Team Members - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Team Members

Description:

Team Members – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:316
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: ryanm8
Category:
Tags: diego | members | san | team | zoo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Team Members


1
  • Team Members

Julia Brazas Ben Lorch Achyuth Hassan
Matt Howard Ryan Malone Sean York
2
Digital Divide
  • By 2002, 92 of schools online
  • K-12 spent 7.87B on technology in 03-04
  • Infrastructure in placenow what?
  • Of that, 1.5B went to
  • Instructional Software
  • Integrating Technology into Curriculum
  • 61 of teachers said classroom internet access
    was essential to learning
  • Fastest growing segment
  • 24 CAGR in spending since 00-01 school year
  • But, most dont use itWhy?

3
Lack of Quality
  • Most educators lack practical skills of what to
    do with the web
  • 66 of teachers cite ease of use as a major
    problem
  • Online materials are missing excitement, such as
    animation and sound
  • Software does not provide proper evaluation
    techniques like quizzes and parental links

4
How Do We Fit In?
  • Online learning company
  • Established web product
  • Dynamic learning experience
  • Experienced team
  • Addresses the issues
  • Lack of high-quality online content in schools
  • Easy-to-use and incorporate for educators
  • Delivers vast, unique resources from museums

5
How Do We Fit In?
  • Online learning company
  • Established web product
  • Dynamic learning experience
  • Experienced team
  • Addresses the issues
  • Lack of high-quality online content in schools
  • Easy-to-use and incorporate for educators
  • Delivers vast, unique resources from museums

You neednt take our word for it ...lets hear
what the customers say!
6
Sample Sales Video
7
What is eFieldTrips?
  • Online learning company
  • Supplemental, web-based curriculum
  • Subscription revenue model
  • Popular subjects, relevant topics
  • Established, tested product
  • Successful CPS test bed
  • Kids love the dynamic material
  • Easy for educators to incorporate
  • Credible content by teachers, for teachers
  • Platform is a virtual field trip experience
  • Strong museum partnerships

8
How do we know all of this?
  • University of Chicago WebDocent Pilot
  • CPS test bed
  • 100 hours of material
  • Existing partnerships
  • 8 renowned cultural institutions
  • Letters of Interest
  • Experienced management team
  • Strong advisory board

9
Management Team
  • Benjamin Lorch
  • Managing Director, CPS UC Internet Project
  • Julia Brazas
  • Director, Chicago WebDocent Project
  • Sean York
  • Creative Director, Chicago WebDocent Project
  • Matthew Howard
  • Senior e-learning strategist, web producer
  • Achyuth Hassan
  • GSB, focus on business, new product development
  • Ryan Malone
  • GSB, focus on sales, marketing

10
Advisory Board
  • Don G. York
  • Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
    University of Chicago
  • Founder, CPS UofC Internet Project
  • Tom Berkshire
  • Chief of Staff, IL Dept. of Children Family
    Services (DCFS)
  • Scott Clegg
  • Former President, Nobel Learning Communities
  • Mary Cullinane
  • Technology Architect, Microsoft School of the
    Future
  • Sharnell Jackson
  • Chief eLearning Officer, Chicago Public Schools
  • In progress the presidents of our eight partner
    Chicago cultural institutions

11
So where do you come in?
  • Stage 1 Investment 900,000
  • Operational, start-up expenses through 2006
  • Stage 2 Investment 900,000
  • Continuation of Stage 1
  • Grow to revenue positive
  • So what does that buy you?

Great Company, Solid Strategy!
12
Going-to-Market Strategy
  • Revenues generated through subscriptions
  • Quantity-discounted subscriptions to districts
  • Individual subscriptions for home use
  • Customers involved to reach student (3rd party
    buyer)
  • Major metropolitan school districts
  • Smaller school districts, individual public or
    parochial schools, classrooms
  • Home schools, individual users, parents buying
    for children
  • Slightly different processes for each

