Title: Reengineering the Secondary Mortgage Market for Better Risk Management
1Re-engineering the Secondary Mortgage Market for
Better Risk Management
- Michelle McCarthy
- SVP, Corporate Market Risk Management
- Washington Mutual Bank
- May 19, 2004
2Overview
- The case for change in the mortgage market
- The risk management challenges posed by the
mortgage servicing right asset (MSR) - Comparing MSR to an IO
- Hedging tradeoffs for MSRs
- What market changes can affect the MSR?
- What would the impacts be on lenders and
investors?
3The case for change
- Continuing growth in mortgage market
- Continuing consolidation among mortgage servicers
- Concentrates MSR asset
- Asset must be capitalized
- Behavior similar to an IO
- Requires complex hedging, can be capital
intensive
Resolving these pressures in the secondary market
could avoid dislocations in the primary market
4Case for Change Continuing Growth in the
Mortgage Market
- State of the Nations Housing
- Harvard Housing Center reported that U.S.
households will increase 22.6 to 129 million in
the next 20 years or 1.19 million new households
per year
It is clear that the underlying demographics
will (drive) the housing market - Nicolas
Retsinas
Source State of the Nations Housing report,
Harvard Housing Center, June 2002.
5Drivers of Growth Projected Single-Family
Mortgage Debt Outstanding
Actual(a) Forecast
Range(b) 1980s 1990s 2001-2010 Households
1.5 1.3 1.2 - 1.3 Homeownership Rate
(0.2) 0.5 0.3 - 0.4 Average Home Price
Gains 7.3 3.9 5.0 - 6.5 SF Residential
Investment 8.6 5.7 6.5 - 8.2 Debt-to-Valu
e Ratio 2.0 1.4 1.3 - 1.7 SF Mortgage
Debt Outstanding 10.6 7.1 8.0 - 10.0
6Mortgage Origination Market Trends
Steady Projected Growth
3.8
8.0 Purchase Market CAGR
2.6
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
Source Mortgage Bankers Association, Mortgage
Finance Forecast, April 2004
7Case for Change Continuing Growth in the
Mortgage Market
Mortgage Debt Outstanding
Source Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve, Flow of Funds Accounts, 2003 data
through Q2
8Case for Change Continuing Growth in the
Mortgage Market
Debt Securities Outstanding Market Share
Source Bond Market Association 2003 data
through Q2
9Case for Change Continuing Consolidation Among
Mortgage Servicers
- Mortgage Servicing Market Trends
in trillions
8.5 CAGR
10Accelerating Consolidation in the Mortgage
Industry
Case for Change Continuing Consolidation Among
Mortgage Servicers
Top 10 Market Share
Source Inside Mortgage Finance April 30, 2004
(Originators) and May 7, 2004 (Servicers).
11The Challenges of the MSR asset
- The IO market that dwarfs other IO markets
- Base excess servicing capitalized
- Market value moves strongly for changes in
interest rates - Mortgage servicers can be a strong factor in the
hedging markets after large interest rate
movements - The perfect hedge eludes, requiring heavy
activity - The larger the servicing fee is relative to cost
- Activity shifts away from performing a service
for a fee - Activity shifts to managing a complex IO portfolio
Large concentrations of this capital-intensive
asset across a limited range of participants
could affect the growth of the mortgage market
12How is an MSR similar to an IO?
- Strip of expected cashflows related to an
underlying set of mortgages - Subject to prepayment risk
- Likely to prepay in low rate environments
- Duration lengthens in high rate environments
- Value change, in percent terms, very large for a
given change in rates - Relates to the unpaid principal balance of the
underlying mortgage loans - Hedge buy duration
13How is an MSR different than an IO?
- Need a mortgage servicing plant in order to own
MSR - Items other than interest rates, prepayment
speeds affecting value include - Costs to service
- Ancillary income (fees, etc)
- Earnings on certain balances
- Timing of mortgage payoffs, tax and insurance
payments - Other items
- Every securitized mortgage creates an MSR
- IOs are created for a much smaller subset of
mortgages that underlie Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations
14Two sources of larger than desirable IO
- Base servicing fee arguably too high
- MBS trading in 1/2 point coupons
15Servicing is an Operating BusinessNot a
Derivative Investment
- Base service fee in current operating environment
is too high - Unit costs have decreased with scale and
technology - Expenses are based on units
- Revenue has increased
- Based on loan size
- Contribution of non-service fee income -
ancillary float -
Result Margin between revenue and expenses has
created a larger absolute MSR value, and has
expanded the role of servicers to investors in IOs
16No Viable Secondary Market Outlet for
Additional Premium
- Agency MBS market is the only fixed-income market
that trades in 1/2 coupons - As a result, the bulk of the market for the past
two years is in 6s and 6.5s last years recent
refi boom produced 5s and 5.5s - Mortgages are slotted into closest coupon,
buying up or buying down - Buying up avoids excess servicing but is often
uneconomic - Buying down creates excess servicing
-
Result Lenders create relatively large excess
servicing (IOs) that they capitalize and hold
17What changes in mortgage market would improve MSR
concentration?
- Reducing servicing fees
- 1/4 or 1/8 coupons
- Excess servicing sales
18Reducing servicing fees
- 10-15 bp servicing fee instead of current 25
- Align servicing fee with the costs and income of
servicing - Strike a balance between risk/reward and market
requirements - the lenders skin in the game - Recent moves
- GNMA II from 44 bp to 19 bp
- Fannie Hybrid _at_ 12.5 bp
- Freddie Hybrid _at_ 10 bp
- The time is right for a thorough review
19Trading in 1/4 or 1/8 coupons
- Mortgage originators price their loans to
consumers in 1/8s - An MBS market that traded in 1/4s or 1/8s would
allow originators to sell their excess
servicing and book cash gains - Diffuse the risk
- couple with original security,
- distribute across capital markets rather than
concentrating among servicers - Issue perceived liquidity risk
- Supply is in the trillions
- CMO bid a natural buyer
20Excess servicing sales
- Countrywide and Washington Mutual have executed
transactions selling excess servicing to the
capital markets - FN Trust 309, 325, 330, 331, 335 and 336
- Appeals to the more limited set of IO investors
- 1/8 or 1/4 coupons bring this same cashflow to a
wider set of investors
21Conclusion
- It makes sense to concentrate servicing
- Cost reduction and increased efficiency through
scale - But it doesnt make sense to concentrate and
magnify the ownership of IOs - As the mortgage market grows and the servicers
consolidate, every extra basis point in an MSR
leads to avoidable risk concentration - If lenders, investors and all other interested
parties can agree changes to right-size the value
of MSRs, it will remove unnecessary volatility
and can ultimately benefit borrowers