cuff does not fit. ... Remove cuffs after cardiac procedure completed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: kathleen173
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Anatomical Determinants of Forearm


1
Anatomical Determinants of Forearm Upper Arm
OscillometricBlood Pressure Differences
  • Kathleen Schell, PhD, RN, Associate Professor,
    Nursing
  • William Rose, PhD, Assistant Professor, Health
    Exercise Science
  • In Collaboration with Angela Di Sabatino, RN, MS
    Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Program, CCHS

2
Background Significance
  • Accurate BP measurement is essential to providing
    appropriate healthcare.
  • Increased use of forearm BP when upper arm
    inaccessible or when available cuff does not fit.
  • Past research demonstrates that forearm and upper
    arm automatic BPs differ for many individuals.
    Size of differences varies.
  • Unclear what factors influence the differences.

3
Aims
  • Aim 1 Compare forearm and upper arm automatic
    BPs and central arterial pressure in adults
    undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization
    or coronary intervention.
  • Hypothesis 1A Upper arm BP will be within 5 mm
    Hg of central arterial pressure.
  • Hypothesis 1B Forearm BP will be within 10 mm
    Hg of central arterial pressure.
  • Hypothesis 1C Forearm BP will be within 5 mm
    Hg of corresponding upper arm BP.

4
Aims
  • Aim 2 Determine effects of anatomical structures
    on differences in forearm and upper arm automatic
    BPs in adults undergoing non-emergent cardiac
    catheterization or coronary intervention.
  • Hypothesis 2 Body mass index, arm circumference,
    biceps skin-fold measurement, vessel diameter,
    and vessel depth will predict the differences
    between forearm and upper arm automatic BP
    readings.

5
Aims
  • Aim 3 Compare central aortic pressure waveform
    with brachial and radial pressure waveforms and
    with waveform predicted by a computer model.
  • Hypothesis 3 A quantitative model of pressure
    wave propagation and reflection will predict the
    differences between central aortic, brachial, and
    radial pressure waveforms.

6
Subject Eligibility Convenience Sample
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Able to read and speak English or Spanish
    (consent will be translated into Spanish)
  • Age 18 years
  • Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-intact skin where BP cuffs would be placed
  • Arm injury or surgery within the last month
  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (as
    recommended by BP device manufacturers due to
    device inaccuracy)
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR) gt 1.7
  • Intravenous catheters in both arms
  • Hemodynamic instability or need for immediate
    cardiac surgery or emergency treatment

7
Procedure
  • In the Cardiac Intervention Room
  • BP cuffs placed on right forearm and upper arm
    prior to draping of patient
  • Obtain simultaneous central aortic pressure
    waveform and forearm and upper arm cuff BP
    measurements X 2
  • Radial and brachial artery tonometry
  • Data collection via laptop computer
  • Remove cuffs after cardiac procedure completed
  • Cart with Dinamap ProCare and laptop computer
    positioned on right side of patient, away from
    table, superior and to the right of patients head

8
Tonometry
  • Tonometry
  • Position tonometry probe on radial artery
    measure waveform for 20 seconds
  • Repeat with brachial artery

9
Data Collection Timeline
  • Time (minutes)

Ao Central aortic blood pressure via catheter
UAC, FAC Upper arm cuff pressure, forearm cuff
pressure
RT, BT Radial artery tonometry, brachial artery
tonometry
10
FUNDING
  • University of Delaware
  • Research Foundation Grant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com