Lets take a look at the Unit Model
13
District Purchasing Process
1-1 ½ Year Pilot Sell Build Relationship ?
Sales Presentations ? Buyers include
District Tech Coordinators, School
Administration, Principals, Teachers ?
Submit Pilot Proposal
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Summer
14
District Purchasing Process
  • 1-1 ½ Year Pilot Sell
  • Build Relationship
  • ? Sales Presentations
  • ? Buyers include
  • District Tech Coordinators,
  • School Administration,
  • Principals, Teachers
  • ? Submit Pilot Proposal
  • Gain Acceptance
  • ? Facilitate Trials
  • ? Teacher Acceptance Key
  • Possible Training Session
  • ? Refined District Proposal
  • ? Board Budget Decision

Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Summer
15
District Purchasing Process
  • 1-1 ½ Year Pilot Sell
  • Build Relationship
  • ? Sales Presentations
  • ? Buyers include
  • District Tech Coordinators,
  • School Administration,
  • Principals, Teachers
  • ? Submit Pilot Proposal
  • Gain Acceptance
  • ? Facilitate Trials
  • ? Teacher Acceptance Key
  • Possible Training Session
  • ? Refined District Proposal
  • ? Board Budget Decision
  • Launch Pilot

Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Summer
16
District Pilot Details
  • Districts want to ramp up pilots
  • Proves worth and eases into investment
  • Y1 10, Y2 25, Y3 50, Y4 100
  • Volume discounted pricing schedule
  • Based on customer and competitive research
  • Ex CPS, 500 schools 300,000
  • 600 per school or about 1.20/student
  • Ex Milwaukee PS, 150 schools 210,000
  • 1,400 per school or about 2.80/student

17
Gaining District Adoption
  • Hire Sales Executive
  • Prior textbook or edu-software sales
  • Leverage existing content
  • Sales video with CPS, student testimonials
  • Loss leader, free trials
  • Conference presentations, booth
  • American Assoc. of School Administrators (AASA)
  • Urban Superintendents Assoc. of America (USAA)
  • Promote brand, product
  • National Education Association (NEA) publication
  • Capture sponsorships
  • Email blasts, print advertising with National PTA

18
The Individual Subscriber
  • Largely scattered base
  • Initial focus on Chicago-area individuals
  • 2.2M students
  • Subscription price of 29.99/year
  • Higher willingness to pay
  • Based on customer and competitive research
  • Echoes desire for educational materials that kids
    will enjoy!

19
Gaining Individual Adoption
  • Teacher referrals, student take-home effect
  • Tons of existing content
  • Complimentary access to all future lessons
  • Parent e-notifications, email blasts
  • Sales video available online, via mail
  • Loss leader, free trials
  • Promote brand, product
  • Discovery for Kids or National Geographic
    magazines
  • Leverage sponsorships
  • Email blasts, print advertising with National PTA

20
And, the skys the limit!
  • By subject
  • History Henry Ford Museum, Industrial Revolution
  • Science San Diego Zoo, zoological sciences
  • Physics Indianapolis Motor Speedway, friction
    and acceleration
  • Health Milwaukee Public Museum, dairy and
    nutrition
  • By customer
  • Teachers professional development credits
  • Parents questions for the dinner table weekly
    emails
  • Students Passport club membership
  • Museums kiosk content that ties into curriculum

21
Projected Earnings
22
Total Competition
23
Simplified Competition
24
Recap of Investment
  • Stage 1 Investment 900,000
  • Operational, start-up expenses through 2006
  • Refine online platform to accommodate sales
  • Hire CEO and Sales Executive
  • Fund CPS 2nd stage pilot
  • Begin to gain suburban and regional adoption
  • Support some new lesson development
  • Stage 2 Investment 900,000
  • Continuation of Stage 1 grow to revenue positive
  • Ramp up pilots at new districts
  • Transition efforts to individual subscriber
    market
  • New content development
  • National expansion of partnerships and focus

25
In Summary
  • Solves important problems
  • Big technology investments
  • Lack of meaningful learning experiences
  • Has momentum and experience
  • Successful CPS pilot, letters of interest
  • Solid management
  • Good investment
  • 3M in year 5, 3-year breakeven
  • Highly liquid edu-software market (500M)

26
Questions?
Thank You!
  • Contact Information
  • Achyuth Hassan
  • ahassan_at_ChicagoGSB.edu
  • (847) 630-7826
  • Ryan Malone
  • rmalone_at_ChicagoGSB.edu
  • (773) 620-4538

