Utility of CGMS as a Measure of Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes T1DM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Utility of CGMS as a Measure of Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes T1DM

Description:

Jennifer Fisher. Barb Tallant. University of Iowa. Eva Tsalikian ... Amy Sheehan. Nemours Children's Clinic. Tim Wysocki. Nelly Mauras. Larry Fox. Keisha Bird ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: bdc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Utility of CGMS as a Measure of Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes T1DM


1
Utility of CGMS as a Measure of Glycemic Control
in Children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM)
Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer, MD for
2
Background DirecNet
  • Diabetes Research in Children Network
  • NIH funded collaborative study group
  • 5 clinical centers, central laboratory,
    coordinating center, and representatives from
    NICHD and NIDDK
  • Objective to critically evaluate the clinical
    usefulness of current and future glucose sensors
    in children and adolescents

3
DirecNet Outpatient Randomized Clinical Trial
(RCT)
  • 6-month RCT to assess the merits of the
    GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (Cygnus Inc. Redwood
    City, CA) in children ages 7-17 years with type 1
    diabetes

4
  • Initial outpatient evaluations of glycemic
    control prior to randomization included
  • 48-72 hr CGMS (Medtronic MiniMed) profile.
  • 8-point SMBG testing while simultaneously
    wearing a CGMS for 2-3 days using the One Touch
    UltraSmart (Life scan) meter.
  • HbA1c measured by HPLC in a central laboratory.
  • Purpose To examine and compare the results
    obtained by these baseline measures of glycemic
    control in a large sample of children and
    adolescents with T1DM.

5
Methods
  • Analysis included 183 patients who completed the
    following
  • At least 10 Ultra measurements during 2 days of
    8-point testing.
  • 40 total hours of CGMS use.
  • At least one day of overlap between 8-point
    testing and CGMS use.
  • Ultra plasma glucose levels used as reference
    values for assessment of accuracy of hypoglycemic
    detection by the CGMS.

6
  • Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of 183
    Subjects
  • Male/Female 52/48
  • Age 12.5 2.8 years
  • Minorities 14
  • Duration of Diabetes 5.4 3.3 years
  • Injections/Pump 54/46

7
Number of Glucose Measurements
  • Ultra 3,408
  • CGMS 170,381

8
Mean Ultra and CGMS glucose values
Ultra
CGMS
Mean ( SD) A1c value was 8.0 0.9
9
Percent Glucose Values in Range, Below Range and
Above Range
Results were similar for pre- and post-prandial
and bedtime.
10
Mean Glucose Values by Time of Day
11
Mean Ultra Glucose Values by A1c With regression
line and 95 confidence limits
Spearman correlation 0.44 P-value 12
Mean CGMS Glucose Values by A1c With regression
line and 95 confidence limits
Spearman correlation 0.44 P-value 13
Slopes of Regression Lines
  • 8-point testing
  • 26 mg/dl per 1.0 change in A1c
  • CGMS
  • 22 mg/dl per 1.0 change in A1c

14
CGMS and Ultra During Hypoglycemia
136 CGMS hypoglycemia episodes
Hypoglycemia two values ? 60 mg/dl without
an intermediate value 70 mg/dl
80 ULTRA hypoglycemia episodes
Hypoglycemia BG value ? 60 mg/dl
CGMS 70
10
Ultra 70
32
CGMS 61-70
11
Ultra 61-70
33
79
CGMS 60
Ultra 60
35
Sensitivity defined as CGMS 70 within 30
minutes False positive defined as Ultra 70.
15
CGMS and Ultra During Overnight Hypoglycemia
17 CGMS episodes Hypoglycemia two values ? 60
mg/dl without
an intermediate value 70 mg/dl
5 ULTRA episodes Hypoglycemia BG value ? 60 m
g/dl
CGMS 70
40
Ultra 70
59
CGMS 61-70
20
29
Ultra 61-70
40
CGMS 60
Ultra 60
12
Sensitivity defined as CGMS 70 within 30
minutes False positive defined as Ultra 70.
16
Summary
  • 8-point testing and CGMS were similar in
    detection of hyperglycemia and normoglycemia, and
    in their correlation to A1c values.
  • One-third of CGMS defined hypoglycemia episodes
    overall and over half overnight could not be
    confirmed by the home glucose meter.

17
Conclusions
  • 8-point testing and the CGMS provide useful
    short-term measure of glucose control in youth
    with type 1 diabetes
  • Both methods have limitations for determining the
    true rate of hypoglycemia in these patients

18
Conclusions
  • Limitations of 8-point testing
  • Compliance
  • Limited number of values
  • Limitations of CGMS
  • Retrospective data
  • Inaccuracy of low glucose measurements

19
  • Barbara Davis Center
  • H. Peter Chase
  • Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer
  • Jennifer Fisher
  • Barb Tallant
  • University of Iowa
  • Eva Tsalikian
  • Michael Tansey
  • Linda Larson
  • Julie Coffey
  • Amy Sheehan
  • Nemours Childrens Clinic
  • Tim Wysocki
  • Nelly Mauras
  • Larry Fox
  • Keisha Bird
  • Kelly Lofton
  • Stanford University
  • Bruce Buckingham
  • Darrell Wilson
  • Jennifer Block
  • Paula Clinton
  • Yale University
  • William Tamborlane
  • Stuart Weinzimer
  • Elizabeth Doyle
  • Kristin Sikes
  • Amy Steffen
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research
  • Roy Beck
  • Katrina Ruedy
  • Craig Kollman
  • Dongyuan Xing
  • Cynthia Silvester
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com