Greenhouse Gas Mitigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Description:

Herzog, MIT 2006. Capture, purification, reuse & storage of CO2 ... Herzog, MIT 2006. Capture, purification, reuse & storage of CO2. Is geological storage safe? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ctci
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation


1
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation CO2 Storage
  • Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang
  • Chemical Petroleum Engineering Department
  • The University of Kansas

2
Capture, purification, reuse storage of CO2
  • Costs of Capture
  • Highly location, technology, energy costs, etc.
    dependent.
  • Estimated cost of capture US23 53/t.
  • Herzog, MIT 2006

3
Capture, purification, reuse storage of CO2
  • Costs of Transportation Storage
  • Highly location, method, energy costs, etc.
    dependent.
  • Estimated cost US2.92 4.86/t.
  • Herzog, MIT 2006

4
Capture, purification, reuse storage of CO2
  • Opportunity Cost
  • Estimated opportunity cost for substantial
    capture storage activity US25 35/t.
  • Herzog, MIT 2006

5
Capture, purification, reuse storage of CO2
  • Is geological storage safe?
  • With careful site selection and characterization,
    it is generally considered safe to store CO2 in
    geological formations.

6
Capture, purification, reuse storage of CO2
  • Issues with storage in other countries
  • Increased costs and risks of leakage during
    transportation.
  • Global carbon credit trading not established.
  • Difficulties in monitoring verification.

7
Geologic Sequestration
  • Oil Gas Reservoirs
  • Enhanced oil recovery
  • Enhanced gas recovery in gas condensate
    reservoirs
  • Depleted oil gas reservoirs
  • Reservoir pressure maintenance
  • Saline Aquifers
  • Coal Beds
  • Enhanced coal bed methane recovery
  • income generating

8
Geologic Sequestration
  • Near-term, low-volume implementation
  • Store high purity CO2 in local hydrocarbon
    reservoirs or saline aquifers.
  • Suitable for industries producing high purity CO2.

9
Geologic Sequestration
  • Long-term, large-scale implementation
  • Store CO2 in deep saline aquifers.
  • Takes decades to build expensive infrastructures
    for capture and transportation.

10
Geologic Sequestration
  • Key issues
  • Costs associated with the CCS.
  • Storage capacity of venues selected.
  • Containment longevity.
  • Monitoring verification

11
Geologic Sequestration
  • Cost issues
  • CCS is expensive.
  • Needs income generating potential for industries
    to implement.
  • Carbon tax credits or government subsidy required
    for large-scale implementation.

12
Geologic Sequestration
  • Storage-capacity issues
  • Requires good geologic model.
  • Need reservoir simulation for CO2 movement and
    trapping.
  • Simulation must couple flow, phase, geochemical,
    geomechanical models.
  • Storage capacity estimates must be conservative
    and Monte Carlo simulation should be used to
    address uncertainties.

13
Geologic Sequestration
  • Monitoring issues
  • Monitoring strategy should be site specific and
    risk based
  • Risk profile differs in different geological
    formations.
  • Best developed monitoring methods
  • Seismic
  • Pressure
  • Vegetative stress
  • Eddy covariance and flux accumulation chamber

14
Geologic Sequestration
  • Verification issues
  • Detection limit and precision of measurements
    must be established to insure accurate and
    cost-effective inventory accounting.
  • Methods for establishing detection limit
  • Fraction of background CO2 flux
  • Prescribed CO2 flux
  • Specified CO2 emission per year
  • Percent of CO2 will be injected

15
Where should Taiwan be heading?
  • Learn from others first (do not reinvent the
    wheel)
  • CCS Consortia
  • CO2NET, CO2NET3, CO2ReMoVe (EU-funded consortia)
  • CCP, GCEP (Industry-funded consortia)
  • GEODISC, CO2CRC (Australia)
  • Commercial Projects
  • Weyburn project CO2 EOR (EnCana)
  • Salah project Saline formation (BP)
  • Sleipner project CO2-rich gas reservoir
    (Statoil)
  • Pilot projects
  • Nagaoka pilot (RITE of Japan)
  • Frio Brine pilot (Texas BEG)

16
Where should Taiwan be heading?
  • Things can be done NOW
  • Survey suitable geological formations for CO2
    storage.
  • Gain site assessment experience using well-
    characterized CPC gas reservoirs
  • use Monte Carlo simulation to estimate storage
    capacity,
  • use reservoir model to simulate long-term CO2
    trapping and movements,
  • establish risk profile and develop monitoring
    strategy,
  • evaluate sub- and above-surface monitoring
    methods,
  • estimate costs.

17
Where should Taiwan be heading?
  • Roles of industries, government, and academia
  • Oil and gas industry, geological surveys, and
    academia need to work together to identify sites
    that can be used to store CO2 safely, near
    permanently, and cost effectively.
  • Government should sponsor pilot demonstration
    projects to validate findings from feasibility
    studies.

18
Where should Taiwan be heading?
  • Roles of industries, government, and academia
  • Government should sponsor outreach program
    through education, forums to gain public support.
  • The outreach program should address the status of
    current technological developments and the risks
    involved in CCS.
  • Including NGOs views in an objective fashion is
    crucial to gaining public acceptance.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com