27
Still Want To See More?
  • More Details
  • About Your Favorite
  • Online Educational Company

28
The School Product
29
Technology Spending
(by Category, National Data for 2003-2004 School
Year)
Source QEDs 10th Annual Technology Purchasing
Forecast 2004-2005 Preliminary Data
30
Student Computer Use Frequency
Source National Survey (n158 educators)
31
Whats Missing?
Source National Survey (n158 educators)
32
Museum PartnerInformation
33
Current Partner Listing
  • The Field Museum
  • The Art Institute of Chicago
  • The Museum of Science and Industry
  • The Chicago Historical Society
  • The Adler Planetarium
  • The Newberry Library
  • The Oriental Institute
  • The DuSable Museum of African American History

34
Museums Need
  • Unable to leverage educational outreach
  • Want lifelong relationship with younger visitors
  • Need better exhibit asset utilization
  • Desire to drive foot traffic to events

35
Satisfying the Partners
  • Supply us with content, underwrite some
    development costs
  • We use that content in the schools
  • Build curriculum around material
  • Add significant value to the archives
  • Return kiosk-ready content to partner
  • Ties into classroom activities
  • Passport promotions, drive foot traffic
  • Fulfilling outreach obligations

36
The Museum Product
37
Timeline and RolloutInformation
38
Timeline
YE 2006 Goals Content 80 total lessons Kiosks
1 completed, 1 in progress CPS 100 school pilot
in progress Pilots 2 major districts
begun Schools 100 smaller schools Individual
2,500 users
  • Build Customer Base
  • ? Chicago unit model
  • ? CPS and suburban focus
  • ? Existing content, testimonials
  • ? Build team, relationships
  • Expand the Base
  • ? New district pilots
  • ? Individual subscriptions
  • ? New content, partnerships
  • ? Expand team, relationships
  • National Progression
  • ? Move to national pilots
  • ? Promote individual subscribers
  • ? Leverage relationships
  • ? National conference promotion

39
Timeline
YE 2008 Goals Content120 total lessons Kiosks
1 per quarter Traveling 1 in progress CPS 100
adoption Pilots 6 major districts in
progress Schools 180 individual
schools Individual 25,000 users
  • Build Customer Base
  • ? Chicago unit model
  • ? CPS and suburban focus
  • ? Existing content, testimonials
  • ? Build team, relationships
  • Expand the Base
  • ? New district pilots
  • ? Individual subscriptions
  • ? New content, partnerships
  • ? Expand team, relationships
  • National Progression
  • ? Move to national pilots
  • ? Promote individual subscribers
  • ? Leverage relationships
  • ? National conference promotion

40
Timeline
YE 2010 Goals Content 175 total
lessons Kiosks 2 per quarter Traveling 1
completed, 1 in progress District 6 at 100
total adoption Pilots 6 new districts in
progress Schools 225 individual
schools Individual 75,000 users
  • Build Customer Base
  • ? Chicago unit model
  • ? CPS and suburban focus
  • ? Existing content, testimonials
  • ? Build team, relationships
  • Expand the Base
  • ? New district pilots
  • ? Individual subscriptions
  • ? New content, partnerships
  • ? Expand team, relationships
  • National Progression
  • ? Move to national pilots
  • ? Promote individual subscribers
  • ? Leverage relationships
  • ? National conference promotion

41
Value Proposition
42
The Process
43
The Process
44
The Process
45
The Process
46
The Process
47
The Process
48
The Process
49
Business Risks
50
Minimum Hurdles
  • Add some info here about our minimum hurdles in
    the revenue-neutral world of break-evenie, x
    schools or x individuals or x kiosks even

51
Projected Gross Profit Details
52
Projected Net Income Details
53
Projected Revenue Detail
54
Revenue Assumptions
55
Projected Expense Detail
56
Expense Assumptions
  • Bulk in team compensation
  • Low COGS, all development
  • Clear team growth
  • Internal support
  • Sales
  • Content development
  • Yearly compensation increases

57
Projected Cash Flows
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com